@vanzack
Jasondemz
@Dental
@Dental
I incorporated the 1pm parlay and the 4pm parlay as er below to win $12500
Bengals ML and under 37
Vikings +3.5 and under 46
Jets +1.5
Tenn/Jax over 41.5
GB/Chicago under 45
Denver+3
KC/LAC under 35.5
Dallas/Wash over 46.5
Philly/NYG over 42
I did not parlay all 1pm recommendations into 1 parlay but my analysis says they are the suggested plays. 4pm as well.
@Dental
@Dental
I incorporated the 1pm parlay and the 4pm parlay as er below to win $12500
Bengals ML and under 37
Vikings +3.5 and under 46
Jets +1.5
Tenn/Jax over 41.5
GB/Chicago under 45
Denver+3
KC/LAC under 35.5
Dallas/Wash over 46.5
Philly/NYG over 42
I did not parlay all 1pm recommendations into 1 parlay but my analysis says they are the suggested plays. 4pm as well.
@TRAIN69
Ever know someone with potential that you encourage to stop doing self destructive behavior?
Thats all I was doing.
Jeesh.
@TRAIN69
Ever know someone with potential that you encourage to stop doing self destructive behavior?
Thats all I was doing.
Jeesh.
Parlay lovers (who I curse every time I go to kiosks at a decent hour) want to portray 10 leg parlays as the same as any other, fine...how many posters here have hit a 10+ leg parlay? I don't even remember ever getting 10 straight bet wins (or losses) in a row.
Nothing unwise about 2 or 3 -110 legs if you're consistentlyish hitting 53+% with many picks, but you'll get raped by variance trying to win 4+ legs even if the legs hit 60%. You'd have to make like 800 4 leg parlays to overcome variance and get the full ~72.7% ROI you deserve by hitting 104 of those, but no one is going to hit on 60% of 3200 picks, are they. Wiser to try to hit the 30-50% ROI from 2-3 leg parlays, you think? If you're really that good and are hitting 60%. Or is increasing your roll by 30-50% every week unacceptable?
Parlay lovers (who I curse every time I go to kiosks at a decent hour) want to portray 10 leg parlays as the same as any other, fine...how many posters here have hit a 10+ leg parlay? I don't even remember ever getting 10 straight bet wins (or losses) in a row.
Nothing unwise about 2 or 3 -110 legs if you're consistentlyish hitting 53+% with many picks, but you'll get raped by variance trying to win 4+ legs even if the legs hit 60%. You'd have to make like 800 4 leg parlays to overcome variance and get the full ~72.7% ROI you deserve by hitting 104 of those, but no one is going to hit on 60% of 3200 picks, are they. Wiser to try to hit the 30-50% ROI from 2-3 leg parlays, you think? If you're really that good and are hitting 60%. Or is increasing your roll by 30-50% every week unacceptable?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.