If it wasn't week 2, this would be a bigger wager. The Vikings are who they are - except without key players from last season and a regression to the mean. They are a 6-10 type of team.
Love this spot, short week with a new center for Minny.... Eagles roll. Giving 6 in week 2 is painful for me - but tonight is the place to do it.
GL all
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
6
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
NFL Record -2.5 units
Eagles -6 (2 units)
If it wasn't week 2, this would be a bigger wager. The Vikings are who they are - except without key players from last season and a regression to the mean. They are a 6-10 type of team.
Love this spot, short week with a new center for Minny.... Eagles roll. Giving 6 in week 2 is painful for me - but tonight is the place to do it.
I'm on the other side this time with a very low unit.
The Vikings didn't lose that game to the Buucs if you look closely. The Eagles didn't beat the Patriots either, the Patriots lost to themselves. The Eagles' production was truly ridiculous in week one.
Furthermore, there seems to be a “superbowl” factor in the Eagles that leaves them unmotivated at the moment.
I really missed out on getting Vikings at 7, but I'll settle for a low unit at 6.
Everyone is addicted to gambling. But I try to be a controlled addict.
2
I'm on the other side this time with a very low unit.
The Vikings didn't lose that game to the Buucs if you look closely. The Eagles didn't beat the Patriots either, the Patriots lost to themselves. The Eagles' production was truly ridiculous in week one.
Furthermore, there seems to be a “superbowl” factor in the Eagles that leaves them unmotivated at the moment.
I really missed out on getting Vikings at 7, but I'll settle for a low unit at 6.
Read his last post to me in the other thread… he “encouraged me to add it in” and that’s what I’m doing! If you don’t like it then just ignore it, but I’m gonna keep an HONEST and ACCURATE record of his if he doesn’t, -103 juice isn’t even the average juice for most people but that’s what I’m following by
1
@brn2loslive2win
Read his last post to me in the other thread… he “encouraged me to add it in” and that’s what I’m doing! If you don’t like it then just ignore it, but I’m gonna keep an HONEST and ACCURATE record of his if he doesn’t, -103 juice isn’t even the average juice for most people but that’s what I’m following by
Lest we not forget the NFL is week to week. If we base all our plays simply off what happened last week, we won't be betting very long, I can assure you of that. But GL to you!
"I'm afraid all we may have done is awakened a sleeping giant."
3
@GriLo
Lest we not forget the NFL is week to week. If we base all our plays simply off what happened last week, we won't be betting very long, I can assure you of that. But GL to you!
Then just share your plays instead of saying you have an “accurate record” when it’s clearly fake? Haha what’s the point of posting a record with no juice?
1
@mrusso
Then just share your plays instead of saying you have an “accurate record” when it’s clearly fake? Haha what’s the point of posting a record with no juice?
I'm on the other side this time with a very low unit. The Vikings didn't lose that game to the Buucs if you look closely. The Eagles didn't beat the Patriots either, the Patriots lost to themselves. The Eagles' production was truly ridiculous in week one. Furthermore, there seems to be a “superbowl” factor in the Eagles that leaves them unmotivated at the moment. I really missed out on getting Vikings at 7, but I'll settle for a low unit at 6.
I respect your opinion but those factors - even if true - would be very low on my list of things I would consider for making a wager in week 2.
I don't put much in to what happened in week 1, unless meaningful. Do you discount what happened to the Vikings 2 games ago when they lost to the Giants - who were totally embarrassed in week 1? Losing or winning one week doesnt mean much to me.
I take more stock in the Vikings over the last 19 games they have played. The first 10 or so their results way outperformed their statistical expectations - and the last 9 or so have been what they really are - a bottom 10 NFL team.
GL tonight.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
1
Quote Originally Posted by GriLo:
I'm on the other side this time with a very low unit. The Vikings didn't lose that game to the Buucs if you look closely. The Eagles didn't beat the Patriots either, the Patriots lost to themselves. The Eagles' production was truly ridiculous in week one. Furthermore, there seems to be a “superbowl” factor in the Eagles that leaves them unmotivated at the moment. I really missed out on getting Vikings at 7, but I'll settle for a low unit at 6.
I respect your opinion but those factors - even if true - would be very low on my list of things I would consider for making a wager in week 2.
I don't put much in to what happened in week 1, unless meaningful. Do you discount what happened to the Vikings 2 games ago when they lost to the Giants - who were totally embarrassed in week 1? Losing or winning one week doesnt mean much to me.
I take more stock in the Vikings over the last 19 games they have played. The first 10 or so their results way outperformed their statistical expectations - and the last 9 or so have been what they really are - a bottom 10 NFL team.
VAN, longlong time lurker. Don't post much. But please don't let guys like SPICYCURRY bother you. These are the guys who run off the great cappers. I responded to him in your previous post and told him "it's almost sounding like you are a book that's pissed because Van does so well". NO response. But ty from all the lukers for all you do!
4
VAN, longlong time lurker. Don't post much. But please don't let guys like SPICYCURRY bother you. These are the guys who run off the great cappers. I responded to him in your previous post and told him "it's almost sounding like you are a book that's pissed because Van does so well". NO response. But ty from all the lukers for all you do!
@mrusso Then just share your plays instead of saying you have an “accurate record” when it’s clearly fake? Haha what’s the point of posting a record with no juice?
He does
0
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry:
@mrusso Then just share your plays instead of saying you have an “accurate record” when it’s clearly fake? Haha what’s the point of posting a record with no juice?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Eagles -6 (2 units)
Valid points. Gl van let’s get ‘em this weekend!
Hot Forum Topics
