"Fade the Hilton" WEEK 9

5 most selected
@ Texans +2 1/2 [-2 1/2] (347) vs Colts
Saints -6 [-6 1/2] (300) @ Jets
Ravens -2 1/2 [-2] (284) @ Browns
Chiefs -3 [-3 1/2] (284) @ Bills
@ Raiders -2 1/2 [-2] (268) vs Eagles

Packers are #3 "least selected" and that list is 4-1 so far Week 9. I usually only use "least selected" to determine "contras" BUT that list has been decent on it's own this season. they are -10 tonight

5 least selected WEEK 9
Buccaneers +16 [-15 1/2] (59) @ Seahawks cover 24-27
@ Dolphins +2 1/2 (74) vs Bengals *** WIN 22-20
@ Packers -10 1/2 [-10 1/2] (100) vs Bears Monday Night
@ Cowboys -10 [-9 1/2] (139) vs Vikings DNC 27-23
Eagles +2 1/2 [+2] (143) @ Raiders WIN 49-20
@ Browns +2 1/2 [+2] (153) vs Ravens WIN 24-18

the Eagles and Browns were the two "contras" this week

there are 6 teams in this list because of the "Thursday night anomaly" where those teams (indicated by the ***) tend to always be "least selected" because Hilton contestants don't have their picks in yet. most wait to post closer to the Saturday12 noon pacific time cutoff.

Ya would have made the "least selected" list IF Bengals had been a "least selected" because of Thursday night.

the "least selected" has been decent as a "stand alone" tool @ 31-20-1 thru Week 8 BUT not nearly as good as fading the 5 most selected OR the "contra" of a most selected vs a least selected playing straight up  

after making HUGE escape with the Colts Sunday night, I will probably just watch tonight. I get "hookey" laying double figures in the NFL no matter HOW big a mis-match the game is (note Seahawks @ Buccs yesterday)