Should also add if you take out the 2nd MIN game where the Vikings were down their Top 2 RB, when the Packers faced a rush offense that was Top 15 they gave up the following yards per carry: 7.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.8.
Either way good luck Van. Great to see you posting.
0
Should also add if you take out the 2nd MIN game where the Vikings were down their Top 2 RB, when the Packers faced a rush offense that was Top 15 they gave up the following yards per carry: 7.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.8.
Either way good luck Van. Great to see you posting.
Should also add if you take out the 2nd MIN game where the Vikings were down their Top 2 RB, when the Packers faced a rush offense that was Top 15 they gave up the following yards per carry: 7.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.8.
Either way good luck Van. Great to see you posting.
Gb is 23rd against the run, and the niners are a top rushing team. The fact that he says sf won’t be able to run on gb is laughable. Wishful thinking it seems, van is a good capper, but this is a head scratcher
0
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
Should also add if you take out the 2nd MIN game where the Vikings were down their Top 2 RB, when the Packers faced a rush offense that was Top 15 they gave up the following yards per carry: 7.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.8.
Either way good luck Van. Great to see you posting.
Gb is 23rd against the run, and the niners are a top rushing team. The fact that he says sf won’t be able to run on gb is laughable. Wishful thinking it seems, van is a good capper, but this is a head scratcher
Here is a point in the KC game that I haven’t seen anyone mention and discuss. This is the Titans 4th consecutive road game. Henry has over 30 carries 3 weeks in a row. The Titan defense was on the field a whopping 91 plays last weekend and it was worse than a typical 91 because a good portion of those plays was spent chasing Lamar. I would think fatigue would have to be a factor in the 2nd half at the very least, but possibly right out of the gate. As good as the Titans defense is, fatigue makes fools. Now they have to keep up with all that speed all over the field, not just 1 guy. If they win I feel like they will have to win a shootout.
0
Here is a point in the KC game that I haven’t seen anyone mention and discuss. This is the Titans 4th consecutive road game. Henry has over 30 carries 3 weeks in a row. The Titan defense was on the field a whopping 91 plays last weekend and it was worse than a typical 91 because a good portion of those plays was spent chasing Lamar. I would think fatigue would have to be a factor in the 2nd half at the very least, but possibly right out of the gate. As good as the Titans defense is, fatigue makes fools. Now they have to keep up with all that speed all over the field, not just 1 guy. If they win I feel like they will have to win a shootout.
Here is a point in the KC game that I haven’t seen anyone mention and discuss. This is the Titans 4th consecutive road game. Henry has over 30 carries 3 weeks in a row. The Titan defense was on the field a whopping 91 plays last weekend and it was worse than a typical 91 because a good portion of those plays was spent chasing Lamar. I would think fatigue would have to be a factor in the 2nd half at the very least, but possibly right out of the gate. As good as the Titans defense is, fatigue makes fools. Now they have to keep up with all that speed all over the field, not just 1 guy. If they win I feel like they will have to win a shootout.
Greg Rosenthal of NFL.com mentioned it and I posted it earlier in the week:
The Titans' mid-level defense played more snaps last week than any defense played in an NFL game all year. It's the Chiefs' time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SUPEREAGLE43:
Here is a point in the KC game that I haven’t seen anyone mention and discuss. This is the Titans 4th consecutive road game. Henry has over 30 carries 3 weeks in a row. The Titan defense was on the field a whopping 91 plays last weekend and it was worse than a typical 91 because a good portion of those plays was spent chasing Lamar. I would think fatigue would have to be a factor in the 2nd half at the very least, but possibly right out of the gate. As good as the Titans defense is, fatigue makes fools. Now they have to keep up with all that speed all over the field, not just 1 guy. If they win I feel like they will have to win a shootout.
Greg Rosenthal of NFL.com mentioned it and I posted it earlier in the week:
The Titans' mid-level defense played more snaps last week than any defense played in an NFL game all year. It's the Chiefs' time.
Being that coach Shanahan is offensive minded, look for the Niners to really mix it up with their run game, then open up the passing game to keep GB on its heels. Aaron Rogers won't stink up the place like he did in week 12, but if the 49ers defense gets into an early rhythm and control the line, Rogers will go into panic mode and throw a pick or two. I'll take San Fran to control the game and clock S.F. 42, GB 24.
0
Being that coach Shanahan is offensive minded, look for the Niners to really mix it up with their run game, then open up the passing game to keep GB on its heels. Aaron Rogers won't stink up the place like he did in week 12, but if the 49ers defense gets into an early rhythm and control the line, Rogers will go into panic mode and throw a pick or two. I'll take San Fran to control the game and clock S.F. 42, GB 24.
Should also add if you take out the 2nd MIN game where the Vikings were down their Top 2 RB, when the Packers faced a rush offense that was Top 15 they gave up the following yards per carry: 7.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.8. Either way good luck Van. Great to see you posting.
