Spurs are off until Wed. They'll be nice and rested and, lest I forget, they're coming off a loss. Not to mention, they own the Grizz, kind of like how the seachickens own the niners.
0
Spurs are off until Wed. They'll be nice and rested and, lest I forget, they're coming off a loss. Not to mention, they own the Grizz, kind of like how the seachickens own the niners.
Like it BB, I actually like Memphis tomorrow, then the Spurs on Wednesday. But be careful not the underestimate the Griz at home this season. I suspect both GS and Memphis will battle not only for the best home record in the NBA, but the #1 seed in the West.
0
Like it BB, I actually like Memphis tomorrow, then the Spurs on Wednesday. But be careful not the underestimate the Griz at home this season. I suspect both GS and Memphis will battle not only for the best home record in the NBA, but the #1 seed in the West.
I can't see the Grizzlies beating the Spurs at SA on Wednesday off a back to back and like you stated the Spurs have owned the Grizzlies. If the Spurs line is under -6 I'll defiantly be on it.
0
I can't see the Grizzlies beating the Spurs at SA on Wednesday off a back to back and like you stated the Spurs have owned the Grizzlies. If the Spurs line is under -6 I'll defiantly be on it.
Like it BB, I actually like Memphis tomorrow, then the Spurs on Wednesday. But be careful not the underestimate the Griz at home this season. I suspect both GS and Memphis will battle not only for the best home record in the NBA, but the #1 seed in the West.
This is funny Mak. You were not posting last year but the Dubs were/are my local team. I bet them and even faded them, but was often on the wrong side. They cost me a lot of money with their inconsistent play (mostly because of their coach). In fact, I faded them against the Grizz in a very close game at Oakland, which the Dubs won. Finally, I was so disgusted by them that I put a big chunk against them in the playoffs. Then the whole Sterling thing happened and suddenly the Clippers were not interested in basketball. Lucky for me they pulled it out. Now this year I said the Warriors would be money (because of Kerr) but have rarely bet them. And now that I'm ready to back them you (who have been backing them this entire time) are ready to fade them.
Too funny. I'm worried that you might be right. I certainly don't like the fact that Lee might be playing tomorrow. The team has been in a groove and that can only throw them off. We also don't know Bogut's status or how effective he will be. But here is what I do like. The Warriors finally learned how to beat the Grizz last year and will go into this game with a lot of confidence. Also, this Warriors team is vastly different than the one the Grizz used to own and knew how to defend. These guys (i.e., the warriors) move the ball and don't rely on one on one play or isolation basketball like last year. In fact, they are more like the Spurs than last year's dubs and the big, lumbering Grizz struggle against the Spurs offense, which is predicated on ball movement (as this offsets Memphis' great defense). Also, like the Spurs, the Dubs are now very deep and can throw different lineups at the Grizz, forcing them to constantly adjust. Most importantly, this year's Warriors are protecting the basketball, which was their biggest achilles heel. I listen to Kerr's interviews on the radio and has been preaching taking care of the ball and making good choices. He is all about making the game easy, and that happens with ball movement and finding the open man. Finally, the Warriors, unlike the depressed looking cast of characters from last year, are playing with a song in their heart. They love to be out on the court (as much as fish love water). In short, the Grizz will be facing a very different team.
0
Quote Originally Posted by makaveli23:
Like it BB, I actually like Memphis tomorrow, then the Spurs on Wednesday. But be careful not the underestimate the Griz at home this season. I suspect both GS and Memphis will battle not only for the best home record in the NBA, but the #1 seed in the West.
This is funny Mak. You were not posting last year but the Dubs were/are my local team. I bet them and even faded them, but was often on the wrong side. They cost me a lot of money with their inconsistent play (mostly because of their coach). In fact, I faded them against the Grizz in a very close game at Oakland, which the Dubs won. Finally, I was so disgusted by them that I put a big chunk against them in the playoffs. Then the whole Sterling thing happened and suddenly the Clippers were not interested in basketball. Lucky for me they pulled it out. Now this year I said the Warriors would be money (because of Kerr) but have rarely bet them. And now that I'm ready to back them you (who have been backing them this entire time) are ready to fade them.
