- Jaguars +7.5 ($5,000)
- Vikings -3.5 ($4,000)
- Saints Under 20.5 ($1,000)
I like your picks. I will add this on the Minne game. Saints were terrible in road domes. Communication is key to Brees. He failed to score 20 this year in either of his two road dome games and is 1-4 career in road playoff games. Vikings allowing 12 ppg at home and most are late garbage versus points in the first three quarters of games when they matter.
I like your picks. I will add this on the Minne game. Saints were terrible in road domes. Communication is key to Brees. He failed to score 20 this year in either of his two road dome games and is 1-4 career in road playoff games. Vikings allowing 12 ppg at home and most are late garbage versus points in the first three quarters of games when they matter.
Thanks for the write up! Don’t know if I should wait if the line moves a bit, I could have it at +7 and -4?
Thanks for the write up! Don’t know if I should wait if the line moves a bit, I could have it at +7 and -4?
With you on the Vikings as well. I have them for SB at 8-1, but will be doubling down on them for this game too.
But the Jags pick I am not too confident with. I like Pittsburg, but the books got it right on the money at 7 points. Gonna be tough, but I think Pitts squeezes it out. Havent placed a bet yet, hoping line drops down but I doubt it.
With you on the Vikings as well. I have them for SB at 8-1, but will be doubling down on them for this game too.
But the Jags pick I am not too confident with. I like Pittsburg, but the books got it right on the money at 7 points. Gonna be tough, but I think Pitts squeezes it out. Havent placed a bet yet, hoping line drops down but I doubt it.
With you on the Vikings as well. I have them for SB at 8-1, but will be doubling down on them for this game too.
But the Jags pick I am not too confident with. I like Pittsburg, but the books got it right on the money at 7 points. Gonna be tough, but I think Pitts squeezes it out. Havent placed a bet yet, hoping line drops down but I doubt it.
With you on the Vikings as well. I have them for SB at 8-1, but will be doubling down on them for this game too.
But the Jags pick I am not too confident with. I like Pittsburg, but the books got it right on the money at 7 points. Gonna be tough, but I think Pitts squeezes it out. Havent placed a bet yet, hoping line drops down but I doubt it.
I like Minnesota. I agree with LC that NO is fool's gold. CAR could have easily pulled that victory. The NO secondary is not good. They were beat bad by TB. CAR could have easily won last week. Cam had 300 yards passing and 2 TDS and should have had a 3rd TD if K. Clay caught that endzone pass in the corner. MINN's defense is for real and I think they are going to exploit the NO secondary. I am still debating on the +4.
I may tease this or do a ML parlay with MINN.
I like Minnesota. I agree with LC that NO is fool's gold. CAR could have easily pulled that victory. The NO secondary is not good. They were beat bad by TB. CAR could have easily won last week. Cam had 300 yards passing and 2 TDS and should have had a 3rd TD if K. Clay caught that endzone pass in the corner. MINN's defense is for real and I think they are going to exploit the NO secondary. I am still debating on the +4.
I may tease this or do a ML parlay with MINN.
LC,
Do you trust Bortles to hit the wideouts. I am not too keen with the Jags' WR core. I just don't see Bortles making the plays to keep JAC in the game. But, I do agree Shazier's absence could be exploited.
LC,
Do you trust Bortles to hit the wideouts. I am not too keen with the Jags' WR core. I just don't see Bortles making the plays to keep JAC in the game. But, I do agree Shazier's absence could be exploited.
LC,
Do you trust Bortles to hit the wideouts. I am not too keen with the Jags' WR core. I just don't see Bortles making the plays to keep JAC in the game. But, I do agree Shazier's absence could be exploited.
LC,
Do you trust Bortles to hit the wideouts. I am not too keen with the Jags' WR core. I just don't see Bortles making the plays to keep JAC in the game. But, I do agree Shazier's absence could be exploited.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.