Gb is 23rd against the run, and the niners are a top rushing team. The fact that he says sf won’t be able to run on gb is laughable. Wishful thinking it seems, van is a good capper, but this is a head scratcher
Told u so
0
Quote Originally Posted by jdmoney14:
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
Should also add if you take out the 2nd MIN game where the Vikings were down their Top 2 RB, when the Packers faced a rush offense that was Top 15 they gave up the following yards per carry: 7.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.8. Either way good luck Van. Great to see you posting.
Gb is 23rd against the run, and the niners are a top rushing team. The fact that he says sf won’t be able to run on gb is laughable. Wishful thinking it seems, van is a good capper, but this is a head scratcher
The Chiefs have a serious problem on their hands, I don't know if they're going to have any better success stopping this running attack, its not their strong suit. Plus it takes just a couple of hours of watching film , to realize the Chiefs have two offenses , one deadly one with out being blitzed, and one that loses its teeth when being blitzed. 49ers are going to be blitzing 90% of the time, I see big trouble for KC.
0
The Chiefs have a serious problem on their hands, I don't know if they're going to have any better success stopping this running attack, its not their strong suit. Plus it takes just a couple of hours of watching film , to realize the Chiefs have two offenses , one deadly one with out being blitzed, and one that loses its teeth when being blitzed. 49ers are going to be blitzing 90% of the time, I see big trouble for KC.
Gb is 23rd against the run, and the niners are a top rushing team. The fact that he says sf won’t be able to run on gb is laughable. Wishful thinking it seems, van is a good capper, but this is a head scratcher
Told u so
Hate to pile on van(much respect to u as a capper), but damn I told u
0
Quote Originally Posted by jdmoney14:
Gb is 23rd against the run, and the niners are a top rushing team. The fact that he says sf won’t be able to run on gb is laughable. Wishful thinking it seems, van is a good capper, but this is a head scratcher
Told u so
Hate to pile on van(much respect to u as a capper), but damn I told u
Gb is 23rd against the run, and the niners are a top rushing team. The fact that he says sf won’t be able to run on gb is laughable. Wishful thinking it seems, van is a good capper, but this is a head scratcher Told u so
Hate to pile on van(much respect to u as a capper), but damn I told u
^^^^^^^^^ jdmoney14,,, you're just 8 posts away from being able to post " I told you so" on the top of a new page!
GL, I hope my post here helps you get there
0
Quote Originally Posted by jdmoney14:
Quote Originally Posted by jdmoney14:
Gb is 23rd against the run, and the niners are a top rushing team. The fact that he says sf won’t be able to run on gb is laughable. Wishful thinking it seems, van is a good capper, but this is a head scratcher Told u so
Hate to pile on van(much respect to u as a capper), but damn I told u
^^^^^^^^^ jdmoney14,,, you're just 8 posts away from being able to post " I told you so" on the top of a new page!
The Chiefs have a serious problem on their hands, I don't know if they're going to have any better success stopping this running attack, its not their strong suit. Plus it takes just a couple of hours of watching film , to realize the Chiefs have two offenses , one deadly one with out being blitzed, and one that loses its teeth when being blitzed. 49ers are going to be blitzing 90% of the time, I see big trouble for KC.
KC just took out the best running back in the game . I think they can handle SF 's running game
0
Quote Originally Posted by iceman67:
The Chiefs have a serious problem on their hands, I don't know if they're going to have any better success stopping this running attack, its not their strong suit. Plus it takes just a couple of hours of watching film , to realize the Chiefs have two offenses , one deadly one with out being blitzed, and one that loses its teeth when being blitzed. 49ers are going to be blitzing 90% of the time, I see big trouble for KC.
KC just took out the best running back in the game . I think they can handle SF 's running game
The Chiefs have a serious problem on their hands, I don't know if they're going to have any better success stopping this running attack, its not their strong suit. Plus it takes just a couple of hours of watching film , to realize the Chiefs have two offenses , one deadly one with out being blitzed, and one that loses its teeth when being blitzed. 49ers are going to be blitzing 90% of the time, I see big trouble for KC.
KC just took out the best running back in the game . I think they can handle SF 's running game
So no concerns for you then. Maybe you're right. I just think there may just be a red flag popping up considering the Chiefs are ranked 29th (thats out of 32) in run defense efficiency, and the team up next just slammed down near 300 yrds on the ground in the Conference Championship game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Quote Originally Posted by iceman67:
The Chiefs have a serious problem on their hands, I don't know if they're going to have any better success stopping this running attack, its not their strong suit. Plus it takes just a couple of hours of watching film , to realize the Chiefs have two offenses , one deadly one with out being blitzed, and one that loses its teeth when being blitzed. 49ers are going to be blitzing 90% of the time, I see big trouble for KC.
KC just took out the best running back in the game . I think they can handle SF 's running game
So no concerns for you then. Maybe you're right. I just think there may just be a red flag popping up considering the Chiefs are ranked 29th (thats out of 32) in run defense efficiency, and the team up next just slammed down near 300 yrds on the ground in the Conference Championship game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.