I'll throw my $0.02 on the lower shooting %. *And these are numbers from this year. FGA per game: Steph #2, Trae #22 PPG: Steph #1 32.0, Trae #14 25.3 Points per Attempt: Steph - 1.47, Trae - 1.43 Now... Trae averages 24.3 assist points per game as well to Steph's 14.7 PPG + APPG: Trae 49.6, Curry 46.7 .... and for fun Doncic 49.8 (and grabs nearly as many rebounds as Steph and Trae combined) One thing Trae has improved on this year, especially under McMillan, is taking less shots, distributing the ball more and drawing more fouls. You'll see several times a game, Trae will sprint past a defender even in the open floor and then just stop and see if they will run into him. It's annoying but not a bad strategy for an undersized PG who is a great FT shooter and gets primary defenders in foul trouble. This is a great debate and it'll be fun to see it play out over time but to me, their styles will start to drift apart more and more as Trae matures and begins to lean on his speed and passing ability. I'll also say: Luka is perfect for Dallas and Trae is perfect for Atlanta; their styles, personality, and demeanor are exactly what each town/franchise needed. **If Cam Reddish amounts to much of anything at all though, Atlanta won the trade.
Good take, even if you are comparing current Curry to Young.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GamblinDAWG:
I'll throw my $0.02 on the lower shooting %. *And these are numbers from this year. FGA per game: Steph #2, Trae #22 PPG: Steph #1 32.0, Trae #14 25.3 Points per Attempt: Steph - 1.47, Trae - 1.43 Now... Trae averages 24.3 assist points per game as well to Steph's 14.7 PPG + APPG: Trae 49.6, Curry 46.7 .... and for fun Doncic 49.8 (and grabs nearly as many rebounds as Steph and Trae combined) One thing Trae has improved on this year, especially under McMillan, is taking less shots, distributing the ball more and drawing more fouls. You'll see several times a game, Trae will sprint past a defender even in the open floor and then just stop and see if they will run into him. It's annoying but not a bad strategy for an undersized PG who is a great FT shooter and gets primary defenders in foul trouble. This is a great debate and it'll be fun to see it play out over time but to me, their styles will start to drift apart more and more as Trae matures and begins to lean on his speed and passing ability. I'll also say: Luka is perfect for Dallas and Trae is perfect for Atlanta; their styles, personality, and demeanor are exactly what each town/franchise needed. **If Cam Reddish amounts to much of anything at all though, Atlanta won the trade.
Good take, even if you are comparing current Curry to Young.
I do remember Steph at his earliest days. But I admit I was not the degen I am now where I barely miss any game from the season.
There are obviously some differences. Trae was a hyped up rookie that has lived up to expectations. Steph was someone everyone knew was a good shooter, but not one person could have foreseen how good he would become. My turnover argument may be rebutted since Trae holds the basketball about 90% of the time he is on the court, while Steph has never been that type of PG.
My point is, in his earliest years, Steph still had that sharpshooter numbers that he has today. You may check that. Trae can work hard to improve them (and he has improved a lot with his free throw percentage)... but he will never be a 40%+ from 3p land for his career. Steph is from another planet.
0
@StumpTownStu
I do remember Steph at his earliest days. But I admit I was not the degen I am now where I barely miss any game from the season.
There are obviously some differences. Trae was a hyped up rookie that has lived up to expectations. Steph was someone everyone knew was a good shooter, but not one person could have foreseen how good he would become. My turnover argument may be rebutted since Trae holds the basketball about 90% of the time he is on the court, while Steph has never been that type of PG.
My point is, in his earliest years, Steph still had that sharpshooter numbers that he has today. You may check that. Trae can work hard to improve them (and he has improved a lot with his free throw percentage)... but he will never be a 40%+ from 3p land for his career. Steph is from another planet.
@StumpTown Yes, you're right. I was not watching every game of Steph's career. I was too busy doing important things that REALLY matter. You know, like working, making money, traveling and just....wait for it....enjoying life.
