Miami fan boy bandwagon at it again. The difference between LeBron and Curry is that LeBron has 4 defenders at him throughout the game and he's doing post ups turnaround fadeaways as oppose to Curry who has hobit Delly on him and just missed open shot.
See the difference? The reason why LeBron shot horribly was because of good defensive scheme vs Curry just missing shot.
Get your head out of your behind!!!
0
Miami fan boy bandwagon at it again. The difference between LeBron and Curry is that LeBron has 4 defenders at him throughout the game and he's doing post ups turnaround fadeaways as oppose to Curry who has hobit Delly on him and just missed open shot.
See the difference? The reason why LeBron shot horribly was because of good defensive scheme vs Curry just missing shot.
Miami fan boy bandwagon at it again. The difference between LeBron and Curry is that LeBron has 4 defenders at him throughout the game and he's doing post ups turnaround fadeaways as oppose to Curry who has hobit Delly on him and just missed open shot. See the difference? The reason why LeBron shot horribly was because of good defensive scheme vs Curry just missing shot.Get your head out of your behind!!!
I'm from LA actually , one day I'd like to live in Miami but back to the topic...
If curry had an " open shot " he would have made it
Cleveland and something called Defense that kept them in both games , shit Cleveland SHOULD be up 2-0.
You golden state backers are just going to ride the train out because it's something new and flashy that caught everyone's attention but I'm not falling for that.
You better hope it's not 3-1 going back to GS
0
Quote Originally Posted by SCC:
Miami fan boy bandwagon at it again. The difference between LeBron and Curry is that LeBron has 4 defenders at him throughout the game and he's doing post ups turnaround fadeaways as oppose to Curry who has hobit Delly on him and just missed open shot. See the difference? The reason why LeBron shot horribly was because of good defensive scheme vs Curry just missing shot.Get your head out of your behind!!!
I'm from LA actually , one day I'd like to live in Miami but back to the topic...
If curry had an " open shot " he would have made it
Cleveland and something called Defense that kept them in both games , shit Cleveland SHOULD be up 2-0.
You golden state backers are just going to ride the train out because it's something new and flashy that caught everyone's attention but I'm not falling for that.
OH, you're from LA. That's even easier for me. lOL no wonder all your post are against the Warriors. HAHAHA. "If he had an open shot he would've made it." If that's the case then everyone would be shooting in the 50's right? Yeah it's called human nature. Even the greatest shooters in history has bad days with open shots.
New and flashy that everyone jumped on? We've been fans since before they were good. We expected them to be decent and yes, this is a big leap from last year, is to no surprise. They had the ability to beat Clippers missing Bogut last year and they have the best guard duo in the game.
"Cleveland 'SHOULD' be up" Get that garbage out of here. If you were a real sports fan there's not such thing as should, would, could. The end result is 1-1. I can easily say that Curry should have shot a lot better then he did and the Warriors should be up 2-0 easily, but I don't, because I know better then blaming it on the bounce of the ball. Fact of the matter is. Warriors are deeper, more complete, and overall the better team. Get over it just because LA sucks in every area of every sport. No wonder you follow Miami, which is equally shitty now that LeBron left which actually points to why you're on the Cavaliers train.
0
OH, you're from LA. That's even easier for me. lOL no wonder all your post are against the Warriors. HAHAHA. "If he had an open shot he would've made it." If that's the case then everyone would be shooting in the 50's right? Yeah it's called human nature. Even the greatest shooters in history has bad days with open shots.
New and flashy that everyone jumped on? We've been fans since before they were good. We expected them to be decent and yes, this is a big leap from last year, is to no surprise. They had the ability to beat Clippers missing Bogut last year and they have the best guard duo in the game.
