At least look at this
as for the SD/Pit game, I agree with you that there was no need to go through all the hoopla at the end to review the play but I've seen it before where a meaningless play got review by the booth such as a completion of a pass or whether or not a receiver stepped out of bound on a last second meaningless TD. The ref screwed up with the call on the penalty issue but as far as being fixed by the league itself, I don't think so. This is a billion dollars industry where each team is worth well into billion of dollars, I do not think they would risk it. May be individual players or refs but not the league itself.
as for the SD/Pit game, I agree with you that there was no need to go through all the hoopla at the end to review the play but I've seen it before where a meaningless play got review by the booth such as a completion of a pass or whether or not a receiver stepped out of bound on a last second meaningless TD. The ref screwed up with the call on the penalty issue but as far as being fixed by the league itself, I don't think so. This is a billion dollars industry where each team is worth well into billion of dollars, I do not think they would risk it. May be individual players or refs but not the league itself.
that was a long write up there...I can't recall when was the last time there was no xtra point attempt in the NFL, in college, yes, but not in pro. If you have the game where they didn't attempt the extra point, let me know.
USC versus Stanford this last weekend. Had USC -21.5 as the sixth team in a winning six team parlay (I know it was weird I bought points back that far on USC) and only won because Stanford did not kick an extra point on their touchdown with time expired. Thus uSC won by 22 instead of 21. Pretty amazing and still not sure how it was within the rules but I will certainly never forget it. ![]()
that was a long write up there...I can't recall when was the last time there was no xtra point attempt in the NFL, in college, yes, but not in pro. If you have the game where they didn't attempt the extra point, let me know.
USC versus Stanford this last weekend. Had USC -21.5 as the sixth team in a winning six team parlay (I know it was weird I bought points back that far on USC) and only won because Stanford did not kick an extra point on their touchdown with time expired. Thus uSC won by 22 instead of 21. Pretty amazing and still not sure how it was within the rules but I will certainly never forget it. ![]()
Possible conspiracy theory by the referee crew.
Confusion of what lateral, foward lateral, dead ball on 2nd lateral, the whistle was blown on dead ball, and we made a mistake seems very suspicious.
Investigation needs to review the whole game between SD & PIT. Review the film for Penalties that was missed and called for possible Collusion would be a good start.
Possible conspiracy theory by the referee crew.
Confusion of what lateral, foward lateral, dead ball on 2nd lateral, the whistle was blown on dead ball, and we made a mistake seems very suspicious.
Investigation needs to review the whole game between SD & PIT. Review the film for Penalties that was missed and called for possible Collusion would be a good start.
Tell me this than, WHY DID HE TRY TO RUN IT BACK, to cover the spread? No, its to score points in the event of a tie-breaker for the playoffs, nothing more. If it was a fix, S.D. would have won the game outright, not just cover. You think the NFL would go thru all of this to just see S.D. cover, NO FUCKING WAY. If it was some type of fix, S.D. would have won, and somebody would have cashed in on the moneyline. If it was a fix, it would not have been that sloppy. If it was a fix, S.D. WOULD HAVE WON THE FUCKING GAME, PERIOD.
Tell me this than, WHY DID HE TRY TO RUN IT BACK, to cover the spread? No, its to score points in the event of a tie-breaker for the playoffs, nothing more. If it was a fix, S.D. would have won the game outright, not just cover. You think the NFL would go thru all of this to just see S.D. cover, NO FUCKING WAY. If it was some type of fix, S.D. would have won, and somebody would have cashed in on the moneyline. If it was a fix, it would not have been that sloppy. If it was a fix, S.D. WOULD HAVE WON THE FUCKING GAME, PERIOD.
That's not true. Plenty of pro and ex pro athletes bet on sports. No matter how much money someone makes, they will still gamble, sell drugs, get arrested, etc. You give these people too much credit. BTW, an NFL ref only makes between $42,295 and $120,998 per season, that is isn't much at all. Give a guy like Scott Green, say $1 - $5 million on that Pitt game, end of story.
That's not true. Plenty of pro and ex pro athletes bet on sports. No matter how much money someone makes, they will still gamble, sell drugs, get arrested, etc. You give these people too much credit. BTW, an NFL ref only makes between $42,295 and $120,998 per season, that is isn't much at all. Give a guy like Scott Green, say $1 - $5 million on that Pitt game, end of story.
Tell me this than, WHY DID HE TRY TO RUN IT BACK, to cover the spread? No, its to score points in the event of a tie-breaker for the playoffs, nothing more. If it was a fix, S.D. would have won the game outright, not just cover. You think the NFL would go thru all of this to just see S.D. cover, NO FUCKING WAY. If it was some type of fix, S.D. would have won, and somebody would have cashed in on the moneyline. If it was a fix, it would not have been that sloppy. If it was a fix, S.D. WOULD HAVE WON THE FUCKING GAME, PERIOD.
The point here is about a ref not the NFL idiot!
Tell me this than, WHY DID HE TRY TO RUN IT BACK, to cover the spread? No, its to score points in the event of a tie-breaker for the playoffs, nothing more. If it was a fix, S.D. would have won the game outright, not just cover. You think the NFL would go thru all of this to just see S.D. cover, NO FUCKING WAY. If it was some type of fix, S.D. would have won, and somebody would have cashed in on the moneyline. If it was a fix, it would not have been that sloppy. If it was a fix, S.D. WOULD HAVE WON THE FUCKING GAME, PERIOD.
The point here is about a ref not the NFL idiot!
Maybe Palamalou wanted to cover the spread, what is so wrong with that? NFL refs can fix game, just like an NBA ref can. Do you deny that an NBA ref fixed games? If not, then this whole topic isn't worth discussing with you.
Maybe Palamalou wanted to cover the spread, what is so wrong with that? NFL refs can fix game, just like an NBA ref can. Do you deny that an NBA ref fixed games? If not, then this whole topic isn't worth discussing with you.
I never believed in fixes and I don't think the NFL was involved, but something seems fishy here.
I never believed in fixes and I don't think the NFL was involved, but something seems fishy here.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
448,721
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
302,171
-
Thursday 09/17/2026
737
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
257,865
-
Couple Beers
5,086
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
58,316
-
PART DEUX
185
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
97,791
-
DET@BUFF Under 55 Small Write up
3,196
-
Week 3 Money
2,662
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
