Why would anyone listen to someone who is dumb as garbage? If you want your opinions to mean something in this world, you need to makre sure your statements don't embarass yourself. You have proven to be incompetent. Why should anyone listen to you?
Why would anyone listen to someone who is dumb as garbage? If you want your opinions to mean something in this world, you need to makre sure your statements don't embarass yourself. You have proven to be incompetent. Why should anyone listen to you?
Why would anyone listen to someone who is dumb as garbage? If you want your opinions to mean something in this world, you need to makre sure your statements don't embarass yourself. You have proven to be incompetent. Why should anyone listen to you?
He should focus on the players closer to the line of scrimmage because his arm can't get it to the secondary. You blissfully ignored my point about the Chargers containing them and shrugged off the fact that the offense didn't score 35 points against the Ravens last year so I'll take the victory. They largely broke the record because of their strength of schedule, or lack thereof. We will see how they fare next year when they have to play the NFC west and AFC east plus another meeting with Andrew Luck and a matchup with the Bengals defense. There is a reason Peyton didn't want to play for the 49ers even though they were his best bet to waltz right in and win--he didn't want to have to play all of those defenses twice (it probably also had something to do with Jim Harbaugh not wanting to allow Peyton to run a pick-and-roll offense.) I live in Denver and can testify that this whole damn town has been sitting back waiting for the rings to pour in without realizing what they really got--a great QB that is not great in the big games. He never has been going all the way back to the University of Tennessee and the one Super Bowl he did win was against the great Rex Grossman in the rain. As a side note: Manning stole that Super Bowl MVP award from Dominic Rhodes.
He should focus on the players closer to the line of scrimmage because his arm can't get it to the secondary. You blissfully ignored my point about the Chargers containing them and shrugged off the fact that the offense didn't score 35 points against the Ravens last year so I'll take the victory. They largely broke the record because of their strength of schedule, or lack thereof. We will see how they fare next year when they have to play the NFC west and AFC east plus another meeting with Andrew Luck and a matchup with the Bengals defense. There is a reason Peyton didn't want to play for the 49ers even though they were his best bet to waltz right in and win--he didn't want to have to play all of those defenses twice (it probably also had something to do with Jim Harbaugh not wanting to allow Peyton to run a pick-and-roll offense.) I live in Denver and can testify that this whole damn town has been sitting back waiting for the rings to pour in without realizing what they really got--a great QB that is not great in the big games. He never has been going all the way back to the University of Tennessee and the one Super Bowl he did win was against the great Rex Grossman in the rain. As a side note: Manning stole that Super Bowl MVP award from Dominic Rhodes.
I really don't want to embarrass you but you seem to do it pretty good yourself.
Remember the name, " Greatest Show on Turf"? Rams was a offensive juggernaut that year. The Pat's defense held them to 3 points for 3 quarters by forcing 3 TOs. Sure, a team SCORES 17 points should expect to win every game. If the team did win, it's probably because the defense did a good job by holding the other team below that. See, you can't have it BOTH ways. LOL
^^^^^THIS
Plus the Pats scored 7 off that INT return by Ty Law
I really don't want to embarrass you but you seem to do it pretty good yourself.
Remember the name, " Greatest Show on Turf"? Rams was a offensive juggernaut that year. The Pat's defense held them to 3 points for 3 quarters by forcing 3 TOs. Sure, a team SCORES 17 points should expect to win every game. If the team did win, it's probably because the defense did a good job by holding the other team below that. See, you can't have it BOTH ways. LOL
^^^^^THIS
Plus the Pats scored 7 off that INT return by Ty Law
just noticed your a patriots fan, no wonder you are hating on peyton manning, lollll
you are such a hater, hoping the seahawks win just so peyton doesn't because he beat your team
i bet my life if patriots were playing the seahawks you would pick the patriots to win right?
If the patriots were in the Super Bowl, I'd have avoided this forum for 2 weeks & I wouldn't bet on the Super Bowl because I refuse to allow my emotions to get the better of me when it comes to gambling
I'm not like the average numbskull who roots for the team that beat their fave team to lose. I believe that if the team that beat your team in the playoffs ends up winnign the championship then you can say "well at least they lost to the best".
Lastly, at no point have I said that betting Denver was a bad bet. I merely pointed out that you shouldnt take advice from a guy that doesn't know the difference between your & you're or front & from.
just noticed your a patriots fan, no wonder you are hating on peyton manning, lollll
you are such a hater, hoping the seahawks win just so peyton doesn't because he beat your team
i bet my life if patriots were playing the seahawks you would pick the patriots to win right?
If the patriots were in the Super Bowl, I'd have avoided this forum for 2 weeks & I wouldn't bet on the Super Bowl because I refuse to allow my emotions to get the better of me when it comes to gambling
I'm not like the average numbskull who roots for the team that beat their fave team to lose. I believe that if the team that beat your team in the playoffs ends up winnign the championship then you can say "well at least they lost to the best".
Lastly, at no point have I said that betting Denver was a bad bet. I merely pointed out that you shouldnt take advice from a guy that doesn't know the difference between your & you're or front & from.
yeah, who was his opponent? kappernick and the 49ers, lol
yeah, who was his opponent? kappernick and the 49ers, lol
because joe Montana, troy aikman, steve young, brett favre, john Elway, kurt warner, tom brady, ben rothlisburger, eli manning, drew breese and aaron Rodgers were busy winning the rest
joe Montana 4
troy aikman 3
steve young 1
brett favre 1
john Elway 2
kurt warner 1
tom brady 3
big ben 2
eli manning 2
drew breese 1
aaron Rodgers 1
peyton manning 1 and 2nd on the way :)
Here's the problem with these type post.
