You're an idiot and I'm a 49er fan.
NICE JOB ON THE RANKINGS BUT YOU CAN THROW THEM OUT THE WINDOW. GAMES COME DOWN TO MATCHUPS, AND THATS WHY NOBODY GOES 0-16.
THREE OF THE FOUR GAMES THIS WEEKEND ARE BAD MATCHUPS, THIS IS ONE OF THEM FOR THE PACK.
SEATTLE OVER ATL. . .
PATS OVER HOUSTON. IF YOUR NOT BUYING IT, SEE RAMS VS NINERS THIS YEAR IN BOTH GAMES. MINNESOTA AND SEATTLE ARE THE OTHER TWO NINERS ARE HOPING TO AVOID. GREENBAY IS DEADLY AGAINST SLOW TEAMS, THIS ISN'T ONE OF THEM. . .
NICE JOB ON THE RANKINGS BUT YOU CAN THROW THEM OUT THE WINDOW. GAMES COME DOWN TO MATCHUPS, AND THATS WHY NOBODY GOES 0-16.
THREE OF THE FOUR GAMES THIS WEEKEND ARE BAD MATCHUPS, THIS IS ONE OF THEM FOR THE PACK.
SEATTLE OVER ATL. . .
PATS OVER HOUSTON. IF YOUR NOT BUYING IT, SEE RAMS VS NINERS THIS YEAR IN BOTH GAMES. MINNESOTA AND SEATTLE ARE THE OTHER TWO NINERS ARE HOPING TO AVOID. GREENBAY IS DEADLY AGAINST SLOW TEAMS, THIS ISN'T ONE OF THEM. . .
I couldn't resist....one more trivial statistic for all of you enthusiasts....SF is 35.1% on 3rd down conversion. GB is 43% on 3rd down conversions. Since this is the most relevant statistic in football, I thought I'd share.
I couldn't resist....one more trivial statistic for all of you enthusiasts....SF is 35.1% on 3rd down conversion. GB is 43% on 3rd down conversions. Since this is the most relevant statistic in football, I thought I'd share.
I couldn't resist....one more trivial statistic for all of you enthusiasts....SF is 35.1% on 3rd down conversion. GB is 43% on 3rd down conversions. Since this is the most relevant statistic in football, I thought I'd share.
43% AGAINST AVG. DEFENSE WHICH NINERS ARE NOT. MISLEADING DONT YOU THINK.
AND CONSIDERING KAP HASN'T PLAYED HALF THE SEASON, THAT 35% NUMBER IS ALSO MISLEADING NOT TO MENTION THAT GREENBAY IS VERY AVERAGE ON DEFENSE. NICE EFFORT THOUGH
I couldn't resist....one more trivial statistic for all of you enthusiasts....SF is 35.1% on 3rd down conversion. GB is 43% on 3rd down conversions. Since this is the most relevant statistic in football, I thought I'd share.
43% AGAINST AVG. DEFENSE WHICH NINERS ARE NOT. MISLEADING DONT YOU THINK.
AND CONSIDERING KAP HASN'T PLAYED HALF THE SEASON, THAT 35% NUMBER IS ALSO MISLEADING NOT TO MENTION THAT GREENBAY IS VERY AVERAGE ON DEFENSE. NICE EFFORT THOUGH
43% AGAINST AVG. DEFENSE WHICH NINERS ARE NOT. MISLEADING DONT YOU THINK.
AND CONSIDERING KAP HASN'T PLAYED HALF THE SEASON, THAT 35% NUMBER IS ALSO MISLEADING NOT TO MENTION THAT GREENBAY IS VERY AVERAGE ON DEFENSE. NICE EFFORT THOUGH
Take out your Webster's Dictionary and look up the term, trivial.
Ad for your vaunted 49ers defense, they have a putrid 26 takeaways for the 2012 season and 7 out of the 16 weeks consisted of opponents such as the Rams, Cardinals, Bills, Jets and Dolphins. Lovely.
43% AGAINST AVG. DEFENSE WHICH NINERS ARE NOT. MISLEADING DONT YOU THINK.
AND CONSIDERING KAP HASN'T PLAYED HALF THE SEASON, THAT 35% NUMBER IS ALSO MISLEADING NOT TO MENTION THAT GREENBAY IS VERY AVERAGE ON DEFENSE. NICE EFFORT THOUGH
Take out your Webster's Dictionary and look up the term, trivial.
