Remember 2007? We coming for blood next week.
Hey, I made a statement.
Im not the one who throws out insults and big, tough internet words.
People dont have to click my thread.
They choose to read it, they choose to insult.
Not my fault people turn to insults and cheap shots on a sports forum.
Hey, I made a statement.
Im not the one who throws out insults and big, tough internet words.
People dont have to click my thread.
They choose to read it, they choose to insult.
Not my fault people turn to insults and cheap shots on a sports forum.
I was gonna give you a pass initially, but now you really need to shut the fuck up...
You turned this into "look at my record betting GB" immediately, so tell me mr. fucking wizard, how is one not to associate the two...
you are the reason sarbanes-oxley is alive and well in our socialistic country - "FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS"...but as us to prove your record for you, show me what I said...blah, blah, blah...
you also are the idiot that thinks the total would be over 60 if GB plays NO at the storied and scary Lambeau...now that should tell you that you need to learn to seperate from being a fan and being a gambler (along wioth this initial post)....
good luck to your Pack...
So, when you make a comment calling me a square, and saying that I am going to bet the Packers and the big spread, and I make a comment that I just dont bet the Packers to bet the Packers...you then claim I am throwing a record in your face???
I claim that I only bet 50% of their games this year, and that still means im a square.
Got it
So you think after scoring 76 on opening night, that a NFC championship game wouldnt be over 60 with the same two teams and maybe hottest 2 qbs in the league???
Ok, mr Im a great gambler, what would that total be???
I was gonna give you a pass initially, but now you really need to shut the fuck up...
You turned this into "look at my record betting GB" immediately, so tell me mr. fucking wizard, how is one not to associate the two...
you are the reason sarbanes-oxley is alive and well in our socialistic country - "FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS"...but as us to prove your record for you, show me what I said...blah, blah, blah...
you also are the idiot that thinks the total would be over 60 if GB plays NO at the storied and scary Lambeau...now that should tell you that you need to learn to seperate from being a fan and being a gambler (along wioth this initial post)....
good luck to your Pack...
So, when you make a comment calling me a square, and saying that I am going to bet the Packers and the big spread, and I make a comment that I just dont bet the Packers to bet the Packers...you then claim I am throwing a record in your face???
I claim that I only bet 50% of their games this year, and that still means im a square.
Got it
So you think after scoring 76 on opening night, that a NFC championship game wouldnt be over 60 with the same two teams and maybe hottest 2 qbs in the league???
Ok, mr Im a great gambler, what would that total be???
tune in next Sunday and someone will be wrong-have the nads to showup, I will...and please tell all your friends to build the line up to +8 or 9 so I can take my wife out to a nice holiday weekend, watching the Giants-49ers, but oh, you're probably expecting Saints-Pack...
But you are definitely facing a different Giants Defense than you saw 4 weeks ago, and they have won an important playoff game in Lambeau before-you were old enough to see that, right?
tune in next Sunday and someone will be wrong-have the nads to showup, I will...and please tell all your friends to build the line up to +8 or 9 so I can take my wife out to a nice holiday weekend, watching the Giants-49ers, but oh, you're probably expecting Saints-Pack...
But you are definitely facing a different Giants Defense than you saw 4 weeks ago, and they have won an important playoff game in Lambeau before-you were old enough to see that, right?
KC didnt really blitz that much, and blitzed much less than NY will.
No Jennings, No starks makes a big difference as well.
Playing in KC and playing in GB will make a difference.
So, because 1 team had success, it means others will???
Last time I checked, GB scored 38 in NY a few weeks ago
KC didnt really blitz that much, and blitzed much less than NY will.
No Jennings, No starks makes a big difference as well.
Playing in KC and playing in GB will make a difference.
So, because 1 team had success, it means others will???
Last time I checked, GB scored 38 in NY a few weeks ago
but he does not bet.......
but he does not bet.......
Remember 2007? We coming for blood next week.
Remember 2007? We coming for blood next week.
Ha ha!!!!! Wow, you have good math. If thats what you came up with good job buddy. Not exactly sure what threads you were in
Ha ha!!!!! Wow, you have good math. If thats what you came up with good job buddy. Not exactly sure what threads you were in
but he does not bet.......
When did I say I didnt bet???
Im 4-1 in college hoops today.
I said I dont bet EVERY PACKERS GAME.
You made a statement I was saying bet the Packers next week.
I responded that I have only bet ATS on 8 packer games this year.
Unlike most gamblers, I dont need action on every game. I try to pick my spots.
Not sure where I said I dont bet????
Still waiting to see what you think the Saints/GB over would be???
but he does not bet.......
When did I say I didnt bet???
Im 4-1 in college hoops today.
I said I dont bet EVERY PACKERS GAME.
You made a statement I was saying bet the Packers next week.
I responded that I have only bet ATS on 8 packer games this year.
Unlike most gamblers, I dont need action on every game. I try to pick my spots.
Not sure where I said I dont bet????
Still waiting to see what you think the Saints/GB over would be???
When did I say I didnt bet???
Im 4-1 in college hoops today.
I said I dont bet EVERY PACKERS GAME.
You made a statement I was saying bet the Packers next week.
I responded that I have only bet ATS on 8 packer games this year.
Unlike most gamblers, I dont need action on every game. I try to pick my spots.
Not sure where I said I dont bet????
Still waiting to see what you think the Saints/GB over would be???
56 - 57....maybe not above 55.....
When did I say I didnt bet???
Im 4-1 in college hoops today.
I said I dont bet EVERY PACKERS GAME.
You made a statement I was saying bet the Packers next week.
I responded that I have only bet ATS on 8 packer games this year.
Unlike most gamblers, I dont need action on every game. I try to pick my spots.
Not sure where I said I dont bet????
Still waiting to see what you think the Saints/GB over would be???
56 - 57....maybe not above 55.....
56 - 57....maybe not above 55.....
Well, maybe we will find out. I think SF will win next week, but maybe we will be back in this thread a week from now.
I would be shocked if it was under 60.
But, that makes me a bad gambler saying that??
56 - 57....maybe not above 55.....
Well, maybe we will find out. I think SF will win next week, but maybe we will be back in this thread a week from now.
I would be shocked if it was under 60.
But, that makes me a bad gambler saying that??
Yeah, that PICK in OT was just awful.
Field conditions should be great next week, I expect a good game just like their prior meeting.
Yeah, that PICK in OT was just awful.
Field conditions should be great next week, I expect a good game just like their prior meeting.
Yeah, that PICK in OT was just awful.
Field conditions should be great next week, I expect a good game just like their prior meeting.
Yeah, that PICK in OT was just awful.
Field conditions should be great next week, I expect a good game just like their prior meeting.
I dont wish you luck ha, but just because youre rooting against my team
I dont wish you luck ha, but just because youre rooting against my team
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.