KC you have to wait for Mahomes and his toe. i hope he makes a full recovery, he's a baller.
Just came out:
Source: QB Patrick Mahomes will undergo surgery tomorrow to repair a torn plantar plate in his foot, also known as turf toe. The rehab will be several months, but he’s expected to make a full recovery. Noted foot specialist Dr. Robert Anderson will perform the procedure.
1
KC you have to wait for Mahomes and his toe. i hope he makes a full recovery, he's a baller.
Just came out:
Source: QB Patrick Mahomes will undergo surgery tomorrow to repair a torn plantar plate in his foot, also known as turf toe. The rehab will be several months, but he’s expected to make a full recovery. Noted foot specialist Dr. Robert Anderson will perform the procedure.
KC I think loss some it’s mojo this year. Not sure how that will transpire to next year? One thing is imagine how the rest of the AFC is feeling after what KC did to them last couple years. Very tough obstacle to climb, but they have the personnel to achieve b2b2b SB’s.
0
@budwiser
KC I think loss some it’s mojo this year. Not sure how that will transpire to next year? One thing is imagine how the rest of the AFC is feeling after what KC did to them last couple years. Very tough obstacle to climb, but they have the personnel to achieve b2b2b SB’s.
yeah at one book they're the favorite at +550 next up are +900 buccs and pack
should be interesting to see if teams take the tampa blueprint and put 2 safeties back there and rush 4, and don't react to the fakes. the chiefs looked mortal. a lot of that was due to mahomes' toe, which is why i said wait it out AND watch his first games back
0
@LB_Dirtbags
yeah at one book they're the favorite at +550 next up are +900 buccs and pack
should be interesting to see if teams take the tampa blueprint and put 2 safeties back there and rush 4, and don't react to the fakes. the chiefs looked mortal. a lot of that was due to mahomes' toe, which is why i said wait it out AND watch his first games back
The Bucs had the first home field advantage at the super bowl in NFL history. The odds of the Rams getting home field in back to back super bowl is extremely rare like back to back super bowl overtime games, it's even more rare than winning back to back super bowls.
Stafford seems to struggle against teams with over .500 win record, he also struggles in the 4th quarter and had a history of being injured. Maybe I'm wrong and the Rams make it to the super bowl.
0
The Bucs had the first home field advantage at the super bowl in NFL history. The odds of the Rams getting home field in back to back super bowl is extremely rare like back to back super bowl overtime games, it's even more rare than winning back to back super bowls.
Stafford seems to struggle against teams with over .500 win record, he also struggles in the 4th quarter and had a history of being injured. Maybe I'm wrong and the Rams make it to the super bowl.
You can pretty much throw the host city statistic out the window. Anything can happen. I’d rather have my $ on the business/ marketing platform aspect of the SB and it’s location more so than anything.
0
@PepeFrog
You can pretty much throw the host city statistic out the window. Anything can happen. I’d rather have my $ on the business/ marketing platform aspect of the SB and it’s location more so than anything.
The Bucs had the first home field advantage at the super bowl in NFL history. The odds of the Rams getting home field in back to back super bowl is extremely rare like back to back super bowl overtime games, it's even more rare than winning back to back super bowls. Stafford seems to struggle against teams with over .500 win record, he also struggles in the 4th quarter and had a history of being injured. Maybe I'm wrong and the Rams make it to the super bowl.
Um..the struggling came from being on detroit. Still had 30 last minute drive wins and 30 come from behind wins
0
Quote Originally Posted by PepeFrog:
The Bucs had the first home field advantage at the super bowl in NFL history. The odds of the Rams getting home field in back to back super bowl is extremely rare like back to back super bowl overtime games, it's even more rare than winning back to back super bowls. Stafford seems to struggle against teams with over .500 win record, he also struggles in the 4th quarter and had a history of being injured. Maybe I'm wrong and the Rams make it to the super bowl.