It did all of that and still watched my home team's games. Sometimes at Oracle Arena. Sometimes on replay later on. Sometimes at happy hour. I'm a homer and a lifelong Warriors fan. I went to my first game when I was three with my two brothers and my aunt and i've been a diehard ever since. You guys are just fanboys revisionist memories. I'm giving an objective opinion about a guy who's entire career I have followed, a guy i've met in real life, a guy who literally is the savior of my team. At 22, he was a flawed rookie. That's the truth. A pure shooter but the rest of his game was flawed. I listed all the ways multiple times. Like I said before, this shit is like arguing about the meaning of a book with guys who have only read portions of it and the book is in a language they barely speak. Half of you don't even understand basketball as well as you think you do. And guarantee none of you watched more than 10 or 15 games of Steph's rookie seaon/sophmore seasons. So it's asinine to even argue with you all. Like Roger Mayweather said, most people don't know shit about boxing.
"Love, love will tear us apart again."
0
Quote Originally Posted by slapshot101:
@StumpTown Yes, you're right. I was not watching every game of Steph's career. I was too busy doing important things that REALLY matter. You know, like working, making money, traveling and just....wait for it....enjoying life.
It did all of that and still watched my home team's games. Sometimes at Oracle Arena. Sometimes on replay later on. Sometimes at happy hour. I'm a homer and a lifelong Warriors fan. I went to my first game when I was three with my two brothers and my aunt and i've been a diehard ever since. You guys are just fanboys revisionist memories. I'm giving an objective opinion about a guy who's entire career I have followed, a guy i've met in real life, a guy who literally is the savior of my team. At 22, he was a flawed rookie. That's the truth. A pure shooter but the rest of his game was flawed. I listed all the ways multiple times. Like I said before, this shit is like arguing about the meaning of a book with guys who have only read portions of it and the book is in a language they barely speak. Half of you don't even understand basketball as well as you think you do. And guarantee none of you watched more than 10 or 15 games of Steph's rookie seaon/sophmore seasons. So it's asinine to even argue with you all. Like Roger Mayweather said, most people don't know shit about boxing.
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @gutinstinctus @slapshot101 @GamblinDAWG He said at the age of 22. Where their careers were/are at the age of 22. Not all-time. I promise you dudes were even watching Steph when he was 22. If you say you were i'd call you a liar to your face. I was going to 20-30 games a year for the 1st have of Stephs career. I watched every other game on TV except one or two a year. I've seen more or less every minute of that man's career. You guys are thinking of Steph now or remembering Steph when he was like 26-27 because I promise you guys weren't watching the Warriors when Steph was 22. Youre trying to tell me an above average, poor defending, inefficient point guard is better at 22 than arguably the most skilled and talented offensive player to ever play the game of basketball when he was 22? Lmao. That’s circus comedy. You weren't watching Steph at 22. You weren't even watching him at 24. That much is clear. You're a bandwagon jonnie come lately fan. Like I said, i've seen more Steph Curry games live than you've seen period. He had to develop his NBA game over time. You're imaging Steph at 26.
I watched him plenty in college, both Steph and Trae. Any one who watches and follows college basketball knew about them both. And Steph was a way smoother and more efficient player in college. I watch steph as a rookie and I watched Trae as a rookie. Trae at times looked like a bust. Everyone knew Steph was a sharpshooting stud. He does not have the ball as much as Trae especially in his early days. At 22 he had a shooting line of 48/44/93. One of the most elite lines you will ever see in the game. Steph was better in college, he was better at 21, better at 22, there has never been a time Trae Young was better than Steph Curry. You might have watched steph play but you didn't understand what you were watching especially if you think Trae Young is better. Are you basing this just off his last game? Lol. Because I've watched him plenty in the pros and there's plenty of games he commits too many turnovers and bricks them out of games. He is no where near Steph's level of efficiency. The only thing he has over Steph at 22 is he is the primary ball handler for the team so he'll have more touches, more shots, get fouled more, and have more assists. That's about it, otherwise when it comes to offensive skill, he's not even in the same conversation as Steph's 22 year old skill.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @gutinstinctus @slapshot101 @GamblinDAWG He said at the age of 22. Where their careers were/are at the age of 22. Not all-time. I promise you dudes were even watching Steph when he was 22. If you say you were i'd call you a liar to your face. I was going to 20-30 games a year for the 1st have of Stephs career. I watched every other game on TV except one or two a year. I've seen more or less every minute of that man's career. You guys are thinking of Steph now or remembering Steph when he was like 26-27 because I promise you guys weren't watching the Warriors when Steph was 22. Youre trying to tell me an above average, poor defending, inefficient point guard is better at 22 than arguably the most skilled and talented offensive player to ever play the game of basketball when he was 22? Lmao. That’s circus comedy. You weren't watching Steph at 22. You weren't even watching him at 24. That much is clear. You're a bandwagon jonnie come lately fan. Like I said, i've seen more Steph Curry games live than you've seen period. He had to develop his NBA game over time. You're imaging Steph at 26.
