to the rest of you that believe what you are told, Id feel sorry for you but your really not worth the waste of emotion since you are mere followers and you will live your pathetic lives in this manner, never take chances in life, and that will define you and the legacy you leave behind to your children and childrens children.
NFL Fix? Please reply...
to the rest of you that believe what you are told, Id feel sorry for you but your really not worth the waste of emotion since you are mere followers and you will live your pathetic lives in this manner, never take chances in life, and that will define you and the legacy you leave behind to your children and childrens children.
to the rest of you that believe what you are told, Id feel sorry for you but your really not worth the waste of emotion since you are mere followers and you will live your pathetic lives in this manner, never take chances in life, and that will define you and the legacy you leave behind to your children and childrens children.
Can't we all just state our opinions and move on? Why is there such a need to banter like a bunch of babies on a forum? Just answer the questions, give your opinion and move on. If someone calles you a name or says something bad about you, who the hell cares? There is no need to retaliate and start a war of wits(or lack there of) on this forum.
I am sick of people ruining good threads and discussions with their childish behaviour. Come on people....GROW UP already.. If you are old enough to gamble than you should be old enough to know this already and quit acting like BABIES.
That being said....thanks to all of you who posted your opinions about this subject.
![]()
Can't we all just state our opinions and move on? Why is there such a need to banter like a bunch of babies on a forum? Just answer the questions, give your opinion and move on. If someone calles you a name or says something bad about you, who the hell cares? There is no need to retaliate and start a war of wits(or lack there of) on this forum.
I am sick of people ruining good threads and discussions with their childish behaviour. Come on people....GROW UP already.. If you are old enough to gamble than you should be old enough to know this already and quit acting like BABIES.
That being said....thanks to all of you who posted your opinions about this subject.
![]()
Iv decided not to waste anymore time educating the misled sheep of this forum, Luckily and to my surprise, there are a-lot of you here that arent sheep, You question the system and you will not be misled.
to the rest of you that believe what you are told, Id feel sorry for you but your really not worth the waste of emotion since you are mere followers and you will live your pathetic lives in this manner, never take chances in life, and that will define you and the legacy you leave behind to your children and childrens children.
Seems you are quite passionate about this...i respect that. You have made a lot of great points and backed them up with good research. There is no need to "educate anymore sheep" not everyone is going to agree with your point of view. Besides....the world needs wolves and sheep.
GL![]()
Iv decided not to waste anymore time educating the misled sheep of this forum, Luckily and to my surprise, there are a-lot of you here that arent sheep, You question the system and you will not be misled.
to the rest of you that believe what you are told, Id feel sorry for you but your really not worth the waste of emotion since you are mere followers and you will live your pathetic lives in this manner, never take chances in life, and that will define you and the legacy you leave behind to your children and childrens children.
Seems you are quite passionate about this...i respect that. You have made a lot of great points and backed them up with good research. There is no need to "educate anymore sheep" not everyone is going to agree with your point of view. Besides....the world needs wolves and sheep.
GL![]()
Years ago when I was betting in NC my bookie knew I played Middles ( betting both sides ) especially basketball. I had outs in Ohio and NC.Mybook in NC called me at home to see how much I could bet for him on NC St. in Ohio. The line was NCSt -18 in Ohio he had NCSt -22.5.My partner in Ohio could bet up to 5,000 with 1 book and 500 with 2 other books per game. We bet 5,000 for him and 1000 for us on NCSt. -18. The game was tied at the half 25-25 NCSt pulled away in the last 5 minutes to win by 29. This was against Duquense with Jimmy V was coaching!!!!!!! THIS WAS AN ALUMNI SPECIAL!!!Game for the large donater's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Years ago when I was betting in NC my bookie knew I played Middles ( betting both sides ) especially basketball. I had outs in Ohio and NC.Mybook in NC called me at home to see how much I could bet for him on NC St. in Ohio. The line was NCSt -18 in Ohio he had NCSt -22.5.My partner in Ohio could bet up to 5,000 with 1 book and 500 with 2 other books per game. We bet 5,000 for him and 1000 for us on NCSt. -18. The game was tied at the half 25-25 NCSt pulled away in the last 5 minutes to win by 29. This was against Duquense with Jimmy V was coaching!!!!!!! THIS WAS AN ALUMNI SPECIAL!!!Game for the large donater's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
And w/ all the disgruntled former players suing the NFL for medical bills, pensions, dangerous work conditions, etc. NOT ONE has blown the whistle on this omnipresent rigging of games, or even thought to blackmail Goodellw/ the "truth" to get what they want. It's a really uncanny streak of luck they're having, dontcha think?
