USC versus Stanford this last weekend. Had USC -21.5 as the sixth team in a winning six team parlay (I know it was weird I bought points back that far on USC) and only won because Stanford did not kick an extra point on their touchdown with time expired. Thus uSC won by 22 instead of 21. Pretty amazing and still not sure how it was within the rules but I will certainly never forget it.
USC versus Stanford this last weekend. Had USC -21.5 as the sixth team in a winning six team parlay (I know it was weird I bought points back that far on USC) and only won because Stanford did not kick an extra point on their touchdown with time expired. Thus uSC won by 22 instead of 21. Pretty amazing and still not sure how it was within the rules but I will certainly never forget it.
Possible conspiracy theory by the referee crew.
Confusion of what lateral, foward lateral, dead ball on 2nd lateral, the whistle was blown on dead ball, and we made a mistake seems very suspicious.
Investigation needs to review the whole game between SD & PIT. Review the film for Penalties that was missed and called for possible Collusion would be a good start.
Possible conspiracy theory by the referee crew.
Confusion of what lateral, foward lateral, dead ball on 2nd lateral, the whistle was blown on dead ball, and we made a mistake seems very suspicious.
Investigation needs to review the whole game between SD & PIT. Review the film for Penalties that was missed and called for possible Collusion would be a good start.
Tell me this than, WHY DID HE TRY TO RUN IT BACK, to cover the spread? No, its to score points in the event of a tie-breaker for the playoffs, nothing more. If it was a fix, S.D. would have won the game outright, not just cover. You think the NFL would go thru all of this to just see S.D. cover, NO FUCKING WAY. If it was some type of fix, S.D. would have won, and somebody would have cashed in on the moneyline. If it was a fix, it would not have been that sloppy. If it was a fix, S.D. WOULD HAVE WON THE FUCKING GAME, PERIOD.
Tell me this than, WHY DID HE TRY TO RUN IT BACK, to cover the spread? No, its to score points in the event of a tie-breaker for the playoffs, nothing more. If it was a fix, S.D. would have won the game outright, not just cover. You think the NFL would go thru all of this to just see S.D. cover, NO FUCKING WAY. If it was some type of fix, S.D. would have won, and somebody would have cashed in on the moneyline. If it was a fix, it would not have been that sloppy. If it was a fix, S.D. WOULD HAVE WON THE FUCKING GAME, PERIOD.
That's not true. Plenty of pro and ex pro athletes bet on sports. No matter how much money someone makes, they will still gamble, sell drugs, get arrested, etc. You give these people too much credit. BTW, an NFL ref only makes between $42,295 and $120,998 per season, that is isn't much at all. Give a guy like Scott Green, say $1 - $5 million on that Pitt game, end of story.
That's not true. Plenty of pro and ex pro athletes bet on sports. No matter how much money someone makes, they will still gamble, sell drugs, get arrested, etc. You give these people too much credit. BTW, an NFL ref only makes between $42,295 and $120,998 per season, that is isn't much at all. Give a guy like Scott Green, say $1 - $5 million on that Pitt game, end of story.
Tell me this than, WHY DID HE TRY TO RUN IT BACK, to cover the spread? No, its to score points in the event of a tie-breaker for the playoffs, nothing more. If it was a fix, S.D. would have won the game outright, not just cover. You think the NFL would go thru all of this to just see S.D. cover, NO FUCKING WAY. If it was some type of fix, S.D. would have won, and somebody would have cashed in on the moneyline. If it was a fix, it would not have been that sloppy. If it was a fix, S.D. WOULD HAVE WON THE FUCKING GAME, PERIOD.
The point here is about a ref not the NFL idiot!
Tell me this than, WHY DID HE TRY TO RUN IT BACK, to cover the spread? No, its to score points in the event of a tie-breaker for the playoffs, nothing more. If it was a fix, S.D. would have won the game outright, not just cover. You think the NFL would go thru all of this to just see S.D. cover, NO FUCKING WAY. If it was some type of fix, S.D. would have won, and somebody would have cashed in on the moneyline. If it was a fix, it would not have been that sloppy. If it was a fix, S.D. WOULD HAVE WON THE FUCKING GAME, PERIOD.
The point here is about a ref not the NFL idiot!
Maybe Palamalou wanted to cover the spread, what is so wrong with that? NFL refs can fix game, just like an NBA ref can. Do you deny that an NBA ref fixed games? If not, then this whole topic isn't worth discussing with you.
Maybe Palamalou wanted to cover the spread, what is so wrong with that? NFL refs can fix game, just like an NBA ref can. Do you deny that an NBA ref fixed games? If not, then this whole topic isn't worth discussing with you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.