I watched him plenty in college, both Steph and Trae. Any one who watches and follows college basketball knew about them both. And Steph was a way smoother and more efficient player in college. I watch steph as a rookie and I watched Trae as a rookie. Trae at times looked like a bust. Everyone knew Steph was a sharpshooting stud. He does not have the ball as much as Trae especially in his early days. At 22 he had a shooting line of 48/44/93. One of the most elite lines you will ever see in the game. Steph was better in college, he was better at 21, better at 22, there has never been a time Trae Young was better than Steph Curry. You might have watched steph play but you didn't understand what you were watching especially if you think Trae Young is better. Are you basing this just off his last game? Lol. Because I've watched him plenty in the pros and there's plenty of games he commits too many turnovers and bricks them out of games. He is no where near Steph's level of efficiency. The only thing he has over Steph at 22 is he is the primary ball handler for the team so he'll have more touches, more shots, get fouled more, and have more assists. That's about it, otherwise when it comes to offensive skill, he's not even in the same conversation as Steph's 22 year old skill.
Trae has a higher assist to turnover ratio than Steph had at 22, and a virtually a even ratio as Steph's first full season without Monta, when Steph would've been 25ish. All this while handing out four more assists, similar rebounds, more than twice the points in the paint, committing half the personal fouls. These are things you squares aren't even hip too. Steph couldn't get into the paint at 22, scoring about 4 in the key. He committed a ton of personal fouls because he always been grabby on defense. This is stuff you see when you're actually watching games and not googling shooting percentage. Everybody knows Steph was a better shooter at 22 as Trae will ever be. You guys are some real fucking Tex Winters for pointing that shit out. Real great basketball minds.
I don't think Trae will end up near the player as Steph but i'm objectively comparing their games at 22.
"Love, love will tear us apart again."
0
@gutinstinctus
Trae has a higher assist to turnover ratio than Steph had at 22, and a virtually a even ratio as Steph's first full season without Monta, when Steph would've been 25ish. All this while handing out four more assists, similar rebounds, more than twice the points in the paint, committing half the personal fouls. These are things you squares aren't even hip too. Steph couldn't get into the paint at 22, scoring about 4 in the key. He committed a ton of personal fouls because he always been grabby on defense. This is stuff you see when you're actually watching games and not googling shooting percentage. Everybody knows Steph was a better shooter at 22 as Trae will ever be. You guys are some real fucking Tex Winters for pointing that shit out. Real great basketball minds.
I don't think Trae will end up near the player as Steph but i'm objectively comparing their games at 22.
Curry 3 point percentages years 1 and 2: .437, .442
Young 3 point percentage in first 3 years: .324, .361, .343. I can find a lot of fools in the NBA to shoot that from 3. Trae just had a hot game, and people overreacted
Curry slightly less turnovers, slightly more steals. At 22
Young better assists, slightly better rebounding and slightly less fouling, at 22
Curry was the better player at 22, purely by stats.
Curry is the better player, period.