Again, almost every1 concedes that SOME outcomes are OCCASIONLY influenced to some degree or another. From control-freak commisioners exerting undue influence to outright fixing. But unexpected outcomes DO happen. To think that an oblong ball didn't bounce as you predicted, or that the linesmakers are actually smarter than you is simply IMPOSSIBLE to accept. Hence, "The fix is in!!!!!" Waaaaah.
And w/ all the disgruntled former players suing the NFL for medical bills, pensions, dangerous work conditions, etc. NOT ONE has blown the whistle on this omnipresent rigging of games, or even thought to blackmail Goodellw/ the "truth" to get what they want. It's a really uncanny streak of luck they're having, dontcha think?
Again, almost every1 concedes that SOME outcomes are OCCASIONLY influenced to some degree or another. From control-freak commisioners exerting undue influence to outright fixing. But unexpected outcomes DO happen. To think that an oblong ball didn't bounce as you predicted, or that the linesmakers are actually smarter than you is simply IMPOSSIBLE to accept. Hence, "The fix is in!!!!!" Waaaaah.
The NFL nor it's referees ever explained why this td did not count at the end of the game. It was a 10 yard lateral so it was super clear that it was a live ball and that fact was backed up the referees not blowing the whistle and allowing the td. The td did not change the outcome of the game but did cover the spread for steelers backers as the steelers were 4 point faves.
After the td the refs got together and for a mysterious reason no one knows, and one that was never given despite the public demanding one, the td was erased and never counted towards the final score as the refs hurried off the field. The public in the game was heavily on the side of the Steelers who because of this unexplained, nonsensical event failed to cover the betting spread.
It was a td 100%. There is zero argument to say it was not and therefore one was never even offered by the league or its officials. So I ask the people that say anyone who thinks games are tampered with are crazy, to please explain these events. I'm sorry but there is only one sensible conclusion here in my opinion. If there was another sensible one, then surely the league would have offered it. All they ever said was oops! I do not want to hear they blew the call, they know the rules, it was as very basic play and everyone including them knew it was a clear td.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVtlJgt_8FY
The spread covering touchdown that magically never happened, after it actually did happen.
Tell it brother !! I remember this game like it was yesterday.The refs got together for 10 minutes discussing a meaningless play that had no affect on the outcome (just the spread) and somehow got it wrong.I think the Steelers had 12 penalties to the Chargers 3 also.This was the game that opened my eyes and made realize that some games arent on the up and up
The NFL nor it's referees ever explained why this td did not count at the end of the game. It was a 10 yard lateral so it was super clear that it was a live ball and that fact was backed up the referees not blowing the whistle and allowing the td. The td did not change the outcome of the game but did cover the spread for steelers backers as the steelers were 4 point faves.
After the td the refs got together and for a mysterious reason no one knows, and one that was never given despite the public demanding one, the td was erased and never counted towards the final score as the refs hurried off the field. The public in the game was heavily on the side of the Steelers who because of this unexplained, nonsensical event failed to cover the betting spread.
