@MP2056
I keep hearing "experts" on national sports media talk about JJ McCarthy like he's a sure-fire franchise QB
He isn't. He can develop into one with the proper work and coaching over a long period of time.
By this, I mean is not 'sure-fire'. But he does have the tools to be a 'franchise' QB. He can develop, just as Darnold has, over time.
It is not like he was 'sure-fire' like Luck was -- but no QB last year was.
But it is a nice spot for the Vikings to be in, because they have choices now.
Darnold was always going to be a 'bridge' between Cousins and McCarthy.
So, now do you really want to pay money to keep Darnold when he is, basically, having just a breakout year?
When you scout, draft, sign, and start developing a 'sure-fire franchise QB' -- you know it.
For example, Luck, Manning, Burrow, etc. There is never much question from the 'experts' or even the fans about the direction to go with a QB.
That is why, even several games into the season (or even now), Viking fans were still talking about 'McCarthy or Darnold'. Because neither is seen as a true franchise can't-miss type of QB.
What if the Vikings lose in the first-round -- do they move on from Darnold; or if they make it to the CF or SB -- would that solidify them sticking with Darnold?
I like when teams take the time to develop QBs instead of throwing them into the 'fire'. I think it can be a setback for the QB and the team if they do not.
Even if they have a breakout year, like Stroud, the expectations going forward for the team and the QB may be unrealistic. Even Stroud has had some hiccups this year.
If you are 'sure-fire' you do not get scouted and drafted behind the guys that went in from of him -- you are the first (maybe second) QB drafted.
When was the last time 2 sure-fire guys went in the same draft? Eli, Rivers? Luck and maybe RG III, if he had't got hurt? Or Peyton and Leaf?
No, he is NOT 'sure-fire' because that means he is drafted 1st and is playing right away and very little development is needed and there is no controversy.
BUT he can certainly develop over time into a 'franchise' QB.
BUT I do not trust Darnold past this year for the type of money someone is going to be willing to pay him.
But it is nice to have two good QBs on your team that you can turn to.
I would also add that, to me, just because someone starts for a team (maybe for years) does not make them a true 'franchise' QB. It just means there are no great QBs they can draft or trade for and stick with a solid starter.
Just being a longtime starter does not make you a franchise QB -- to me.