Cincinatti ML (Cleveland resting starters with seed locked up and on road. Cleveland won and covered last 4 games. Due for an L)
NY Jets +2 (New England covered last 4 ATS and Jets lost last 3 ATS. Books begging you to take NE at home on short line that has went from +3 to +1.5 in some books. Jets on extended rest having played on Thursday night. Don't fall for the "Bill's last game in NE intrigue.)
Tenn +3.5 (Tennessee lost their last 3 games at home ATS and now playing with same season revenge against a banged up division rival and opportunity to play spoiler. Field goal game at best. I have the hook in my favor here as well.)
Over 41 Jax/Tenn (both of these teams are on 3 straight unders coming into this game. Plus their first game went over. Repeat the over in this game as well.)
San Francisco ML (Here is a stat that you may not know. As good as SF has been they have not covered in 4 straight games at home. This changes this week despite backups playing. Taking the ML just to be safe but an outright cover would not surprise me here.)
Denver +2.5 (Raiders have covered 3 straight games. They are due for an L. Denver has not had a winning season via record since 2016. They are playing for something in this game. Raiders already beat them earlier and both are out of contention for playoffs. No Josh at RB for Raiders either. Stidham is a former Raider who got cut and is now playing with revenge against former team. Payton has the coaching advantage. Furthermore, the line has not moved off of 2.5. Why? Because they are baiting you to take the Raiders on a small line at home. Go opposite. Take Denver)
Bears / Packers over 45 (Packers on 5 or 6 straight overs. Go opposite playing a good Bears defense. Points will be at a premium in this game. Take the under)
Bears +3 (They are playing solid football on both ends over the last month and a half. The addition of Montez Sweat has paid dividends on a massive level for this team. Field goal game. I could see a push here at best but an outright win is what I am expecting. GB has won 9 out of last 10 in this matchup. Same situation as the Tenn/Jax game where we have a division rival who lost earlier this year and now has the opportunity to play spoiler in last game of season. The thing is that I actually think that Chicago is the better team than GB in this case.)
Seattle ML (Arizona did their Superbowl last week. They will hurt their draft position if they win here. Regardless of that, Seattle is the better team and has the more experienced coach. It is a road game and I normally like taking dogs at home after a road win plus the fact that Arizona lost to two striaght division rivals at home in SF and Rams which gives me pause...but I think talent wins out here but it is close. Another field goal game and I am taking the better team in this situation but not taking the -3. Going ML instead.) A little note. The last 3 years in this series, the teams have exchanged unders and overs. if they played over the first game they go under the 2nd game. Take a look yourself. Based on this pattern, the over is in play. I was tempted to take the over here but I just stuck to the Seattle ML. Just an FYI.
TB / Carolina under 37.5 (TB has played the over in 3 straight road games and their QB is a bit banged up. They are due for an under on the road in a tight defensive match up. Carolina defense shows up here to keep it tight and under)
5
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Cincinatti ML (Cleveland resting starters with seed locked up and on road. Cleveland won and covered last 4 games. Due for an L)
NY Jets +2 (New England covered last 4 ATS and Jets lost last 3 ATS. Books begging you to take NE at home on short line that has went from +3 to +1.5 in some books. Jets on extended rest having played on Thursday night. Don't fall for the "Bill's last game in NE intrigue.)
Tenn +3.5 (Tennessee lost their last 3 games at home ATS and now playing with same season revenge against a banged up division rival and opportunity to play spoiler. Field goal game at best. I have the hook in my favor here as well.)
Over 41 Jax/Tenn (both of these teams are on 3 straight unders coming into this game. Plus their first game went over. Repeat the over in this game as well.)
San Francisco ML (Here is a stat that you may not know. As good as SF has been they have not covered in 4 straight games at home. This changes this week despite backups playing. Taking the ML just to be safe but an outright cover would not surprise me here.)