"Cleveland 'SHOULD' be up" Get that garbage out of here. If you were a real sports fan there's not such thing as should, would, could. The end result is 1-1. I can easily say that Curry should have shot a lot better then he did and the Warriors should be up 2-0 easily, but I don't, because I know better then blaming it on the bounce of the ball. Fact of the matter is. Warriors are deeper, more complete, and overall the better team. Get over it just because LA sucks in every area of every sport. No wonder you follow Miami, which is equally shitty now that LeBron left which actually points to why you're on the Cavaliers train.
Miami fan boy bandwagon at it again. The difference between LeBron and Curry is that LeBron has 4 defenders at him throughout the game and he's doing post ups turnaround fadeaways as oppose to Curry who has hobit Delly on him and just missed open shot.
See the difference? The reason why LeBron shot horribly was because of good defensive scheme vs Curry just missing shot.
Get your head out of your behind!!!
Delly played great D on Curry the entire time he was guarding him. Similar to how Iggy did against Bron. Curry did not have many "open" shots at all that game. His shots were very difficult and yes he was off a bit, but lets give credit to Delly for playing out of his mind defensively. Same way I give credit to Iggy game 1, holding Bron to 4-14 shooting.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SCC:
Miami fan boy bandwagon at it again. The difference between LeBron and Curry is that LeBron has 4 defenders at him throughout the game and he's doing post ups turnaround fadeaways as oppose to Curry who has hobit Delly on him and just missed open shot.
See the difference? The reason why LeBron shot horribly was because of good defensive scheme vs Curry just missing shot.
Get your head out of your behind!!!
Delly played great D on Curry the entire time he was guarding him. Similar to how Iggy did against Bron. Curry did not have many "open" shots at all that game. His shots were very difficult and yes he was off a bit, but lets give credit to Delly for playing out of his mind defensively. Same way I give credit to Iggy game 1, holding Bron to 4-14 shooting.
From LA but ur avatar is a dolphin and u wish to love in miami one day. Ur a clown another di.ck riding lebron fan if ur from la ur team should be clippers or lakers.
0
From LA but ur avatar is a dolphin and u wish to love in miami one day. Ur a clown another di.ck riding lebron fan if ur from la ur team should be clippers or lakers.
Delly played great D on Curry the entire time he was guarding him. Similar to how Iggy did against Bron. Curry did not have many "open" shots at all that game. His shots were very difficult and yes he was off a bit, but lets give credit to Delly for playing out of his mind defensively. Same way I give credit to Iggy game 1, holding Bron to 4-14 shooting.
Curry was 1-9 on uncontested shots. Ppl that say delly had great d know nothing about basketball he was okay at best we will see that bum game 3. Dude does nothing but follow curry no offense at all. That white boy is getting hyped rofl.
0
Quote Originally Posted by zeets1:
Delly played great D on Curry the entire time he was guarding him. Similar to how Iggy did against Bron. Curry did not have many "open" shots at all that game. His shots were very difficult and yes he was off a bit, but lets give credit to Delly for playing out of his mind defensively. Same way I give credit to Iggy game 1, holding Bron to 4-14 shooting.
Curry was 1-9 on uncontested shots. Ppl that say delly had great d know nothing about basketball he was okay at best we will see that bum game 3. Dude does nothing but follow curry no offense at all. That white boy is getting hyped rofl.
Curry was 1-9 on uncontested shots. Ppl that say delly had great d know nothing about basketball he was okay at best we will see that bum game 3. Dude does nothing but follow curry no offense at all. That white boy is getting hyped rofl.
Delly did okay vs Curry, but Curry missed his own shots. All these people who listen to the media instead of watching the games with their own eyes are going to pay up tonight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EastOakland:
Curry was 1-9 on uncontested shots. Ppl that say delly had great d know nothing about basketball he was okay at best we will see that bum game 3. Dude does nothing but follow curry no offense at all. That white boy is getting hyped rofl.
Delly did okay vs Curry, but Curry missed his own shots. All these people who listen to the media instead of watching the games with their own eyes are going to pay up tonight.
