My Unit is 2.5%+Juice of my Initial Bankroll ($10K)
Began with 10,000$ and after 12 plays have 10,787$. That is an average profit of 65.58$ per game(wekk seven was 135$ per game). Much lower than I expect from myself (150$ profit per game is a reasonable number for $10K investment as 750$ gains per week are 3,000$ per month which is 30% monthly increase of a bankroll)
Remember that a proper management is the key to a successful enterprise in Sports Gambling. If you do that right - it is no more gambling but betting and is considered a way of life and good business for some.
Don't be a degenerate gambler! Become a Sports Betting Professional Businessman!
0
1-0 on 3 Unit Plays
2-1 on 1 Unit Plays
0-1 on Less Than a Unit Plays
My Unit is 2.5%+Juice of my Initial Bankroll ($10K)
Began with 10,000$ and after 12 plays have 10,787$. That is an average profit of 65.58$ per game(wekk seven was 135$ per game). Much lower than I expect from myself (150$ profit per game is a reasonable number for $10K investment as 750$ gains per week are 3,000$ per month which is 30% monthly increase of a bankroll)
Remember that a proper management is the key to a successful enterprise in Sports Gambling. If you do that right - it is no more gambling but betting and is considered a way of life and good business for some.
Don't be a degenerate gambler! Become a Sports Betting Professional Businessman!
The Patriots at home at plus line (last season 11 months ago they were +2 and won by a FG). The Patriots never lost to Peyton Manning as a Bronco at home. The Patriots have an agenda for their fans after being humiliated in the playoffs last season (humiliations is of the fans - the players - don't kid yourselves - they do not feel humiliated, neither would you knowing you're off to a Golf season with tens of millions of dollars in your bank account). If the Broncos are going to lose to someone this season - the Patriots are definitely a good candidate.
For me this is a 2 units play meaning I invest 525$ to win 500$
0
Week 9
#468 NE Patriots +3 -105
Why?
The Patriots at home at plus line (last season 11 months ago they were +2 and won by a FG). The Patriots never lost to Peyton Manning as a Bronco at home. The Patriots have an agenda for their fans after being humiliated in the playoffs last season (humiliations is of the fans - the players - don't kid yourselves - they do not feel humiliated, neither would you knowing you're off to a Golf season with tens of millions of dollars in your bank account). If the Broncos are going to lose to someone this season - the Patriots are definitely a good candidate.
For me this is a 2 units play meaning I invest 525$ to win 500$
Andy Reid hates foot fetish. So do I. The whole soft atmosphere in Jets is far from a football world we're accustommed to. Look at the Steelers - they are a football team. Look at the Jets - bunch of cry babies with the coach that I would not let him near neighbour's kids to coach. Andy Reid is all opposite that. Professional finally away from Philadelphia "freedom" and back down to basic football with the players who know the hierarchy in the team and what is asked from them. The opponent study is a first meeting of the team prior to a match. I can imagine the Jets being described in Reid's locker room. That was ironically. Now professionally - the teams are playing two absolutely different styles of football - if you can the softball the Jets playing a football. The Chiefs are playing progressive defense which first of all eliminates the opponents possible advantage positions by doubling on short and long coverages. The Jets will be trying a new QB? No problem for Reid - he will let him throw couple good ones - get some false confidence and then intercept him at least twice. That is a way Reid likes to play. Chezz. Because with the Chiefs - who are not the Pats or the Broncos -he has to adjust to the "stronger" opponent. Look what happened to the Rams who Reid "considered" as a "strong" opponent.
I risk here 1100$ to win 1000$ as a 4 Unit play.
0
#462 KC Chiefs -9.5 -110
Why?