Denver +2.5 (Raiders have covered 3 straight games. They are due for an L. Denver has not had a winning season via record since 2016. They are playing for something in this game. Raiders already beat them earlier and both are out of contention for playoffs. No Josh at RB for Raiders either. Stidham is a former Raider who got cut and is now playing with revenge against former team. Payton has the coaching advantage. Furthermore, the line has not moved off of 2.5. Why? Because they are baiting you to take the Raiders on a small line at home. Go opposite. Take Denver)
Bears / Packers over 45 (Packers on 5 or 6 straight overs. Go opposite playing a good Bears defense. Points will be at a premium in this game. Take the under)
Bears +3 (They are playing solid football on both ends over the last month and a half. The addition of Montez Sweat has paid dividends on a massive level for this team. Field goal game. I could see a push here at best but an outright win is what I am expecting. GB has won 9 out of last 10 in this matchup. Same situation as the Tenn/Jax game where we have a division rival who lost earlier this year and now has the opportunity to play spoiler in last game of season. The thing is that I actually think that Chicago is the better team than GB in this case.)
Seattle ML (Arizona did their Superbowl last week. They will hurt their draft position if they win here. Regardless of that, Seattle is the better team and has the more experienced coach. It is a road game and I normally like taking dogs at home after a road win plus the fact that Arizona lost to two striaght division rivals at home in SF and Rams which gives me pause...but I think talent wins out here but it is close. Another field goal game and I am taking the better team in this situation but not taking the -3. Going ML instead.) A little note. The last 3 years in this series, the teams have exchanged unders and overs. if they played over the first game they go under the 2nd game. Take a look yourself. Based on this pattern, the over is in play. I was tempted to take the over here but I just stuck to the Seattle ML. Just an FYI.
TB / Carolina under 37.5 (TB has played the over in 3 straight road games and their QB is a bit banged up. They are due for an under on the road in a tight defensive match up. Carolina defense shows up here to keep it tight and under)
I always do 1 parlay on Sunday afternoons based on your selections.
I actually hit 2 big parlays (1 for $1500 and 1 for $1650) last week and decided to be a little brave this week. Hence the post today.
I had Rams ML, Texans ML, KC ML, Saints ML, Jags ML, Pitt +4, the over in the Ari/Phil game 48 and the over in the Seattle/Pitt game 41. That was on 1 parlay.
The other parlay I had was Dallas ML, Colts ML, Jags ML, KC ML, Saints ML, Pitt +4, Giants +5, and the over in the Seattle/Pitt game 41. That was my other parlay.
I wish I can share 2 other parlays but Miami at +3.5 killed those. All others hit on the other ones. Either way I do put some thought into a mix of trends and analysis. I feel good about this one. The Seattle ML is concerning but I feel it will squeak by barely. Thoughts welcomed on my picks will be greatly appreciated.
1
@vanzack
Hello Vanzack,
I always do 1 parlay on Sunday afternoons based on your selections.
I actually hit 2 big parlays (1 for $1500 and 1 for $1650) last week and decided to be a little brave this week. Hence the post today.
I had Rams ML, Texans ML, KC ML, Saints ML, Jags ML, Pitt +4, the over in the Ari/Phil game 48 and the over in the Seattle/Pitt game 41. That was on 1 parlay.
The other parlay I had was Dallas ML, Colts ML, Jags ML, KC ML, Saints ML, Pitt +4, Giants +5, and the over in the Seattle/Pitt game 41. That was my other parlay.
I wish I can share 2 other parlays but Miami at +3.5 killed those. All others hit on the other ones. Either way I do put some thought into a mix of trends and analysis. I feel good about this one. The Seattle ML is concerning but I feel it will squeak by barely. Thoughts welcomed on my picks will be greatly appreciated.
A little further information that I will add to this thread.
Colts have won 3 games straight up at home including a recent Saturday night game where they dominated Pittsburgh. Here is another Saturday night game in front of their home fans playing against a Texans team seeking same season revenge. Leaning a change in regression here. I have Houston ML on a few other parlays.
Pittsburgh was blown out on a recent Saturday game against the Colts and now they play another Saturday game against Baltimore who has covered 6 games in a row. They are due regression. Hence, I have Pittsburgh ML paired with Houston ML on those same parlays.