Too funny. I'm worried that you might be right. I certainly don't like the fact that Lee might be playing tomorrow. The team has been in a groove and that can only throw them off. We also don't know Bogut's status or how effective he will be. But here is what I do like. The Warriors finally learned how to beat the Grizz last year and will go into this game with a lot of confidence. Also, this Warriors team is vastly different than the one the Grizz used to own and knew how to defend. These guys (i.e., the warriors) move the ball and don't rely on one on one play or isolation basketball like last year. In fact, they are more like the Spurs than last year's dubs and the big, lumbering Grizz struggle against the Spurs offense, which is predicated on ball movement (as this offsets Memphis' great defense). Also, like the Spurs, the Dubs are now very deep and can throw different lineups at the Grizz, forcing them to constantly adjust. Most importantly, this year's Warriors are protecting the basketball, which was their biggest achilles heel. I listen to Kerr's interviews on the radio and has been preaching taking care of the ball and making good choices. He is all about making the game easy, and that happens with ball movement and finding the open man. Finally, the Warriors, unlike the depressed looking cast of characters from last year, are playing with a song in their heart. They love to be out on the court (as much as fish love water). In short, the Grizz will be facing a very different team.
Just keep mind Golden State had upped their defense..... but they've played a lotta medoicre teams who love to chuck a lot aka west coast style so keeping those chucking teams FG% under 43-42% like they have is nice but I'm not overly convinced yet.
memphis gets points differently and has solid/above average/elite athletic defenders and they bang people out.
Can Golden State win a game in 80 point range?
0
Just keep mind Golden State had upped their defense..... but they've played a lotta medoicre teams who love to chuck a lot aka west coast style so keeping those chucking teams FG% under 43-42% like they have is nice but I'm not overly convinced yet.
memphis gets points differently and has solid/above average/elite athletic defenders and they bang people out.
Theres no "particular" spot here. So the question is what problems does Memphis pose to Golden State and how do they match up?
Clearly both will be fired up to play each other they both understand that.
I agree that looking ahead is not a good thing to do when capping, you need analyze the game with simplicity. But BB is not really looking that far ahead. It makes a difference, a back-to-back is always an important situational aspect of capping. The double down strategy is something I have never done, but it isn't a bad idea if BB wants to bet GS against Memphis. Basically he is betting on Memphis being unable to cover against two top tier Western teams on a back-to-back. It's a solid strategy.
BB, I'm not ready to fade the Dubs on a consistent basis. Am 11-2 on wagers involving backing the Dubs and 0-1 betting against them. What Genecam said was key, what problems does Memphis pose to the West leading Dubs. It's quite simple, perimeter defense. They have not faced a team like this yet. Will go in depth on this once I do my writeups.
One quick note, you said that you don't know if Bogut will play. He is officially ruled out of tomorrow's game. He will not play. It's Lee that is still questionable, if he plays, it may be a much lower bet for me, but I will still take the Griz and hope that Lee is rusty.
See you guys tomorrow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GeneCam27:
You're looking way too ahead.
Just play it as it is tomorrow.
Set aside being a fan of golden state.
Theres no "particular" spot here. So the question is what problems does Memphis pose to Golden State and how do they match up?
Clearly both will be fired up to play each other they both understand that.
I agree that looking ahead is not a good thing to do when capping, you need analyze the game with simplicity. But BB is not really looking that far ahead. It makes a difference, a back-to-back is always an important situational aspect of capping. The double down strategy is something I have never done, but it isn't a bad idea if BB wants to bet GS against Memphis. Basically he is betting on Memphis being unable to cover against two top tier Western teams on a back-to-back. It's a solid strategy.
