All Forums | NFL Betting

*** NFL Sunday Ticket *** Week 5

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 22280
Posts: 101
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #1
Rough past few weeks but made a lot of adjustments for this Sunday. Love these plays below.

Kansas City Chiefs @ San Francisco 49ers

The 49ers are going through some internal turmoil but they are facing a team off a HUGE dominating win over a powerhouse Patriots team. KC should be drained emotionally, tie that with players playing there former team, they won't be 100% focused, especially on the road.

St. Louis Rams @ Philadelphia Eagles

Love the Rams play, the Eagles are extremely overrated and lucky to be 3-1. There offensive struggles last week have been blinded by there 21 points off special teams. Coach Fisher is 4-0 against the Eagles in his career - but why? Fisher was interviewing for the Eagles coaching gig about 20 years ago and they turned him down for someone else. Since then he has made it a point to exact some revenge against them. Fisher is also 7-2 ATS off a bye week.

New York Jets @ San Diego Chargers

Very strong system play favoring the Jets here. Plus for whatever reason, Geno Smith has played much better on the road in his short career then at home. Guess all the media hype in New York can be a burden to a young QB. The Jets are desperate coming off 3 straight losses. They'll do everything they can here to pull the upset. Plus, how focused will the Chargers be for a 1-3 Jets team after all the media hype of them being a Superbowl contender this week?

Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints

Must win for Drew Brees and the Saints, and playing in the Superdome against an opponent they always beat. And whom are playing in there 3rd straight road game. Yikes.
  • 49ers -5.5 (4x)
  • Rams +7 (4x)
  • Jets +7 (bovada line) (3.5x)
  • Saints -10 (2x)
  • Steelers/Jags Over 47 (1.5x)
  • Falcons +11 / Saints -3 (2x)
  • Jets +260 (0.5x)
  • Rams +240 (1x)

2014 NFL YTD: -12.9 Units

2013 NFL Regular Season: +104.76 Units
2013 NFL Playoffs: 6-2 ATS 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 2572
Posted: #2
GL 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 10292
Posted: #3
agree with all of them im only on sf at this point but strong lean toward n.o and nyj 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1574
Posted: #4
GL LC.  Like the jets as well, think they keep it within 3, and maybe win ML
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 9124
Posted: #5
Like SF and NO..Will look into the Rams.......I'm surprised you are not on NE.......BOL as always...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 371
Posted: #6

Love the Stl pick, good luck this week.

Interested to hear your thoughts on cinci/NE game. I'm guessing many would be picking NE after last weeks embarressment on national tv and them playing home. But this NE team doesnt lkook right all year.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2014
Posts: 6640
Posted: #7
Love your top 4
NO and RAMs is going to be my BIG plays of the week.
GL this week LC
Fan of your ...., PS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2794
Posted: #8
Great looking picks this week LC. Best card to date IMO

Here's to the turn around 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14926
Posted: #9
Falcons +11 / Saints -3 (2x)

LC, I know you use 5 dimes and those a holes had the Saints at -11 and I could not tease them below 4, so did you tease this with another book? Thanks.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 8776
Posted: #10
Leaguecapper,

SF, rams, and jets were in my play as well!!!!! I am loving SF and rams.

But I also hv colts...

Anyhow Bol LC 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 4617
Posted: #11
LIKE everything except I think Giants blow out ATL. GL LC
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #12
Sorry guys BB is correct. Teaser should say Saints -4. Honest mistake.
  • Falcons +11 / Saints -4 (2x) **
Xanthax and LMB - The Patriots are my favorite team and I watch them very closely. Brady is an astonishing 19-3 ATS after a loss as long as he's not favored by a touchdown or more. With the public all over the 3-0 Bengals team the Patriots look like a good play. However, I'm still leaning Bengals in a competitive matchup. The Pats have some issues that won't be fixed immediately. I still think they'll head into the playoffs with a lot of steam as always, but early on they will continue to struggle. 

The Bengals were 0-4 in Baltimore before this year, they went in and finally won there. This is a game that Cincinatti would normally lose in year's prior, but it looks like they are trying to make a statement this season after the embarassing playoff loss last season. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 2964
Posted: #13
....like the niners jets and saints....good luck!!!!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 16675
Posted: #14
I'm still waiting on some actual reasoning from pages 6 & 7 of your thread last week.  