Andy Reid hates foot fetish. So do I. The whole soft atmosphere in Jets is far from a football world we're accustommed to. Look at the Steelers - they are a football team. Look at the Jets - bunch of cry babies with the coach that I would not let him near neighbour's kids to coach. Andy Reid is all opposite that. Professional finally away from Philadelphia "freedom" and back down to basic football with the players who know the hierarchy in the team and what is asked from them. The opponent study is a first meeting of the team prior to a match. I can imagine the Jets being described in Reid's locker room. That was ironically. Now professionally - the teams are playing two absolutely different styles of football - if you can the softball the Jets playing a football. The Chiefs are playing progressive defense which first of all eliminates the opponents possible advantage positions by doubling on short and long coverages. The Jets will be trying a new QB? No problem for Reid - he will let him throw couple good ones - get some false confidence and then intercept him at least twice. That is a way Reid likes to play. Chezz. Because with the Chiefs - who are not the Pats or the Broncos -he has to adjust to the "stronger" opponent. Look what happened to the Rams who Reid "considered" as a "strong" opponent.
I like it Vagas about KC, they haven't missed a beat since the bye week, what you say about them rings true, concentrate on the defense and the offense will take care of itself
0
I like it Vagas about KC, they haven't missed a beat since the bye week, what you say about them rings true, concentrate on the defense and the offense will take care of itself
Andy Reid hates foot fetish. So do I. The whole soft atmosphere in Jets is far from a football world we're accustommed to. Look at the Steelers - they are a football team. Look at the Jets - bunch of cry babies with the coach that I would not let him near neighbour's kids to coach. Andy Reid is all opposite that. Professional finally away from Philadelphia "freedom" and back down to basic football with the players who know the hierarchy in the team and what is asked from them. The opponent study is a first meeting of the team prior to a match. I can imagine the Jets being described in Reid's locker room. That was ironically. Now professionally - the teams are playing two absolutely different styles of football - if you can the softball the Jets playing a football. The Chiefs are playing progressive defense which first of all eliminates the opponents possible advantage positions by doubling on short and long coverages. The Jets will be trying a new QB? No problem for Reid - he will let him throw couple good ones - get some false confidence and then intercept him at least twice. That is a way Reid likes to play. Chezz. Because with the Chiefs - who are not the Pats or the Broncos -he has to adjust to the "stronger" opponent. Look what happened to the Rams who Reid "considered" as a "strong" opponent.
I risk here 1100$ to win 1000$ as a 4 Unit play.
gl with this one. you gonna need it
0
Quote Originally Posted by vagaswikileaks:
#462 KC Chiefs -9.5 -110
Why?
Andy Reid hates foot fetish. So do I. The whole soft atmosphere in Jets is far from a football world we're accustommed to. Look at the Steelers - they are a football team. Look at the Jets - bunch of cry babies with the coach that I would not let him near neighbour's kids to coach. Andy Reid is all opposite that. Professional finally away from Philadelphia "freedom" and back down to basic football with the players who know the hierarchy in the team and what is asked from them. The opponent study is a first meeting of the team prior to a match. I can imagine the Jets being described in Reid's locker room. That was ironically. Now professionally - the teams are playing two absolutely different styles of football - if you can the softball the Jets playing a football. The Chiefs are playing progressive defense which first of all eliminates the opponents possible advantage positions by doubling on short and long coverages. The Jets will be trying a new QB? No problem for Reid - he will let him throw couple good ones - get some false confidence and then intercept him at least twice. That is a way Reid likes to play. Chezz. Because with the Chiefs - who are not the Pats or the Broncos -he has to adjust to the "stronger" opponent. Look what happened to the Rams who Reid "considered" as a "strong" opponent.
Enjoy your write ups, VWL! I lean towards Broncos this week; realize PM has never won there but believe three things: 1) Weather will affect NE more than DEN because I think DEN's ground game is better. 2) NE's banged up defense won't be able to handle DEN's receiving corps. 3) This is one of the best defenses PM has ever had. I think the Broncos actually win convincingly this week.
0
Enjoy your write ups, VWL! I lean towards Broncos this week; realize PM has never won there but believe three things: 1) Weather will affect NE more than DEN because I think DEN's ground game is better. 2) NE's banged up defense won't be able to handle DEN's receiving corps. 3) This is one of the best defenses PM has ever had. I think the Broncos actually win convincingly this week.
