i can see a potential Charger upset but the Under seems a lil sketchy to me ....
what makes you want to take the Under traindogg?
I think 51 is a tough number to reach in the NFL. Sure, Denver has looked solid, but nobody has their number like SD. I think SD keeps it close, and in order for them to do that, this game is gonna have to be played in the mid/low 20s
Just my opinion, Ive been wrong before
0
Quote Originally Posted by thaknuts:
i can see a potential Charger upset but the Under seems a lil sketchy to me ....
what makes you want to take the Under traindogg?
I think 51 is a tough number to reach in the NFL. Sure, Denver has looked solid, but nobody has their number like SD. I think SD keeps it close, and in order for them to do that, this game is gonna have to be played in the mid/low 20s
Train, you still haven't explained how San Diego is gonna block Denver.
He's just taking a shot with a good qb and decent team getting a 6.5-1 payout. I don't really think he needs to break down every single thing on this game, it's a thursday night game. I liked this play better last year , as denver was the banged up team and the payout was better. As did train. But rivers is a competitor and won't just lay down tomorrow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rr207:
Train, you still haven't explained how San Diego is gonna block Denver.
He's just taking a shot with a good qb and decent team getting a 6.5-1 payout. I don't really think he needs to break down every single thing on this game, it's a thursday night game. I liked this play better last year , as denver was the banged up team and the payout was better. As did train. But rivers is a competitor and won't just lay down tomorrow.
My gut tells me that this game is gonna be like last years game 24-17.......and Chargers seem to be a better team this year.....plus the line moving up in Denvers favor makes me like this game even more....JMHO.....
0
My gut tells me that this game is gonna be like last years game 24-17.......and Chargers seem to be a better team this year.....plus the line moving up in Denvers favor makes me like this game even more....JMHO.....
I think 51 is a tough number to reach in the NFL. Sure, Denver has looked solid, but nobody has their number like SD. I think SD keeps it close, and in order for them to do that, this game is gonna have to be played in the mid/low 20s
Just my opinion, Ive been wrong before
I'm looking at the under myself. If Diego can control the clock I believe the under is a shoe in. My concern is if Oliver can't run the ball this game may very easily become a shoot out. But WTF do I know?
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
I think 51 is a tough number to reach in the NFL. Sure, Denver has looked solid, but nobody has their number like SD. I think SD keeps it close, and in order for them to do that, this game is gonna have to be played in the mid/low 20s
Just my opinion, Ive been wrong before
I'm looking at the under myself. If Diego can control the clock I believe the under is a shoe in. My concern is if Oliver can't run the ball this game may very easily become a shoot out. But WTF do I know?
Train, you still haven't explained how San Diego is gonna block Denver.
I hope you realize the Chargers have the 6th best offensive Line and SF had the 26th ranked offensive Line. See people are just un educated amd willing to put money down with out research
0
Quote Originally Posted by rr207:
Train, you still haven't explained how San Diego is gonna block Denver.
I hope you realize the Chargers have the 6th best offensive Line and SF had the 26th ranked offensive Line. See people are just un educated amd willing to put money down with out research
For all you Denver backers pull up the history of games between these two and look at how many times Broncos have won by more than a TD, you might be surprised...
0
Love the play Train
For all you Denver backers pull up the history of games between these two and look at how many times Broncos have won by more than a TD, you might be surprised...
If it goes up anymore I will lay a little more on it....Just submitted a SD +10/U52 parlay.....If I can get +900 with U52.5 or 53 I will pop again.....
0
If it goes up anymore I will lay a little more on it....Just submitted a SD +10/U52 parlay.....If I can get +900 with U52.5 or 53 I will pop again.....
I like it train.... people are so in love with manning they forget this is a divisional rivalry and that sd beat them in denver last year... manning is not unbeatable
Last year, they beat them with Keenan Allen catching passes, Ryan Matthews running the ball hard, Woodhead catching passes out of the backfield and an almost perfect defensive performance. It happened when they were able to spread the ball.
How are all these guys doing lately ?
And btw, Rivers only threw for 166 yards in that game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2Team_Parlay:
I like it train.... people are so in love with manning they forget this is a divisional rivalry and that sd beat them in denver last year... manning is not unbeatable
Last year, they beat them with Keenan Allen catching passes, Ryan Matthews running the ball hard, Woodhead catching passes out of the backfield and an almost perfect defensive performance. It happened when they were able to spread the ball.
How are all these guys doing lately ?
And btw, Rivers only threw for 166 yards in that game.
If it goes up anymore I will lay a little more on it....Just submitted a SD +10/U52 parlay.....If I can get +900 with U52.5 or 53 I will pop again.....
