only thing I cant figure out is will they want to pit brother against brother in the superbowl, thats if they get to the championship game..........
u are right about one thing its fixed and its what ever THEY want!!!...U ARE DEAD ON WITH THAT STATEMENT!!....but they def dont want another harb brothers cause that sleep snoozer on turkey day night was bad enough....they want u to watch super bowl not fall asleep during it
0
prime says....
only thing I cant figure out is will they want to pit brother against brother in the superbowl, thats if they get to the championship game..........
u are right about one thing its fixed and its what ever THEY want!!!...U ARE DEAD ON WITH THAT STATEMENT!!....but they def dont want another harb brothers cause that sleep snoozer on turkey day night was bad enough....they want u to watch super bowl not fall asleep during it
Seems like Vegas wants people on the Giants with a line like that, still not buying Eli and compnay. Like GB -9
Texans are fired up for these playoffs. Defense can hold Balt back some, and offense will give their left arm for points...Like Houst +9
Even if I had a time machine and KNEW the Pats would cover, Id take Tebow strictly cause Im not betting against Jesus' best friend
All signs point towards a Saints dd victory, BUT the 49ers have a way of winning games they should lose. These two teams on paper, Id go with NO -4 or even NO -14 if that were the line....but in reality gotta go with SF to cover the 4 if not win su
Hope we both win em all PrimeTime...
0
Seems like Vegas wants people on the Giants with a line like that, still not buying Eli and compnay. Like GB -9
Texans are fired up for these playoffs. Defense can hold Balt back some, and offense will give their left arm for points...Like Houst +9
Even if I had a time machine and KNEW the Pats would cover, Id take Tebow strictly cause Im not betting against Jesus' best friend
All signs point towards a Saints dd victory, BUT the 49ers have a way of winning games they should lose. These two teams on paper, Id go with NO -4 or even NO -14 if that were the line....but in reality gotta go with SF to cover the 4 if not win su
Even if I had a time machine and KNEW the Pats would cover, Id take Tebow strictly cause Im not betting against Jesus' best friend
All signs point towards a Saints dd victory, BUT the 49ers have a way of winning games they should lose. These two teams on paper, Id go with NO -4 or even NO -14 if that were the line....but in reality gotta go with SF to cover the 4 if not win su
LMAO if u knew pats would cover u still bet benver?thats off the shelf there......than you basically talk yourself out of saints and onto niners,lol....u might as well flip a coin with that logic
0
aaust says.....
Even if I had a time machine and KNEW the Pats would cover, Id take Tebow strictly cause Im not betting against Jesus' best friend
All signs point towards a Saints dd victory, BUT the 49ers have a way of winning games they should lose. These two teams on paper, Id go with NO -4 or even NO -14 if that were the line....but in reality gotta go with SF to cover the 4 if not win su
LMAO if u knew pats would cover u still bet benver?thats off the shelf there......than you basically talk yourself out of saints and onto niners,lol....u might as well flip a coin with that logic
I won my last 3team parlays.. That's 9 for 9 on parlay picks. Lemme guess, you are taking giants ML... HAHHAHHAAhahahahahahha, seem like that kinda guy/fool
0
I won my last 3team parlays.. That's 9 for 9 on parlay picks. Lemme guess, you are taking giants ML... HAHHAHHAAhahahahahahha, seem like that kinda guy/fool
I won my last 3team parlays.. That's 9 for 9 on parlay picks. Lemme guess, you are taking giants ML... HAHHAHHAAhahahahahahha, seem like that kinda guy/fool
9 for 9 on parlay picks?
the odds of the happening are like 1 in .00000000000000000000001
0
Quote Originally Posted by Antonius:
I won my last 3team parlays.. That's 9 for 9 on parlay picks. Lemme guess, you are taking giants ML... HAHHAHHAAhahahahahahha, seem like that kinda guy/fool
9 for 9 on parlay picks?