0
Curry 3 point percentages years 1 and 2: .437, .442
Young 3 point percentage in first 3 years: .324, .361, .343. I can find a lot of fools in the NBA to shoot that from 3. Trae just had a hot game, and people overreacted
Curry slightly less turnovers, slightly more steals. At 22
Young better assists, slightly better rebounding and slightly less fouling, at 22
Curry was the better player at 22, purely by stats.
@ThrowDemDarts Anthony Morrow was 48% and 47% his rookie year. I guess he's better than Steph AND Trae. If only he had more touches. You probably don't even know who Anthony Morrow is.
holy shi.t,what ever happened to morrow??..man that dude could shoot for real.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
@ThrowDemDarts Anthony Morrow was 48% and 47% his rookie year. I guess he's better than Steph AND Trae. If only he had more touches. You probably don't even know who Anthony Morrow is.
holy shi.t,what ever happened to morrow??..man that dude could shoot for real.
Ice Tray is such a polarizing player that many will find it hard to truly be objective about just how good he is...his attitude definitely rubs people the wrong way because he's openly cocky and arrogant...however now after his experience with MSG and getting a taste of Spike Lee, he's definitely playing up the heel character and will make tons of cash from this new persona moving forward...Steph was and always has been a likeable guy who never really did anything to piss people off...classic hero vs villian storyline between Curry and Young. i follow college hoops and have always been able to spot next level talent...the things Curry did in his final year at Davidson was the stuff of legends all season long, and his run in the tourney only solidified how good he was going to be at the next level, but no one could have predicted just how much he was going to revolutionize the game itself...however Young was mainly a ball hog and chucker practically half the games he played, and at times he would be completely invisible and a turnover machine...i thought he was going to be a total bust when drafted, and posted it multiple times on covers, especially because i knew exactly how good Doncic was from following euro hoops as closely as i did back then...but i underestimated just how soft the league was becoming, just how much of a 3pt shooting exhibition league the nba was turning into, and because of this i didn't account for Young's style to be as effective as how it has become...now, the guy's future is basically set in stone to be one of the leagues biggest showtime players and with this heel persona, people will line up to pay good money just for the opportunity to boo and troll his balding hair...this Hawks team is no joke
this is what shouldnt be overlooked,trae should get huuuge credit for improving his game and strength to become what he has become..there was gigantic question marks from many about how he would transfer/translate his talent to the league...looking at him he just looked soooo fragile and inefficient/inconsistent coming in and at certain times early on in pre-season and his first year it seemed like he wasnt even capable of PLAYING at that level,let alone being a regular rotation guy or star...but ya gotta credit dude for how he has worked his way into being this player.
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Ice Tray is such a polarizing player that many will find it hard to truly be objective about just how good he is...his attitude definitely rubs people the wrong way because he's openly cocky and arrogant...however now after his experience with MSG and getting a taste of Spike Lee, he's definitely playing up the heel character and will make tons of cash from this new persona moving forward...Steph was and always has been a likeable guy who never really did anything to piss people off...classic hero vs villian storyline between Curry and Young. i follow college hoops and have always been able to spot next level talent...the things Curry did in his final year at Davidson was the stuff of legends all season long, and his run in the tourney only solidified how good he was going to be at the next level, but no one could have predicted just how much he was going to revolutionize the game itself...however Young was mainly a ball hog and chucker practically half the games he played, and at times he would be completely invisible and a turnover machine...i thought he was going to be a total bust when drafted, and posted it multiple times on covers, especially because i knew exactly how good Doncic was from following euro hoops as closely as i did back then...but i underestimated just how soft the league was becoming, just how much of a 3pt shooting exhibition league the nba was turning into, and because of this i didn't account for Young's style to be as effective as how it has become...now, the guy's future is basically set in stone to be one of the leagues biggest showtime players and with this heel persona, people will line up to pay good money just for the opportunity to boo and troll his balding hair...this Hawks team is no joke
this is what shouldnt be overlooked,trae should get huuuge credit for improving his game and strength to become what he has become..there was gigantic question marks from many about how he would transfer/translate his talent to the league...looking at him he just looked soooo fragile and inefficient/inconsistent coming in and at certain times early on in pre-season and his first year it seemed like he wasnt even capable of PLAYING at that level,let alone being a regular rotation guy or star...but ya gotta credit dude for how he has worked his way into being this player.