Those players ONLY BECAME ELITE looking back, NOT FORWARD.
Was K Warner elite BEFORE he won his first SB ?
Was Brady elite before he won his 1st SB ?
Was Eli elite before he won his 1st SB ?
Both Warner and Brady won the SB their very first time their teams made the playoffs, so it would be impossible to call them elite at the time.
Eli was considered a disappointment for the 1st overall player taken in the draft BEFORE he won his 1st SB, how could he have been elite before he won.
Your using the info all wrong, your looking back AFTER they won to call them elite, you can not Bet on those QB's after they won, you would of needed to bet them before they won..................just like you know who..............Wilson.
See , next year you'll call Wilson elite, after he won and after you lost betting against him because you say he was not elite.
Was Rodgers elite before he won ? He play Big Ben who you say is elite so when those 2 QB's played you would of bet the elite QB which was Big Ben not Rodgers at the time.
Your using info that needs to be looked back upon to use, not forward.
Brady is 0-4 ATS in SB's as an elite QB.
And he played 3 QB's in their very first SB.
because joe Montana, troy aikman, steve young, brett favre, john Elway, kurt warner, tom brady, ben rothlisburger, eli manning, drew breese and aaron Rodgers were busy winning the rest
joe Montana 4
troy aikman 3
steve young 1
brett favre 1
john Elway 2
kurt warner 1
tom brady 3
big ben 2
eli manning 2
drew breese 1
aaron Rodgers 1
peyton manning 1 and 2nd on the way :)
Here's the problem with these type post.
Those players ONLY BECAME ELITE looking back, NOT FORWARD.
Was K Warner elite BEFORE he won his first SB ?
Was Brady elite before he won his 1st SB ?
Was Eli elite before he won his 1st SB ?
Both Warner and Brady won the SB their very first time their teams made the playoffs, so it would be impossible to call them elite at the time.
Eli was considered a disappointment for the 1st overall player taken in the draft BEFORE he won his 1st SB, how could he have been elite before he won.
Your using the info all wrong, your looking back AFTER they won to call them elite, you can not Bet on those QB's after they won, you would of needed to bet them before they won..................just like you know who..............Wilson.
See , next year you'll call Wilson elite, after he won and after you lost betting against him because you say he was not elite.
Was Rodgers elite before he won ? He play Big Ben who you say is elite so when those 2 QB's played you would of bet the elite QB which was Big Ben not Rodgers at the time.
Your using info that needs to be looked back upon to use, not forward.
Brady is 0-4 ATS in SB's as an elite QB.
And he played 3 QB's in their very first SB.
add another nickel buddy, you will lose, i guarantee it
I have been right my last 7 super bowl picks
eli manning won his 2nd super bowl in big brothers house
peyton manning will win his 2nd super bowl in little brothers house
don't say i didn't warn you
add another nickel buddy, you will lose, i guarantee it
I have been right my last 7 super bowl picks
eli manning won his 2nd super bowl in big brothers house
peyton manning will win his 2nd super bowl in little brothers house
don't say i didn't warn you
Think about Troy Aikman, in his very first SB , he was 1-1 in playoff games coming into that playoffs.
He played Jim Kelley, who was in his 3rd straight SB, who's more elite ?
When Aikman became elite, in his 3rd SB he play Neil Odonnel while Neil playing IN HIS 1ST SB, it was Neil who covered the spread , the 1st time QB.
Betting on the elite QB is always looking back not forward.
Not the best way to use the info.
Farve won his 1st SB but lost his 2cd and failed to cover as elite.
Warner won his 1st but lost his 2cd and failed to cover as elite.
Brady won his 1st but failed to cover his 2cd as elite.
Big Ben won his 1st but failed to cover his 2cd as elite.
Manning won his 1st SB but lost and failed to cover as elite.
That's 5 QB's since the middle 90's.
Elway won in 98 then repeated and covered in 99 SB,
Eli won his 1st SB and won and covered his 2cd.
That's 2 QB'S.
Where do you see that AFTER WINNING THE SB AND BECOMING ELITE that would create a betting advantage for you ?
Think about Troy Aikman, in his very first SB , he was 1-1 in playoff games coming into that playoffs.
He played Jim Kelley, who was in his 3rd straight SB, who's more elite ?
When Aikman became elite, in his 3rd SB he play Neil Odonnel while Neil playing IN HIS 1ST SB, it was Neil who covered the spread , the 1st time QB.
Betting on the elite QB is always looking back not forward.
Not the best way to use the info.
Farve won his 1st SB but lost his 2cd and failed to cover as elite.
Warner won his 1st but lost his 2cd and failed to cover as elite.
Brady won his 1st but failed to cover his 2cd as elite.
Big Ben won his 1st but failed to cover his 2cd as elite.
Manning won his 1st SB but lost and failed to cover as elite.
That's 5 QB's since the middle 90's.
Elway won in 98 then repeated and covered in 99 SB,
Eli won his 1st SB and won and covered his 2cd.
That's 2 QB'S.
Where do you see that AFTER WINNING THE SB AND BECOMING ELITE that would create a betting advantage for you ?
[NFL Betting] Topic: Conrgrats
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101820199
[NFL Betting] Topic: Conrgrats
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101820199
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.