BB, I'm not ready to fade the Dubs on a consistent basis. Am 11-2 on wagers involving backing the Dubs and 0-1 betting against them. What Genecam said was key, what problems does Memphis pose to the West leading Dubs. It's quite simple, perimeter defense. They have not faced a team like this yet. Will go in depth on this once I do my writeups.
One quick note, you said that you don't know if Bogut will play. He is officially ruled out of tomorrow's game. He will not play. It's Lee that is still questionable, if he plays, it may be a much lower bet for me, but I will still take the Griz and hope that Lee is rusty.
I agree that looking ahead is not a good thing to do when capping, you need analyze the game with simplicity. But BB is not really looking that far ahead. It makes a difference, a back-to-back is always an important situational aspect of capping. The double down strategy is something I have never done, but it isn't a bad idea if BB wants to bet GS against Memphis. Basically he is betting on Memphis being unable to cover against two top tier Western teams on a back-to-back. It's a solid strategy.
BB, I'm not ready to fade the Dubs on a consistent basis. Am 11-2 on wagers involving backing the Dubs and 0-1 betting against them. What Genecam said was key, what problems does Memphis pose to the West leading Dubs. It's quite simple, perimeter defense. They have not faced a team like this yet. Will go in depth on this once I do my writeups.
One quick note, you said that you don't know if Bogut will play. He is officially ruled out of tomorrow's game. He will not play. It's Lee that is still questionable, if he plays, it may be a much lower bet for me, but I will still take the Griz and hope that Lee is rusty.
See you guys tomorrow.
David Lee (hamstring) and Andrew Bogut (knee) will not play against the Grizzlies on Tuesday.
Just saw that on Rotoworld right now. Best of luck with your play man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by makaveli23:
I agree that looking ahead is not a good thing to do when capping, you need analyze the game with simplicity. But BB is not really looking that far ahead. It makes a difference, a back-to-back is always an important situational aspect of capping. The double down strategy is something I have never done, but it isn't a bad idea if BB wants to bet GS against Memphis. Basically he is betting on Memphis being unable to cover against two top tier Western teams on a back-to-back. It's a solid strategy.
BB, I'm not ready to fade the Dubs on a consistent basis. Am 11-2 on wagers involving backing the Dubs and 0-1 betting against them. What Genecam said was key, what problems does Memphis pose to the West leading Dubs. It's quite simple, perimeter defense. They have not faced a team like this yet. Will go in depth on this once I do my writeups.
One quick note, you said that you don't know if Bogut will play. He is officially ruled out of tomorrow's game. He will not play. It's Lee that is still questionable, if he plays, it may be a much lower bet for me, but I will still take the Griz and hope that Lee is rusty.
See you guys tomorrow.
David Lee (hamstring) and Andrew Bogut (knee) will not play against the Grizzlies on Tuesday.
Just saw that on Rotoworld right now. Best of luck with your play man.
I agree that looking ahead is not a good thing to do when capping, you need analyze the game with simplicity. But BB is not really looking that far ahead. It makes a difference, a back-to-back is always an important situational aspect of capping. The double down strategy is something I have never done, but it isn't a bad idea if BB wants to bet GS against Memphis. Basically he is betting on Memphis being unable to cover against two top tier Western teams on a back-to-back. It's a solid strategy.
BB, I'm not ready to fade the Dubs on a consistent basis. Am 11-2 on wagers involving backing the Dubs and 0-1 betting against them. What Genecam said was key, what problems does Memphis pose to the West leading Dubs. It's quite simple, perimeter defense. They have not faced a team like this yet. Will go in depth on this once I do my writeups.
One quick note, you said that you don't know if Bogut will play. He is officially ruled out of tomorrow's game. He will not play. It's Lee that is still questionable, if he plays, it may be a much lower bet for me, but I will still take the Griz and hope that Lee is rusty.
See you guys tomorrow.
