Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11: ”they’re now talking about 2 inches of snow during game time” turned into there might be some left over flurries from a system Thursday night in less than 30 minutes. Idk about you guys but the Rams should just stay home at this point. Last week 43 in Seattle was ok but this 33 degrees thing is too much. Do you think any of these players have ever seen snow?! Or been on an airplane even?! You're a fake account troll, tying to get people to bet early.. Saturday Mostly cloudy, with a high near 31. Saturday Night Mostly cloudy, with a low around 17 Somebody struggles with quotes & sarcasm eh
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11: ”they’re now talking about 2 inches of snow during game time” turned into there might be some left over flurries from a system Thursday night in less than 30 minutes. Idk about you guys but the Rams should just stay home at this point. Last week 43 in Seattle was ok but this 33 degrees thing is too much. Do you think any of these players have ever seen snow?! Or been on an airplane even?! You're a fake account troll, tying to get people to bet early.. Saturday Mostly cloudy, with a high near 31. Saturday Night Mostly cloudy, with a low around 17 Somebody struggles with quotes & sarcasm eh
I think I thought I was quoting the other guy.
I couldn't tell if/that *Rams should just stay home is sarcasm
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11: ”they’re now talking about 2 inches of snow during game time” turned into there might be some left over flurries from a system Thursday night in less than 30 minutes. Idk about you guys but the Rams should just stay home at this point. Last week 43 in Seattle was ok but this 33 degrees thing is too much. Do you think any of these players have ever seen snow?! Or been on an airplane even?! You're a fake account troll, tying to get people to bet early.. Saturday Mostly cloudy, with a high near 31. Saturday Night Mostly cloudy, with a low around 17 Somebody struggles with quotes & sarcasm eh
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11: ”they’re now talking about 2 inches of snow during game time” turned into there might be some left over flurries from a system Thursday night in less than 30 minutes. Idk about you guys but the Rams should just stay home at this point. Last week 43 in Seattle was ok but this 33 degrees thing is too much. Do you think any of these players have ever seen snow?! Or been on an airplane even?! You're a fake account troll, tying to get people to bet early.. Saturday Mostly cloudy, with a high near 31. Saturday Night Mostly cloudy, with a low around 17 Somebody struggles with quotes & sarcasm eh
I think I thought I was quoting the other guy.
I couldn't tell if/that *Rams should just stay home is sarcasm
point noted but your talking about the past who cares . yes we grew up watching the packers Farve and now rodgers in the last 25 years. what happend in the past is not going to predict the future nor this game. The packers are a better team and trending in the right Direction. The ram's yes have a great defense but they also have injuries and they played their hearts out last week to beat Seattle . Now they have to do it again in Green bay . forget about the stats and all the playoff records that happend in the recent years. let's talk about the Elephant in the room and this game. Green bay will win. They will cover and they will go to the Super bowl . Think about this. Do you think State farm wants to advertise as much as they do with Rodgers and Mahomes just so people can buy insurance. No they are building a Super bowl Match up quietly that will be the most watched superbowl ever. Vegas want's it The Nfl wants it and we will get it. It will be exciting next week watching Brady Vs rodgers as i expect tampa to win. but that will be only a preview to the big dance. Save your Money it wont do well betting on the rams.. A fellow wisconsin Friend
0
@kamphil
point noted but your talking about the past who cares . yes we grew up watching the packers Farve and now rodgers in the last 25 years. what happend in the past is not going to predict the future nor this game. The packers are a better team and trending in the right Direction. The ram's yes have a great defense but they also have injuries and they played their hearts out last week to beat Seattle . Now they have to do it again in Green bay . forget about the stats and all the playoff records that happend in the recent years. let's talk about the Elephant in the room and this game. Green bay will win. They will cover and they will go to the Super bowl . Think about this. Do you think State farm wants to advertise as much as they do with Rodgers and Mahomes just so people can buy insurance. No they are building a Super bowl Match up quietly that will be the most watched superbowl ever. Vegas want's it The Nfl wants it and we will get it. It will be exciting next week watching Brady Vs rodgers as i expect tampa to win. but that will be only a preview to the big dance. Save your Money it wont do well betting on the rams.. A fellow wisconsin Friend
Rams D > Pack D Pack O > Rams O Rams Special Teams > Packs Special Teams Rams Coach > Packers Coach Have Rams w/ slight edge. No play unless Wofford starts.