The whole soft atmosphere in Jets is far from a football world we're accustommed to. Look at the Steelers - they are a football team. Look at the Jets - bunch of cry babies with the coach that I would not let him near neighbour's kids to coach. Andy Reid is all opposite that. Professional finally away from Philadelphia "freedom" and back down to basic football with the players who know the hierarchy in the team and what is asked from them. The opponent study is a first meeting of the team prior to a match. I can imagine the Jets being described in Reid's locker room. That was ironically. Now professionally - the teams are playing two absolutely different styles of football - if you can the softball the Jets playing a football. The Chiefs are playing progressive defense which first of all eliminates the opponents possible advantage positions by doubling on short and long coverages. The Jets will be trying a new QB? No problem for Reid - he will let him throw couple good ones - get some false confidence and then intercept him at least twice. That is a way Reid likes to play. Chezz. Because with the Chiefs - who are not the Pats or the Broncos -he has to adjust to the "stronger" opponent. Look what happened to the Rams who Reid "considered" as a "strong" opponent.
I don't get your reasoning 100%.
Jets are not a soft team. They may lose, you may hate the coach, but they play for the coach. They play hard, even in the 4th quarter when the game's over. A soft team doesn't prefer to run the ball, and make for a physical game. If you're referring to Jets secondary-yeah, they're soft, there's a lack of talent. That said, not sure Alex Smith is going to be throwing deep balls all game against a soft secondary-it's not the Chiefs' style.
Seems foolish for Reid to double on short and long passes against the Jets, when the Jets want to run the ball.
The Jets aren't going to fooled with false confidence. Because they don't have much confidence at all. They've lost 7 games in a row. To give them any confidence makes little sense, to me. Sure the Rams went up by 7, before they lost 3 offensive linemen. The Jets would love to be up 7, at any time.
You might be right, but the reasoning I just don't get.
0
Quote Originally Posted by vagaswikileaks:
The whole soft atmosphere in Jets is far from a football world we're accustommed to. Look at the Steelers - they are a football team. Look at the Jets - bunch of cry babies with the coach that I would not let him near neighbour's kids to coach. Andy Reid is all opposite that. Professional finally away from Philadelphia "freedom" and back down to basic football with the players who know the hierarchy in the team and what is asked from them. The opponent study is a first meeting of the team prior to a match. I can imagine the Jets being described in Reid's locker room. That was ironically. Now professionally - the teams are playing two absolutely different styles of football - if you can the softball the Jets playing a football. The Chiefs are playing progressive defense which first of all eliminates the opponents possible advantage positions by doubling on short and long coverages. The Jets will be trying a new QB? No problem for Reid - he will let him throw couple good ones - get some false confidence and then intercept him at least twice. That is a way Reid likes to play. Chezz. Because with the Chiefs - who are not the Pats or the Broncos -he has to adjust to the "stronger" opponent. Look what happened to the Rams who Reid "considered" as a "strong" opponent.
I don't get your reasoning 100%.
Jets are not a soft team. They may lose, you may hate the coach, but they play for the coach. They play hard, even in the 4th quarter when the game's over. A soft team doesn't prefer to run the ball, and make for a physical game. If you're referring to Jets secondary-yeah, they're soft, there's a lack of talent. That said, not sure Alex Smith is going to be throwing deep balls all game against a soft secondary-it's not the Chiefs' style.
Seems foolish for Reid to double on short and long passes against the Jets, when the Jets want to run the ball.
The Jets aren't going to fooled with false confidence. Because they don't have much confidence at all. They've lost 7 games in a row. To give them any confidence makes little sense, to me. Sure the Rams went up by 7, before they lost 3 offensive linemen. The Jets would love to be up 7, at any time.
You might be right, but the reasoning I just don't get.
