Goff 32 TD, 12 INT, 4688 yards, 101.1 rating Brady 29 TD, 11 INT, 4355 yards, 97.7 rating (lowest since 2014) Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd. Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Wow sorry bud but this isn't the place for that kinda crap. Debate this stuff in appropriate areas. You're talking to a Covers legend who is 14-3 in Superbowls and he's sharing his play not looking for arguments.
IDGAF his argument is flawed.
I got this dont worry... GOAT, could you please tell me the rivals that the Rams faced with Talib and the rivals that they faced without Talib? Could you also please let me know how many points did the 49ers score against the Rams without Talib, and how many did they score with Talib? May your Talib argument rest in peace. This ain´t 2015. YOU´RE WELCOME!
The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was playing = 2 games (25%)
The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was NOT playing = 6 games (75%)
w/ Talib
@ CHI 15 | NEP @ CHI 31 -- 16 Point differential
@ DET 16 | NEP @ DET 26 -- 10 Point differential
49ers w/ Talib was week 17
0
Quote Originally Posted by gutinstinctus:
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12:
Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12:
Goff 32 TD, 12 INT, 4688 yards, 101.1 rating Brady 29 TD, 11 INT, 4355 yards, 97.7 rating (lowest since 2014) Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd. Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Wow sorry bud but this isn't the place for that kinda crap. Debate this stuff in appropriate areas. You're talking to a Covers legend who is 14-3 in Superbowls and he's sharing his play not looking for arguments.
IDGAF his argument is flawed.
I got this dont worry... GOAT, could you please tell me the rivals that the Rams faced with Talib and the rivals that they faced without Talib? Could you also please let me know how many points did the 49ers score against the Rams without Talib, and how many did they score with Talib? May your Talib argument rest in peace. This ain´t 2015. YOU´RE WELCOME!
The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was playing = 2 games (25%)
The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was NOT playing = 6 games (75%)
Goff 32 TD, 12 INT, 4688 yards, 101.1 rating Brady 29 TD, 11 INT, 4355 yards, 97.7 rating (lowest since 2014) Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd. Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Wow sorry bud but this isn't the place for that kinda crap. Debate this stuff in appropriate areas. You're talking to a Covers legend who is 14-3 in Superbowls and he's sharing his play not looking for arguments.
IDGAF his argument is flawed.
I got this dont worry... GOAT, could you please tell me the rivals that the Rams faced with Talib and the rivals that they faced without Talib? Could you also please let me know how many points did the 49ers score against the Rams without Talib, and how many did they score with Talib? May your Talib argument rest in peace. This ain´t 2015. YOU´RE WELCOME!
The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was playing = 2 games (25%) The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was NOT playing = 6 games (75%) w/ Talib @ CHI 15 | NEP @ CHI 31 -- 16 Point differential @ DET 16 | NEP @ DET 26 -- 10 Point differential 49ers w/ Talib was week 17
Ok, you skipped a lot of my questions. So I will provide my assistance to enlighten you.
With Talib: They played Oakland (28), Arizona (32), Chargers (6), Detroit (25), Chicago (10), Philadelphia (20), Arizona (32) and San Francisco (22)
Without Talib: Minnesota (18), Seattle (7), Denver (24), San Francisco (22), Green Bay (15), New Orleans (3), Seattle (7), Kansas City (1).
The numbers that you see in parenthesis are how each team ranks in terms of ppg. On average they played the 22nd seed in terms of scoring with Talib, and the 12th seed without Talib.
Don´t jump into conclusions before examining all premises. Clearly, the apparent better opp ppg is not attributable entirely to Talib but mostly (maybe even entirely) to the strength of the schedule.
Week 17 argument... Come on bro. At least I thought you were rational. It was not a Jets vs Bengals game. The Rams were playing for the 1st seed and also could´ve fallen to 3rd seed if they wouldve lost. It was no walk in the park game. Plus... division rivalry.
In the words of Magnus Carlsen: Checkmate madafaka
0
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12:
Quote Originally Posted by gutinstinctus:
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12:
Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12:
Goff 32 TD, 12 INT, 4688 yards, 101.1 rating Brady 29 TD, 11 INT, 4355 yards, 97.7 rating (lowest since 2014) Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd. Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Wow sorry bud but this isn't the place for that kinda crap. Debate this stuff in appropriate areas. You're talking to a Covers legend who is 14-3 in Superbowls and he's sharing his play not looking for arguments.
IDGAF his argument is flawed.
I got this dont worry... GOAT, could you please tell me the rivals that the Rams faced with Talib and the rivals that they faced without Talib? Could you also please let me know how many points did the 49ers score against the Rams without Talib, and how many did they score with Talib? May your Talib argument rest in peace. This ain´t 2015. YOU´RE WELCOME!
The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was playing = 2 games (25%) The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was NOT playing = 6 games (75%) w/ Talib @ CHI 15 | NEP @ CHI 31 -- 16 Point differential @ DET 16 | NEP @ DET 26 -- 10 Point differential 49ers w/ Talib was week 17
Ok, you skipped a lot of my questions. So I will provide my assistance to enlighten you.
With Talib: They played Oakland (28), Arizona (32), Chargers (6), Detroit (25), Chicago (10), Philadelphia (20), Arizona (32) and San Francisco (22)
Without Talib: Minnesota (18), Seattle (7), Denver (24), San Francisco (22), Green Bay (15), New Orleans (3), Seattle (7), Kansas City (1).
The numbers that you see in parenthesis are how each team ranks in terms of ppg. On average they played the 22nd seed in terms of scoring with Talib, and the 12th seed without Talib.