Just read that Bogut is not playing, Mak. So you are right. Funny enough, Bogut only played 4 minutes in that game at Oakland last year (he got hurt) and Lee didn't play at all. The Warriors had an inferior bench and coach, though they had home court. Speights gave the Memphis bigs fits (especially Randolph) and had a great game (15 points 8 rebound 7-9 shooting). Remember, Speights was a former Grizz, and wanted to stick it to his former team. All this to say, I'm still not dissuaded from betting the Dubs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by makaveli23:
I agree that looking ahead is not a good thing to do when capping, you need analyze the game with simplicity. But BB is not really looking that far ahead. It makes a difference, a back-to-back is always an important situational aspect of capping. The double down strategy is something I have never done, but it isn't a bad idea if BB wants to bet GS against Memphis. Basically he is betting on Memphis being unable to cover against two top tier Western teams on a back-to-back. It's a solid strategy.
BB, I'm not ready to fade the Dubs on a consistent basis. Am 11-2 on wagers involving backing the Dubs and 0-1 betting against them. What Genecam said was key, what problems does Memphis pose to the West leading Dubs. It's quite simple, perimeter defense. They have not faced a team like this yet. Will go in depth on this once I do my writeups.
One quick note, you said that you don't know if Bogut will play. He is officially ruled out of tomorrow's game. He will not play. It's Lee that is still questionable, if he plays, it may be a much lower bet for me, but I will still take the Griz and hope that Lee is rusty.
See you guys tomorrow.
Just read that Bogut is not playing, Mak. So you are right. Funny enough, Bogut only played 4 minutes in that game at Oakland last year (he got hurt) and Lee didn't play at all. The Warriors had an inferior bench and coach, though they had home court. Speights gave the Memphis bigs fits (especially Randolph) and had a great game (15 points 8 rebound 7-9 shooting). Remember, Speights was a former Grizz, and wanted to stick it to his former team. All this to say, I'm still not dissuaded from betting the Dubs.
really have to think hard betting against warriors at any time this year, they just do too many things well on the court that just add up on the scoreboard even in bad spots and such
warriors won't be favored tmr without bogut, think grizz win su but warriors still cover
0
really have to think hard betting against warriors at any time this year, they just do too many things well on the court that just add up on the scoreboard even in bad spots and such
warriors won't be favored tmr without bogut, think grizz win su but warriors still cover
I think it's fair to say that GS has a bigger target on their back than the Spurs do at this moment in time.
Along with the fact that this will be the first of a b2b and they travel for the second leg. I don't see why the Grizz don't leave it all on the floor tonight to break a hot streaking Warriors team, just to look ahead to an away game they know they are in a bad spot against.
Memphis is a big game team. Warriors have been playing at peak efficiency early in the season and are being overvalued. Mem pull this one out
0
I think it's fair to say that GS has a bigger target on their back than the Spurs do at this moment in time.
Along with the fact that this will be the first of a b2b and they travel for the second leg. I don't see why the Grizz don't leave it all on the floor tonight to break a hot streaking Warriors team, just to look ahead to an away game they know they are in a bad spot against.
Memphis is a big game team. Warriors have been playing at peak efficiency early in the season and are being overvalued. Mem pull this one out
Well guys, we barely lost the cover. The best shooter in the world had two cracks at it with the clock ticking down and down by 5 but missed both 3's. Memphis backers should feel fortunate. Curry had an awful night (one his worst) and the Dubs were still in it. And don't forget the bogus technicals (2 shots) for nothing really (or the Conley travel that caused the technicals). Why can't these refs just admit they blew the call instead of giving everyone and their mothers a T? Oh well, on to tomorrow.
0
Well guys, we barely lost the cover. The best shooter in the world had two cracks at it with the clock ticking down and down by 5 but missed both 3's. Memphis backers should feel fortunate. Curry had an awful night (one his worst) and the Dubs were still in it. And don't forget the bogus technicals (2 shots) for nothing really (or the Conley travel that caused the technicals). Why can't these refs just admit they blew the call instead of giving everyone and their mothers a T? Oh well, on to tomorrow.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.