The Patriots at home at plus line (last season 11 months ago they were +2 and won by a FG). The Patriots never lost to Peyton Manning as a Bronco at home. The Patriots have an agenda for their fans after being humiliated in the playoffs last season (humiliations is of the fans - the players - don't kid yourselves - they do not feel humiliated, neither would you knowing you're off to a Golf season with tens of millions of dollars in your bank account). If the Broncos are going to lose to someone this season - the Patriots are definitely a good candidate.
For me this is a 2 units play meaning I invest 525$ to win 500$
NE Patriots 43 - DEN Broncos 21
Win (+25 Rating)
+500$
0
Quote Originally Posted by vagaswikileaks:
Week 9
#468 NE Patriots +3 -105
Why?
The Patriots at home at plus line (last season 11 months ago they were +2 and won by a FG). The Patriots never lost to Peyton Manning as a Bronco at home. The Patriots have an agenda for their fans after being humiliated in the playoffs last season (humiliations is of the fans - the players - don't kid yourselves - they do not feel humiliated, neither would you knowing you're off to a Golf season with tens of millions of dollars in your bank account). If the Broncos are going to lose to someone this season - the Patriots are definitely a good candidate.
For me this is a 2 units play meaning I invest 525$ to win 500$
Andy Reid hates foot fetish. So do I. The whole soft atmosphere in Jets is far from a football world we're accustommed to. Look at the Steelers - they are a football team. Look at the Jets - bunch of cry babies with the coach that I would not let him near neighbour's kids to coach. Andy Reid is all opposite that. Professional finally away from Philadelphia "freedom" and back down to basic football with the players who know the hierarchy in the team and what is asked from them. The opponent study is a first meeting of the team prior to a match. I can imagine the Jets being described in Reid's locker room. That was ironically. Now professionally - the teams are playing two absolutely different styles of football - if you can the softball the Jets playing a football. The Chiefs are playing progressive defense which first of all eliminates the opponents possible advantage positions by doubling on short and long coverages. The Jets will be trying a new QB? No problem for Reid - he will let him throw couple good ones - get some false confidence and then intercept him at least twice. That is a way Reid likes to play. Chezz. Because with the Chiefs - who are not the Pats or the Broncos -he has to adjust to the "stronger" opponent. Look what happened to the Rams who Reid "considered" as a "strong" opponent.
I risk here 1100$ to win 1000$ as a 4 Unit play.
KC Chiefs 24 - NY Jets 10
Win (+4.5 Rating)
+1000$
0
Quote Originally Posted by vagaswikileaks:
#462 KC Chiefs -9.5 -110
Why?
Andy Reid hates foot fetish. So do I. The whole soft atmosphere in Jets is far from a football world we're accustommed to. Look at the Steelers - they are a football team. Look at the Jets - bunch of cry babies with the coach that I would not let him near neighbour's kids to coach. Andy Reid is all opposite that. Professional finally away from Philadelphia "freedom" and back down to basic football with the players who know the hierarchy in the team and what is asked from them. The opponent study is a first meeting of the team prior to a match. I can imagine the Jets being described in Reid's locker room. That was ironically. Now professionally - the teams are playing two absolutely different styles of football - if you can the softball the Jets playing a football. The Chiefs are playing progressive defense which first of all eliminates the opponents possible advantage positions by doubling on short and long coverages. The Jets will be trying a new QB? No problem for Reid - he will let him throw couple good ones - get some false confidence and then intercept him at least twice. That is a way Reid likes to play. Chezz. Because with the Chiefs - who are not the Pats or the Broncos -he has to adjust to the "stronger" opponent. Look what happened to the Rams who Reid "considered" as a "strong" opponent.
Been following your thread. Dont feel bad about the slow buildup, I'm in the same boat. It's been unreal adjusting from last seasons flow into this one. Lonnnnnnng 2nd half of the season to get your stack on.
0
Been following your thread. Dont feel bad about the slow buildup, I'm in the same boat. It's been unreal adjusting from last seasons flow into this one. Lonnnnnnng 2nd half of the season to get your stack on.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