Um..the struggling came from being on detroit. Still had 30 last minute drive wins and 30 come from behind wins
@LETGOPACK1234 Packers prob played their best football this year. Not sure if they can replicate their performance. I think there were a handful of teams that performed better on the road without the opposing team’s fans...one being the Packers.
Agree, but I dont see why they cant do the same exact thing next year, while improving....They outplayed Tampa...if it wasnt for King being horrible on defense, a fumble on their own 10, and awful calls, they win that game....
I dont think King will be back, and if he is, he wont be a starter. I think management realizes they are close and will bring in someone on the corner and one more pass rusher.....heck they may even draft a WR or sign one....
Fact is, they have zero holes on offense, one of the best lines (when healthy) and they will all be back.....they will probably lose Jones but I dont see the combo of Williams/Dillon being any of a drop-off.....Adams is unstoppable and they finally have a TE again....
Their division stinks, so pending injuries, I dont see them not competing for the #1 seed again next year in the playoffs...
The cap wont be an issue at all for them next year, so if they bring in 1-2 guys, there is no reason they wont be back
0
Quote Originally Posted by LB_Dirtbags:
@LETGOPACK1234 Packers prob played their best football this year. Not sure if they can replicate their performance. I think there were a handful of teams that performed better on the road without the opposing team’s fans...one being the Packers.
Agree, but I dont see why they cant do the same exact thing next year, while improving....They outplayed Tampa...if it wasnt for King being horrible on defense, a fumble on their own 10, and awful calls, they win that game....
I dont think King will be back, and if he is, he wont be a starter. I think management realizes they are close and will bring in someone on the corner and one more pass rusher.....heck they may even draft a WR or sign one....
Fact is, they have zero holes on offense, one of the best lines (when healthy) and they will all be back.....they will probably lose Jones but I dont see the combo of Williams/Dillon being any of a drop-off.....Adams is unstoppable and they finally have a TE again....
Their division stinks, so pending injuries, I dont see them not competing for the #1 seed again next year in the playoffs...
The cap wont be an issue at all for them next year, so if they bring in 1-2 guys, there is no reason they wont be back
My problem with taking futures on short notice from now is that rosters will be hussled a lot the forthcoming months. And we don't know who's going to get an injury in the weeks ahead of the season opener. Too much risks in my opinion.
Normally I wait untill one week ahead the season opener and make 'future' bets on the Exchange. And with a lot of trading towards the SuperBowl I'm trying to get a positive result no matter the outcome.
0
My problem with taking futures on short notice from now is that rosters will be hussled a lot the forthcoming months. And we don't know who's going to get an injury in the weeks ahead of the season opener. Too much risks in my opinion.
Normally I wait untill one week ahead the season opener and make 'future' bets on the Exchange. And with a lot of trading towards the SuperBowl I'm trying to get a positive result no matter the outcome.
I like taking advantage of Futures now. Feel like off-season can be extremely profitable, especially if you can determine who’ll be good and bad for most part of the year. For example in college ball, I took a future on Gonzaga and Baylor at 10:1 and 14:1 early in October. Now they’re close to 2.5:1 / 3:1...pretty good value considering they’ve dropped about 80%+ in price.
1
@Charon84
I like taking advantage of Futures now. Feel like off-season can be extremely profitable, especially if you can determine who’ll be good and bad for most part of the year. For example in college ball, I took a future on Gonzaga and Baylor at 10:1 and 14:1 early in October. Now they’re close to 2.5:1 / 3:1...pretty good value considering they’ve dropped about 80%+ in price.
@PepeFrog You can pretty much throw the host city statistic out the window. Anything can happen. I’d rather have my $ on the business/ marketing platform aspect of the SB and it’s location more so than anything.
Congrats on your Rams bet. I should have tailed. You just need one more game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LB_Dirtbags:
@PepeFrog You can pretty much throw the host city statistic out the window. Anything can happen. I’d rather have my $ on the business/ marketing platform aspect of the SB and it’s location more so than anything.
Congrats on your Rams bet. I should have tailed. You just need one more game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.