I'm done here... There is a way to be gracious and humble, AND still prove you're right.. I never once said Debver was the right side, was just pointing out the philosophy of buy low/sell high.....
This is not buy low sell high though. Buy low sell high is Georgia being counted out by everyone against Baylor.. boom cover... The line was exactly right for this game. Indiana at home against a team they could go down the wire with at - 1 1/2.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AvidGuru:
I'm done here... There is a way to be gracious and humble, AND still prove you're right.. I never once said Debver was the right side, was just pointing out the philosophy of buy low/sell high.....
This is not buy low sell high though. Buy low sell high is Georgia being counted out by everyone against Baylor.. boom cover... The line was exactly right for this game. Indiana at home against a team they could go down the wire with at - 1 1/2.
It's refreshing to hear an intelligent point of view which doesn't come off as obnoxious...
I suppose we have different views of what constitutes "buying low" but my main gripe was with OP declaring anyone who disagreed with him an "idiot"
I should clarify, though. This philosophy is only one small angle...there are many, many things one can look at when Handicapping a game; I would never make a wager based solely on one small angle .
1
Westbelfort
It's refreshing to hear an intelligent point of view which doesn't come off as obnoxious...
I suppose we have different views of what constitutes "buying low" but my main gripe was with OP declaring anyone who disagreed with him an "idiot"
I should clarify, though. This philosophy is only one small angle...there are many, many things one can look at when Handicapping a game; I would never make a wager based solely on one small angle .
AvidGuru...you can only click on threads like these for entertainment purposes only...donkeys like the OP are necessary for this site because misery loves SAF company.
Dont bother ever trying to debate these morons.
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
0
AvidGuru...you can only click on threads like these for entertainment purposes only...donkeys like the OP are necessary for this site because misery loves SAF company.
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
0
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by Jerseyboy89:
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Excuses...You pick your spots when betting the NBA...Like I said...Denver just got destroyed by Houston and Indy just destroyed Philly...Line movement said it all...Now off the line didn't move...and stayed Nuggets +1.5..I would not have played this game..
Mayweather bet 450000 on
1
Quote Originally Posted by TheWestbelfort:
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by Jerseyboy89:
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Excuses...You pick your spots when betting the NBA...Like I said...Denver just got destroyed by Houston and Indy just destroyed Philly...Line movement said it all...Now off the line didn't move...and stayed Nuggets +1.5..I would not have played this game..
So what I learned from this is when I see a thread title like this (YOU'RE AN IDIOT IF YOU BET THE NUGGETS TONIGHT) bet on the idiot side and win $$$$.
I can't recall ever in the history of Covers seeing a thread title like that and the OP actually winning his bet.....it just doesn't happen.
1
So what I learned from this is when I see a thread title like this (YOU'RE AN IDIOT IF YOU BET THE NUGGETS TONIGHT) bet on the idiot side and win $$$$.
I can't recall ever in the history of Covers seeing a thread title like that and the OP actually winning his bet.....it just doesn't happen.
It's very easy to tell when someone isn't confident in their argument. As soon as someone disagrees with their premise they are attack and called childish names. It's the hallmark of someone who lacks confidence/self esteem.
0
It's very easy to tell when someone isn't confident in their argument. As soon as someone disagrees with their premise they are attack and called childish names. It's the hallmark of someone who lacks confidence/self esteem.
So what I learned from this is when I see a thread title like this (YOU'RE AN IDIOT IF YOU BET THE NUGGETS TONIGHT) bet on the idiot side and win $$$$.
I can't recall ever in the history of Covers seeing a thread title like that and the OP actually winning his bet.....it just doesn't happen.
This
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Dundee:
So what I learned from this is when I see a thread title like this (YOU'RE AN IDIOT IF YOU BET THE NUGGETS TONIGHT) bet on the idiot side and win $$$$.
I can't recall ever in the history of Covers seeing a thread title like that and the OP actually winning his bet.....it just doesn't happen.