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101956772&page=6


I proved your Saints trend wrong with actual game results and you pretended not to see it, only saying that your "database" is "never false".  

Finals scores are never false.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54481
Posted: #15
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 13
Posted: #16

Nice picks, I also like the over in Indy as well as NY Giants; What do you think?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly:

I'm still waiting on some actual reasoning from pages 6 & 7 of your thread last week.  

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101956772&page=6


I proved your Saints trend wrong with actual game results and you pretended not to see it, only saying that your "database" is "never false".  

Finals scores are never false.


I thought you'd have the common courtesy to believe someone that has been here for 3 years and has no point in posting false information. I barely spend any time on Covers anymore, I havn’t even been reading a lot of the stuff in my threads lately mostly because of people like you who do nothing but try and bring people down. All I do is share my plays and my thoughts on why i'm playing them, if you don’t like it you can stay out.

But regardless, I’ll be home in 2 hours and will share those systems you are claiming are false for you to prove to you that I would never make anything up. I’m sure afterwards you’ll move on to someone else’s thread and harass them as well. True asset to this forum you are
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 70
Posted: #18
 Best of luck
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 16675
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:


I thought you'd have the common courtesy to believe someone that has been here for 3 years and has no point in posting false information. I barely spend any time on Covers anymore, I havn’t even been reading a lot of the stuff in my threads lately mostly because of people like you who do nothing but try and bring people down. All I do is share my plays and my thoughts on why i'm playing them, if you don’t like it you can stay out.

But regardless, I’ll be home in 2 hours and will share those systems you are claiming are false for you to prove to you that I would never make anything up. I’m sure afterwards you’ll move on to someone else’s thread and harass them as well. True asset to this forum you are

I did believe you for a long while until one day I saw something in your thread that just seemed strange.  Don't remember what it was exactly, but I can tell you that it was a trend favoring the team I had planned on betting against that week.  So naturally I tried to verify the info and came up empty.  I didn't think much of it at the time and I moved on.  Then it happened again.  And again.  

So this past week when you touted your Saints ATS Sunday Night Football trend, and I proved to you that it's not true, I decided to ask for an explanation.  Instead of providing one, you cited a "database" that is apparently never wrong.  Maybe it's an anomaly, maybe a bug in the system, maybe a mistake, maybe this, maybe that...  

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 208
Posted: #20

  Thanks for taking the time to post.  Always enjoy your work.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 401
Posted: #21
Absolutely love St Louis....Was at the Eagles game few weeks back against washington and then to see them have a chance at the end to win in SF but fall short by 2 yards and fly back after that...the perfect storm is brewing for the Rams.

MAX bet for me on them 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 8776
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly:


I did believe you for a long while until one day I saw something in your thread that just seemed strange.  Don't remember what it was exactly, but I can tell you that it was a trend favoring the team I had planned on betting against that week.  So naturally I tried to verify the info and came up empty.  I didn't think much of it at the time and I moved on.  Then it happened again.  And again.  

So this past week when you touted your Saints ATS Sunday Night Football trend, and I proved to you that it's not true, I decided to ask for an explanation.  Instead of providing one, you cited a "database" that is apparently never wrong.  Maybe it's an anomaly, maybe a bug in the system, maybe a mistake, maybe this, maybe that...  


Wow seriously...no offence but wouldn't it be easier to move on?. 

Enjoy the game and move on.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 688
Posted: #23
Rams +7 and ML are also my top plays this week.

I'm all over this game. I just wish I had more to bet!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 102
Posted: #24
THANKS FOR THE PICKS LC.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54481
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly:


I did believe you for a long while until one day I saw something in your thread that just seemed strange.  Don't remember what it was exactly, but I can tell you that it was a trend favoring the team I had planned on betting against that week.  So naturally I tried to verify the info and came up empty.  I didn't think much of it at the time and I moved on.  Then it happened again.  And again.  

So this past week when you touted your Saints ATS Sunday Night Football trend, and I proved to you that it's not true, I decided to ask for an explanation.  Instead of providing one, you cited a "database" that is apparently never wrong.  Maybe it's an anomaly, maybe a bug in the system, maybe a mistake, maybe this, maybe that...  

You should try finding a life. Gotta be better than what you currently have......
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.