the odds of the happening are like 1 in .00000000000000000000001
I won my last 3team parlays.. That's 9 for 9 on parlay picks. Lemme guess, you are taking giants ML... HAHHAHHAAhahahahahahha, seem like that kinda guy/fool
9 for 9 on 30pt teaser parlays?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Antonius:
I won my last 3team parlays.. That's 9 for 9 on parlay picks. Lemme guess, you are taking giants ML... HAHHAHHAAhahahahahahha, seem like that kinda guy/fool
Artificial turf teams on the road on grass are 5-13 SU in the playoffs since 2002 if im not mistaken...............
prime--an additional strong system play to support--Balt and N/E
play on a team in their first play off game if they lost in the div round last year and scored 24 or less points---1981 to present 10-1-1-----play on Balt and N/E
0
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:
Artificial turf teams on the road on grass are 5-13 SU in the playoffs since 2002 if im not mistaken...............
prime--an additional strong system play to support--Balt and N/E
play on a team in their first play off game if they lost in the div round last year and scored 24 or less points---1981 to present 10-1-1-----play on Balt and N/E
prime--an additional strong system play to support--Balt and N/E
play on a team in their first play off game if they lost in the div round last year and scored 24 or less points---1981 to present 10-1-1-----play on Balt and N/E
Reasons to bet HOU
In the divisional round, top seeds from the AFC have struggled, going 12-9 SU and 8-13 ATS, including 5-5 SU and 1-9 ATS when playing off back-to-back wins (Balt won their last two games).
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2211nfl:
prime--an additional strong system play to support--Balt and N/E
play on a team in their first play off game if they lost in the div round last year and scored 24 or less points---1981 to present 10-1-1-----play on Balt and N/E
Reasons to bet HOU
In the divisional round, top seeds from the AFC have struggled, going 12-9 SU and 8-13 ATS, including 5-5 SU and 1-9 ATS when playing off back-to-back wins (Balt won their last two games).
prime--an additional strong system play to support--Balt and N/E
play on a team in their first play off game if they lost in the div round last year and scored 24 or less points---1981 to present 10-1-1-----play on Balt and N/E
I just checked the above system you typed & it is 100% correct my friend, good stuff............looks like the Ravens are a solid bet............the Patriots didnt score 24 or more last year, they scored 21 points so they dont belong with this system.............just take the Ravens if you like the above system................
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2211nfl:
prime--an additional strong system play to support--Balt and N/E
play on a team in their first play off game if they lost in the div round last year and scored 24 or less points---1981 to present 10-1-1-----play on Balt and N/E
I just checked the above system you typed & it is 100% correct my friend, good stuff............looks like the Ravens are a solid bet............the Patriots didnt score 24 or more last year, they scored 21 points so they dont belong with this system.............just take the Ravens if you like the above system................
Either way, I feel like pounding the Patriots big time, gonna wait to see if the line comes down..........Tebow's train will derail this Saturday.............
0
Either way, I feel like pounding the Patriots big time, gonna wait to see if the line comes down..........Tebow's train will derail this Saturday.............
I just checked the above system you typed & it is 100% correct my friend, good stuff............looks like the Ravens are a solid bet............the Patriots didnt score 24 or more last year, they scored 21 points so they dont belong with this system.............just take the Ravens if you like the above system................
[/Quote---prime--system is to have scored 24 or less--N/E scored 21 last year and the ravens scored 24---both fall into the system
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys]
I just checked the above system you typed & it is 100% correct my friend, good stuff............looks like the Ravens are a solid bet............the Patriots didnt score 24 or more last year, they scored 21 points so they dont belong with this system.............just take the Ravens if you like the above system................
[/Quote---prime--system is to have scored 24 or less--N/E scored 21 last year and the ravens scored 24---both fall into the system
[Quote: Originally Posted by 2211nfl] [Quote: Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys]
I just checked the above system you typed & it is 100% correct my friend, good stuff............looks like the Ravens are a solid bet............the Patriots didnt score 24 or more last year, they scored 21 points so they dont belong with this system.............just take the Ravens if you like the above system................
[/Quote---prime--system is to have scored 24 or less--N/E scored 21 last year and the ravens scored 24---both fall into the system [/Quote---------
SORRY--I STAND CORRECTED--your correct system is 24 or more NOT 24 or less----NE no play BUT balt a play
thanks
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by 2211nfl] [Quote: Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys]
I just checked the above system you typed & it is 100% correct my friend, good stuff............looks like the Ravens are a solid bet............the Patriots didnt score 24 or more last year, they scored 21 points so they dont belong with this system.............just take the Ravens if you like the above system................
