prestige youre nothing but a rigtard you bet whoever side the public is against you have no real insight or opinion of the teams playing, whos injured etc etc
youre an idiot and everyone that bumped this page to 4 pages following this idiot is a moron as well
0
prestige youre nothing but a rigtard you bet whoever side the public is against you have no real insight or opinion of the teams playing, whos injured etc etc
youre an idiot and everyone that bumped this page to 4 pages following this idiot is a moron as well
prestige youre nothing but a rigtard you bet whoever side the public is against you have no real insight or opinion of the teams playing, whos injured etc etc
youre an idiot and everyone that bumped this page to 4 pages following this idiot is a moron as well
I'm a idiot! Of course.. Vegas morron....
6.12.2013 POR -11.5 W 7.12.2013 DEN -6.5 W 8.12.2013 HOU -13.5 L + 60% public was on HOU against ORL 9.12.2013 LAC -9.5 W 10.12.2013 SAS -8.5 W 11.12.2013 SAS -11 W 12.12.2013 POR (-2) W 13.12.2013 OKC -12.5 W 14.12.2013 DAL -11 W 15.12.2013 OKC -13.5 L + 65% public was on OKC 16.12.2013 MIA -12.5 W 17.12.2013 GSW -8.5 W 18.12.2013 LAC(-10.5) W Vegas won Public money was on NOH and Davis come back 19.12.2013 OKC (-13) L - fixed Vegas won. All the money was on OKC and they blowout their 17 points lead... 20.12.2013 MIA (-10.5) W Vegas won. Public money was on Sacramento. 21.12.2013 GSW(-13) W Vegas won. Public money was on LAL.. 22.12.2013 IND(-11.5) W public money was 50/50 23.12.2013 SAS(-11.5) W Vegas won. Public money was on Tor. 25.12.2013 OKC (-10.5) W Public money won. Vegas gifts. Vegas clean up all money on LAL/MIA game
Dec 26 2013 - HOU (-7.5) W Vegas won. 54% was on Memphis..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Coverdeeznutz:
prestige youre nothing but a rigtard you bet whoever side the public is against you have no real insight or opinion of the teams playing, whos injured etc etc
youre an idiot and everyone that bumped this page to 4 pages following this idiot is a moron as well
I'm a idiot! Of course.. Vegas morron....
6.12.2013 POR -11.5 W 7.12.2013 DEN -6.5 W 8.12.2013 HOU -13.5 L + 60% public was on HOU against ORL 9.12.2013 LAC -9.5 W 10.12.2013 SAS -8.5 W 11.12.2013 SAS -11 W 12.12.2013 POR (-2) W 13.12.2013 OKC -12.5 W 14.12.2013 DAL -11 W 15.12.2013 OKC -13.5 L + 65% public was on OKC 16.12.2013 MIA -12.5 W 17.12.2013 GSW -8.5 W 18.12.2013 LAC(-10.5) W Vegas won Public money was on NOH and Davis come back 19.12.2013 OKC (-13) L - fixed Vegas won. All the money was on OKC and they blowout their 17 points lead... 20.12.2013 MIA (-10.5) W Vegas won. Public money was on Sacramento. 21.12.2013 GSW(-13) W Vegas won. Public money was on LAL.. 22.12.2013 IND(-11.5) W public money was 50/50 23.12.2013 SAS(-11.5) W Vegas won. Public money was on Tor. 25.12.2013 OKC (-10.5) W Public money won. Vegas gifts. Vegas clean up all money on LAL/MIA game
Dec 26 2013 - HOU (-7.5) W Vegas won. 54% was on Memphis..
6.12.2013 POR -11.5 W 7.12.2013 DEN -6.5 W 8.12.2013 HOU -13.5 L + 60% public was on HOU against ORL 9.12.2013 LAC -9.5 W 10.12.2013 SAS -8.5 W 11.12.2013 SAS -11 W 12.12.2013 POR (-2) W 13.12.2013 OKC -12.5 W 14.12.2013 DAL -11 W 15.12.2013 OKC -13.5 L + 65% public was on OKC 16.12.2013 MIA -12.5 W 17.12.2013 GSW -8.5 W 18.12.2013 LAC(-10.5) W Vegas won Public money was on NOH and Davis come back 19.12.2013 OKC (-13) L - fixed Vegas won. All the money was on OKC and they blowout their 17 points lead... 20.12.2013 MIA (-10.5) W Vegas won. Public money was on Sacramento. 21.12.2013 GSW(-13) W Vegas won. Public money was on LAL.. 22.12.2013 IND(-11.5) W public money was 50/50 23.12.2013 SAS(-11.5) W Vegas won. Public money was on Tor. 25.12.2013 OKC (-10.5) W Public money won. Vegas gifts. Vegas clean up all money on LAL/MIA game
Dec 26 2013 - HOU (-7.5) W Vegas won. 54% was on Memphis..
You are convenientlt leaving out your big loss on Under 183.5 on IND/CHA game Friday, December 13, 2013 when the acyual total turned out to be 193. Show some honesty!
0
Quote Originally Posted by prestige33:
I'm a idiot! Of course.. Vegas morron....