Philly has lost 5 straight games against the spread with 4 of those straight up. They happen to be playing at the same time as the Cowboys who are on the road against a division rival. Giants covered their last game at home and Philly is in the playoffs already but they are lacking momentum going in. Giants are not truly playing spoiler here. Philly has an NFC championship to defend but it all starts with getting the team playing better going into the playoffs. I have Philly ML on a few parlays and I even have Philly -5 in 1 parlay. Philly is due to cover a game.
Dallas is on 4 straight unders and 3 straight losses against the spread and Washington's game last week at home went under. Go opposite. I took the over in the Washington/Dallas game and is in some of my parlays. I am careful about taking Dallas with all of those points. I avoided it. I just have a feeling that Washington keeps it closer than it needs to be this week. They are also seeking same season revenge however talent for Dallas will probably win out here. Staying away from spread but gun to head says Washington +13.5.
0
A little further information that I will add to this thread.
Colts have won 3 games straight up at home including a recent Saturday night game where they dominated Pittsburgh. Here is another Saturday night game in front of their home fans playing against a Texans team seeking same season revenge. Leaning a change in regression here. I have Houston ML on a few other parlays.
Pittsburgh was blown out on a recent Saturday game against the Colts and now they play another Saturday game against Baltimore who has covered 6 games in a row. They are due regression. Hence, I have Pittsburgh ML paired with Houston ML on those same parlays.
Philly has lost 5 straight games against the spread with 4 of those straight up. They happen to be playing at the same time as the Cowboys who are on the road against a division rival. Giants covered their last game at home and Philly is in the playoffs already but they are lacking momentum going in. Giants are not truly playing spoiler here. Philly has an NFC championship to defend but it all starts with getting the team playing better going into the playoffs. I have Philly ML on a few parlays and I even have Philly -5 in 1 parlay. Philly is due to cover a game.
Dallas is on 4 straight unders and 3 straight losses against the spread and Washington's game last week at home went under. Go opposite. I took the over in the Washington/Dallas game and is in some of my parlays. I am careful about taking Dallas with all of those points. I avoided it. I just have a feeling that Washington keeps it closer than it needs to be this week. They are also seeking same season revenge however talent for Dallas will probably win out here. Staying away from spread but gun to head says Washington +13.5.
You seem serious about the amount of thought and time you put in to this. 10 team parlays are lottery tickets for grandmothers who want to pick their teams by using colors or mascots. Why are you wasting your time doing this? Bet them straight. Build a bankroll. Develop a process. Stop betting 10 team parlays.
this is such a bad take. Only people who don’t win parlays say stuff like this.
4
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
You seem serious about the amount of thought and time you put in to this. 10 team parlays are lottery tickets for grandmothers who want to pick their teams by using colors or mascots. Why are you wasting your time doing this? Bet them straight. Build a bankroll. Develop a process. Stop betting 10 team parlays.
this is such a bad take. Only people who don’t win parlays say stuff like this.
Vanzack is right, Play staright games, build a bankroll. If you feel the need to play arlays, play them with House money (your winnings only) Most of the people that come into this forum are just trying to pick more single game winners than losers let only parlays.
Parlays are for suckers, you may hit a few and feel the exhilaration of hitting that Parlay but in the longrun playing parlays will grind you down and you will lose money.
You need to hit 52.4% picking straight play winners to overcome the 10% standard vig in Football. You need to be perfect in your parlay. No disrespect intended, just speaking from 46 years of Sports Gambling experience.
I do hope you hit it today!
3
Vanzack is right, Play staright games, build a bankroll. If you feel the need to play arlays, play them with House money (your winnings only) Most of the people that come into this forum are just trying to pick more single game winners than losers let only parlays.
Parlays are for suckers, you may hit a few and feel the exhilaration of hitting that Parlay but in the longrun playing parlays will grind you down and you will lose money.
