So your system would say pick the Browns +3 Indy +2.5 Because 65 percent of the public go with the fav or put another way kc and jets have a 65 percent chance of winning those game. ???
PLEASE read this thread before you ask these questions.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ham_choi:
So your system would say pick the Browns +3 Indy +2.5 Because 65 percent of the public go with the fav or put another way kc and jets have a 65 percent chance of winning those game. ???
PLEASE read this thread before you ask these questions.
So your system would say pick the Browns +3 Indy +2.5 Because 65 percent of the public go with the fav or put another way kc and jets have a 65 percent chance of winning those game. ???
PLEASE read this thread before you ask these questions.
My ???? Was how can he differentiate between picking gb and not Cleveland or Indy. There are so many games with spread that falls into those categories. I like his pick on gb. But if you following his bet, he shouldn't be blind eye.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Debo71:
Quote Originally Posted by ham_choi:
So your system would say pick the Browns +3 Indy +2.5 Because 65 percent of the public go with the fav or put another way kc and jets have a 65 percent chance of winning those game. ???
PLEASE read this thread before you ask these questions.
My ???? Was how can he differentiate between picking gb and not Cleveland or Indy. There are so many games with spread that falls into those categories. I like his pick on gb. But if you following his bet, he shouldn't be blind eye.
PLEASE read this thread before you ask these questions. My ???? Was how can he differentiate between picking gb and not Cleveland or Indy. There are so many games with spread that falls into those categories. I like his pick on gb. But if you following his bet, he shouldn't be blind eye.
The information is in the first post on page 1.
"...Now how do you select those key games throughout the 17 week season? The games that the program I use that selects a team to win by 65% and only by 65% no other number. If a team is selected to win by exactly 65% you wager on the opposite team..."
I underlined the important part. You wouldn't know that there are many games that fall into this category because you do not have access to his program!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by ham_choi:
PLEASE read this thread before you ask these questions. My ???? Was how can he differentiate between picking gb and not Cleveland or Indy. There are so many games with spread that falls into those categories. I like his pick on gb. But if you following his bet, he shouldn't be blind eye.
The information is in the first post on page 1.
"...Now how do you select those key games throughout the 17 week season? The games that the program I use that selects a team to win by 65% and only by 65% no other number. If a team is selected to win by exactly 65% you wager on the opposite team..."
I underlined the important part. You wouldn't know that there are many games that fall into this category because you do not have access to his program!!!
65% trend plays still profit halfway into the season. Gotta love how 8k was moosed with the colts who could not stop that fluke 14 pts under 3 minutes against the Texans . The cardinals game by far the worse moose ever since watching the NFL.
Obviously program percentage plays have been a push. I guess I can admit it's my degenerate in me that wants to play these games. It actually keeps me busy which at this point -250 I can live with the hit to the bankroll...
Packers @ Falcons (Falcons 65% to win)
A buddy of mine asked wtf is up with the packers? Told him just wait till they are dogs this season Made a play on the Falcons against the panthers even took the moneyline a few weeks ago....same situation here but I'm gonna pass on the ML plays and just double up on the spread because at this rate anything and I mean ANYTHING can happen in the NFL
Pick Packers $4300 to win $4000 ( waited on the public to push it to +3)
NFL 2016
8-4-2 (65% trend plays)
Bankroll Total = $10,350
Falcons @ Bucs (Falcons 65% chance to win)
Took Falcons against panthers and won....faded the Falcons last week and won....now Falcons are road chalk for a position to increase the bankroll....waited on public to push it to +4
Pick Bucs +4 $4450 to win $4000
Bills @ Seahawks (Seahawks 65% chance to win)
Percy Harvin coming out of retirement is all I have to say....
65% trend plays still profit halfway into the season. Gotta love how 8k was moosed with the colts who could not stop that fluke 14 pts under 3 minutes against the Texans . The cardinals game by far the worse moose ever since watching the NFL.
Obviously program percentage plays have been a push. I guess I can admit it's my degenerate in me that wants to play these games. It actually keeps me busy which at this point -250 I can live with the hit to the bankroll...
Packers @ Falcons (Falcons 65% to win)
A buddy of mine asked wtf is up with the packers? Told him just wait till they are dogs this season Made a play on the Falcons against the panthers even took the moneyline a few weeks ago....same situation here but I'm gonna pass on the ML plays and just double up on the spread because at this rate anything and I mean ANYTHING can happen in the NFL
Pick Packers $4300 to win $4000 ( waited on the public to push it to +3)
NFL 2016
8-4-2 (65% trend plays)
Bankroll Total = $10,350
Falcons @ Bucs (Falcons 65% chance to win)
Took Falcons against panthers and won....faded the Falcons last week and won....now Falcons are road chalk for a position to increase the bankroll....waited on public to push it to +4
Pick Bucs +4 $4450 to win $4000
Bills @ Seahawks (Seahawks 65% chance to win)
Percy Harvin coming out of retirement is all I have to say....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.