Curry was 1-9 on uncontested shots. Ppl that say delly had great d know nothing about basketball he was okay at best we will see that bum game 3. Dude does nothing but follow curry no offense at all. That white boy is getting hyped rofl.
I understand you would say this seeing you are a GS fan. I actually really like GS. That being said, Steve Kerr was quoted today say this...
"He's in a slump? Steph Curry's in a slump?" Kerr asked assembled media at shootaround before tonight's Game 3 in Cleveland. "Steph's fine. Steph's fine. ... We just have to get better shots for him and get him in a good rhythm."
This is what I mean by Delly playing good D on him. He didnt allow Steph to get into a rhythm. You said all he did is follow Curry, well thats all he was asked to do and look how that turned out. They aren't asking for offense out of him, they asked him to stick on Curry like glue. To make a statement that people dont know about basketball who said he played great defense just shows how much you knowledge you lack. Now if you want to admit that or not makes no difference to me. I would have to side with their coach on this one.
No offense man but Steve Kerr knows a bit more about basketball than all of us on here. I have been watching basketball and played since the 80's. Curry is hands down the best shooter I have EVER watched. Basketball is all about rhythm, anyone who has actually played would know that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EastOakland:
Curry was 1-9 on uncontested shots. Ppl that say delly had great d know nothing about basketball he was okay at best we will see that bum game 3. Dude does nothing but follow curry no offense at all. That white boy is getting hyped rofl.
I understand you would say this seeing you are a GS fan. I actually really like GS. That being said, Steve Kerr was quoted today say this...
"He's in a slump? Steph Curry's in a slump?" Kerr asked assembled media at shootaround before tonight's Game 3 in Cleveland. "Steph's fine. Steph's fine. ... We just have to get better shots for him and get him in a good rhythm."
This is what I mean by Delly playing good D on him. He didnt allow Steph to get into a rhythm. You said all he did is follow Curry, well thats all he was asked to do and look how that turned out. They aren't asking for offense out of him, they asked him to stick on Curry like glue. To make a statement that people dont know about basketball who said he played great defense just shows how much you knowledge you lack. Now if you want to admit that or not makes no difference to me. I would have to side with their coach on this one.
No offense man but Steve Kerr knows a bit more about basketball than all of us on here. I have been watching basketball and played since the 80's. Curry is hands down the best shooter I have EVER watched. Basketball is all about rhythm, anyone who has actually played would know that.
No he's not Michael Cooper. He is however a professional basketball player and went out and played above his level. He had a great defensive game against one of the greatest shooters of all time. Why is that so hard for people to understand the guy played a good game. Who cares about him playing 9 min in game one. Kyrie was playing. Not really sure what your point is.
0
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:
All of a sudden, Delly is Michael Cooper?
Is that why he played 9 minutes in game 1?
No he's not Michael Cooper. He is however a professional basketball player and went out and played above his level. He had a great defensive game against one of the greatest shooters of all time. Why is that so hard for people to understand the guy played a good game. Who cares about him playing 9 min in game one. Kyrie was playing. Not really sure what your point is.
Delly did not play "great D"- people are morons. Curry had a terrible game and he'll be the first to tell you that.. (And they still almost won).. Such a bad game yet he still made a few plays Down the stretch and hit his free throws to force OT. Still torn on tonight though- wish public was on Cleveland- that's the only thing stopping me from GSW play tonight
0
Delly did not play "great D"- people are morons. Curry had a terrible game and he'll be the first to tell you that.. (And they still almost won).. Such a bad game yet he still made a few plays Down the stretch and hit his free throws to force OT. Still torn on tonight though- wish public was on Cleveland- that's the only thing stopping me from GSW play tonight
Curry was 1-9 on uncontested shots. Ppl that say delly had great d know nothing about basketball he was okay at best we will see that bum game 3. Dude does nothing but follow curry no offense at all. That white boy is getting hyped rofl.