It was a td 100%. There is zero argument to say it was not and therefore one was never even offered by the league or its officials. So I ask the people that say anyone who thinks games are tampered with are crazy, to please explain these events. I'm sorry but there is only one sensible conclusion here in my opinion. If there was another sensible one, then surely the league would have offered it. All they ever said was oops! I do not want to hear they blew the call, they know the rules, it was as very basic play and everyone including them knew it was a clear td.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVtlJgt_8FY
The spread covering touchdown that magically never happened, after it actually did happen.
Tell it brother !! I remember this game like it was yesterday.The refs got together for 10 minutes discussing a meaningless play that had no affect on the outcome (just the spread) and somehow got it wrong.I think the Steelers had 12 penalties to the Chargers 3 also.This was the game that opened my eyes and made realize that some games arent on the up and up
And w/ all the disgruntled former players suing the NFL for medical bills, pensions, dangerous work conditions, etc. NOT ONE has blown the whistle on this omnipresent rigging of games, or even thought to blackmail Goodellw/ the "truth" to get what they want. It's a really uncanny streak of luck they're having, dontcha think?
Again, almost every1 concedes that SOME outcomes are OCCASIONLY influenced to some degree or another. From control-freak commisioners exerting undue influence to outright fixing. But unexpected outcomes DO happen. To think that an oblong ball didn't bounce as you predicted, or that the linesmakers are actually smarter than you is simply IMPOSSIBLE to accept. Hence, "The fix is in!!!!!" Waaaaah.
Linesmakers are smarter than us.
Proof: Who's got the nice houses, big bank accounts and nice casinos. There's your answer.
And w/ all the disgruntled former players suing the NFL for medical bills, pensions, dangerous work conditions, etc. NOT ONE has blown the whistle on this omnipresent rigging of games, or even thought to blackmail Goodellw/ the "truth" to get what they want. It's a really uncanny streak of luck they're having, dontcha think?
Again, almost every1 concedes that SOME outcomes are OCCASIONLY influenced to some degree or another. From control-freak commisioners exerting undue influence to outright fixing. But unexpected outcomes DO happen. To think that an oblong ball didn't bounce as you predicted, or that the linesmakers are actually smarter than you is simply IMPOSSIBLE to accept. Hence, "The fix is in!!!!!" Waaaaah.
Linesmakers are smarter than us.
Proof: Who's got the nice houses, big bank accounts and nice casinos. There's your answer.
I wouldn’t say NFL/CFB games are fixed, however there is NO doubt in my mind gamblers get to key members of a roster that can affect the outcome of a game (i.e. QB’s, Kickers). I have watched intently over the years and obviously it’s always the team that’s favored. I have compiled a list of individuals that are the most egregious violators of the public's trust below for your viewing pleasure. They are as follows:
1. Joe Flacco
2. Michael Vick (last two seasons)
3. Tom Brady (never lay double digit chalk with Tommy Terrific)
4. Payton Manning (his last three seasons with the Colts)
5. Stephen Garcia (I’m still trying to figure what caused him to fumble the ball late 4th
quarter when the Gamecocks had Cam Newton beat at Auburn)
6. Kevin Kolb
7. Matt Shaub (*Note: Monday night game against the Jets was the first time I saw that
type of behavior out of him)
8. Tino Sunseri
You forgot Moniz from Hawaii. ![]()
I wouldn’t say NFL/CFB games are fixed, however there is NO doubt in my mind gamblers get to key members of a roster that can affect the outcome of a game (i.e. QB’s, Kickers). I have watched intently over the years and obviously it’s always the team that’s favored. I have compiled a list of individuals that are the most egregious violators of the public's trust below for your viewing pleasure. They are as follows:
1. Joe Flacco
2. Michael Vick (last two seasons)
3. Tom Brady (never lay double digit chalk with Tommy Terrific)
4. Payton Manning (his last three seasons with the Colts)
5. Stephen Garcia (I’m still trying to figure what caused him to fumble the ball late 4th
quarter when the Gamecocks had Cam Newton beat at Auburn)
6. Kevin Kolb
7. Matt Shaub (*Note: Monday night game against the Jets was the first time I saw that
type of behavior out of him)
8. Tino Sunseri
You forgot Moniz from Hawaii. ![]()
You mean like having the over of 40.5 for 500$ in the jets/texans games and getting fucked when a high power offense can't score at the 3 yard line and settles for a field goal or the Jets driving all the way with also a Tebow run to the 2 yard line and also settling for a field goal and only 3 points being scored in the 4th qt!!! Hmmmmm you guys tell me?!!!!