6.12.2013 POR -11.5 W 7.12.2013 DEN -6.5 W 8.12.2013 HOU -13.5 L + 60% public was on HOU against ORL 9.12.2013 LAC -9.5 W 10.12.2013 SAS -8.5 W 11.12.2013 SAS -11 W 12.12.2013 POR (-2) W 13.12.2013 OKC -12.5 W 14.12.2013 DAL -11 W 15.12.2013 OKC -13.5 L + 65% public was on OKC 16.12.2013 MIA -12.5 W 17.12.2013 GSW -8.5 W 18.12.2013 LAC(-10.5) W Vegas won Public money was on NOH and Davis come back 19.12.2013 OKC (-13) L - fixed Vegas won. All the money was on OKC and they blowout their 17 points lead... 20.12.2013 MIA (-10.5) W Vegas won. Public money was on Sacramento. 21.12.2013 GSW(-13) W Vegas won. Public money was on LAL.. 22.12.2013 IND(-11.5) W public money was 50/50 23.12.2013 SAS(-11.5) W Vegas won. Public money was on Tor. 25.12.2013 OKC (-10.5) W Public money won. Vegas gifts. Vegas clean up all money on LAL/MIA game
Dec 26 2013 - HOU (-7.5) W Vegas won. 54% was on Memphis..
You are convenientlt leaving out your big loss on Under 183.5 on IND/CHA game Friday, December 13, 2013 when the acyual total turned out to be 193. Show some honesty!
What an awful game to go against "Vegas" First of all OKC(to cover) was the public bet here(although not huge) so I don't know what the hell OP is talking about. Vegas won.
0
What an awful game to go against "Vegas" First of all OKC(to cover) was the public bet here(although not huge) so I don't know what the hell OP is talking about. Vegas won.
I'm all for fading big public plays but like I said earlier, line movement was due to lineup change... Even tho it's hot now, you should becafeful if you guys are following... My 2cents
0
I'm all for fading big public plays but like I said earlier, line movement was due to lineup change... Even tho it's hot now, you should becafeful if you guys are following... My 2cents
What an awful game to go against "Vegas" First of all OKC(to cover) was the public bet here(although not huge) so I don't know what the hell OP is talking about. Vegas won.
Lol, It seems someone is mad they lost money they couldn't afford to lose or else it wouldn't be a big deal.
Look here buddy, this site is meant for people to post their picks. Take what you want from here, but don't bring your emotion into the blogs. If I remember, this site wasn't meant for whining, but rather helping people decide on sport picks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DatExpert:
What an awful game to go against "Vegas" First of all OKC(to cover) was the public bet here(although not huge) so I don't know what the hell OP is talking about. Vegas won.
Lol, It seems someone is mad they lost money they couldn't afford to lose or else it wouldn't be a big deal.
Look here buddy, this site is meant for people to post their picks. Take what you want from here, but don't bring your emotion into the blogs. If I remember, this site wasn't meant for whining, but rather helping people decide on sport picks.
HUGEmoneysomewhere in the worldwere placedonCHA(+9).In thatmoment"publicmoney" was 70/30.Thelinecolapsed- CHA(+7.5).BeforeTO"publicmoney" was 55/45onCHA+.Vegasloseagainst"the public"inCHA/OKCbuttheycleanupallmoneyin ORL/DETandSAC/MIA. InEurope we have"syndicate" that are composed bymillions ofgamblers...
0
HUGEmoneysomewhere in the worldwere placedonCHA(+9).In thatmoment"publicmoney" was 70/30.Thelinecolapsed- CHA(+7.5).BeforeTO"publicmoney" was 55/45onCHA+.Vegasloseagainst"the public"inCHA/OKCbuttheycleanupallmoneyin ORL/DETandSAC/MIA. InEurope we have"syndicate" that are composed bymillions ofgamblers...
Prestige do you consider that simply the better team being laid huge negative spread could affect into public to go against them causing this "shift" on consensus would have any effect on this "Vegas syndrome"?
Also shouldn't "Vegas" be more concerned on the amount of money being laid in the game instead of singular event volatility on public consensus?
The way I see it is that guys in Vegas lay the odds based on their analysis of the games based on decades of experience and really powerful system based and team performance and shift these odds based on the actual monetal volatility to keep the money as close as possible to 50/50. After that it's a coinflip to them.
Wouldn't it be more effective to manipulate the public money by faking the spreads (for example give heat +3 on yesterdays game) and then shift the lines if public doesnt fall for that?
Just my 5 cents and BOL from this "european syndicate".
0
Prestige do you consider that simply the better team being laid huge negative spread could affect into public to go against them causing this "shift" on consensus would have any effect on this "Vegas syndrome"?
Also shouldn't "Vegas" be more concerned on the amount of money being laid in the game instead of singular event volatility on public consensus?
The way I see it is that guys in Vegas lay the odds based on their analysis of the games based on decades of experience and really powerful system based and team performance and shift these odds based on the actual monetal volatility to keep the money as close as possible to 50/50. After that it's a coinflip to them.
Wouldn't it be more effective to manipulate the public money by faking the spreads (for example give heat +3 on yesterdays game) and then shift the lines if public doesnt fall for that?
Just my 5 cents and BOL from this "european syndicate".
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.