This one should show a nice profit this year.
....season>=2024 and n:day=Thursday and H and p:L and line>-8..............(2-10) ATS and (10-3) OU
This one should show a nice profit this year.
....season>=2024 and n:day=Thursday and H and p:L and line>-8..............(2-10) ATS and (10-3) OU
This one should show a nice profit this year.
....season>=2024 and n:day=Thursday and H and p:L and line>-8..............(2-10) ATS and (10-3) OU
...season>=2024 and n:day=Monday and p:W and line>-9 and total<56.5.............(11-2) ATS
teams off a win heading into a MNF game less than 9 pt favs with a total of less than 56.5.............MONEY!
...season>=2024 and n:day=Monday and p:W and line>-9 and total<56.5.............(11-2) ATS
teams off a win heading into a MNF game less than 9 pt favs with a total of less than 56.5.............MONEY!
...season>=2023 and n:day=Monday and p:W and line>-9 and total<56.5 and H
Going back to 2023 this beauty is (14-2) ATS and (14-5) OU
It will be high on my priority list ;-)
...season>=2023 and n:day=Monday and p:W and line>-9 and total<56.5 and H
Going back to 2023 this beauty is (14-2) ATS and (14-5) OU
It will be high on my priority list ;-)
....season>=2024 and on:day=Monday and op:W and p:L and line<9.....WOW (0-8) losing to the spread by a whopping 9.1 points
Been a good morning scraping this database today!
....season>=2024 and on:day=Monday and op:W and p:L and line<9.....WOW (0-8) losing to the spread by a whopping 9.1 points
Been a good morning scraping this database today!
.....season>=2024 and day=Monday and D and p:W and op:W.....(0-3) ATS and (3-0) OU
I include this one as the OVER covers the line by more than 25 points
.....season>=2024 and day=Monday and D and p:W and op:W.....(0-3) ATS and (3-0) OU
I include this one as the OVER covers the line by more than 25 points
....season>=2024 and n:day=Thursday and D and total>38 and p:L...........adding p:L you get (7-1) Over
this trend covered the total by 11.1 points,very much +EV
....season>=2024 and n:day=Thursday and D and total>38 and p:L...........adding p:L you get (7-1) Over
this trend covered the total by 11.1 points,very much +EV
Some nice one's but most seem to only be good for last the last couple seasons # 210 I went back to 2018 and is 21-9 so i added the following (and A,H and D,F) also depends on what site you look at, nice job buddy, I'm on to the CFL soon.
season>=2018 and p:day=Monday and p:HF and op:W and line<3 and 17>week>2 and A,H and D,F
Some nice one's but most seem to only be good for last the last couple seasons # 210 I went back to 2018 and is 21-9 so i added the following (and A,H and D,F) also depends on what site you look at, nice job buddy, I'm on to the CFL soon.
season>=2018 and p:day=Monday and p:HF and op:W and line<3 and 17>week>2 and A,H and D,F
One extra parameter:
season>=2018 and p:day=Monday and p:HF and op:W and line<3 and 17>week>2 and o:INT < 1.5
ATS: 18-6 (4.2,75.0%)
One extra parameter:
season>=2018 and p:day=Monday and p:HF and op:W and line<3 and 17>week>2 and o:INT < 1.5
ATS: 18-6 (4.2,75.0%)
After I added the INT parameter, I should have rechecked the weeklies before posting. This is an improvement:
season>=2018 and p:day=Monday and p:HF and op:W and line < 2.7 and o:INT < 1.5 and 3.5 < week < 13.5
ATS: 16-3 (5.3,84.2%)
After I added the INT parameter, I should have rechecked the weeklies before posting. This is an improvement:
season>=2018 and p:day=Monday and p:HF and op:W and line < 2.7 and o:INT < 1.5 and 3.5 < week < 13.5
ATS: 16-3 (5.3,84.2%)
More improvements generated a sample size of over 400 games - hooray!
season > 1999 and p:day=Sunday and p:HF and op:W and line < 2.7 and o:INT = 0 and week > 2.5
ATS: 276-158-10 (4.9,63.6%)
Thanks for the inspiration, hoody.
More improvements generated a sample size of over 400 games - hooray!
season > 1999 and p:day=Sunday and p:HF and op:W and line < 2.7 and o:INT = 0 and week > 2.5
ATS: 276-158-10 (4.9,63.6%)
Thanks for the inspiration, hoody.
I screwed up. Reject this BS - o:INT = 0 is a CURRENT parameter. I made a rookie mistake; shame on me.
Reject the query in Post #214 for the same reason.
I screwed up. Reject this BS - o:INT = 0 is a CURRENT parameter. I made a rookie mistake; shame on me.
Reject the query in Post #214 for the same reason.
That's my problem as well,only I make it all the time...lol
On a side note, last year in general was piss poor for the members here. My regression anchor teasers were over the top. I have noticed in review that
last years' outcomes may have been an outlier, in which case my model could regress, however if instead we are into a new emerging trend line then I am in early.
We saw in 2024 that the overs represented 53.5% of the games which drastically changed from the 46.5% average of the previous 4 years.
Imo the AWAY FAVORITE outcome is responsible for the piss poor ROI of the serious cappers here. That represents a 32% increase over the average of the 4
previous seasons..OUCH!!
Again, it will be profitable determining if these are unsustainable outliers or profitable emerging new trends.I prefer to put the most weight on the most recent year
results. I have benefited from avoiding recency bias with respect to teams BUT when it applies to league wide stats then that is different. We shall see!
That's my problem as well,only I make it all the time...lol
On a side note, last year in general was piss poor for the members here. My regression anchor teasers were over the top. I have noticed in review that
last years' outcomes may have been an outlier, in which case my model could regress, however if instead we are into a new emerging trend line then I am in early.
We saw in 2024 that the overs represented 53.5% of the games which drastically changed from the 46.5% average of the previous 4 years.
Imo the AWAY FAVORITE outcome is responsible for the piss poor ROI of the serious cappers here. That represents a 32% increase over the average of the 4
previous seasons..OUCH!!
Again, it will be profitable determining if these are unsustainable outliers or profitable emerging new trends.I prefer to put the most weight on the most recent year
results. I have benefited from avoiding recency bias with respect to teams BUT when it applies to league wide stats then that is different. We shall see!
...season=2024 and op:DIV and op:W and p:L and D and total<49.5 and week<18...........(5-18)ATS
LOVE THIS ONE!!!
Covers the line by -8.6 pts , that is huge and 23 plays last year....yum yum
...season=2024 and op:DIV and op:W and p:L and D and total<49.5 and week<18...........(5-18)ATS
LOVE THIS ONE!!!
Covers the line by -8.6 pts , that is huge and 23 plays last year....yum yum
....season=2024 and op:DIV and op:W and p:L and D and total<49.5 and week<18 and line>1
adding line>1 makes this (4-18) covering the ATS line by -9.2 pts....WOW!!!
....season=2024 and op:DIV and op:W and p:L and D and total<49.5 and week<18 and line>1
adding line>1 makes this (4-18) covering the ATS line by -9.2 pts....WOW!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.