So what I learned from this is when I see a thread title like this (YOU'RE AN IDIOT IF YOU BET THE NUGGETS TONIGHT) bet on the idiot side and win $$$$. I can't recall ever in the history of Covers seeing a thread title like that and the OP actually winning his bet.....it just doesn't happen.
I think these are just Bookie accounts trying to squeeze some more money from the public, I mean no-one can be this stupid right ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Dundee:
So what I learned from this is when I see a thread title like this (YOU'RE AN IDIOT IF YOU BET THE NUGGETS TONIGHT) bet on the idiot side and win $$$$. I can't recall ever in the history of Covers seeing a thread title like that and the OP actually winning his bet.....it just doesn't happen.
I think these are just Bookie accounts trying to squeeze some more money from the public, I mean no-one can be this stupid right ?
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Excuses...You pick your spots when betting the NBA...Like I said...Denver just got destroyed by Houston and Indy just destroyed Philly...Line movement said it all...Now off the line didn't move...and stayed Nuggets +1.5..I would not have played this game..
Betting based on line movement is a no no for me. I've won with line moving my way and won with it moving away from my bet. Line is the line.. it's the markets perception. The line moved in Denver favor simply because garry Harris was announced to play. Literally it moved up during that time. Funny thing is .. he wasn't the difference maker. It was a coin flip game that went denver way. Them getting blown out simply isn't a concern for me in the long run lol. We are not their psychologists, we are theives in the night looking for the loot.. good win my man.. but I was simply saying that Denver 9/10 is not a winner in that spot. They got bailed by foul trouble from holiday and an amazing performance from Porter
0
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by TheWestbelfort:
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by Jerseyboy89:
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Excuses...You pick your spots when betting the NBA...Like I said...Denver just got destroyed by Houston and Indy just destroyed Philly...Line movement said it all...Now off the line didn't move...and stayed Nuggets +1.5..I would not have played this game..
Betting based on line movement is a no no for me. I've won with line moving my way and won with it moving away from my bet. Line is the line.. it's the markets perception. The line moved in Denver favor simply because garry Harris was announced to play. Literally it moved up during that time. Funny thing is .. he wasn't the difference maker. It was a coin flip game that went denver way. Them getting blown out simply isn't a concern for me in the long run lol. We are not their psychologists, we are theives in the night looking for the loot.. good win my man.. but I was simply saying that Denver 9/10 is not a winner in that spot. They got bailed by foul trouble from holiday and an amazing performance from Porter
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Excuses...You pick your spots when betting the NBA...Like I said...Denver just got destroyed by Houston and Indy just destroyed Philly...Line movement said it all...Now off the line didn't move...and stayed Nuggets +1.5..I would not have played this game..
Betting based on line movement is a no no for me. I've won with line moving my way and won with it moving away from my bet. Line is the line.. it's the markets perception. The line moved in Denver favor simply because garry Harris was announced to play. Literally it moved up during that time. Funny thing is .. he wasn't the difference maker. It was a coin flip game that went denver way. Them getting blown out simply isn't a concern for me in the long run lol. We are not their psychologists, we are theives in the night looking for the loot.. good win my man.. but I was simply saying that Denver 9/10 is not a winner in that spot. They got bailed by foul trouble from holiday and an amazing performance from Porter
Jokic was in foul trouble the entire 1st half leading to him playing only 24 minutes. Indiana started 9/10 included 4/4 from 3, cooled off and the deeper team won. Simple as that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheWestbelfort:
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by TheWestbelfort:
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by Jerseyboy89:
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Excuses...You pick your spots when betting the NBA...Like I said...Denver just got destroyed by Houston and Indy just destroyed Philly...Line movement said it all...Now off the line didn't move...and stayed Nuggets +1.5..I would not have played this game..