You need to hit 52.4% picking straight play winners to overcome the 10% standard vig in Football. You need to be perfect in your parlay. No disrespect intended, just speaking from 46 years of Sports Gambling experience.
A few other games to note and I have in some parlays is the under 37.5 in the Cincy / Cleveland game. Cleveland is on 5 straight road overs. Go opposite and take under. I have on 2 parlays.
Vikings on 3 straight overs. Go opposite Take the under of 46. I have on 2 parlays.
Lions on 3 straight covers ats. Go opposite. Take Vikings +3.5. I got +5.5 earlier in week.
Pats on 4 straight overs. Go opposite.Take under 30.
Sunday 1pm summary:
Vikings ATS and under
Bengals ML and under
Jets ATS and under
Tenn ATS and over
Car/ TB under
No play on ATL/NO game but I lean over
0
A few other games to note and I have in some parlays is the under 37.5 in the Cincy / Cleveland game. Cleveland is on 5 straight road overs. Go opposite and take under. I have on 2 parlays.
Vikings on 3 straight overs. Go opposite Take the under of 46. I have on 2 parlays.
Lions on 3 straight covers ats. Go opposite. Take Vikings +3.5. I got +5.5 earlier in week.
Pats on 4 straight overs. Go opposite.Take under 30.
Vanzack is right, Play staright games, build a bankroll. If you feel the need to play arlays, play them with House money (your winnings only) Most of the people that come into this forum are just trying to pick more single game winners than losers let only parlays. Parlays are for suckers, you may hit a few and feel the exhilaration of hitting that Parlay but in the longrun playing parlays will grind you down and you will lose money. You need to hit 52.4% picking straight play winners to overcome the 10% standard vig in Football. You need to be perfect in your parlay. No disrespect intended, just speaking from 46 years of Sports Gambling experience. I do hope you hit it today!
i agree overall, but the statement “10 team parlays are lottery tickets for grandmothers who want to pick their teams by using colors or mascots” was pretty disrespectful. Parlays are not impossible and I speak from personal experience. Parlays paid off my college tuition and bought me a new car as well as paid for vacations. Straight plays should definitely be the basis, but I wouldn’t downplay parlays like he did.
2
Quote Originally Posted by KeyMaster:
Vanzack is right, Play staright games, build a bankroll. If you feel the need to play arlays, play them with House money (your winnings only) Most of the people that come into this forum are just trying to pick more single game winners than losers let only parlays. Parlays are for suckers, you may hit a few and feel the exhilaration of hitting that Parlay but in the longrun playing parlays will grind you down and you will lose money. You need to hit 52.4% picking straight play winners to overcome the 10% standard vig in Football. You need to be perfect in your parlay. No disrespect intended, just speaking from 46 years of Sports Gambling experience. I do hope you hit it today!
i agree overall, but the statement “10 team parlays are lottery tickets for grandmothers who want to pick their teams by using colors or mascots” was pretty disrespectful. Parlays are not impossible and I speak from personal experience. Parlays paid off my college tuition and bought me a new car as well as paid for vacations. Straight plays should definitely be the basis, but I wouldn’t downplay parlays like he did.
Another thought is you do you and stop whining. If a guy wants to throw down a little parlay on the side who cares. People do play lottery and as we all realize it is a long shot it can be fun to take a stab at a lucky payday. I have a system but I also take a small percentage of my pot to throw a long shot in there. I only hit one this season but it paid for it self. You need to stop with the sounding like a 90 year old grumpy old man.
0
@vanzack
Another thought is you do you and stop whining. If a guy wants to throw down a little parlay on the side who cares. People do play lottery and as we all realize it is a long shot it can be fun to take a stab at a lucky payday. I have a system but I also take a small percentage of my pot to throw a long shot in there. I only hit one this season but it paid for it self. You need to stop with the sounding like a 90 year old grumpy old man.
@vanzack Another thought is you do you and stop whining. If a guy wants to throw down a little parlay on the side who cares. People do play lottery and as we all realize it is a long shot it can be fun to take a stab at a lucky payday. I have a system but I also take a small percentage of my pot to throw a long shot in there. I only hit one this season but it paid for it self. You need to stop with the sounding like a 90 year old grumpy old man.
