damn looking bad for green bay but i still like them this weekend... i think both 6 seeds make it this year since it has never happend before
I cant buck these either Pitt or the Bears are winning if not both.It has come up so many times where could have happend where a 1 or 2 seed could have not made it to the superbowl but they won everytime.I should go get the record when it could have happend but the lower seed lost
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2Team_Parlay:
damn looking bad for green bay but i still like them this weekend... i think both 6 seeds make it this year since it has never happend before
I cant buck these either Pitt or the Bears are winning if not both.It has come up so many times where could have happend where a 1 or 2 seed could have not made it to the superbowl but they won everytime.I should go get the record when it could have happend but the lower seed lost
How exactly does that influence the game at hand? That's cool it happened in the past but I wouldn't let that affect who I'm choosing
If there is a solid reason why the trend keeps going in the same direction and canstantly it has merit.I can explain why every trend above is so lopsided.
.For 40 yrs there has been no lower seed than 2 in the superbowl no matter whats anyone thinks the higher seeds are there for a reason and the lower seed is on the road.
For 2 teams to win their gm on the road at the sametime when its 2-10 is tough to do
A team that scores 40 well they have had a great gm and he line will always be higher than it would have if lets say they won 21-17 which = some of why its 2-17 ATS
I have played sports all my life and see why some of these trends are valid
0
Quote Originally Posted by EazyFBaby:
How exactly does that influence the game at hand? That's cool it happened in the past but I wouldn't let that affect who I'm choosing
If there is a solid reason why the trend keeps going in the same direction and canstantly it has merit.I can explain why every trend above is so lopsided.
.For 40 yrs there has been no lower seed than 2 in the superbowl no matter whats anyone thinks the higher seeds are there for a reason and the lower seed is on the road.
For 2 teams to win their gm on the road at the sametime when its 2-10 is tough to do
A team that scores 40 well they have had a great gm and he line will always be higher than it would have if lets say they won 21-17 which = some of why its 2-17 ATS
I have played sports all my life and see why some of these trends are valid
Question is, do both #2 seeds make it in & if not, which one makes it & which one doesnt.
I am going through each yr right now and seeing how many times it could have happend and how many times the situation came up when both could have happend
0
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:
Question is, do both #2 seeds make it in & if not, which one makes it & which one doesnt.
I am going through each yr right now and seeing how many times it could have happend and how many times the situation came up when both could have happend
2009 the franchise of Arizona make it to the SB for it's first time. 2010 the franchise of New Orleans gets to the SB for the first time. Never say never
0
2009 the franchise of Arizona make it to the SB for it's first time. 2010 the franchise of New Orleans gets to the SB for the first time. Never say never
Karma is a Bitc#, just ask Lebron after his tweet. (0-4 since tweet). Favre calls it quits after 20 years and Packers and Jets play in SB. Favre came back for one reason, to get to the big game but instead he got his ass kicked and now he's watching two of his old teams play in the SB.
0
Karma is a Bitc#, just ask Lebron after his tweet. (0-4 since tweet). Favre calls it quits after 20 years and Packers and Jets play in SB. Favre came back for one reason, to get to the big game but instead he got his ass kicked and now he's watching two of his old teams play in the SB.
2009 the franchise of Arizona make it to the SB for it's first time. 2010 the franchise of New Orleans gets to the SB for the first time. Never say never
didnt say never but this is a lil different than a particular team making it to the SB that sucked as a franchise we are talking about 1 and 2 seeds who are very good football teams
0
Quote Originally Posted by IgetMoney101:
2009 the franchise of Arizona make it to the SB for it's first time. 2010 the franchise of New Orleans gets to the SB for the first time. Never say never
didnt say never but this is a lil different than a particular team making it to the SB that sucked as a franchise we are talking about 1 and 2 seeds who are very good football teams
didnt say never but this is a lil different than a particular team making it to the SB that sucked as a franchise we are talking about 1 and 2 seeds who are very good football teams
I don't think the seeds mean anything. How often does the best regular season team win? The team to streak at the end is the one standing last. Chicago will not win on Sunday, I just don't see it happening maybe they cover the 3.5.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MJ2345:
didnt say never but this is a lil different than a particular team making it to the SB that sucked as a franchise we are talking about 1 and 2 seeds who are very good football teams
I don't think the seeds mean anything. How often does the best regular season team win? The team to streak at the end is the one standing last. Chicago will not win on Sunday, I just don't see it happening maybe they cover the 3.5.
I don't think the seeds mean anything. How often does the best regular season team win? The team to streak at the end is the one standing last. Chicago will not win on Sunday, I just don't see it happening maybe they cover the 3.5.
