The Pelicans played the Warriors three times last year. The Warriors went 3-0 winning by 1, 11, and 10 but let’s take a closer look at how those games played out.
The first game the Pelicans lost at the last second by 1 point. The other two games, Eric Gordon shot a combined 4-26 (15%), Tyreke Evans missed 1 game due to a high ankle sprain, and Anthony Davis was inactive in the other game. David Lee from GS was also responsible for 62 points in those 3 games. Tyreke Evans and Anthony Davis will both be active in this game while David Lee is inactive for the Warriors. Eric Gordon is out for the Pelicans, but it’s not like his 4-26 shooting will be missed and it’s hard to see any other Pelican shooting that poorly. Big differences all around from the 3 games that were played last year. This game should be a lot closer against a more experienced, underrated Pelican squad.
Knicks/Cavs Under 197 (1x)
Pelicans +8.5 -105 (3.5x)
Pelicans +360 (0.5x)
2014 NBA Season: +21.10 Units (26-15 ATS)
2014 5 Unit Plays: 2-0 ATS
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
New Orleans Pelicans @ Golden State Warriors
The Pelicans played the Warriors three times last year. The Warriors went 3-0 winning by 1, 11, and 10 but let’s take a closer look at how those games played out.
The first game the Pelicans lost at the last second by 1 point. The other two games, Eric Gordon shot a combined 4-26 (15%), Tyreke Evans missed 1 game due to a high ankle sprain, and Anthony Davis was inactive in the other game. David Lee from GS was also responsible for 62 points in those 3 games. Tyreke Evans and Anthony Davis will both be active in this game while David Lee is inactive for the Warriors. Eric Gordon is out for the Pelicans, but it’s not like his 4-26 shooting will be missed and it’s hard to see any other Pelican shooting that poorly. Big differences all around from the 3 games that were played last year. This game should be a lot closer against a more experienced, underrated Pelican squad.
What do you think of the Pacers today LC -- I like the match-ups and the refs, but don't have any trends or SDQL that points there -- headed to the Warrior game -- it should be a good one -- Warriors going for a franchise record win streak, that should help with your angle -- they may play TIGHT
0
What do you think of the Pacers today LC -- I like the match-ups and the refs, but don't have any trends or SDQL that points there -- headed to the Warrior game -- it should be a good one -- Warriors going for a franchise record win streak, that should help with your angle -- they may play TIGHT
What do you think of the Pacers today LC -- I like the match-ups and the refs, but don't have any trends or SDQL that points there -- headed to the Warrior game -- it should be a good one -- Warriors going for a franchise record win streak, that should help with your angle -- they may play TIGHT
Came very close to adding Indiana actually but they don't play their best on the road against fast paced teams. Decided to pass
0
Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive:
What do you think of the Pacers today LC -- I like the match-ups and the refs, but don't have any trends or SDQL that points there -- headed to the Warrior game -- it should be a good one -- Warriors going for a franchise record win streak, that should help with your angle -- they may play TIGHT
Came very close to adding Indiana actually but they don't play their best on the road against fast paced teams. Decided to pass
Draymond Green announced in 10 minutes after I lock my bet in, spread moves to -9.5. Doesn't affect my pick at all but crazy how it happens right after I lock my bet in lol. Hopefully some of you can get a better line.
No thoughts on NFL till Sunday games
0
Draymond Green announced in 10 minutes after I lock my bet in, spread moves to -9.5. Doesn't affect my pick at all but crazy how it happens right after I lock my bet in lol. Hopefully some of you can get a better line.
Man makes an interesting point, LC. The Dubs under Kerr have been ruthless against opponents (this is not like last year's team by any means). They have a deep bench and are not afraid of running opponents out of the gym. So you really need a close game here all the way till the end, if the Warriors have/get a decent lead in the 2nd half they are likely to blow it wide open.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigazzdog:
Did you consider the new coach
Man makes an interesting point, LC. The Dubs under Kerr have been ruthless against opponents (this is not like last year's team by any means). They have a deep bench and are not afraid of running opponents out of the gym. So you really need a close game here all the way till the end, if the Warriors have/get a decent lead in the 2nd half they are likely to blow it wide open.
Man makes an interesting point, LC. The Dubs under Kerr have been ruthless against opponents (this is not like last year's team by any means). They have a deep bench and are not afraid of running opponents out of the gym. So you really need a close game here all the way till the end, if the Warriors have/get a decent lead in the 2nd half they are likely to blow it wide open.
Not at all, Kerr came into a very good situation with an already proven Warrior team. Look at who they've beat recently, they are not as dominant as they look.
Warriors 10 game win streak:
Nets
Hornets
Lakers
Jazz
Thunder (without Westbrook or Durant)
Heat (without Dwayne Wade)
Magic
Hornets
Pistons
Magic
Are any of those even playoff teams ? Warriors winstreak is a mirage. I don't see a blowout here
0
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
Man makes an interesting point, LC. The Dubs under Kerr have been ruthless against opponents (this is not like last year's team by any means). They have a deep bench and are not afraid of running opponents out of the gym. So you really need a close game here all the way till the end, if the Warriors have/get a decent lead in the 2nd half they are likely to blow it wide open.
Not at all, Kerr came into a very good situation with an already proven Warrior team. Look at who they've beat recently, they are not as dominant as they look.
Warriors 10 game win streak:
Nets
Hornets
Lakers
Jazz
Thunder (without Westbrook or Durant)
Heat (without Dwayne Wade)
Magic
Hornets
Pistons
Magic
Are any of those even playoff teams ? Warriors winstreak is a mirage. I don't see a blowout here
Have to agree with above. They are are very good team but overrated at the moment. Last 10 games have been against bad teams. They havent proven anything yet. Spurs also own this team. Any teams numbers would be pretty damn good especially defensively. No team here shoots worth a crap.
“You don’t get what you hope for, you get what you work for!”
0
Have to agree with above. They are are very good team but overrated at the moment. Last 10 games have been against bad teams. They havent proven anything yet. Spurs also own this team. Any teams numbers would be pretty damn good especially defensively. No team here shoots worth a crap.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.