I took philly because i know for certain,, philly should not be a favorite.. I dont care if this game is being playing in the north pole with santa clause... Or if they were in the DOME at home LOL..... We'll see how this plays out... Im pretty sure the PUBLIC is all over the Saints...
Same for me. I took Philly -3 coz of this.
You know what? If Saints were a -5.5 favorite i would have taken that as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:
I took philly because i know for certain,, philly should not be a favorite.. I dont care if this game is being playing in the north pole with santa clause... Or if they were in the DOME at home LOL..... We'll see how this plays out... Im pretty sure the PUBLIC is all over the Saints...
Same for me. I took Philly -3 coz of this.
You know what? If Saints were a -5.5 favorite i would have taken that as well.
All Chiefs had to do: Run the ball - dont make turnovers.
What do they do? Throw the ball - Make turnovers.
Its so easy to win this game especially when they have such a good Defense, its a miracle if they gave up more than 24 pts tonight actually. And they cant even win from 28 points. This can ONLY happen if matchfixing is involved.
0
All Chiefs had to do: Run the ball - dont make turnovers.
What do they do? Throw the ball - Make turnovers.
Its so easy to win this game especially when they have such a good Defense, its a miracle if they gave up more than 24 pts tonight actually. And they cant even win from 28 points. This can ONLY happen if matchfixing is involved.
Eagles - Cowboys last week, first half line was Philly -3.5. Cowboys turn the ball intentionally over so eagles get TD and win by those exact 4 points. This week, Saints score field goal now to cover the +1.5 for first half :DD u gotta love these small things. But right - Line doesnt dictate the game, huh? :D
0
Eagles - Cowboys last week, first half line was Philly -3.5. Cowboys turn the ball intentionally over so eagles get TD and win by those exact 4 points. This week, Saints score field goal now to cover the +1.5 for first half :DD u gotta love these small things. But right - Line doesnt dictate the game, huh? :D
I don't think vegas got middled....But I'm sure some whales out there hit both ends from what the starting line was....That was a big move...Good luck to all!!!!
0
I don't think vegas got middled....But I'm sure some whales out there hit both ends from what the starting line was....That was a big move...Good luck to all!!!!
bk im sorry but u sound crazy this time. u are saying VEGAS got middled?
sucks for them right? looks like they need to close down some casinos, they took a big hit (sarcasm)
okay end of discussion
I have no idea what the net results were for all books. What I am saying is that is the kind of result that they could lose money on. On one that one game. It's very rare. Vegas does not lose money on many games, that is the one thing we agree on.
But to say it can ONLY happen due to match fixing is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.
Boston is so blinded by ANY kind of variance it's ridiculous.
And then please explain to me about your buddy Holding's picks??
KC has a good D?? Ranked 26th against the pass (yards against) and 22nd against the run. Wow, dominant. Colts shot themselves in the foot in the 1H and KC capitalized, but the real over-achieving Chiefs showed up in the 2H, and didn't help that they had so many injuries, which I'm sure you knuckleheads think is just part of the fix.
Of course Boston, please show me WHERE YOU STATED BEFORE THE GAME THAT THIS PARTICULAR LINE MOVEMENT, WHICH WAS ODD, WAS GOING TO LEAD TO A NARROW COLTS WIN???
Please, show me.
Thanks in advance.
If you don't have that available, oh well. Keep up the great 20-20 hindsight capping you are so brilliant at.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaboons:
bk im sorry but u sound crazy this time. u are saying VEGAS got middled?
sucks for them right? looks like they need to close down some casinos, they took a big hit (sarcasm)
okay end of discussion
I have no idea what the net results were for all books. What I am saying is that is the kind of result that they could lose money on. On one that one game. It's very rare. Vegas does not lose money on many games, that is the one thing we agree on.
But to say it can ONLY happen due to match fixing is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.
Boston is so blinded by ANY kind of variance it's ridiculous.
And then please explain to me about your buddy Holding's picks??
