I think Jimmy Johnson was a much better coach.And even he didn't do to well once he went to Miami minus the ton of star players like he had in Dallas,even though Miami had some star players of their own.I don't think and never said BB was some POS coach.I actually think drafting wise he found some really solid players in the later rounds.What I did say was that "he didn't accomplish much when Brady wasn't his QB".I think players determine who wins SB,especially star players and QB's,not coaches.
I think Jimmy Johnson was a much better coach.And even he didn't do to well once he went to Miami minus the ton of star players like he had in Dallas,even though Miami had some star players of their own.I don't think and never said BB was some POS coach.I actually think drafting wise he found some really solid players in the later rounds.What I did say was that "he didn't accomplish much when Brady wasn't his QB".I think players determine who wins SB,especially star players and QB's,not coaches.
Can't say I disagree with you completely. Not a big Dak fan. As for BB, I know what you're saying and the record is what it is. Not that I like coming to Belichick's defense but you have to consider the Patriots from 2001 - 2020 were fundamentally sound, disciplined and opportunistic; things that result from good coaching, and Belichick's in-game coaching was the best I've seen, I do think Ernie Adams, who sat up in the booth had a lot to do with that part too. My point is that coaching was a big factor in the team's success.
That said it looks like Jerry Jones agrees with you about BB - not about Dak...
Can't say I disagree with you completely. Not a big Dak fan. As for BB, I know what you're saying and the record is what it is. Not that I like coming to Belichick's defense but you have to consider the Patriots from 2001 - 2020 were fundamentally sound, disciplined and opportunistic; things that result from good coaching, and Belichick's in-game coaching was the best I've seen, I do think Ernie Adams, who sat up in the booth had a lot to do with that part too. My point is that coaching was a big factor in the team's success.
That said it looks like Jerry Jones agrees with you about BB - not about Dak...
I also agree with some of what you guys are saying.Until Brady left I was on the fence as far as who was the real reason for all the Patriots success and SuperBowls through the years.But after seeing Brady win another SB,this time without BB as the coach.I don't think someone can put up a real good argument that BB was the more important key to all their success.I agree that coaching was a big factor in the teams success for all those years,just not that it was the most important factor,in my eyes that was Brady.I never even knew BB had a losing record without Brady till I looked it up a couple days ago and was kinda shocked how bad his record was without Brady as his QB.I remember when he was in Cleveland and I remember when he had Bledsoe (a former #1 pick in the draft,so he was no inept QB) as his QB,and in either instance his teams were in no way dominate teams in the league.I wasn't saying BB was some scrub coach or a bum,I said he didn't really accomplish much when Brady wasn't his QB.And I think his record proves that to be true.As Stu mentioned,and I agree with.He was a very good defensive coach,but I wouldn't agree that he was "one of the greatest football minds in NFL history",I think that's pushing it a little (but that's his opinion).
I like Dak,I think he's a respectable QB.I think he just has some problems performing and handling pressure in big time games.And unless he changes that somehow,I really can't see any team (with any coach),winning any SB's with him as the QB.
I also agree with some of what you guys are saying.Until Brady left I was on the fence as far as who was the real reason for all the Patriots success and SuperBowls through the years.But after seeing Brady win another SB,this time without BB as the coach.I don't think someone can put up a real good argument that BB was the more important key to all their success.I agree that coaching was a big factor in the teams success for all those years,just not that it was the most important factor,in my eyes that was Brady.I never even knew BB had a losing record without Brady till I looked it up a couple days ago and was kinda shocked how bad his record was without Brady as his QB.I remember when he was in Cleveland and I remember when he had Bledsoe (a former #1 pick in the draft,so he was no inept QB) as his QB,and in either instance his teams were in no way dominate teams in the league.I wasn't saying BB was some scrub coach or a bum,I said he didn't really accomplish much when Brady wasn't his QB.And I think his record proves that to be true.As Stu mentioned,and I agree with.He was a very good defensive coach,but I wouldn't agree that he was "one of the greatest football minds in NFL history",I think that's pushing it a little (but that's his opinion).
I like Dak,I think he's a respectable QB.I think he just has some problems performing and handling pressure in big time games.And unless he changes that somehow,I really can't see any team (with any coach),winning any SB's with him as the QB.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.