Ad for your vaunted 49ers defense, they have a putrid 26 takeaways for the 2012 season and 7 out of the 16 weeks consisted of opponents such as the Rams, Cardinals, Bills, Jets and Dolphins. Lovely.
simple a.rod or c.kap?
all else is a even sided contest!
lean could go to the turnover margin in a close gm.
gottta go with the big game qb here! gl all!!
simple a.rod or c.kap?
all else is a even sided contest!
lean could go to the turnover margin in a close gm.
gottta go with the big game qb here! gl all!!
I couldn't resist....one more trivial statistic for all of you enthusiasts....SF is 35.1% on 3rd down conversion. GB is 43% on 3rd down conversions. Since this is the most relevant statistic in football, I thought I'd share.
I couldn't resist....one more trivial statistic for all of you enthusiasts....SF is 35.1% on 3rd down conversion. GB is 43% on 3rd down conversions. Since this is the most relevant statistic in football, I thought I'd share.
Take out your Webster's Dictionary and look up the term, trivial.
Ad for your vaunted 49ers defense, they have a putrid 26 takeaways for the 2012 season and 7 out of the 16 weeks consisted of opponents such as the Rams, Cardinals, Bills, Jets and Dolphins. Lovely.
Dont forget to add in the Bears with Campbell....
They played 11 of their 16 games this year against teams in the bottom 50% of the NFL in offense
Take out your Webster's Dictionary and look up the term, trivial.
Ad for your vaunted 49ers defense, they have a putrid 26 takeaways for the 2012 season and 7 out of the 16 weeks consisted of opponents such as the Rams, Cardinals, Bills, Jets and Dolphins. Lovely.
Dont forget to add in the Bears with Campbell....
They played 11 of their 16 games this year against teams in the bottom 50% of the NFL in offense
Enough Stalker....you guys are getting old. Ok, you disagree with everything I say I get it.
That clown comes in all my threads and says I make EXCUSE after EXCUSE for game after game.
They played 17 games this year. I said they took ONE game off.
If saying that for 1 out of 17 games means ALL i do is make excuses than whatever. I didnt realize doing something 6% of the time makes it a true statement
"You make EXCUSES ALL THE TIME FOR EVERY GAME"= 1 out of 17 games....
WOW
Enough Stalker....you guys are getting old. Ok, you disagree with everything I say I get it.
That clown comes in all my threads and says I make EXCUSE after EXCUSE for game after game.
They played 17 games this year. I said they took ONE game off.
If saying that for 1 out of 17 games means ALL i do is make excuses than whatever. I didnt realize doing something 6% of the time makes it a true statement
"You make EXCUSES ALL THE TIME FOR EVERY GAME"= 1 out of 17 games....
WOW
Its going to be a great game.
I dont think any team has a CLEAR advantage.
You can throw whatever stats out you want. It doesnt matter when it comes to the game. People claim GB has a "horrible" defense, but in fact they rank very close to SF in almost every category.
As for offense, GB has the advantage even with the lack of running game. This is the healthiest GB has been since week 3.
SF D played 11 games against AWFUL offenses this year, and has been shredded at the end of the year with similar offenses to GB.
I dont trust 1st start qbs in th playoffs.
I dont trust teams beating the same team twice in the same year.
I dont trust teams with byes. The last few years, I am pretty sure teams with byes have been losing more than winning.
I think SF is a great team, and if they win this game I will back them to win it all.
In my write-up, I said if this game is played 10 time, both teams win 5.
Its going to be a great game.
I dont think any team has a CLEAR advantage.
You can throw whatever stats out you want. It doesnt matter when it comes to the game. People claim GB has a "horrible" defense, but in fact they rank very close to SF in almost every category.
As for offense, GB has the advantage even with the lack of running game. This is the healthiest GB has been since week 3.
SF D played 11 games against AWFUL offenses this year, and has been shredded at the end of the year with similar offenses to GB.
I dont trust 1st start qbs in th playoffs.
I dont trust teams beating the same team twice in the same year.
I dont trust teams with byes. The last few years, I am pretty sure teams with byes have been losing more than winning.
I think SF is a great team, and if they win this game I will back them to win it all.
In my write-up, I said if this game is played 10 time, both teams win 5.