Betting based on line movement is a no no for me. I've won with line moving my way and won with it moving away from my bet. Line is the line.. it's the markets perception. The line moved in Denver favor simply because garry Harris was announced to play. Literally it moved up during that time. Funny thing is .. he wasn't the difference maker. It was a coin flip game that went denver way. Them getting blown out simply isn't a concern for me in the long run lol. We are not their psychologists, we are theives in the night looking for the loot.. good win my man.. but I was simply saying that Denver 9/10 is not a winner in that spot. They got bailed by foul trouble from holiday and an amazing performance from Porter
Jokic was in foul trouble the entire 1st half leading to him playing only 24 minutes. Indiana started 9/10 included 4/4 from 3, cooled off and the deeper team won. Simple as that.
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Excuses...You pick your spots when betting the NBA...Like I said...Denver just got destroyed by Houston and Indy just destroyed Philly...Line movement said it all...Now off the line didn't move...and stayed Nuggets +1.5..I would not have played this game..
Betting based on line movement is a no no for me. I've won with line moving my way and won with it moving away from my bet. Line is the line.. it's the markets perception. The line moved in Denver favor simply because garry Harris was announced to play. Literally it moved up during that time. Funny thing is .. he wasn't the difference maker. It was a coin flip game that went denver way. Them getting blown out simply isn't a concern for me in the long run lol. We are not their psychologists, we are theives in the night looking for the loot.. good win my man.. but I was simply saying that Denver 9/10 is not a winner in that spot. They got bailed by foul trouble from holiday and an amazing performance from Porter
Jokic was in foul trouble the entire 1st half leading to him playing only 24 minutes. Indiana started 9/10 included 4/4 from 3, cooled off and the deeper team won. Simple as that.
Jocic being in foul trouble did not matter. His impact was offset by Indiana defense. He's soft . Truthfully in this particular game . Plumlee gave an advantage because he's a better rim protector and cause more problems for McConnell trying to penetrate. I watched the whole game lol trust me Denver is not really that good as people believe them to be
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jumpman024:
Quote Originally Posted by TheWestbelfort:
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by TheWestbelfort:
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Quote Originally Posted by Jerseyboy89:
Nuggets got bailed out by an unreal perfr from porter jr...11 for 12...unreal
Nuggets are the better team....Jokic had a horrible 1st half..2 points....Dominated 2nd half..
He's right. Nuggets aren't "the better team". They're equal as hell. Porter was the difference maker tonight and holiday getting in foul trouble early. McConnell messed the game flow up and was bothered by the length. He became a liability running the offense for pacers. I wouldn't call anyone an idiot for betting on a side. My only thing is, if we talking positive plays... I'd say a person would lose more in that spot taking Denver in the long run.
Excuses...You pick your spots when betting the NBA...Like I said...Denver just got destroyed by Houston and Indy just destroyed Philly...Line movement said it all...Now off the line didn't move...and stayed Nuggets +1.5..I would not have played this game..
Betting based on line movement is a no no for me. I've won with line moving my way and won with it moving away from my bet. Line is the line.. it's the markets perception. The line moved in Denver favor simply because garry Harris was announced to play. Literally it moved up during that time. Funny thing is .. he wasn't the difference maker. It was a coin flip game that went denver way. Them getting blown out simply isn't a concern for me in the long run lol. We are not their psychologists, we are theives in the night looking for the loot.. good win my man.. but I was simply saying that Denver 9/10 is not a winner in that spot. They got bailed by foul trouble from holiday and an amazing performance from Porter
Jokic was in foul trouble the entire 1st half leading to him playing only 24 minutes. Indiana started 9/10 included 4/4 from 3, cooled off and the deeper team won. Simple as that.
Jocic being in foul trouble did not matter. His impact was offset by Indiana defense. He's soft . Truthfully in this particular game . Plumlee gave an advantage because he's a better rim protector and cause more problems for McConnell trying to penetrate. I watched the whole game lol trust me Denver is not really that good as people believe them to be
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.