You mean like having the over of 40.5 for 500$ in the jets/texans games and getting fucked when a high power offense can't score at the 3 yard line and settles for a field goal or the Jets driving all the way with also a Tebow run to the 2 yard line and also settling for a field goal and only 3 points being scored in the 4th qt!!! Hmmmmm you guys tell me?!!!!
Referred to as the “Peyton Manning Rule,” it’s a recently spotlighted potential penalty against quarterbacks who try to draw defenders offside with movements instead of hard counts. But Triplette, as is his wont, took things too far. Perhaps he was confused by the presence of Manning in this game, and figured — what the heck!
“I’ve never seen that called twice in a game in my life,” ESPN’s Jon Gruden said. “I’d be interested to see what Jeff Triplette is seeing here.”
“I know the emphasis is on the hands, but the [hand movement] has got to be more exaggerated than what we saw, in my opinion,” said Gerry Austin, ESPN’s roving officiating expert and a former Super Bowl referee himself. “And also, I didn’t think the head bob was sufficient. I think [the defenders] are jumping on the hard count.”
Rivers has long been a master of the hard count; his ability to draw defenders offside is an important color in his palette. It’s interesting to note that before tonight’s game, Rivers had no false start penalties in 2012 … or, in 2011, 2010, 2009, and on and on. In fact, these are the first false start penalties of Rivers’ career, and he’s been in the league since 2004. So, there’s no actual precedent, and no specific rule interpretation — point of emphasis or not — that would lead a reasonable and qualified official to throw those flags.
“This wasn’t a rule change, this was a point of emphasis this year,” McKay said in September .
saintsnews.net
Referred to as the “Peyton Manning Rule,” it’s a recently spotlighted potential penalty against quarterbacks who try to draw defenders offside with movements instead of hard counts. But Triplette, as is his wont, took things too far. Perhaps he was confused by the presence of Manning in this game, and figured — what the heck!
“I’ve never seen that called twice in a game in my life,” ESPN’s Jon Gruden said. “I’d be interested to see what Jeff Triplette is seeing here.”
“I know the emphasis is on the hands, but the [hand movement] has got to be more exaggerated than what we saw, in my opinion,” said Gerry Austin, ESPN’s roving officiating expert and a former Super Bowl referee himself. “And also, I didn’t think the head bob was sufficient. I think [the defenders] are jumping on the hard count.”
Rivers has long been a master of the hard count; his ability to draw defenders offside is an important color in his palette. It’s interesting to note that before tonight’s game, Rivers had no false start penalties in 2012 … or, in 2011, 2010, 2009, and on and on. In fact, these are the first false start penalties of Rivers’ career, and he’s been in the league since 2004. So, there’s no actual precedent, and no specific rule interpretation — point of emphasis or not — that would lead a reasonable and qualified official to throw those flags.
“This wasn’t a rule change, this was a point of emphasis this year,” McKay said in September .
saintsnews.net
On Monday night’s game between the San Diego Chargers and Denver Broncos, Deputy Dawg was at it again. Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers was called for two false starts in the first half — once for barely moving his hands pre-snap in a shotgun formation, and once for moving his head under center pre-snap. Atlanta Falcons President and NFL Competition Committee Chairman Rich McKay recently said that pre-snap quarterback movement would be a greater point of emphasis this season, but anyone would have to agree that this was a bit much.