Don´t jump into conclusions before examining all premises. Clearly, the apparent better opp ppg is not attributable entirely to Talib but mostly (maybe even entirely) to the strength of the schedule.
Week 17 argument... Come on bro. At least I thought you were rational. It was not a Jets vs Bengals game. The Rams were playing for the 1st seed and also could´ve fallen to 3rd seed if they wouldve lost. It was no walk in the park game. Plus... division rivalry.
In the words of Magnus Carlsen: Checkmate madafaka
Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd.
Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Since Kupp was lost for the season with the Rams Goffs passing numbers went down .
Brady was far better then Goff in the playoffs..........................
Brady ave QBPR per playoff game................91.8
and Brady did it against better pass defenses then Goff played, Goff's ave playoff opponent was 98 to Brady's ave opp being 90.8.
Brady played better then the other QB's played VS Chargers and Chiefs while Goff played far worse then all other QB's played VS Cowboys and Saints defense.
PERHAPS MAYBE YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO BOTH INJURIES AND STATISTICS
Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd.
Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Since Kupp was lost for the season with the Rams Goffs passing numbers went down .
Brady was far better then Goff in the playoffs..........................
Brady ave QBPR per playoff game................91.8
and Brady did it against better pass defenses then Goff played, Goff's ave playoff opponent was 98 to Brady's ave opp being 90.8.
Brady played better then the other QB's played VS Chargers and Chiefs while Goff played far worse then all other QB's played VS Cowboys and Saints defense.
PERHAPS MAYBE YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO BOTH INJURIES AND STATISTICS
Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd.
Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Since Kupp was lost for the season with the Rams Goffs passing numbers went down .
Brady was far better then Goff in the playoffs..........................
Brady ave QBPR per playoff game................91.8
and Brady did it against better pass defenses then Goff played, Goff's ave playoff opponent was 98 to Brady's ave opp being 90.8.
Brady played better then the other QB's played VS Chargers and Chiefs while Goff played far worse then all other QB's played VS Cowboys and Saints defense.
PERHAPS MAYBE YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO BOTH INJURIES AND STATISTICS
Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd.
Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Since Kupp was lost for the season with the Rams Goffs passing numbers went down .
Brady was far better then Goff in the playoffs..........................
Brady ave QBPR per playoff game................91.8
and Brady did it against better pass defenses then Goff played, Goff's ave playoff opponent was 98 to Brady's ave opp being 90.8.
Brady played better then the other QB's played VS Chargers and Chiefs while Goff played far worse then all other QB's played VS Cowboys and Saints defense.
PERHAPS MAYBE YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO BOTH INJURIES AND STATISTICS
Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd.
Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Since Kupp was lost for the season with the Rams Goffs passing numbers went down .
Brady was far better then Goff in the playoffs..........................
Brady ave QBPR per playoff game................91.8
and Brady did it against better pass defenses then Goff played, Goff's ave playoff opponent was 98 to Brady's ave opp being 90.8.
Brady played better then the other QB's played VS Chargers and Chiefs while Goff played far worse then all other QB's played VS Cowboys and Saints defense.
PERHAPS MAYBE YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO BOTH INJURIES AND STATISTICS
Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd.
Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
Since Kupp was lost for the season with the Rams Goffs passing numbers went down .
Brady was far better then Goff in the playoffs..........................
Brady ave QBPR per playoff game................91.8
and Brady did it against better pass defenses then Goff played, Goff's ave playoff opponent was 98 to Brady's ave opp being 90.8.
Brady played better then the other QB's played VS Chargers and Chiefs while Goff played far worse then all other QB's played VS Cowboys and Saints defense.
PERHAPS MAYBE YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO BOTH INJURIES AND STATISTICS
Goff's 78.7 is very ikerly one of the worst performances of any QB TO TAKE HIS TEAM TO THE SB SINCE 1978 WHEN LEAGUE WENT TO 16 GAME SCHEDULE AND CHANGE THE RULES TO OPEN UP THE PASSING GAME.
GOFF WAS OUT-PLAYED BY BOTH QB'S HE FACED IN PLAYOFFS WITHOUT Kupp
0
Goff's 78.7 is very ikerly one of the worst performances of any QB TO TAKE HIS TEAM TO THE SB SINCE 1978 WHEN LEAGUE WENT TO 16 GAME SCHEDULE AND CHANGE THE RULES TO OPEN UP THE PASSING GAME.
GOFF WAS OUT-PLAYED BY BOTH QB'S HE FACED IN PLAYOFFS WITHOUT Kupp
Goff's 78.7 is very ikerly one of the worst performances of any QB TO TAKE HIS TEAM TO THE SB SINCE 1978 WHEN LEAGUE WENT TO 16 GAME SCHEDULE AND CHANGE THE RULES TO OPEN UP THE PASSING GAME.GOFF WAS OUT-PLAYED BY BOTH QB'S HE FACED IN PLAYOFFS WITHOUT Kupp
Goff finished the season with a higher rating than Brady 101.1 vs. 97.7, last time Brady had a QB Rating that low was 2014, you high?
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Goff's 78.7 is very ikerly one of the worst performances of any QB TO TAKE HIS TEAM TO THE SB SINCE 1978 WHEN LEAGUE WENT TO 16 GAME SCHEDULE AND CHANGE THE RULES TO OPEN UP THE PASSING GAME.GOFF WAS OUT-PLAYED BY BOTH QB'S HE FACED IN PLAYOFFS WITHOUT Kupp
Goff finished the season with a higher rating than Brady 101.1 vs. 97.7, last time Brady had a QB Rating that low was 2014, you high?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
!!
Hot Forum Topics