He was also 4-14 on contested shots. The guy was not able to get into any rhythm which is why he shot 5-23 from 3 pt range.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EastOakland:
Curry was 1-9 on uncontested shots. Ppl that say delly had great d know nothing about basketball he was okay at best we will see that bum game 3. Dude does nothing but follow curry no offense at all. That white boy is getting hyped rofl.
He was also 4-14 on contested shots. The guy was not able to get into any rhythm which is why he shot 5-23 from 3 pt range.
Delly did not play "great D"- people are morons. Curry had a terrible game and he'll be the first to tell you that.. (And they still almost won).. Such a bad game yet he still made a few plays Down the stretch and hit his free throws to force OT. Still torn on tonight though- wish public was on Cleveland- that's the only thing stopping me from GSW play tonight
Right, so you know more than NBA basketball players and coaches. Let me guess, you don't like Lebron and you are rooting for the Warriors. No one is saying Delly is the next defensive player of the year but the guy played way over his head against Curry. For that I would say he had a great game. You want to say GS "still almost won"? Well guess what the "almost" lost game 1. Almost counts when throwing horse shoes and hand grenades. A win is a win, take your "almost" bs somewhere else.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EagesCoast:
Delly did not play "great D"- people are morons. Curry had a terrible game and he'll be the first to tell you that.. (And they still almost won).. Such a bad game yet he still made a few plays Down the stretch and hit his free throws to force OT. Still torn on tonight though- wish public was on Cleveland- that's the only thing stopping me from GSW play tonight
Right, so you know more than NBA basketball players and coaches. Let me guess, you don't like Lebron and you are rooting for the Warriors. No one is saying Delly is the next defensive player of the year but the guy played way over his head against Curry. For that I would say he had a great game. You want to say GS "still almost won"? Well guess what the "almost" lost game 1. Almost counts when throwing horse shoes and hand grenades. A win is a win, take your "almost" bs somewhere else.
No he's not Michael Cooper. He is however a professional basketball player and went out and played above his level. He had a great defensive game against one of the greatest shooters of all time. Why is that so hard for people to understand the guy played a good game. Who cares about him playing 9 min in game one. Kyrie was playing. Not really sure what your point is.
The point is, since it is not clear enough for you, is that if this guy is SO GOOD at playing defense, why not have him guarding Curry or Thompson in game 1? Why not play more than 9 friggin minutes? In an overtime game?
Then, Game 2, has ONE assist, and SIX turnovers, and, all of a sudden, he's a "stopper"...........not buying it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by zeets1:
No he's not Michael Cooper. He is however a professional basketball player and went out and played above his level. He had a great defensive game against one of the greatest shooters of all time. Why is that so hard for people to understand the guy played a good game. Who cares about him playing 9 min in game one. Kyrie was playing. Not really sure what your point is.
The point is, since it is not clear enough for you, is that if this guy is SO GOOD at playing defense, why not have him guarding Curry or Thompson in game 1? Why not play more than 9 friggin minutes? In an overtime game?
Then, Game 2, has ONE assist, and SIX turnovers, and, all of a sudden, he's a "stopper"...........not buying it.
Delly did okay vs Curry, but Curry missed his own shots. All these people who listen to the media instead of watching the games with their own eyes are going to pay up tonight.
You have no idea what your talking about, did you see the last shot of the game the air ball , he couldn't create space didn't square his shoulders and looked like a 12 year old trying to shoot a basketball he was 7-38 total expext more of this
0
Quote Originally Posted by SCC:
Delly did okay vs Curry, but Curry missed his own shots. All these people who listen to the media instead of watching the games with their own eyes are going to pay up tonight.
You have no idea what your talking about, did you see the last shot of the game the air ball , he couldn't create space didn't square his shoulders and looked like a 12 year old trying to shoot a basketball he was 7-38 total expext more of this
The point is, since it is not clear enough for you, is that if this guy is SO GOOD at playing defense, why not have him guarding Curry or Thompson in game 1? Why not play more than 9 friggin minutes? In an overtime game?