Referred to as the “Peyton Manning Rule,” it’s a recently spotlighted potential penalty against quarterbacks who try to draw defenders offside with movements instead of hard counts. But Triplette, as is his wont, took things too far. Perhaps he was confused by the presence of Manning in this game, and figured — what the heck!
“I’ve never seen that called twice in a game in my life,” ESPN’s Jon Gruden said. “I’d be interested to see what Jeff Triplette is seeing here.”
“I know the emphasis is on the hands, but the [hand movement] has got to be more exaggerated than what we saw, in my opinion,” said Gerry Austin, ESPN’s roving officiating expert and a former Super Bowl referee himself. “And also, I didn’t think the head bob was sufficient. I think [the defenders] are jumping on the hard count.”
Rivers has long been a master of the hard count; his ability to draw defenders offside is an important color in his palette. It’s interesting to note that before tonight’s game, Rivers had no false start penalties in 2012 … or, in 2011, 2010, 2009, and on and on. In fact, these are the first false start penalties of Rivers’ career, and he’s been in the league since 2004. So, there’s no actual precedent, and no specific rule interpretation — point of emphasis or not — that would lead a reasonable and qualified official to throw those flags.
“This wasn’t a rule change, this was a point of emphasis this year,” McKay said in September .
saintsnews.net
Any thoughts on the Peyton Manning Rule? Have you ever heard of it? Get ready, because this call is going to be made on a regular basis.
On Monday night’s game between the San Diego Chargers and Denver Broncos, Deputy Dawg was at it again. Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers was called for two false starts in the first half — once for barely moving his hands pre-snap in a shotgun formation, and once for moving his head under center pre-snap. Atlanta Falcons President and NFL Competition Committee Chairman Rich McKay recently said that pre-snap quarterback movement would be a greater point of emphasis this season, but anyone would have to agree that this was a bit much.
Referred to as the “Peyton Manning Rule,” it’s a recently spotlighted potential penalty against quarterbacks who try to draw defenders offside with movements instead of hard counts. But Triplette, as is his wont, took things too far. Perhaps he was confused by the presence of Manning in this game, and figured — what the heck!
“I’ve never seen that called twice in a game in my life,” ESPN’s Jon Gruden said. “I’d be interested to see what Jeff Triplette is seeing here.”
“I know the emphasis is on the hands, but the [hand movement] has got to be more exaggerated than what we saw, in my opinion,” said Gerry Austin, ESPN’s roving officiating expert and a former Super Bowl referee himself. “And also, I didn’t think the head bob was sufficient. I think [the defenders] are jumping on the hard count.”
Rivers has long been a master of the hard count; his ability to draw defenders offside is an important color in his palette. It’s interesting to note that before tonight’s game, Rivers had no false start penalties in 2012 … or, in 2011, 2010, 2009, and on and on. In fact, these are the first false start penalties of Rivers’ career, and he’s been in the league since 2004. So, there’s no actual precedent, and no specific rule interpretation — point of emphasis or not — that would lead a reasonable and qualified official to throw those flags.
“This wasn’t a rule change, this was a point of emphasis this year,” McKay said in September .
saintsnews.net
Any thoughts on the Peyton Manning Rule? Have you ever heard of it? Get ready, because this call is going to be made on a regular basis.
Instances of fixes in this thread...
I can only laugh at the sheep who think these games aren't fixed
Instances of fixes in this thread...
I can only laugh at the sheep who think these games aren't fixed
2 touchdowns nullified as well
2 touchdowns nullified as well
Arnold Rothstien 1919 World Series and it goes back even further tha that gentlemen. Athletes are just like use normal "Joe's" they use drugs,they drink and sometimes these players even gamble.
But not all games are "fixed". I am however absolutely convinced certain games are.
Arnold Rothstien 1919 World Series and it goes back even further tha that gentlemen. Athletes are just like use normal "Joe's" they use drugs,they drink and sometimes these players even gamble.
But not all games are "fixed". I am however absolutely convinced certain games are.
G-Money
G-Money
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
