hey phix i have a money management question. I tend to bet 3% of my bankroll on each bet i make, bets increase as i win, decrease when i lose. I noticed you bet $550 first bet, $1100 the next bet. Was this because you were more confident in the second pick? Just curious how you go about deciding just how much money you'll be betting on each game. Thanks and good luck this year
0
hey phix i have a money management question. I tend to bet 3% of my bankroll on each bet i make, bets increase as i win, decrease when i lose. I noticed you bet $550 first bet, $1100 the next bet. Was this because you were more confident in the second pick? Just curious how you go about deciding just how much money you'll be betting on each game. Thanks and good luck this year
Nice job Phixer. I'd like you to post in format that we developed and not the laconic few words that you do. This is our old argument I was sure we left behind. And also some reasoning will be helpful unless the "game is Phixed" ha ha ha.
Overall - you're doing a great job. I like your cool headed responses if at all.
Midas - you can do what you ever want in regard of Fuzzrod's thread. It may be a good idea and it also may not be. I don't know. May be it's worth a try. I know he copied respectfully all the beginning of my thread with 1.5 mil views. But what really matters is the participation and the quality maintainance.
Mavin wassssssup buddy?! I just started that thread in hopes to get the ball rolling for all of the old gang to get back to our ole winning ways. But I really don't have the time or determination to manage it well like you did in the past.
I think you should get another thread up and rolling, or you could use the one I already set up. But man, you were a good leader and had everyone on the same page. You should help us out again
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Nice job Phixer. I'd like you to post in format that we developed and not the laconic few words that you do. This is our old argument I was sure we left behind. And also some reasoning will be helpful unless the "game is Phixed" ha ha ha.
Overall - you're doing a great job. I like your cool headed responses if at all.
Midas - you can do what you ever want in regard of Fuzzrod's thread. It may be a good idea and it also may not be. I don't know. May be it's worth a try. I know he copied respectfully all the beginning of my thread with 1.5 mil views. But what really matters is the participation and the quality maintainance.
Mavin wassssssup buddy?! I just started that thread in hopes to get the ball rolling for all of the old gang to get back to our ole winning ways. But I really don't have the time or determination to manage it well like you did in the past.
I think you should get another thread up and rolling, or you could use the one I already set up. But man, you were a good leader and had everyone on the same page. You should help us out again
shudnt really clog up with my opinion,sorry phixer...but seems like the steal of the century getting 7 points with warriors(which it opened at)......which makes me very suspicious,line just seems way off
0
shudnt really clog up with my opinion,sorry phixer...but seems like the steal of the century getting 7 points with warriors(which it opened at)......which makes me very suspicious,line just seems way off
ok. by not playing the last singular/double game days in nba and nfl i have confirmed last season's trend is still going on. what trend? well, that trend will make us money throughout the season on both sports. if that's a thursday night or mnf in nfl and if uts thursday night nba (two or three games). like last season, and the season before - those games draw lots of attention and therefore are vegas games. the rest is for u to figure and of course for me. i made myself a table and would actually hit each and every of the last ats and all but one totals in mnf, thursday nba and nfl. totals of 4 games. would go 7-1 and will at least have 75% ratio in the future . like last season on singulars (thats how i call it - learned it from mavin). so, sometimes season study takes time and once u see the trend ur in. that's my few modest cents in
0
ok. by not playing the last singular/double game days in nba and nfl i have confirmed last season's trend is still going on. what trend? well, that trend will make us money throughout the season on both sports. if that's a thursday night or mnf in nfl and if uts thursday night nba (two or three games). like last season, and the season before - those games draw lots of attention and therefore are vegas games. the rest is for u to figure and of course for me. i made myself a table and would actually hit each and every of the last ats and all but one totals in mnf, thursday nba and nfl. totals of 4 games. would go 7-1 and will at least have 75% ratio in the future . like last season on singulars (thats how i call it - learned it from mavin). so, sometimes season study takes time and once u see the trend ur in. that's my few modest cents in
Sometimes no pix night can prove more valuable for overall winnings than a single night success. After you said it - it seems so logical and obvious once you check the stats and betting trends - and yet - obvious has to be seen as well. True scholar as you will always have an upper hand my wise friend.
0
Sometimes no pix night can prove more valuable for overall winnings than a single night success. After you said it - it seems so logical and obvious once you check the stats and betting trends - and yet - obvious has to be seen as well. True scholar as you will always have an upper hand my wise friend.
thursday night or mnf in nfl and if its thursday night nba (two or three games) - those games draw lots of attention and therefore are vegas games. the rest is for u to figure and of course for me. i made myself a table and would actually hit each and every of the last ats and all but one totals in mnf, thursday nba and nfl. totals of 4 games. would go 7-1 and will at least have 75% ratio in the future . like last season on singulars (thats how i call it - learned it from mavin). so, sometimes season study takes time and once u see the trend ur in. that's my few modest cents in
I've read this a couple times. Phix is saying that there are angles to be played on these games - but hasn't said what they are?
Have I read it correctly? Thanks
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
thursday night or mnf in nfl and if its thursday night nba (two or three games) - those games draw lots of attention and therefore are vegas games. the rest is for u to figure and of course for me. i made myself a table and would actually hit each and every of the last ats and all but one totals in mnf, thursday nba and nfl. totals of 4 games. would go 7-1 and will at least have 75% ratio in the future . like last season on singulars (thats how i call it - learned it from mavin). so, sometimes season study takes time and once u see the trend ur in. that's my few modest cents in
I've read this a couple times. Phix is saying that there are angles to be played on these games - but hasn't said what they are?
I Have not been Tailing but been following it seems to be Phix is the Handicapping Master it is very awesome to see someone beat vegas and the Books keep it up & im on board from here on out Good Luck to all... Phixer Thanks for your knowledge!!!
0
I Have not been Tailing but been following it seems to be Phix is the Handicapping Master it is very awesome to see someone beat vegas and the Books keep it up & im on board from here on out Good Luck to all... Phixer Thanks for your knowledge!!!
What is the threshold for that? 51:49? 60:40? 70:30? 80:20? 90:10?
I have a friend who bets against the public only when it goes above 90% (and of course, sometimes the public is right.)
Also, I don't want to assume I know what Phix means. He didn't actually say, "bet against the public." And even if he did say that, I wouldn't know what the threshold is.
Thanks
0
Quote Originally Posted by Actiz0l:
He said Vegas games...so bet against public...
What is the threshold for that? 51:49? 60:40? 70:30? 80:20? 90:10?
I have a friend who bets against the public only when it goes above 90% (and of course, sometimes the public is right.)
Also, I don't want to assume I know what Phix means. He didn't actually say, "bet against the public." And even if he did say that, I wouldn't know what the threshold is.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
