Been following your posts for quite a while and was just wondering why there's no posted number for the totals anymore. Would be a good indicator if the props actually hit. Also, I noticed that LAL and BOS both moved to Game 3. Did they both hit the OVER? Their total yesterday was pretty low.
Anyway just here to let you know that your post is one of those that I pay close attention to so good luck and more power.
0
@arakias
Been following your posts for quite a while and was just wondering why there's no posted number for the totals anymore. Would be a good indicator if the props actually hit. Also, I noticed that LAL and BOS both moved to Game 3. Did they both hit the OVER? Their total yesterday was pretty low.
Anyway just here to let you know that your post is one of those that I pay close attention to so good luck and more power.
That is fair - I will go back and read through the entire thread. I love when I see someone post their system and some of the picks are in line with what my gut tells me Keep up the great work, friend.
1
@arakias
That is fair - I will go back and read through the entire thread. I love when I see someone post their system and some of the picks are in line with what my gut tells me Keep up the great work, friend.
Both teams went under, so they both move to game 3.
Totals are based on Covers posted line. Rockets/Pelicans yesterday for example would be 222. If you want to make sure you're accurate with the system, check the CURRENT line on the game on covers when you're looking to lock in your wager. I've gotten a better line by a half point or full point many times.
I don't post the totals anymore because it takes me more time to check them, when you guys can easily check them too, knowing this is how they're checked.
System Extraordinaire.
2
@Noobita
Both teams went under, so they both move to game 3.
Totals are based on Covers posted line. Rockets/Pelicans yesterday for example would be 222. If you want to make sure you're accurate with the system, check the CURRENT line on the game on covers when you're looking to lock in your wager. I've gotten a better line by a half point or full point many times.
I don't post the totals anymore because it takes me more time to check them, when you guys can easily check them too, knowing this is how they're checked.
Nope. I just follow the system. That’s the beauty of it. There’s very few people in the world who make money trying to “pick them” correctly. I prefer a system based approach. No need to study, research, guess, etc... just follow what has worked over history.
System Extraordinaire.
0
@GR8FORM
Nope. I just follow the system. That’s the beauty of it. There’s very few people in the world who make money trying to “pick them” correctly. I prefer a system based approach. No need to study, research, guess, etc... just follow what has worked over history.
I’ve picked games plenty of times, started the year like 10-3 and got a bunch of flack when I switched to this (look at the first page of comments). Not sure how anyone can argue with the results at this point though. Notice all the haters who talked shit have disappeared. No one can admit when they’re wrong :D
System Extraordinaire.
0
I’ve picked games plenty of times, started the year like 10-3 and got a bunch of flack when I switched to this (look at the first page of comments). Not sure how anyone can argue with the results at this point though. Notice all the haters who talked shit have disappeared. No one can admit when they’re wrong :D
I see you’re using multiples of 3 per each unit increase. Do you have to use the multiple of 3 per each unit? For someone with a smaller bankroll starting out arbitrarily at $0.25 still leaves you at $546.75 (big wager) on a game 8. I’m intrigued by the system just don’t know if I can afford it. I guess back to the original question can this system be scaled down or does it have to be played in multiples of 3? Thanks for all the effort and bol!
1
I see you’re using multiples of 3 per each unit increase. Do you have to use the multiple of 3 per each unit? For someone with a smaller bankroll starting out arbitrarily at $0.25 still leaves you at $546.75 (big wager) on a game 8. I’m intrigued by the system just don’t know if I can afford it. I guess back to the original question can this system be scaled down or does it have to be played in multiples of 3? Thanks for all the effort and bol!
Multiples of 3 pay for previous losses. My suggestion would be to play games 5-8 for smaller amounts but multiples of 3 if you want to be safer and less “big” action.
even 3-8 or something..
1-3-9-27-81-243
System Extraordinaire.
0
@BuschDood
Multiples of 3 pay for previous losses. My suggestion would be to play games 5-8 for smaller amounts but multiples of 3 if you want to be safer and less “big” action.
No, I’m saying if an 8 game chase is out of your budget, only play the chase games at a certain point and above... don’t play 1-8 for a 3X increase each time.
Play 5-8 (or whatever you want). You’re not “recovering” from 1-4 losses, because you didn’t play them.
System Extraordinaire.
1
@BuschDood
No, I’m saying if an 8 game chase is out of your budget, only play the chase games at a certain point and above... don’t play 1-8 for a 3X increase each time.
Play 5-8 (or whatever you want). You’re not “recovering” from 1-4 losses, because you didn’t play them.
Clippers complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Knicks complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units, Jazz complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, 76ers complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units, Pacers complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Wizards complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Magic complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units.
Chase is now 146-0. Bankroll is +1,760.20 units.
System Extraordinaire.
1
Cavs move to game 2, T-wolves move to game 2.
Clippers complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Knicks complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units, Jazz complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, 76ers complete the chase on game 2 for +1.73 units, Pacers complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Wizards complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units, Magic complete the chase on game 1 for +0.91 units.
Awesome Arakias. Been loving the chase so far, and I thank you for it.
I have however, been tweaking some stuff on my own. I go by halves, and like the Lakers for example, I reduce on the over with the units and lay some on the Laker team total.
Ive noticed that sometimes one team goes over, but then the other team lags off, thus ruining the over. Of course, this is some extra stuff on the side, when they are plenty of units at risk on 1 team and one 1 unit on the other. (I hope I made any sense.)
Nevertheless, I either win - win or win and cover the lose. Good luck everyone.
If you fail to Manage. You are managing to fail.
0
@arakias
Awesome Arakias. Been loving the chase so far, and I thank you for it.
I have however, been tweaking some stuff on my own. I go by halves, and like the Lakers for example, I reduce on the over with the units and lay some on the Laker team total.
Ive noticed that sometimes one team goes over, but then the other team lags off, thus ruining the over. Of course, this is some extra stuff on the side, when they are plenty of units at risk on 1 team and one 1 unit on the other. (I hope I made any sense.)
Nevertheless, I either win - win or win and cover the lose. Good luck everyone.
I got you, if the Lakers are on game 3 you feel better about their TT over than their opponents. Makes sense, just remember, half our games chase the over and half chase the under.
OOOUUUOU in that order on the 8 game chase. Either way, glad I could help!
System Extraordinaire.
0
@LGG79
I got you, if the Lakers are on game 3 you feel better about their TT over than their opponents. Makes sense, just remember, half our games chase the over and half chase the under.
OOOUUUOU in that order on the 8 game chase. Either way, glad I could help!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.