KC has a good D?? Ranked 26th against the pass (yards against) and 22nd against the run. Wow, dominant. Colts shot themselves in the foot in the 1H and KC capitalized, but the real over-achieving Chiefs showed up in the 2H, and didn't help that they had so many injuries, which I'm sure you knuckleheads think is just part of the fix.
Of course Boston, please show me WHERE YOU STATED BEFORE THE GAME THAT THIS PARTICULAR LINE MOVEMENT, WHICH WAS ODD, WAS GOING TO LEAD TO A NARROW COLTS WIN???
Please, show me.
Thanks in advance.
If you don't have that available, oh well. Keep up the great 20-20 hindsight capping you are so brilliant at.
but what joe smoe didnt know. was the line opened at 2.5 then went to 7. so if u took philly any day that week thinking wow i got a good line u still lost.
0
phiily dal was 17-10 at halftime.
but what joe smoe didnt know. was the line opened at 2.5 then went to 7. so if u took philly any day that week thinking wow i got a good line u still lost.
Eagles - Cowboys last week, first half line was Philly -3.5. Cowboys turn the ball intentionally over so eagles get TD and win by those exact 4 points. This week, Saints score field goal now to cover the +1.5 for first half :DD u gotta love these small things. But right - Line doesnt dictate the game, huh? :D
0
Quote Originally Posted by BostonCelticFTW:
Eagles - Cowboys last week, first half line was Philly -3.5. Cowboys turn the ball intentionally over so eagles get TD and win by those exact 4 points. This week, Saints score field goal now to cover the +1.5 for first half :DD u gotta love these small things. But right - Line doesnt dictate the game, huh? :D
INDY WON THE LAST TIME,, OPENING LINE WAS INDY -2.5 ,, PUBLIC HAD INDY AT HOME OF COARSE... FADE HOME FAVORITE EARLY... RLM LANDING RIGHT IN THE WINDOW THIS SEASON IS ABOUT 3-4 Percent,, but they usually happend on Marquee matchups...
0
INDY WON THE LAST TIME,, OPENING LINE WAS INDY -2.5 ,, PUBLIC HAD INDY AT HOME OF COARSE... FADE HOME FAVORITE EARLY... RLM LANDING RIGHT IN THE WINDOW THIS SEASON IS ABOUT 3-4 Percent,, but they usually happend on Marquee matchups...
Keep up with ur cherry picking stats my friend, Kansas City Chiefs is the team that have allowed the least points in the entire AFC Conference, so if u think their defense sucks? Then u dont know what defense is about; avoid giving up points. Kansas city chiefs havent allowed 45 points in their latest but OF COURSE it happens when the fix is in, because if it didnt happen, then Colts wouldnt be able to win.
Please tell me, when was the last time Chiefs gave up 45 points? Not even last season when they were scrub did they do that as far as i can remember. But of course, now with their newly improved defense they give up 45 points, ONLY because they managed to score 44 offensively and they had to lose, thats the ONLY reason they give up so many points.
Trust me, if Chiefs had scored 21 points then NO WAY Colts would have scored 45 anyways, they would MAX have scored 24 and the game would have gone under with 1½ point. So easy to predict. Thats how it is. And then they would have covered the -2.5 pre game line. But because Chiefs showed up this way, THEN THIS IS HOW THE GAME ROLLS OUT.
What part of the fact "i didnt bet on the game because i didnt like anything" didnt u get? I couldnt predict that they would win a narrow win, but fact is; Vegas wins. Thats a fact. And that is what happened. Again. Im just saying, ur statement that they got middled isnt true, BECAUSE THEY DIDNT. They could have been middled, but could have isnt relevant because it didnt happen :D they profited by making this line movement.
0
Keep up with ur cherry picking stats my friend, Kansas City Chiefs is the team that have allowed the least points in the entire AFC Conference, so if u think their defense sucks? Then u dont know what defense is about; avoid giving up points. Kansas city chiefs havent allowed 45 points in their latest but OF COURSE it happens when the fix is in, because if it didnt happen, then Colts wouldnt be able to win.
