@garbagetime
You might want to tail I9. He is a much better handicapper than I am.
I usually prefer to make my own plays. I am a recreational player that bets $7 units. I enjoy the handicapping process more than the wagering or watching.
@garbagetime
You might want to tail I9. He is a much better handicapper than I am.
I usually prefer to make my own plays. I am a recreational player that bets $7 units. I enjoy the handicapping process more than the wagering or watching.
@garbagetime
You might want to tail I9. He is a much better handicapper than I am.
I usually prefer to make my own plays. I am a recreational player that bets $7 units. I enjoy the handicapping process more than the wagering or watching.
@DogbiteWilliams
I don't tail at all. I'm really interested in the sorts of queries that both of you make...in some unknown to me database. It hews closely to what I do betting soccer, although there the databases are ones I've created over 15 years or so.
@DogbiteWilliams
I don't tail at all. I'm really interested in the sorts of queries that both of you make...in some unknown to me database. It hews closely to what I do betting soccer, although there the databases are ones I've created over 15 years or so.
@DogbiteWilliams
Good stuff DBW, I am not at all surprised. My gut says dogs dominate this round spread wise this year it will be different. Thinking the 1 bye team per conference will even out the play field which has normally been a favorite's round. Trend of the last 3 playoff seasons seems to be heading that way.
My prediction: 3-1 ats in favor of dogs possibly 4-0 ats. SU I could see 1 or 2 upsets.
@DogbiteWilliams
Good stuff DBW, I am not at all surprised. My gut says dogs dominate this round spread wise this year it will be different. Thinking the 1 bye team per conference will even out the play field which has normally been a favorite's round. Trend of the last 3 playoff seasons seems to be heading that way.
My prediction: 3-1 ats in favor of dogs possibly 4-0 ats. SU I could see 1 or 2 upsets.
@garbagetime
Understandable considering all the pain the NFC West has inflicted on the Pack mostly by Niners lol. Good luck with your team!
@garbagetime
Understandable considering all the pain the NFC West has inflicted on the Pack mostly by Niners lol. Good luck with your team!
It will be interesting if the Packers can win straight up because they would join a pretty good list in teams that won multiple Playoff games as 7+ point underdogs..
1996 Jaguars
2001 Patriots
2007 Giants
2012 Ravens
I think the Niners win straight up though but not sure about the number
It will be interesting if the Packers can win straight up because they would join a pretty good list in teams that won multiple Playoff games as 7+ point underdogs..
1996 Jaguars
2001 Patriots
2007 Giants
2012 Ravens
I think the Niners win straight up though but not sure about the number
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.