Dont forget to add in the Bears with Campbell....
They played 11 of their 16 games this year against teams in the bottom 50% of the NFL in offense
Oh yeah...I forgot about the al mighty Jason Campbell. However, in fairness, we should mention the top tier teams that SF's defense had to face including New Orleans, Minnesota, New England and Seattle. Oh wait....SF gave up 21, 24, 34 and 42 points, respectively. Nevermind.
Dont forget to add in the Bears with Campbell....
They played 11 of their 16 games this year against teams in the bottom 50% of the NFL in offense
Oh yeah...I forgot about the al mighty Jason Campbell. However, in fairness, we should mention the top tier teams that SF's defense had to face including New Orleans, Minnesota, New England and Seattle. Oh wait....SF gave up 21, 24, 34 and 42 points, respectively. Nevermind.
Oh man, youre in big trouble now
KTRAIN is NEVER WRONG
Now youre going to be attacked by him, Theone1, kaysersoze, porkdinner, riq and all the other Giants/SF fans come attacking and blasting every thread youre in now
Its funny, they are allowed to give their opinions and throw out stats about a game, but once you do it....they claim youre "a homer, dbag, ahole, ruining the site....AND EVEN CLAIM TO HATE YOU"
How sad is your life if someone on covers.com can make you so angry
And, one of the reasons is because I use emoticons
But, to call out the ALL POWRFUL and PERFECT Ktrain
Funny thing is the guys claim im only a homer and know nothing, yet im up 135 units this year in football and 5-1 in packer games
Oh man, youre in big trouble now
KTRAIN is NEVER WRONG
Now youre going to be attacked by him, Theone1, kaysersoze, porkdinner, riq and all the other Giants/SF fans come attacking and blasting every thread youre in now
Its funny, they are allowed to give their opinions and throw out stats about a game, but once you do it....they claim youre "a homer, dbag, ahole, ruining the site....AND EVEN CLAIM TO HATE YOU"
How sad is your life if someone on covers.com can make you so angry
And, one of the reasons is because I use emoticons
But, to call out the ALL POWRFUL and PERFECT Ktrain
Funny thing is the guys claim im only a homer and know nothing, yet im up 135 units this year in football and 5-1 in packer games
Oh yeah...I forgot about the al mighty Jason Campbell. However, in fairness, we should mention the top tier teams that SF's defense had to face including New Orleans, Minnesota, New England and Seattle. Oh wait....SF gave up 21, 24, 34 and 42 points, respectively. Nevermind.
I cant make threads like that...cause im just a homer and get bashed for it...
Glad someone else notices the skewed stats
11 of 16 games against 16th or worse offenses
Oh yeah...I forgot about the al mighty Jason Campbell. However, in fairness, we should mention the top tier teams that SF's defense had to face including New Orleans, Minnesota, New England and Seattle. Oh wait....SF gave up 21, 24, 34 and 42 points, respectively. Nevermind.
I cant make threads like that...cause im just a homer and get bashed for it...
Glad someone else notices the skewed stats
11 of 16 games against 16th or worse offenses
So, GB allowed 24 ppg on the road...
They also scored 25 ppg on the road
So, GB allowed 24 ppg on the road...
They also scored 25 ppg on the road
I would be more worried about this game if Smith was starting
I would be more concerned about this game if GB was the team coming off a bye
I would be more worried about this game if my team was the home team, higher seed, coming off a bye and only giving 3 or 2.5
If GB was at home and laying 3 or 2.5.....i would bet SF to win
I would be more worried about this game if Smith was starting
I would be more concerned about this game if GB was the team coming off a bye
I would be more worried about this game if my team was the home team, higher seed, coming off a bye and only giving 3 or 2.5
If GB was at home and laying 3 or 2.5.....i would bet SF to win
I would be more worried about this game if Smith was starting
I would be more concerned about this game if GB was the team coming off a bye
I would be more worried about this game if my team was the home team, higher seed, coming off a bye and only giving 3 or 2.5
If GB was at home and laying 3 or 2.5.....i would bet SF to win
I would be more worried about this game if Smith was starting
I would be more concerned about this game if GB was the team coming off a bye
I would be more worried about this game if my team was the home team, higher seed, coming off a bye and only giving 3 or 2.5
If GB was at home and laying 3 or 2.5.....i would bet SF to win
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.