Congrats on the self own. Loser.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Basquo1993:
@vanzack Another thought is you do you and stop whining. If a guy wants to throw down a little parlay on the side who cares. People do play lottery and as we all realize it is a long shot it can be fun to take a stab at a lucky payday. I have a system but I also take a small percentage of my pot to throw a long shot in there. I only hit one this season but it paid for it self. You need to stop with the sounding like a 90 year old grumpy old man.
Quote Originally Posted by KeyMaster: Vanzack is right, Play staright games, build a bankroll. If you feel the need to play arlays, play them with House money (your winnings only) Most of the people that come into this forum are just trying to pick more single game winners than losers let only parlays. Parlays are for suckers, you may hit a few and feel the exhilaration of hitting that Parlay but in the longrun playing parlays will grind you down and you will lose money. You need to hit 52.4% picking straight play winners to overcome the 10% standard vig in Football. You need to be perfect in your parlay. No disrespect intended, just speaking from 46 years of Sports Gambling experience. I do hope you hit it today!i agree overall, but the statement “10 team parlays are lottery tickets for grandmothers who want to pick their teams by using colors or mascots” was pretty disrespectful. Parlays are not impossible and I speak from personal experience. Parlays paid off my college tuition and bought me a new car as well as paid for vacations. Straight plays should definitely be the basis, but I wouldn’t downplay parlays like he did.
OK, how about this....
10 team parlays are for long term losers who don't understand probability and the difference between one time payouts and long term success.
The OP seemed like a guy who puts time and effort in to this. I was trying to encourage him to not be a loser.
But if you all insist, keep at it.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
2
Quote Originally Posted by Ravensfan2k3:
Quote Originally Posted by KeyMaster: Vanzack is right, Play staright games, build a bankroll. If you feel the need to play arlays, play them with House money (your winnings only) Most of the people that come into this forum are just trying to pick more single game winners than losers let only parlays. Parlays are for suckers, you may hit a few and feel the exhilaration of hitting that Parlay but in the longrun playing parlays will grind you down and you will lose money. You need to hit 52.4% picking straight play winners to overcome the 10% standard vig in Football. You need to be perfect in your parlay. No disrespect intended, just speaking from 46 years of Sports Gambling experience. I do hope you hit it today!i agree overall, but the statement “10 team parlays are lottery tickets for grandmothers who want to pick their teams by using colors or mascots” was pretty disrespectful. Parlays are not impossible and I speak from personal experience. Parlays paid off my college tuition and bought me a new car as well as paid for vacations. Straight plays should definitely be the basis, but I wouldn’t downplay parlays like he did.
OK, how about this....
10 team parlays are for long term losers who don't understand probability and the difference between one time payouts and long term success.
The OP seemed like a guy who puts time and effort in to this. I was trying to encourage him to not be a loser.
I apologize. I meant Under 45. Take the under. By the way if u are railing that parlay, I would leave out Bears +3 and Seattle ML. Those 2 are leans that I put in the steamer. I feel a bit stronger about my 12 steamer belowin the thread that I added this past Friday night
0
@mccofp
I apologize. I meant Under 45. Take the under. By the way if u are railing that parlay, I would leave out Bears +3 and Seattle ML. Those 2 are leans that I put in the steamer. I feel a bit stronger about my 12 steamer belowin the thread that I added this past Friday night
I apologize. I meant Under 45. Take the under. By the way if u are railing that parlay, I would leave out Bears +3 and Seattle ML. Those 2 are leans that I put in the steamer. I feel a bit stronger about my 12 steamer belowin the thread that I added this past Friday night
1
@mccofp
I apologize. I meant Under 45. Take the under. By the way if u are railing that parlay, I would leave out Bears +3 and Seattle ML. Those 2 are leans that I put in the steamer. I feel a bit stronger about my 12 steamer belowin the thread that I added this past Friday night
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.