I beg to differ it shows me that the seeding for a 16 gm season for the most part dont lie when you cant get under a #2 seed to the SB in 40 yrs and dude i just give the info do what you want with it
0
Quote Originally Posted by IgetMoney101:
I don't think the seeds mean anything. How often does the best regular season team win? The team to streak at the end is the one standing last. Chicago will not win on Sunday, I just don't see it happening maybe they cover the 3.5.
I beg to differ it shows me that the seeding for a 16 gm season for the most part dont lie when you cant get under a #2 seed to the SB in 40 yrs and dude i just give the info do what you want with it
I beg to differ it shows me that the seeding for a 16 gm season for the most part dont lie when you cant get under a #2 seed to the SB in 40 yrs and dude i just give the info do what you want with it
Well 40 yrs is a long span I'll give you that but how long has it been since the NFL has become a league of "parody". This is a day and age were we dont see the dominance of the 49er's in the 80's or Cowgirls in the early 90's. Those days are dead and so are the prohibited favorites getting to the SB. Of those 40 years you also have to ask yourself "Was a 6 seed ever favored over a 2 seed?" I doubt there was such a case, just sayin.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MJ2345:
I beg to differ it shows me that the seeding for a 16 gm season for the most part dont lie when you cant get under a #2 seed to the SB in 40 yrs and dude i just give the info do what you want with it
Well 40 yrs is a long span I'll give you that but how long has it been since the NFL has become a league of "parody". This is a day and age were we dont see the dominance of the 49er's in the 80's or Cowgirls in the early 90's. Those days are dead and so are the prohibited favorites getting to the SB. Of those 40 years you also have to ask yourself "Was a 6 seed ever favored over a 2 seed?" I doubt there was such a case, just sayin.
Ok just went through them 9 times in the last 40 years where it could have happend where 2 teams lower than the 2 seed could have both won on the road 5 times they went 1-1 and 4 times they went 0-2.Then there was 1 other time one team could have gotten when 2 lower seeds were playing each and they lost.
Igetmoney, Your question regarding parody well the situation has come up 4 times in the last 6 yrs
So 5 times its 1-1 4 times 0-2
0
Ok just went through them 9 times in the last 40 years where it could have happend where 2 teams lower than the 2 seed could have both won on the road 5 times they went 1-1 and 4 times they went 0-2.Then there was 1 other time one team could have gotten when 2 lower seeds were playing each and they lost.
Igetmoney, Your question regarding parody well the situation has come up 4 times in the last 6 yrs
And what does favored have to do with anything NE was favored by 9 last and looked liked the far superior team of course until the game was played.Heard the same Sanchez stuuf as i have heard with Cutler remmeber guys do improve and come up with great gm when you least expect it
0
And what does favored have to do with anything NE was favored by 9 last and looked liked the far superior team of course until the game was played.Heard the same Sanchez stuuf as i have heard with Cutler remmeber guys do improve and come up with great gm when you least expect it
Ok just went through them 9 times in the last 40 years where it could have happend where 2 teams lower than the 2 seed could have both won on the road 5 times they went 1-1 and 4 times they went 0-2.Then there was 1 other time one team could have gotten when 2 lower seeds were playing each and they lost.
Igetmoney, Your question regarding parody well the situation has come up 4 times in the last 6 yrs
So 5 times its 1-1 4 times 0-2
Huh?.........im not understanding. The question I want to know is, has there been 2 teams lower than seed #2 meet up to play each other in the super bowl?
0
Quote Originally Posted by MJ2345:
Ok just went through them 9 times in the last 40 years where it could have happend where 2 teams lower than the 2 seed could have both won on the road 5 times they went 1-1 and 4 times they went 0-2.Then there was 1 other time one team could have gotten when 2 lower seeds were playing each and they lost.
Igetmoney, Your question regarding parody well the situation has come up 4 times in the last 6 yrs
So 5 times its 1-1 4 times 0-2
Huh?.........im not understanding. The question I want to know is, has there been 2 teams lower than seed #2 meet up to play each other in the super bowl?
Huh?.........im not understanding. The question I want to know is, has there been 2 teams lower than seed #2 meet up to play each other in the super bowl?
No there has Never been 2 seeds under #2 in the superbowl but the scenero has come up 9 times just like this year where it could have happend and the lower seeds have went 1-1 5 times and 0-2 5 times
0
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:
Huh?.........im not understanding. The question I want to know is, has there been 2 teams lower than seed #2 meet up to play each other in the super bowl?
No there has Never been 2 seeds under #2 in the superbowl but the scenero has come up 9 times just like this year where it could have happend and the lower seeds have went 1-1 5 times and 0-2 5 times
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