Then, Game 2, has ONE assist, and SIX turnovers, and, all of a sudden, he's a "stopper"...........not buying it.
Obviously its not clear for you. No one is saying he is the greatest defender of all time. He played an outstanding game guarding the best point guard in the NBA. That is all I am saying. He is not there for offense and he is by far and away NOT a starter. My point is the kid had a good game and held Curry in check. No one is saying he will do this again. All I was referring to was game 2. So say what you want EVERYONE that watched the game including GS's own coach said this. Curry was not able to find a rhythm and Delly was part of the reason why. Not sure what you don't get about that. 4-14 on guarded 3's. Its like saying Iggy didn't play outstanding defense on Lebron game one, which he did. Held Bron to 4-14 shooting. Same thing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:
The point is, since it is not clear enough for you, is that if this guy is SO GOOD at playing defense, why not have him guarding Curry or Thompson in game 1? Why not play more than 9 friggin minutes? In an overtime game?
Then, Game 2, has ONE assist, and SIX turnovers, and, all of a sudden, he's a "stopper"...........not buying it.
Obviously its not clear for you. No one is saying he is the greatest defender of all time. He played an outstanding game guarding the best point guard in the NBA. That is all I am saying. He is not there for offense and he is by far and away NOT a starter. My point is the kid had a good game and held Curry in check. No one is saying he will do this again. All I was referring to was game 2. So say what you want EVERYONE that watched the game including GS's own coach said this. Curry was not able to find a rhythm and Delly was part of the reason why. Not sure what you don't get about that. 4-14 on guarded 3's. Its like saying Iggy didn't play outstanding defense on Lebron game one, which he did. Held Bron to 4-14 shooting. Same thing.
Okay but can the Cavs stop Klay from having a big game? He went off in Game 2 and will do the same if he gets good looks. Curry is trying to force his shot too much. He should just drive more often and let the game come to him. He can jack up a three anytime he wants. The problem is that sometimes they aren't the best looks. I'm very interested to see his approach tonight.
0
Okay but can the Cavs stop Klay from having a big game? He went off in Game 2 and will do the same if he gets good looks. Curry is trying to force his shot too much. He should just drive more often and let the game come to him. He can jack up a three anytime he wants. The problem is that sometimes they aren't the best looks. I'm very interested to see his approach tonight.
Who knows Curry could have 4 bad games in a row. Or score 30+ the next 3. All I know is that this finals so far has been really fun to watch and overall the refs have been fair. Really looking forward to watching tonight. Overtime x 3 who knows. Blowout either way maybe. The NBA gets what the NBA wants. Excitement, action, characters, carnival barking analysts and announcers.. The Drama The Thrill yes this year The NBA is taking it over the top. Enjoy the ride.
0
Who knows Curry could have 4 bad games in a row. Or score 30+ the next 3. All I know is that this finals so far has been really fun to watch and overall the refs have been fair. Really looking forward to watching tonight. Overtime x 3 who knows. Blowout either way maybe. The NBA gets what the NBA wants. Excitement, action, characters, carnival barking analysts and announcers.. The Drama The Thrill yes this year The NBA is taking it over the top. Enjoy the ride.
The point is, since it is not clear enough for you, is that if this guy is SO GOOD at playing defense, why not have him guarding Curry or Thompson in game 1? Why not play more than 9 friggin minutes? In an overtime game?
Then, Game 2, has ONE assist, and SIX turnovers, and, all of a sudden, he's a "stopper"...........not buying it.
You buying it now?
0
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:
The point is, since it is not clear enough for you, is that if this guy is SO GOOD at playing defense, why not have him guarding Curry or Thompson in game 1? Why not play more than 9 friggin minutes? In an overtime game?
Then, Game 2, has ONE assist, and SIX turnovers, and, all of a sudden, he's a "stopper"...........not buying it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.