I doubt Rams starting QB matters.
And I'd bet-figuratively) it might be Bortles lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by LB_Dirtbags:
Rams D > Pack D Pack O > Rams O Rams Special Teams > Packs Special Teams Rams Coach > Packers Coach Have Rams w/ slight edge. No play unless Wofford starts.
these conversations are as bad as the Election and the Votes that came in at 80 million for Biden. wow. Bortles or even worse wolford. Here is a Headline for Sunday . Packers 3 time MVP rodgers loses at home to Rams and Wolford. I feel like Nancy pelosi is in on these comments..
2
these conversations are as bad as the Election and the Votes that came in at 80 million for Biden. wow. Bortles or even worse wolford. Here is a Headline for Sunday . Packers 3 time MVP rodgers loses at home to Rams and Wolford. I feel like Nancy pelosi is in on these comments..
Jimmy G threw it 8 times against GB last year & the 49ers blew them out. Put the drunkest fan in the parking lot in at QB for the Rams for all I care lol.
what did GB do in the off-season to withhold a good pass rush? If you guessed nothing you’re right. But yeah the loss of their all pro LT should make things easier.
0
Jimmy G threw it 8 times against GB last year & the 49ers blew them out. Put the drunkest fan in the parking lot in at QB for the Rams for all I care lol.
what did GB do in the off-season to withhold a good pass rush? If you guessed nothing you’re right. But yeah the loss of their all pro LT should make things easier.
these conversations are as bad as the Election and the Votes that came in at 80 million for Biden. wow. Bortles or even worse wolford. Here is a Headline for Sunday . Packers 3 time MVP rodgers loses at home to Rams and Wolford. I feel like Nancy pelosi is in on these comments..
Lol you can't remotely call yourself football be knowledgeable fan if you think Bortles is bad.
0
Quote Originally Posted by carguy342005:
these conversations are as bad as the Election and the Votes that came in at 80 million for Biden. wow. Bortles or even worse wolford. Here is a Headline for Sunday . Packers 3 time MVP rodgers loses at home to Rams and Wolford. I feel like Nancy pelosi is in on these comments..
Lol you can't remotely call yourself football be knowledgeable fan if you think Bortles is bad.
your right they did nothing but Draft a Quarter back only to piss off Rodgers and have him have one of his best years ever. oh and they went 13-3 . Dude what planet are you on. your rams will get killed. your a True moron thinking they will compete and Oh The packers signed Veldheer who is a Giant and played with them last year already knows the offense etc.
0
@HockeyNight11
your right they did nothing but Draft a Quarter back only to piss off Rodgers and have him have one of his best years ever. oh and they went 13-3 . Dude what planet are you on. your rams will get killed. your a True moron thinking they will compete and Oh The packers signed Veldheer who is a Giant and played with them last year already knows the offense etc.
@HockeyNight11 your right they did nothing but Draft a Quarter back only to piss off Rodgers and have him have one of his best years ever. oh and they went 13-3 . Dude what planet are you on. your rams will get killed. your a True moron thinking they will compete and Oh The packers signed Veldheer who is a Giant and played with them last year already knows the offense etc.
I am not remotely close to a Rams fan. My team actually gets killed by Rodgers 2x every year and it’s a beautiful thing to watch. Would Veldheer be the first guy in nfl history to get knocked out of the playoffs 2x in 7 days?
2
Quote Originally Posted by carguy342005:
@HockeyNight11 your right they did nothing but Draft a Quarter back only to piss off Rodgers and have him have one of his best years ever. oh and they went 13-3 . Dude what planet are you on. your rams will get killed. your a True moron thinking they will compete and Oh The packers signed Veldheer who is a Giant and played with them last year already knows the offense etc.
I am not remotely close to a Rams fan. My team actually gets killed by Rodgers 2x every year and it’s a beautiful thing to watch. Would Veldheer be the first guy in nfl history to get knocked out of the playoffs 2x in 7 days?
@HockeyNight11 They sure had a tough task against Derrick Henry and they answered the bell. Packers run D has been better lately, and this season. Mike Pettine is playing bigger fronts now and not as much dime. Sellout for the run with bigger personnel, make Goff throw. Not really a hard concept to understand.
