Texans will NOT win this game. Schaub is simply atrocious.
They will be embarrassed by losing to Ponder at home.
schaub is good if he has all day to throw to andre j but other than that he is really bad. can't move at all, gets happy feet at first sign of pressure.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LawsonJames:
Texans will NOT win this game. Schaub is simply atrocious.
They will be embarrassed by losing to Ponder at home.
schaub is good if he has all day to throw to andre j but other than that he is really bad. can't move at all, gets happy feet at first sign of pressure.
Dude STFU when you do not know what you are talking about. The Vikings had a very difficult schedule:
Green Bay 2x (playoff bound and might have 1st round bye)
Chicago 2x (good chance at wildcard)
San Francisco (playoff bound and might have 1st round bye)
Seattle (playoff bound)
Washington (likely playoff bound)
Indianapolis (likely playoff bound)
Houston (playoff bound and 1st round bye
Not to mention St. Louis and Detriot 2x who both just got eliminated recently from playoff contention.
By my calculations that is 9 out of 16 games against playoff teams. If that is a soft schedule I would love to know what you think is a tough schedule.
First of all watch your tone...second of all......Scratch the Skins, Colts and Bears off that list...because those teams have been or will be exposed shortly....That leave u with the packers whom they both lost to....Texans are no better than the Vikings...and should have never been discussed in the same breath...frisco and the pats has had a tough go than either one of them....so the hell with your argument....they are a joke and next year should be written off as a contender....
0
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:
Dude STFU when you do not know what you are talking about. The Vikings had a very difficult schedule:
Green Bay 2x (playoff bound and might have 1st round bye)
Chicago 2x (good chance at wildcard)
San Francisco (playoff bound and might have 1st round bye)
Seattle (playoff bound)
Washington (likely playoff bound)
Indianapolis (likely playoff bound)
Houston (playoff bound and 1st round bye
Not to mention St. Louis and Detriot 2x who both just got eliminated recently from playoff contention.
By my calculations that is 9 out of 16 games against playoff teams. If that is a soft schedule I would love to know what you think is a tough schedule.
First of all watch your tone...second of all......Scratch the Skins, Colts and Bears off that list...because those teams have been or will be exposed shortly....That leave u with the packers whom they both lost to....Texans are no better than the Vikings...and should have never been discussed in the same breath...frisco and the pats has had a tough go than either one of them....so the hell with your argument....they are a joke and next year should be written off as a contender....
First of all watch your tone...second of all......Scratch the Skins, Colts and Bears off that list...because those teams have been or will be exposed shortly....That leave u with the packers whom they both lost to....Texans are no better than the Vikings...and should have never been discussed in the same breath...frisco and the pats has had a tough go than either one of them....so the hell with your argument....they are a joke and next year should be written off as a contender....
When you are spewing misinformation I do not have to watch a thing! Based on both posts you either do not know what you are talking about or losing your bet so you just want to talk $hit. Lets discuss your above post. You cannot just scratch playoff teams off the list because you feel like it or you do not think they are good enough in your opinion. You still have not answered my question of teams that have far harder schedules. 9/16 is pretty tough that of course you have not dealt with. Second, Minnesota plays Green Bay next week at home so NO they have not lost that game. Third, lets look at NE: SF, HOU, INDY, SEA, DEN and BAL. That is 6/15 games so far. How about SF: SEA 2x, CHI, MIN, GB, NYG and NE. That makes it 7/15. Anything else tough guy?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Money756:
First of all watch your tone...second of all......Scratch the Skins, Colts and Bears off that list...because those teams have been or will be exposed shortly....That leave u with the packers whom they both lost to....Texans are no better than the Vikings...and should have never been discussed in the same breath...frisco and the pats has had a tough go than either one of them....so the hell with your argument....they are a joke and next year should be written off as a contender....
When you are spewing misinformation I do not have to watch a thing! Based on both posts you either do not know what you are talking about or losing your bet so you just want to talk $hit. Lets discuss your above post. You cannot just scratch playoff teams off the list because you feel like it or you do not think they are good enough in your opinion. You still have not answered my question of teams that have far harder schedules. 9/16 is pretty tough that of course you have not dealt with. Second, Minnesota plays Green Bay next week at home so NO they have not lost that game. Third, lets look at NE: SF, HOU, INDY, SEA, DEN and BAL. That is 6/15 games so far. How about SF: SEA 2x, CHI, MIN, GB, NYG and NE. That makes it 7/15. Anything else tough guy?
Also, one series a quarter Kubiac typically gives the series to Tate to keep Foster fresh. It is actually planned into the quarter no matter where they are on the field it is Tate's series. Not sure if that is the case here but that would be my guess.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:
why they did not give the ball to foster once
Also, one series a quarter Kubiac typically gives the series to Tate to keep Foster fresh. It is actually planned into the quarter no matter where they are on the field it is Tate's series. Not sure if that is the case here but that would be my guess.
There is a break for HOU there in what should have been a helmet to helmet but then there was a break for MIN in that Ponder is show how much of an idiot he is with that throw that should have been intercepted.
0
There is a break for HOU there in what should have been a helmet to helmet but then there was a break for MIN in that Ponder is show how much of an idiot he is with that throw that should have been intercepted.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
