Good run D - less than average secondary - even Ponder who hasn't completed a pass for more than 20 yds in weeks has 2 for more than 20 against them so far
0
Good run D - less than average secondary - even Ponder who hasn't completed a pass for more than 20 yds in weeks has 2 for more than 20 against them so far
They are frauds...and are really no better than the vikings considering they both have had soft schedules....They are gone in the 1st round...no doubt about it
0
They are frauds...and are really no better than the vikings considering they both have had soft schedules....They are gone in the 1st round...no doubt about it
They are frauds...and are really no better than the vikings considering they both have had soft schedules....They are gone in the 1st round...no doubt about it
Dude STFU when you do not know what you are talking about. The Vikings had a very difficult schedule:
Green Bay 2x (playoff bound and might have 1st round bye)
Chicago 2x (good chance at wildcard)
San Francisco (playoff bound and might have 1st round bye)
Seattle (playoff bound)
Washington (likely playoff bound)
Indianapolis (likely playoff bound)
Houston (playoff bound and 1st round bye
Not to mention St. Louis and Detriot 2x who both just got eliminated recently from playoff contention.
By my calculations that is 9 out of 16 games against playoff teams. If that is a soft schedule I would love to know what you think is a tough schedule.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Money756:
They are frauds...and are really no better than the vikings considering they both have had soft schedules....They are gone in the 1st round...no doubt about it
Dude STFU when you do not know what you are talking about. The Vikings had a very difficult schedule:
Green Bay 2x (playoff bound and might have 1st round bye)
Chicago 2x (good chance at wildcard)
San Francisco (playoff bound and might have 1st round bye)
Seattle (playoff bound)
Washington (likely playoff bound)
Indianapolis (likely playoff bound)
Houston (playoff bound and 1st round bye
Not to mention St. Louis and Detriot 2x who both just got eliminated recently from playoff contention.
By my calculations that is 9 out of 16 games against playoff teams. If that is a soft schedule I would love to know what you think is a tough schedule.
Ok...let me be bluntly honest....Chicago has got nothing.
I hope you are right as I hate the Bears almost as much as I hate the Packers. Nothing would make me happier than to see both of those teams out of the playoffs (or never in it) the quicker the better.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vic-Vega:
"Chicago 2x (good chance at wildcard)"
Ok...let me be bluntly honest....Chicago has got nothing.
I hope you are right as I hate the Bears almost as much as I hate the Packers. Nothing would make me happier than to see both of those teams out of the playoffs (or never in it) the quicker the better.
I hope you are right as I hate the Bears almost as much as I hate the Packers. Nothing would make me happier than to see both of those teams out of the playoffs (or never in it) the quicker the better.
If the Bears and Packers merged they would not beat San Francisco in the NFC Championship game
0
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:
I hope you are right as I hate the Bears almost as much as I hate the Packers. Nothing would make me happier than to see both of those teams out of the playoffs (or never in it) the quicker the better.
If the Bears and Packers merged they would not beat San Francisco in the NFC Championship game
Yeah, it is really tough watching the Texans play. Imagine if they had Michael Vick as QB to scramble around and create plays..... Schaub is too too conservative in my opinion. Hell, I'd think even Alex Smith would shine as a Texan.
0
Yeah, it is really tough watching the Texans play. Imagine if they had Michael Vick as QB to scramble around and create plays..... Schaub is too too conservative in my opinion. Hell, I'd think even Alex Smith would shine as a Texan.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.