I mean if holding Henry to 4.3 ypc in a snowstorm when they give up 4.5 ypc on average this season then sure I guess they were great.
Selling out against the run and dipping and dunking is probably the only thing that Goff would succeed at if he is the starter. Bigger question is can that improved front get to Goff and put the Rams behind the sticks? That’ll be what sets the Packers up well
0
Quote Originally Posted by RowdyNation18:
@HockeyNight11 They sure had a tough task against Derrick Henry and they answered the bell. Packers run D has been better lately, and this season. Mike Pettine is playing bigger fronts now and not as much dime. Sellout for the run with bigger personnel, make Goff throw. Not really a hard concept to understand.
I mean if holding Henry to 4.3 ypc in a snowstorm when they give up 4.5 ypc on average this season then sure I guess they were great.
Selling out against the run and dipping and dunking is probably the only thing that Goff would succeed at if he is the starter. Bigger question is can that improved front get to Goff and put the Rams behind the sticks? That’ll be what sets the Packers up well
The number is kind of skewed by the fact the Packers got a giant lead. Henry was bottled up at 3.3 YPC late until Green Bay went into a softer defense.
Jaire Alexander is just like Ramsey. It’s basically eliminating a receiver. He should take away Kupp from the offense, and the only other issue would be Woods.
Basically both teams should be able to slow each other down, I think this comes down to the turnover battle. Who do you trust more? Goff or Rodgers? I’d definitely think about hitting the under, but if the Rams defense stays on the field all game, eventually their defense will get worn down.
0
@HockeyNight11
The number is kind of skewed by the fact the Packers got a giant lead. Henry was bottled up at 3.3 YPC late until Green Bay went into a softer defense.
Jaire Alexander is just like Ramsey. It’s basically eliminating a receiver. He should take away Kupp from the offense, and the only other issue would be Woods.
Basically both teams should be able to slow each other down, I think this comes down to the turnover battle. Who do you trust more? Goff or Rodgers? I’d definitely think about hitting the under, but if the Rams defense stays on the field all game, eventually their defense will get worn down.
@HockeyNight11 The number is kind of skewed by the fact the Packers got a giant lead. Henry was bottled up at 3.3 YPC late until Green Bay went into a softer defense. Jaire Alexander is just like Ramsey. It’s basically eliminating a receiver. He should take away Kupp from the offense, and the only other issue would be Woods. Basically both teams should be able to slow each other down, I think this comes down to the turnover battle. Who do you trust more? Goff or Rodgers? I’d definitely think about hitting the under, but if the Rams defense stays on the field all game, eventually their defense will get worn down.
Fair point, under may be in play. Rodgers is the obvious choice in your question but when you go back to games where teams have been able to generate pressure without sending the house he has had some turnover issues & the Packers have lost by big margins. The 9ers did it last year & TB this year were the two closest comparisons I could think of to this years Rams defense. If the Rams can’t get to Rodgers then yeah he will shred them
0
Quote Originally Posted by RowdyNation18:
@HockeyNight11 The number is kind of skewed by the fact the Packers got a giant lead. Henry was bottled up at 3.3 YPC late until Green Bay went into a softer defense. Jaire Alexander is just like Ramsey. It’s basically eliminating a receiver. He should take away Kupp from the offense, and the only other issue would be Woods. Basically both teams should be able to slow each other down, I think this comes down to the turnover battle. Who do you trust more? Goff or Rodgers? I’d definitely think about hitting the under, but if the Rams defense stays on the field all game, eventually their defense will get worn down.
Fair point, under may be in play. Rodgers is the obvious choice in your question but when you go back to games where teams have been able to generate pressure without sending the house he has had some turnover issues & the Packers have lost by big margins. The 9ers did it last year & TB this year were the two closest comparisons I could think of to this years Rams defense. If the Rams can’t get to Rodgers then yeah he will shred them
Short and sweet here.....i see alot of ppl on the Rams and I get they play great D but that's about it. I was on the Rams last week mainly due to the familiarity of their opponent. Now they have to go to GB and they just don't have enough offense to stay in this one. The Packs D is underrated a bit imo and I see them cruising into Champ Sunday. A boring game is what I see....A 24 6 24 10 Packers win. Just my 4 cents there
1
Short and sweet here.....i see alot of ppl on the Rams and I get they play great D but that's about it. I was on the Rams last week mainly due to the familiarity of their opponent. Now they have to go to GB and they just don't have enough offense to stay in this one. The Packs D is underrated a bit imo and I see them cruising into Champ Sunday. A boring game is what I see....A 24 6 24 10 Packers win. Just my 4 cents there
I’ve watched film on that Bucs game repeatedly. The Bucs were getting destroyed with their four man front and man/zone in the 1st quarter.
