THEY WEREN'T IN PREVENT. THEY STARTED OUT IN MAN COVERAGE. . .31-3. WENT INTO ZONE DEFENSE 3RD QUARTER. . .31-31. WENT BACK TO MAN 41-31 FINAL.
NINER D PLAYS BEST AGAINST SPREAD. WHERE THEY HAVE TROUBLE IS AGAINST POUND EM TEAMS. . .SEE RAMS, SEAHAWKS AND VIKINGS GAME. ADD GIANTS AS WELL.
THEY WEREN'T IN PREVENT. THEY STARTED OUT IN MAN COVERAGE. . .31-3. WENT INTO ZONE DEFENSE 3RD QUARTER. . .31-31. WENT BACK TO MAN 41-31 FINAL.
NINER D PLAYS BEST AGAINST SPREAD. WHERE THEY HAVE TROUBLE IS AGAINST POUND EM TEAMS. . .SEE RAMS, SEAHAWKS AND VIKINGS GAME. ADD GIANTS AS WELL.
"Packers have been in playoffs 4 years in a row with 2 of them going one and done, so lets not make it like the pack is some juggernaut.."
Can you name other teams that have been 4 years in a row during this time???
Without looking it up, Im guessing just NE....maybe Atl....its not that easy to do
"Packers have been in playoffs 4 years in a row with 2 of them going one and done, so lets not make it like the pack is some juggernaut.."
Can you name other teams that have been 4 years in a row during this time???
Without looking it up, Im guessing just NE....maybe Atl....its not that easy to do
Well, I think you proved my point.
The guy said lets not make them some sory of juggernaut....
Seeing your post, it seems only 3 other teams have done it during that time...so its obviously not that easy
You posted a WHOOPING 6 teams that have done it in the last 10 years
Man, you sure are a bitter Giants fan
Not my fault that Giants cant even make the playoffs after winning it all
GB won it all, then went 15-1 and a divisional round, followed by another division title and divisional round appearance
Maybe next year GMen
I still love your previous post, crying all I do is make excuses.....which i did for 1 game this year .....yet followed to state the only reason GB won last week, and the only reason they will win this week is because they arent playing the Giants
Your anger has clouded your education
Well, I think you proved my point.
The guy said lets not make them some sory of juggernaut....
Seeing your post, it seems only 3 other teams have done it during that time...so its obviously not that easy
You posted a WHOOPING 6 teams that have done it in the last 10 years
Man, you sure are a bitter Giants fan
Not my fault that Giants cant even make the playoffs after winning it all
GB won it all, then went 15-1 and a divisional round, followed by another division title and divisional round appearance
Maybe next year GMen
I still love your previous post, crying all I do is make excuses.....which i did for 1 game this year .....yet followed to state the only reason GB won last week, and the only reason they will win this week is because they arent playing the Giants
Your anger has clouded your education
Weird, the only game I said they didnt care about this year and had excuses for was the Ny game
But, you can keep saying the same lie in every thread thats ok
I like the Giants chances this week Oh wait They couldnt even get into the playoffs
Such a tough guy with a keyboard you are
Weird, the only game I said they didnt care about this year and had excuses for was the Ny game
But, you can keep saying the same lie in every thread thats ok
I like the Giants chances this week Oh wait They couldnt even get into the playoffs
Such a tough guy with a keyboard you are
Didn't even take the time to read one post in this thread..
All i saw was the Title of the thread and what a ridiculous title..
How can you watch the NFL at all and say that, and mean it.. Fine if you feel SF will win and cover, but it's an idiotic title .. Just sayin.
BOL
Didn't even take the time to read one post in this thread..
All i saw was the Title of the thread and what a ridiculous title..
How can you watch the NFL at all and say that, and mean it.. Fine if you feel SF will win and cover, but it's an idiotic title .. Just sayin.
BOL
You failed to mention SF's protection issues. SF allowed 41 sacks this season and only 8 teams allowed more sacks in 2012.
It's amazing how he exclude certain statistics in order to make a stronger case for backing a particular wager.
You failed to mention SF's protection issues. SF allowed 41 sacks this season and only 8 teams allowed more sacks in 2012.
It's amazing how he exclude certain statistics in order to make a stronger case for backing a particular wager.
* To make my previous post unbiased, I will note that Green Bay allowed 51 sacks this season in which 9 of those sacks were allowed in the first half of the Seattle game.
Green Bay has still been able to manage to score at least 21 points in 15 of 17 games this season and average 4.0 yds/carry with their "protection issues."
* To make my previous post unbiased, I will note that Green Bay allowed 51 sacks this season in which 9 of those sacks were allowed in the first half of the Seattle game.
Green Bay has still been able to manage to score at least 21 points in 15 of 17 games this season and average 4.0 yds/carry with their "protection issues."
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.