[/Quote---prime--system is to have scored 24 or less--N/E scored 21 last year and the ravens scored 24---both fall into the system [/Quote---------
SORRY--I STAND CORRECTED--your correct system is 24 or more NOT 24 or less----NE no play BUT balt a play
prime--an additional strong system play to support--Balt and N/E
play on a team in their first play off game if they lost in the div round last year and scored 24 or less points---1981 to present 10-1-1-----play on Balt and N/E
He stated 24 or less points. Pats put up 21 and Ravens 24 so this applies to both teams this week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2211nfl:
prime--an additional strong system play to support--Balt and N/E
play on a team in their first play off game if they lost in the div round last year and scored 24 or less points---1981 to present 10-1-1-----play on Balt and N/E
He stated 24 or less points. Pats put up 21 and Ravens 24 so this applies to both teams this week.
now we got systems from 1981 on who scored 24pts or more?or 24 or less?.....so many useless bullshits systems that they not sure if its MORE or LESS,lmao......since 81?is that a joke?
hey you might as well go back to 1922 girls when the afl became the nfl!!....lmao......this is getting ridiculous with since 81,89,77,92,95,99,02.....u actually think it matters!!!
ANY STAT BEFORE 2002 WHEN THEY CHANGED THE FORMAT OF DIV/WILD CARDS SHOULD BE THROWN IN THE GARBAGE!!!....thats if u really hold stats with any importance!!...i think u better off flipping a coin if you basing your plays on trends!!
0
now we got systems from 1981 on who scored 24pts or more?or 24 or less?.....so many useless bullshits systems that they not sure if its MORE or LESS,lmao......since 81?is that a joke?
hey you might as well go back to 1922 girls when the afl became the nfl!!....lmao......this is getting ridiculous with since 81,89,77,92,95,99,02.....u actually think it matters!!!
ANY STAT BEFORE 2002 WHEN THEY CHANGED THE FORMAT OF DIV/WILD CARDS SHOULD BE THROWN IN THE GARBAGE!!!....thats if u really hold stats with any importance!!...i think u better off flipping a coin if you basing your plays on trends!!
now we got systems from 1981 on who scored 24pts or more?or 24 or less?.....so many useless bullshits systems that they not sure if its MORE or LESS,lmao......since 81?is that a joke?
hey you might as well go back to 1922 girls when the afl became the nfl!!....lmao......this is getting ridiculous with since 81,89,77,92,95,99,02.....u actually think it matters!!!
ANY STAT BEFORE 2002 WHEN THEY CHANGED THE FORMAT OF DIV/WILD CARDS SHOULD BE THROWN IN THE GARBAGE!!!....thats if u really hold stats with any importance!!...i think u better off flipping a coin if you basing your plays on trends!!
Instead of providing us with your ridiculous sarcasm responses, why done you provide us with your system plays so we can see just how much information you have on these games & no, you telling us how crazy we are for taking the opposite side of what you like wont help us, so stop wasting your time & ours with your stupidity.............
0
Quote Originally Posted by dawizard2011:
now we got systems from 1981 on who scored 24pts or more?or 24 or less?.....so many useless bullshits systems that they not sure if its MORE or LESS,lmao......since 81?is that a joke?
hey you might as well go back to 1922 girls when the afl became the nfl!!....lmao......this is getting ridiculous with since 81,89,77,92,95,99,02.....u actually think it matters!!!
ANY STAT BEFORE 2002 WHEN THEY CHANGED THE FORMAT OF DIV/WILD CARDS SHOULD BE THROWN IN THE GARBAGE!!!....thats if u really hold stats with any importance!!...i think u better off flipping a coin if you basing your plays on trends!!
Instead of providing us with your ridiculous sarcasm responses, why done you provide us with your system plays so we can see just how much information you have on these games & no, you telling us how crazy we are for taking the opposite side of what you like wont help us, so stop wasting your time & ours with your stupidity.............
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.