If you look at where the money is going just for this game, the house is pulling for Tampa and KC. With the public winning 50% of the time that suggests we get GB vs KC or Tampa vs Bills.
If you look at it through the futures market, house is pulling for GB and Buffalo. In that case, if public wins 50% of the time, you’d get either GB vs KC or Tampa vs Bills.
same exact results no matter which money trail you follow.
Tampa vs KC would be good for the books for this weekend, but bad for them in terms of the futures bets. Buffalo GB would be good for the books in terms of futures but bad for this weekend.
If you look at where the money is going just for this game, the house is pulling for Tampa and KC. With the public winning 50% of the time that suggests we get GB vs KC or Tampa vs Bills.
If you look at it through the futures market, house is pulling for GB and Buffalo. In that case, if public wins 50% of the time, you’d get either GB vs KC or Tampa vs Bills.
same exact results no matter which money trail you follow.
Tampa vs KC would be good for the books for this weekend, but bad for them in terms of the futures bets. Buffalo GB would be good for the books in terms of futures but bad for this weekend.
If you look at where the money is going just for this game, the house is pulling for Tampa and KC. With the public winning 50% of the time that suggests we get GB vs KC or Tampa vs Bills. If you look at it through the futures market, house is pulling for GB and Buffalo. In that case, if public wins 50% of the time, you’d get either GB vs KC or Tampa vs Bills. same exact results no matter which money trail you follow. Tampa vs KC would be good for the books for this weekend, but bad for them in terms of the futures bets. Buffalo GB would be good for the books in terms of futures but bad for this weekend.
I guess what I’m saying is, either both dogs win or both dogs lose.
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
If you look at where the money is going just for this game, the house is pulling for Tampa and KC. With the public winning 50% of the time that suggests we get GB vs KC or Tampa vs Bills. If you look at it through the futures market, house is pulling for GB and Buffalo. In that case, if public wins 50% of the time, you’d get either GB vs KC or Tampa vs Bills. same exact results no matter which money trail you follow. Tampa vs KC would be good for the books for this weekend, but bad for them in terms of the futures bets. Buffalo GB would be good for the books in terms of futures but bad for this weekend.
I guess what I’m saying is, either both dogs win or both dogs lose.
But if we are talking strictly football, the old adage is you need a good defense and a solid run game to win on the road in the playoffs. The only team that fits that “bill” is not the Bills, who have no run game and an average defense, but Tampa, with its sold run game and good defense.
But if we are talking strictly football, the old adage is you need a good defense and a solid run game to win on the road in the playoffs. The only team that fits that “bill” is not the Bills, who have no run game and an average defense, but Tampa, with its sold run game and good defense.
But if we are talking strictly football, the old adage is you need a good defense and a solid run game to win on the road in the playoffs. The only team that fits that “bill” is not the Bills, who have no run game and an average defense, but Tampa, with its sold run game and good defense.
Didn't Pack make to SB with no run game , their last time?
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
But if we are talking strictly football, the old adage is you need a good defense and a solid run game to win on the road in the playoffs. The only team that fits that “bill” is not the Bills, who have no run game and an average defense, but Tampa, with its sold run game and good defense.
Didn't Pack make to SB with no run game , their last time?