Please tell me, when was the last time Chiefs gave up 45 points? Not even last season when they were scrub did they do that as far as i can remember. But of course, now with their newly improved defense they give up 45 points, ONLY because they managed to score 44 offensively and they had to lose, thats the ONLY reason they give up so many points.
Trust me, if Chiefs had scored 21 points then NO WAY Colts would have scored 45 anyways, they would MAX have scored 24 and the game would have gone under with 1½ point. So easy to predict. Thats how it is. And then they would have covered the -2.5 pre game line. But because Chiefs showed up this way, THEN THIS IS HOW THE GAME ROLLS OUT.
What part of the fact "i didnt bet on the game because i didnt like anything" didnt u get? I couldnt predict that they would win a narrow win, but fact is; Vegas wins. Thats a fact. And that is what happened. Again. Im just saying, ur statement that they got middled isnt true, BECAUSE THEY DIDNT. They could have been middled, but could have isnt relevant because it didnt happen :D they profited by making this line movement.
in their latest; What? 100 matches? Go check urself, im done looking back in history when the last time that was. Cba scrolling so much down the list to find a game where they gave up 45.
0
in their latest; What? 100 matches? Go check urself, im done looking back in history when the last time that was. Cba scrolling so much down the list to find a game where they gave up 45.
I didn't ask you what you bet. I asked you where you stated BEFORE the game HOW THE LINE WOULD DICTATE THE GAME.
I never said the KC's D was bad, but they were not dominant. Whatever, the game is over, I had the Colts, had to sweat it, was fortunate to win. Games like that happen once in a blue moon. That in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM is EVEN CLOSE to any proof it was fixed. NONE.
I regret even addressing you because you have NO logic in any responses, and spin anything you want to conform to your delusional point of view. Have a nice night pal.
0
I didn't ask you what you bet. I asked you where you stated BEFORE the game HOW THE LINE WOULD DICTATE THE GAME.
I never said the KC's D was bad, but they were not dominant. Whatever, the game is over, I had the Colts, had to sweat it, was fortunate to win. Games like that happen once in a blue moon. That in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM is EVEN CLOSE to any proof it was fixed. NONE.
I regret even addressing you because you have NO logic in any responses, and spin anything you want to conform to your delusional point of view. Have a nice night pal.
INDY WON THE LAST TIME,, OPENING LINE WAS INDY -2.5 ,, PUBLIC HAD INDY AT HOME OF COARSE... FADE HOME FAVORITE EARLY... RLM LANDING RIGHT IN THE WINDOW THIS SEASON IS ABOUT 3-4 Percent,, but they usually happend on Marquee matchups...
I don't know about the public, but I know YOU had Indy -2.5 BECAUSE YOU POSTED IT ABOUT 300 TIMES!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:
INDY WON THE LAST TIME,, OPENING LINE WAS INDY -2.5 ,, PUBLIC HAD INDY AT HOME OF COARSE... FADE HOME FAVORITE EARLY... RLM LANDING RIGHT IN THE WINDOW THIS SEASON IS ABOUT 3-4 Percent,, but they usually happend on Marquee matchups...
I don't know about the public, but I know YOU had Indy -2.5 BECAUSE YOU POSTED IT ABOUT 300 TIMES!!!
Well if trolls love to stick to me like flies on SHHITT... Mind as well create work for them... I've counted about 10 of them... Bk you are one of them...
0
Well if trolls love to stick to me like flies on SHHITT... Mind as well create work for them... I've counted about 10 of them... Bk you are one of them...
bk thanks. i didnt notice the scenario. so colts play denver no matter what. so if chargers win. then its colts denv. afc champ. game. if they lose im betting colts over new england
0
bk thanks. i didnt notice the scenario. so colts play denver no matter what. so if chargers win. then its colts denv. afc champ. game. if they lose im betting colts over new england
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.