Im pretty sure you are among those who think Russell Westbrook is among the GOAT discussion.
If we are talking assists you are right. Trae Young is a much better passer than Curry. Just as Russell Westbrook also is. That does not make him a better player.
You talk about scoring on the paint as if it was something that mattered when evaluating these 2 guys. They are light, short PGs. I dont give a rats ass about whether they score or not in the paint. I actually think that even goes in detriment to support Trae, since it shows that his FG% is way worse, despite him taking more shots closer to the rim.
Did Steph foul more? yes he did. He tried to play some sort of defense and his steal stats support that. 1.9 steals per game. I wonder whether that may be among all time highs for a rookie season. Both are putrid defenders but Trae is much worse. Look at Trae Young guarding anyone. Pay special attention to it tomorrow. You will see my point. You can do whatever you want on him.
You try to play smart and use the douchey fallacious card of "oh, I was at Oracle watching Steph", but that does not mean you know shit about basketball. You may have witnessed 200 games courtside, and that does not give by itself more value to the opinions you express . Your facts are flawed. Nothing you said has rebutted anything of what me or Bud have stated.
The only way on which we would be able to settle this up, would be to look at both players +- differential numbers. But I cant find Steph´s historical data for the early seasons. I know it may be close, but Id be willing to bet that Steph has better numbers than Trae, at the same ages.
0
@StumpTownStu
Im pretty sure you are among those who think Russell Westbrook is among the GOAT discussion.
If we are talking assists you are right. Trae Young is a much better passer than Curry. Just as Russell Westbrook also is. That does not make him a better player.
You talk about scoring on the paint as if it was something that mattered when evaluating these 2 guys. They are light, short PGs. I dont give a rats ass about whether they score or not in the paint. I actually think that even goes in detriment to support Trae, since it shows that his FG% is way worse, despite him taking more shots closer to the rim.
Did Steph foul more? yes he did. He tried to play some sort of defense and his steal stats support that. 1.9 steals per game. I wonder whether that may be among all time highs for a rookie season. Both are putrid defenders but Trae is much worse. Look at Trae Young guarding anyone. Pay special attention to it tomorrow. You will see my point. You can do whatever you want on him.
You try to play smart and use the douchey fallacious card of "oh, I was at Oracle watching Steph", but that does not mean you know shit about basketball. You may have witnessed 200 games courtside, and that does not give by itself more value to the opinions you express . Your facts are flawed. Nothing you said has rebutted anything of what me or Bud have stated.
The only way on which we would be able to settle this up, would be to look at both players +- differential numbers. But I cant find Steph´s historical data for the early seasons. I know it may be close, but Id be willing to bet that Steph has better numbers than Trae, at the same ages.
Game 5 against the Knicks is exactly like college Trae Young. Scored 36 points on 10-28 shooting and 3-11 from 3. Thankfully he's an elite foul drawer.
0
Game 5 against the Knicks is exactly like college Trae Young. Scored 36 points on 10-28 shooting and 3-11 from 3. Thankfully he's an elite foul drawer.
And to anyone just picking up this thread, i'm a lifelong Warriors fan. I love Steph Curry. He's my all-time favorite player. I'm not a fan of Trae and don't think he'll be on Steph's level in the long run.
wait wait wait..you got steph ahead of jordan as your favourite??
or do you,like me,put mike in a category all of his own??like a transcendent "outside of the mortal game" category.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
And to anyone just picking up this thread, i'm a lifelong Warriors fan. I love Steph Curry. He's my all-time favorite player. I'm not a fan of Trae and don't think he'll be on Steph's level in the long run.
wait wait wait..you got steph ahead of jordan as your favourite??
or do you,like me,put mike in a category all of his own??like a transcendent "outside of the mortal game" category.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.