The total sacks in the game at 5.5 and Bengals FGs O1.5 stick out to me....
I'm not saying anything is incorrect or rigged....just seem "too easy".....
Anybody see anything they think looks odd....way off....crazy high/low....
The total sacks in the game at 5.5 and Bengals FGs O1.5 stick out to me....
I'm not saying anything is incorrect or rigged....just seem "too easy".....
Anybody see anything they think looks odd....way off....crazy high/low....
The total sacks in the game at 5.5 and Bengals FGs O1.5 stick out to me....
I'm not saying anything is incorrect or rigged....just seem "too easy".....
Anybody see anything they think looks odd....way off....crazy high/low....
ive been insta Betting that Bengals FG prop for awhile now ..Was shocked it was 1.5 again despite hitting 9 of the last 10 games and money Mac having 8 field goals in the last 2 games....At least the juice surged this time( at -139 over here ) ...
Not sure if it's the case nationally but the large northeastern local said the 3 most bet on props are Chase Over 79.5 yards, ( he has 83.5 now ) interceptions over 1.5 ( opened at +105 , now-130 ) , and Stafford MVP ...
ive been insta Betting that Bengals FG prop for awhile now ..Was shocked it was 1.5 again despite hitting 9 of the last 10 games and money Mac having 8 field goals in the last 2 games....At least the juice surged this time( at -139 over here ) ...
Not sure if it's the case nationally but the large northeastern local said the 3 most bet on props are Chase Over 79.5 yards, ( he has 83.5 now ) interceptions over 1.5 ( opened at +105 , now-130 ) , and Stafford MVP ...
I anticipate both teams to come out slow not wanting to make mistakes early, its juiced but 2nd half for most points looks decent, or props with no score early in game or timeline seems decent
I anticipate both teams to come out slow not wanting to make mistakes early, its juiced but 2nd half for most points looks decent, or props with no score early in game or timeline seems decent
DUP
DUP
Yes, but this year's singer has a documented history of singing it quick - typically in about 95 seconds.
Yes, but this year's singer has a documented history of singing it quick - typically in about 95 seconds.
Sacks look like a trap. Think Burrow will be getting ball out quick. Maybe 2 or 3 sack for Rams. 1 or 2 for Bengals.
I admit Over 1.5 FG seems easy
Sacks look like a trap. Think Burrow will be getting ball out quick. Maybe 2 or 3 sack for Rams. 1 or 2 for Bengals.
I admit Over 1.5 FG seems easy
Yeah Bengals over FG is my favorite play on the board ..Been insta Betting money Mac for 6 weeks now ...
Yeah Bengals over FG is my favorite play on the board ..Been insta Betting money Mac for 6 weeks now ...
Van Jefferson over 31.5 yards receiving. He seems like a deep threat guy and I think the number seems a bit low. One big catch or a few catches and you figure he gets the over. I actually like this prop.
Van Jefferson over 31.5 yards receiving. He seems like a deep threat guy and I think the number seems a bit low. One big catch or a few catches and you figure he gets the over. I actually like this prop.
Burrow O10.5 yards rushing -120...
Rams pass rush should chase him out at least a couple times to get this. It's the SB, sliding should not be automatic.
Burrow O10.5 yards rushing -120...
Rams pass rush should chase him out at least a couple times to get this. It's the SB, sliding should not be automatic.
This one is easy for me. Cam Akers rushing total 63.5 yards (which is more than Mixon's) His high water mark on his abbreviated season is only 55, and the Rams just added Henderson to the backfield mix along with Michel.
Who in their right mind would play this over?
This one is easy for me. Cam Akers rushing total 63.5 yards (which is more than Mixon's) His high water mark on his abbreviated season is only 55, and the Rams just added Henderson to the backfield mix along with Michel.
Who in their right mind would play this over?
A prop many people think looks off, but is actually a sucker bet, is the 3 consecutive scores by 1 team. It is usually Yes -280 No +240 or so. A lot of people want to take No but Yes is the better bet.
A prop many people think looks off, but is actually a sucker bet, is the 3 consecutive scores by 1 team. It is usually Yes -280 No +240 or so. A lot of people want to take No but Yes is the better bet.
On the Sugarhouse/Rivers betting app for Pennsylvania:
Total players to attempt a pass - including OT
O2.5 (+145)
U2.5 (-182)
The UNDER seems like a slam dunk at a juice of -182? I mean, just the two qb's making passes? BUT what if a qb gets hurt? Starts making bad plays, loses confidence? A qb sits out OR a pass from another player?
Talk me out of the OVER 2.5 @ + 145..
Thanks in advance..
On the Sugarhouse/Rivers betting app for Pennsylvania:
Total players to attempt a pass - including OT
O2.5 (+145)
U2.5 (-182)
The UNDER seems like a slam dunk at a juice of -182? I mean, just the two qb's making passes? BUT what if a qb gets hurt? Starts making bad plays, loses confidence? A qb sits out OR a pass from another player?
Talk me out of the OVER 2.5 @ + 145..
Thanks in advance..
That's my thoughts on the 1.5 FG , it's always there just bc ...
You're idea with Jefferson and Boyd makes sense ....
Sweep your board Fam
That's my thoughts on the 1.5 FG , it's always there just bc ...
You're idea with Jefferson and Boyd makes sense ....
Sweep your board Fam
I'm on that one at +205, it dropped from +215 in 30 minutes after opening...Amazed its down all the way to +145 now ....Still might be a decent bet with 2 young coaches and an extra week to install trick plays...
I'm on that one at +205, it dropped from +215 in 30 minutes after opening...Amazed its down all the way to +145 now ....Still might be a decent bet with 2 young coaches and an extra week to install trick plays...
This one is easy for me. Cam Akers rushing total 63.5 yards (which is more than Mixon's) His high water mark on his abbreviated season is only 55, and the Rams just added Henderson to the backfield mix along with Michel. Who in their right mind would play this over?
Probably one of the only unders I like...Could see Michel and Henderson taking some carries away ...If Akers fumbles again he might as well take his jersey off ..
This one is easy for me. Cam Akers rushing total 63.5 yards (which is more than Mixon's) His high water mark on his abbreviated season is only 55, and the Rams just added Henderson to the backfield mix along with Michel. Who in their right mind would play this over?
Probably one of the only unders I like...Could see Michel and Henderson taking some carries away ...If Akers fumbles again he might as well take his jersey off ..
Agree ....One of my favorite mushes at OTB thinks NO is a lock ...He wouldn't shut up about it while I was trying to put my pick 4 together.
Agree ....One of my favorite mushes at OTB thinks NO is a lock ...He wouldn't shut up about it while I was trying to put my pick 4 together.
Mixon receiving yards, over 26.5, -110. He's gonna catch at least 4 out of the backfield IMO. 3 for 27 vs KC, 6 for 51 vs Tenn. If the Bengals win Joe Mixon will be a big part of it.
Mixon receiving yards, over 26.5, -110. He's gonna catch at least 4 out of the backfield IMO. 3 for 27 vs KC, 6 for 51 vs Tenn. If the Bengals win Joe Mixon will be a big part of it.
That's my 2nd favorite prop ..He's gone over this number 5 games in a row now ... 26 catches for 216 yards in those 5 games .
Could see lots of dump offs so Burrow can avoid the rush....
Very happy to see you on this one...
Best of luck Brother
That's my 2nd favorite prop ..He's gone over this number 5 games in a row now ... 26 catches for 216 yards in those 5 games .
Could see lots of dump offs so Burrow can avoid the rush....
Very happy to see you on this one...
Best of luck Brother
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.