All Forums | NFL Betting

Help solve this argument... Who would you rather have as your QB in 2008?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13595
Posts: 357
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11380
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by ltbdubz5:

Another fan that sees the big picture. 
 
thanks Allaboutme.

You notice the avatar? He's an Eagles fan.........

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #27
Look @ your avatar Einstein.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #28
BTW---
 
Romo 4                    McNabb 3
 
 
 
Not the slamdunk you thought.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 283
Posted: #29
Both have shown similar productivity with Owens at WR (trying to find something common for a comparison) so I'd focus on age/contract/proness to injury when QB's are fairly similar.
 
I'd take Romo.
 
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #30
When McNabb had the weapons Romo had, he was fantastic.  All other things considered, I'd lean McNabb's way for 2008.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #31
5-4   Romo
 
 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2005
Posts: 2510
Posted: #32
romo
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 535
Posted: #33
McNabb...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 1264
Posted: #34
If a gun was pointed at my head(I would probably just take the bullet), I would take Romo.. McNabb is injury prone right now & has proven he's a puss in a big game with his throwing up incident in the SB against the Pats.. Is that even true? My vote is for Romo, but they can both walk in front of oncoming traffic
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 7018
Posted: #35
ROMO
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 7139
Posted: #36
4 letters
R
O
M
O

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11380
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by ltbdubz5:

5-4   Romo
 
 
 

I'll run the count here itbdubz......chill out with the posts.

 

UPDATE:

ROMO 9

McNABB 5

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 283
Posted: #38
I think we should include Bledsoe's choice.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 38266
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by L8kersFan74:

You notice the avatar? He's an Eagles fan.........

 

You are correct 100% Eagles fan. However I am not a McNabb fan whats so ever. That is the honest truth.

 

Going off of Romo vs McNabb. If both are healthy this year then I take McNabb.

However the intangable is what has Romo showed you when healthy vs what has Mcnabb shows you when he is healthy.

Thats the bottom line will both be healhy if so who is the better qb.

 

PS I would take Favre/Manning/Brady/Big Ben over Mcnabb because they all proved way more then Romo and Mcnabb.

 

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #40
laker---------you chill.
 
You're the one that threw in the variable last night reminding people to consider injury history, etc.
 
Worried I'm trying to sway it?
 
Get over it kitten.
 
 
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11380
Posted: #41
The point is this...
 
With everything considered; overall health, proneness to injury, toll the body has taken, speed, agility, etc.....as a GM, coach, or owner...who would you want as your QB for 2008?
 
That's what this is about itbdubz.....chill out mah man! I've already told you, we're not talking about the past, we're talking about the present WITH all the variables that should be considered.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 4189
Posted: #42

McNabb.  Been battle tested, stronger arm, and does the job with not a lot of weapons at his disposal.

Romo can't hold for Folk... Come on.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11380
Posted: #43
See now we're just getting haters who aren't objective at all.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 283
Posted: #44
I respect MDAAKD's opinion. His first line is stating he will assume health and go with the stronger arm which McNabb has is valid.
 
People will knock McNabb for chucking and Romo for not being able to pin a ball for a kicker. It's all relative.
 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #45
Laker----buddy you've been doing some hating on #5.
 
It's all good though.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11380
Posted: #46
I don't hate #5, I've already told you that in the other thread. I've enjoyed watching him play throughout his career......his good years have come and gone, it happens to the best.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11380
Posted: #47

UPDATE:

ROMO 9

McNABB 6

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 343
Posted: #48
Romo and its not even close.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 343
Posted: #49
McNabb in 8 seasons has had a QB rating over 95 only twice. Romo in 1.5 years has had a QB rating over 95 both times.
 
i'll take the more consistent QB with more upside since Romo WILL get better since he has only made 26 starts in the NFL
 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 707
Posted: #50
I'll take Tony Romo over Donovan McBlack.
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.