Does it really matter you have a 1% chance of hitting it. besides you are only betting 5$ you work for the book
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
If it goes up anymore I will lay a little more on it....Just submitted a SD +10/U52 parlay.....If I can get +900 with U52.5 or 53 I will pop again.....
Does it really matter you have a 1% chance of hitting it. besides you are only betting 5$ you work for the book
Last year, they beat them with Keenan Allen catching passes, Ryan Matthews running the ball hard, Woodhead catching passes out of the backfield and an almost perfect defensive performance. It happened when they were able to spread the ball.
How are all these guys doing lately ?
And btw, Rivers only threw for 166 yards in that game.
You're right. SD should just forfeit, they have no chance.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheCounselor:
Last year, they beat them with Keenan Allen catching passes, Ryan Matthews running the ball hard, Woodhead catching passes out of the backfield and an almost perfect defensive performance. It happened when they were able to spread the ball.
How are all these guys doing lately ?
And btw, Rivers only threw for 166 yards in that game.
You're right. SD should just forfeit, they have no chance.
ast year the chargers lit up the broncos in the first half at home,
they ended up losing that game in a very large comeback win. They
learned the way to stop the broncos wasn't to necc score a lot of
points.. but to keep mannig off the field. they executed this perfectly
in their next match when they kept them selves to a lot of 3rd and
shorts and therefore had a really high conv rate in that game. it really
was a beauty executed game on both sides on the field(remember den had
some inj probs at the time)
this year the chargers were lethal in
the beg of the season, i was on them from the start...then this thing
called injuries started to happen and eventually no matter how much
depth u have u r forced to play with two rookie cb's against the oakland
raiders due to injuries pre game and in game injuries and you barely
beat the raiders. Flowers being out and verrett being limited at best
will be a very key factor in tonight's game. also how were the chargers
able to chew the clock last year, running the ball with multiple backs
in mile high conditions, whereas this year there backfield is a mess...
again due to injuries.
as for the broncos they have very limited
amount of injuries and are running on all cylinders on offense with
some home cooking for while now. usually this would be a let down spot,
after a prime time win and breaking a very recognized record like that
last week. i think manning is the best manger in the game and will make
sure that doesn't affect this offense here, also his lack of success
against this chargers team could be a contributing factor to him really
creating an effective game plan.
0
ast year the chargers lit up the broncos in the first half at home,
they ended up losing that game in a very large comeback win. They
learned the way to stop the broncos wasn't to necc score a lot of
points.. but to keep mannig off the field. they executed this perfectly
in their next match when they kept them selves to a lot of 3rd and
shorts and therefore had a really high conv rate in that game. it really
was a beauty executed game on both sides on the field(remember den had
some inj probs at the time)
this year the chargers were lethal in
the beg of the season, i was on them from the start...then this thing
called injuries started to happen and eventually no matter how much
depth u have u r forced to play with two rookie cb's against the oakland
raiders due to injuries pre game and in game injuries and you barely
beat the raiders. Flowers being out and verrett being limited at best
will be a very key factor in tonight's game. also how were the chargers
able to chew the clock last year, running the ball with multiple backs
in mile high conditions, whereas this year there backfield is a mess...
again due to injuries.
as for the broncos they have very limited
amount of injuries and are running on all cylinders on offense with
some home cooking for while now. usually this would be a let down spot,
after a prime time win and breaking a very recognized record like that
last week. i think manning is the best manger in the game and will make
sure that doesn't affect this offense here, also his lack of success
against this chargers team could be a contributing factor to him really
creating an effective game plan.
Last year, San Diego dominated at Denver. Last year is last year sure, but I know and have seen San Diego's game plan for Denver before and it is a very good one.
IN fact, San Diego ran the same game plan last year on Monday Night against the Colts, which is to keep the ball out of the hands of the opposing QB's hands. Rivers is a good QB at just moving the chains and keeping the ball moving. Barring a Special teams/defensive TDs, I like the Under as well.
0
Already on the under and San Diego +9.5
Last year, San Diego dominated at Denver. Last year is last year sure, but I know and have seen San Diego's game plan for Denver before and it is a very good one.
IN fact, San Diego ran the same game plan last year on Monday Night against the Colts, which is to keep the ball out of the hands of the opposing QB's hands. Rivers is a good QB at just moving the chains and keeping the ball moving. Barring a Special teams/defensive TDs, I like the Under as well.
Just wonder if you posting your bull****t after the game.
I've been here 12 years. I'll be here after the game to take all the criticism after my 6.5-1 play doesnt hit. Hope you can come back and say "told you so".
Covers needs more guys like you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gusfgz:
Just wonder if you posting your bull****t after the game.
I've been here 12 years. I'll be here after the game to take all the criticism after my 6.5-1 play doesnt hit. Hope you can come back and say "told you so".
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
