All Forums | NFL Betting

Don't overthink this Super Bowl game..........................

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5186
Posts: 100
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #1
Number one Pittsburgh will shut down the run with Starks.  Now the yards and points that Rodgers and the Pack have been getting through the play action against three mediocre teams Eagles, Falcons, and Da Bears will no longer be available and the Steelers will now be blitzing the shit out of Rodgers and he will be on his back more than upright.  This Steeler team is way to tough and agressive for the Pack to survive.  Line is back up to +3 and i just think its real easy money.  If the Pack is lucky enough to win it will not be by any more than a 28-27 or similar score and you still win.  Even if they win (not going to happen) on a late field goal the worst you get is a push.  PITTSBURGH +3 and the steel curtain all day long, 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 57577
Posted: #2
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 20468
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

Number one Pittsburgh will shut down the run with Starks.  Now the yards and points that Rodgers and the Pack have been getting through the play action against three mediocre teams Eagles, Falcons, and Da Bears will no longer be available and the Steelers will now be blitzing the shit out of Rodgers and he will be on his back more than upright.  This Steeler team is way to tough and agressive for the Pack to survive.  Line is back up to +3 and i just think its real easy money.  If the Pack is lucky enough to win it will not be by any more than a 28-27 or similar score and you still win.  Even if they win (not going to happen) on a late field goal the worst you get is a push.  PITTSBURGH +3 and the steel curtain all day long, 




 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #4

Another reason the Steelers win TWO WORDS Dick Lebeau the best damn defensive co-ordinator in the league.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #5

Quote Originally Posted by Jose_Reyes:





Whats your point because its easy its not going to happen.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3600
Posted: #6
NFC was better this year. Did u see the 1H of the pro bowl? Wasn't even close... Packers had much tougher road than Steelers. This year's steelers are a shadow of their previous teams. That secondary is going to get torched. Sanchize picked them apart last game's 2H, watch what Rodgers does. Your right, it is too easy taking the -2.5 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #7

Quote Originally Posted by ZonaCats:

NFC was better this year. Did u see the 1H of the pro bowl? Wasn't even close... Packers had much tougher road than Steelers. This year's steelers are a shadow of their previous teams. That secondary is going to get torched. Sanchize picked them apart last game's 2H, watch what Rodgers does. Your right, it is too easy taking the -2.5 

Sanchizzz pick them apart because the Steelers let off on the gas pedal they won't do that against this mediocre Packer team.  The Pack got beat with three weeks to go vs my Detroit Lions team 7-3 and they knocked Rodgers out with a concussion.  Rodgers may have the same fate waiting for him in Dallas after Harrison smokes him to the ground a couple of times.  Take your -2.5 and waste your money.  I'll take my +3 to the bank Monday morning.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #8

Quote Originally Posted by ZonaCats:

NFC was better this year. Did u see the 1H of the pro bowl? Wasn't even close... Packers had much tougher road than Steelers. This year's steelers are a shadow of their previous teams. That secondary is going to get torched. Sanchize picked them apart last game's 2H, watch what Rodgers does. Your right, it is too easy taking the -2.5 

I forgot you are using the NO HIT pro bowl as a way to measure the two leagues now that is a joke.  News alert they are allowed to hit in the Super Bowl and nobody hits meaner or harder than the Pittsburgh Steelers.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 20468
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

Whats your point because its easy its not going to happen.




If its too good to be true, it probably is....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by Jose_Reyes:




If its too good to be true, it probably is....

I read into games like that all season this isn't one of them.   Good Luck who ever you bet on but the Steelers +3 is good money and i am now taking  the word THINK out of the equasion.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #11

Final bet Pittsburgh +3 and over 43.5 bought a pt on the total.  

$500.00 pays $1092.31.  GLA  PIT 30 GB 17.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 7413
Posted: #12
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 459
Posted: #13

Falcons are a mediocre team???

Did you watch the regular season? Falcons were a great team and favored to be in the Super Bowl until GB blew them out of their dome.

Oh wait, is this game in a dome too? I think Rodgers might like that.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 504
Posted: #14
Rodgers tears apart teams that blitz him with quick slants or slide steps.  His concussion against your lions was caused by a freak hit from behind, not a hit such as the one peppers gave him in da bear game. He slides now in those situations where anyone is even near him. The steelers may win but i dont think its because of your reasoning, and to think this will be easy is laughable.

Also, like that one guy said, the NFC won the Pro Bowl so obviously the NFC is better. It's science.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2993
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by bchadwick:

Falcons are a mediocre team???

Did you watch the regular season? Falcons were a great team and favored to be in the Super Bowl until GB blew them out of their dome.

Oh wait, is this game in a dome too? I think Rodgers might like that.

That same Falcon team that Pitt beat week 1 with their backup QB playing  and its weak secondary on the field.. The secondary that allowed NINE points despite being on the field all day because the offense sucked.. That Falcon team ?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 883
Posted: #16
Why do you think Greenbay is the fav?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 10395
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by bchadwick:

Falcons are a mediocre team???

Did you watch the regular season? Falcons were a great team and favored to be in the Super Bowl until GB blew them out of their dome.

Oh wait, is this game in a dome too? I think Rodgers might like that.

Half their wins came vs. teams with less than .500 records and quite a few were from the NFC west.

I'm with you on Pitt even if every single analyst on ESPN is on Rodger's cock.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 12474
Posted: #18

Quote Originally Posted by ArtSchlichterJr:

That same Falcon team that Pitt beat week 1 with their backup QB playing  and its weak secondary on the field.. The secondary that allowed NINE points despite being on the field all day because the offense sucked.. That Falcon team ?

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 10395
Posted: #19

Quote Originally Posted by robert007:

Why do you think Greenbay is the fav?

Yeah and Vegas is NEVER wrong at predicting which team will win the Super Bowl based off of which team is favored...

Like Indy -5 last year

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 10395
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

Final bet Pittsburgh +3 and over 43.5 bought a pt on the total.  

$500.00 pays $1092.31.  GLA  PIT 30 GB 17.



I agree with the bet but I would just stick with the side in this one!
Pitt +3... NO BRAINER
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 5761
Posted: #21
How about buying half a point to +3.5 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #22

Quote Originally Posted by ozzwald:



I agree with the bet but I would just stick with the side in this one!
Pitt +3... NO BRAINER

Thanks but its to late already placed the bet.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #23

Quote Originally Posted by tjohnsont:

How about buying half a point to +3.5 

That probably would have been not a bad idea but i don't think it is going to be necessary.  Already locked, loaded and the bet has been made.  GL with your bet.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5520
Posted: #24
I have to really laugh at the posters on here comparing the two leagues because the NFC won the NO HIT Pro Bowl.
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 13450
Posted: #25

Quote Originally Posted by ZonaCats:

NFC was better this year. Did u see the 1H of the pro bowl? Wasn't even close... Packers had much tougher road than Steelers. This year's steelers are a shadow of their previous teams. That secondary is going to get torched. Sanchize picked them apart last game's 2H, watch what Rodgers does. Your right, it is too easy taking the -2.5 

Using Pro Bowl to analyze the Super Bowl.  

Sanchize was awesome  

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.