Todd Bowles, (as a last resort because his defense was getting shredded) started just sending extra guys. They blitzed the Packers over and over again, and the Packers were not prepared for that. That’s something you can prepare for.
The Niners games were a whipping with their front four. Not much you can do about it.
If the Rams get pressure they have a good chance, but you can say that for any QB in the league. Should be a good game.
0
@HockeyNight11
I’ve watched film on that Bucs game repeatedly. The Bucs were getting destroyed with their four man front and man/zone in the 1st quarter.
Todd Bowles, (as a last resort because his defense was getting shredded) started just sending extra guys. They blitzed the Packers over and over again, and the Packers were not prepared for that. That’s something you can prepare for.
The Niners games were a whipping with their front four. Not much you can do about it.
If the Rams get pressure they have a good chance, but you can say that for any QB in the league. Should be a good game.
@carguy342005 I gave those other instances in history to illustrate a point....I dont bet on the Packers just because I have lived in WI and have been a GB Packer fan all my life(you told me I should move....tongue in cheek or serious, my pick is just my opinion). I told people I lived in wisconsin so that they know even "homer" gives the Rams a puncher's chance. Yes, always nice to meet a fellow "cheesehead". Yes, I can see Rogers(who should win MVP) make it to Super Bowl. But I believe the NFC is more wide open than the AFC. The AFC imo...with all the things that have happened this year, I think there is no way there is anyone else in super Bowl for AFC except KC. It has been a while since a team has repeated as Sbowl champs....and imo..."the new face of the shield" Patrick Mahomes repeats. Giannis is now 2x MVP of the Milwaukee Bucks, what has that got them?
0
@carguy342005 I gave those other instances in history to illustrate a point....I dont bet on the Packers just because I have lived in WI and have been a GB Packer fan all my life(you told me I should move....tongue in cheek or serious, my pick is just my opinion). I told people I lived in wisconsin so that they know even "homer" gives the Rams a puncher's chance. Yes, always nice to meet a fellow "cheesehead". Yes, I can see Rogers(who should win MVP) make it to Super Bowl. But I believe the NFC is more wide open than the AFC. The AFC imo...with all the things that have happened this year, I think there is no way there is anyone else in super Bowl for AFC except KC. It has been a while since a team has repeated as Sbowl champs....and imo..."the new face of the shield" Patrick Mahomes repeats. Giannis is now 2x MVP of the Milwaukee Bucks, what has that got them?
its got them Recognition which us people in wisconsin can be proud of . We aren't a state who pay's to win Championships we try with what we have and try to create amazing players. there is a reason why in the next 20 years Quarterbacks will still chase Favre 's records and now Aaron's some will never ever be broken like Consecutive starts from Favre or Aarons QBR . and so many more. the bottom line is we love our packers and yes there are teams we know who can beat them because we don't match up well but in this week's match up and any others in this season will not be the case.The packers will win the NFC championship and Win the superbowl. Mark my words.. And i was being fresh when i said to move . I was just stating how can u bet against our team. But i get it..
0
@kamphil
its got them Recognition which us people in wisconsin can be proud of . We aren't a state who pay's to win Championships we try with what we have and try to create amazing players. there is a reason why in the next 20 years Quarterbacks will still chase Favre 's records and now Aaron's some will never ever be broken like Consecutive starts from Favre or Aarons QBR . and so many more. the bottom line is we love our packers and yes there are teams we know who can beat them because we don't match up well but in this week's match up and any others in this season will not be the case.The packers will win the NFC championship and Win the superbowl. Mark my words.. And i was being fresh when i said to move . I was just stating how can u bet against our team. But i get it..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.