All Forums | NFL Betting

MRxKRAZZ NFL Week #2

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 8537
Posts: 86
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 98
Posted: #51
100% agree on GB this sunday
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by EastsideBangers:

Bol  tomorrow MrxKrazz
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by BUSTIN_BEANS:

100% agree on GB this sunday
Still trying to put together my final card, and GB might be the only game I think I am 100% on, might lay off on a few strong lean. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #54
Lets filter out some games then put together my final card.

TEN @ DET -6, DET played lights out on the O side of the ball, but that was against a vanilla IND D, to lay 6 I will need to see a few more games of their O, TEN lots by 9 but 2 TD were from their turnovers by their O, TEN +6 seem like the right play but I cant yet put money on this game, not yet.

KC @ HOU -1, at first I loved HOU but after going back to the game for the second time, JJ WATT doesn't look 100% and Brock is just throwing them like a slinger, I still like HOU just not enough to put money on them,

BAL -5.5 @ CLE, everything points towards BAL yet the line is back at 5.5, makes me wonder a bit.

SF @ CAR -13.5, I just dont like playing games with a high unless i am taking the team with the points, and no way I am willing to back SF, not even after their 28-0 win.

TB @ ARI -7, I still TB but they just don't have NE's precision yet, Winston will throw a few up for grabs will will give ARI a chance to cover, I want to take TB +7 but i see too many factors not yet clear with both teams.

IND @ DEN -6, anyone see any reason DEN do not beat the SH*T out of IND? I don't neither but the spread of -6 to me is a bit too low.

SEA -6 @ LA, who knows which team will show up, one team barely won playing at home while the other team couldn't score a point.





 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #55
Going to pick a few out of these games

MIA @ NE -6.5

CIN @ PIT -3.5

DAL @ WAS +3

NO @ NYG -4

ATL @ OAK -4.5

JAC @ SD -3

GB -2 @ MIN

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 2693
Posted: #56
Juz pk yo gmz..... All dis whorin up da attention orz!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 74
Posted: #57
its amazing a thread with so little information has gotten so many responses. Why not post a picture of a dart board with this weeks picks?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by BET2WIN4:

Juz pk yo gmz..... All dis whorin up da attention orz!
Still trolling this season lol, why dont you try to be a little productive around this site?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #59
Quote Originally Posted by Brown8535:

its amazing a thread with so little information has gotten so many responses. Why not post a picture of a dart board with this weeks picks?

Been around for 6 years and you used one of the 54 post to drop that quote? Information are through out this site, just got to absorb it, or you can be a troll like B2W4 and just stay trolling around this site. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 32278
Posted: #60
bol this week bud
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #61
NYG -4 -103 2 units

The better D will win this game, -4 is a tricky spread, but I am fully confident the NYG football team will score one more TD than the NO Saints today. Yes, the NO D is that awful. 

DAL +3 +102 2 units

I loved WAS coming into this season, loved them heading into their season opener, but beside Norman and Breeland, I dont see what else on this WAS D is going to stop Witten and Beasley, Ezeke might have his welcome to the NFL game today, I still like WAS but Cousin showed last week, he is still a work in progress and not yet worth that long contract at 20+ million a year. Look for DAL to shorten up this game running the clock I mean ball like last week with a who can do something in their last position to win the game.

CIN +3 +102 2 units

PIT looked pretty in the eyes of many fans, or was it WAS's D really that bad? Hard to debate that question right now but one thing I know for sure, CIN know AB, that D knows AB, they won't let him burn them on 4th downs and catch a TD, CIN's pass rush will get home, D Will will not look like the late Walter Payton or Barry Sanders, not in this divisional first matchup, look for CIN to ground and pound this PIT D that do have some speed but still is far from their elite days, and AJG to have his back to back big stat line game today.

I am leaning GB big, SD -3and TB only if it gets to +7.5 but will post those plays closer to kick off.

LETS DO THIS!!!


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 3948
Posted: #62
Bol Krazz..
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by trainwreck66:

bol this week bud
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by skyclassic:

Bol Krazz..
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #65
Wanted to hit a play on MIA at +7 or +7.5 but doesn't look like its happening, line sitting at 5.5 now. No play.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #66
TB +7 -105 2 units


Worst case a back door cover for the push.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #67
DEN -6.5 -105 2 units

Too much run game and D from D for Luck to hang around in this game.

OAK -4 +100 2 units

Too much momentum going with this young OAK team.

Debating on a play with JAC....



 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #68
JAC +3 -109

Was going to ride SD, but i think JAC have too much O for SD in this game.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by MRxKrazz:

JAC +3 -109

Was going to ride SD, but i think JAC have too much O for SD in this game.


2 units**

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #70
GB -2 -103 3 units

If Sam Bradford can beat GB, then I will let it be so.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #71
2-6 -8.973 units, simply put, rookie mistakes, going 1-2 in the morning games is fine, but playing TB who I clearly did not want to play, and playing JAC who I thought was going to lose stings, clean this up and LETS GO!!! Bad day.....

2016-2017

YTD 6-10-1
YTD -9.353 units

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #72
More for myself than anyone else.

NYG -4, this is a game I don't mind losing, can't predict turnovers that the NYG had today and and whats with all these teams not kicking the FG in the red zone and going for it this year?

CIN +3, Guess I got to stop hating on the PIT football team as a whole, their D again played above avg and their O even with turnovers can put points up with ease, what i did notice was Dalton not willing to run for yards he normally would in years past, something I got to remember moving on betting on CIN. Simply put a bad bet on the wrong team.

DAL +3, one of the 2 winners I had today, Cole did do some damage, and made plays in the clutch, but WAS's D isn't that good, and Cousin just doesn't have the 20 million a year price tag look on the field, glad I switched from my lean and took DAL.

TB +7, D Gen bet, nothing else to say about this, told myself Winston just do not have the passing precision but yet had the itch to bet, happen one more time with D Gen bets I might need to put myself on TIME OUT and take a week off.

JAC +3, had SD and saw the line at +2.5 heavy juice and let the line chose the play for me, simply put STUPID, why do all the work in researching and let a line dictate your play. Wont let this happen again either.

DEN -6.5, cant even say I am proud of winning this bet, it took a Defensive td in the last few mins to cover this game, simply put, LUCKY WIN.

GB -2, dont regret it but Bradford played lights out, imho the best he played in all the years in the NFL, look poised all game long, if you told me AP and the MIN running game is held under xx amount of yards and Bradford was the KEY in leading MIN to victory I would have thought you was crazy before kickoff. Things to note to self, MIN playing at home have fans that will rock and their D is much better than advertised. GB and Rodgers do not play good when they aren't R E LA X, look too tensed all game, and when Rodgers finally relaxed and played football, it was already too late.

On to MNF!!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 10573
Posted: #73
Oak -4, forgot about this game, OAK is still OAK, their D might be worst in the league, with all those big name players and playing at home, I was VERY disappointed.

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 2693
Posted: #74
So 2cut all dat shrt...... U SUCK?! Orz!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8152
Posted: #75
I tried to warn you about Green Bay
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.