Raiders DO NOT want to give up that first seed to NE with only 4 weeks to go so they will be bringing their A+++ game tonight probably within the field goal. Hated rivalry. For sure this game will not be a yawner.
0
Raiders DO NOT want to give up that first seed to NE with only 4 weeks to go so they will be bringing their A+++ game tonight probably within the field goal. Hated rivalry. For sure this game will not be a yawner.
If your line was Saints +2.5 would you still take the Saints?
If my line was +2.5 I would by it to 3.5...just in case of FG game. My line was 3.. by my rule I always buy 1/2 pt to 1 pt ...I don't worry about how much it cost me...buying points has won me plenty of those FG games . If you cant buy up..take the +2.5..barring any Saints miscues ..they win straight up. They are 4-0 SU @ TBay last 4 there. But again if my figures even show a dog win..I will always buy the 2.5 or the 6.5 up past the #. You only pay the juice when they lose...and I don't lose many of them...BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:
If your line was Saints +2.5 would you still take the Saints?
If my line was +2.5 I would by it to 3.5...just in case of FG game. My line was 3.. by my rule I always buy 1/2 pt to 1 pt ...I don't worry about how much it cost me...buying points has won me plenty of those FG games . If you cant buy up..take the +2.5..barring any Saints miscues ..they win straight up. They are 4-0 SU @ TBay last 4 there. But again if my figures even show a dog win..I will always buy the 2.5 or the 6.5 up past the #. You only pay the juice when they lose...and I don't lose many of them...BOL
Wizer- Curious why the respect for Philly here? they look like they've quit on that buffoon for a head coach Pederson. Haven't competed in the last 2 games and have no shot for the playoffs now.
Football players have pride....
-They play to win the game-
Herm Edwards.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:
Wizer- Curious why the respect for Philly here? they look like they've quit on that buffoon for a head coach Pederson. Haven't competed in the last 2 games and have no shot for the playoffs now.
If you want to go threw my threads and take a tally of the wins and losses of the plays I bought points on, you will find that I am ahead of the game in that department..you only pay the juice when they lose.
If you want to go threw my threads and take a tally of the wins and losses of the plays I bought points on, you will find that I am ahead of the game in that department..you only pay the juice when they lose.
Hey Wizer....just wondering your thoughts on the Rams?....think their defensive line dominates the Falcons o-line and Gurley has a pretty good game......and Julio looks like he's out....thanks for the input....
0
Hey Wizer....just wondering your thoughts on the Rams?....think their defensive line dominates the Falcons o-line and Gurley has a pretty good game......and Julio looks like he's out....thanks for the input....
Now go back and take a tally of all my plays not just the ones you choose to cherry pick. You don't like my lines and what I pay to buy points..to bad. Now go back and do some real detective work for the sides and the sides I did buy points on incl the 2 team 7 pt (-120) / 3 team 10pt teasers (-130) You don't want to because its to much work and your lazy.
Now go back and take a tally of all my plays not just the ones you choose to cherry pick. You don't like my lines and what I pay to buy points..to bad. Now go back and do some real detective work for the sides and the sides I did buy points on incl the 2 team 7 pt (-120) / 3 team 10pt teasers (-130) You don't want to because its to much work and your lazy.
Hey Wizer....just wondering your thoughts on the Rams?....think their defensive line dominates the Falcons o-line and Gurley has a pretty good game......and Julio looks like he's out....thanks for the input....
No play on the Rams bud..BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321:
Hey Wizer....just wondering your thoughts on the Rams?....think their defensive line dominates the Falcons o-line and Gurley has a pretty good game......and Julio looks like he's out....thanks for the input....
The only thing Huskerfan5b exposed is what a douchbag he really is. He cherry picks 41 selections out of 131 and then sets up a thread calling me out on my record. He asked me "please" twice to show units won for the season because the 60% could be misleading..then says thanks.. only to bad mouth me in a later posting. Talks about misleading..? He knows what my units won are and he knows what my record is and people like him including you porcelain fist( rehab) and the tards that bought the bill of goods are the frauds. Step up to the plate..post some plays and list a record..most likely cant hit 30% My units per play have been posted above. Put the work in and embarrass yourself as to what you may find. Im waiting for his post on that one. Since I was such an inspiration to him, maybe he can be an inspiration to me and finish what he started...but he wont, because hes the Fraud.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chupamel:
Thx for exposing the
Well Done Sir
The only thing Huskerfan5b exposed is what a douchbag he really is. He cherry picks 41 selections out of 131 and then sets up a thread calling me out on my record. He asked me "please" twice to show units won for the season because the 60% could be misleading..then says thanks.. only to bad mouth me in a later posting. Talks about misleading..? He knows what my units won are and he knows what my record is and people like him including you porcelain fist( rehab) and the tards that bought the bill of goods are the frauds. Step up to the plate..post some plays and list a record..most likely cant hit 30% My units per play have been posted above. Put the work in and embarrass yourself as to what you may find. Im waiting for his post on that one. Since I was such an inspiration to him, maybe he can be an inspiration to me and finish what he started...but he wont, because hes the Fraud.
The only thing Huskerfan5b exposed is what a douchbag he really is. He cherry picks 41 selections out of 131 and then sets up a thread calling me out on my record. He asked me "please" twice to show units won for the season because the 60% could be misleading..then says thanks.. only to bad mouth me in a later posting. Talks about misleading..? He knows what my units won are and he knows what my record is and people like him including you porcelain fist( rehab) and the tards that bought the bill of goods are the frauds. Step up to the plate..post some plays and list a record..most likely cant hit 30% My units per play have been posted above. Put the work in and embarrass yourself as to what you may find. Im waiting for his post on that one. Since I was such an inspiration to him, maybe he can be an inspiration to me and finish what he started...but he wont, because hes the Fraud.
I didn't cherry pick anything. I specifically chose games where you did not buy any juice because I am not confident that you are truthful at what juice you are buying your inflated lines for. At one point last week shortly after you posted your picks, I wasn't able to get the line/juice you said you had on all three different sites that I use. Your interest here is clearly, for whatever reason, in inflating your record. It's VERY easy to attain 60-65% by mysteriously buying points. Also, it's worth noting that when you buy juice as high as -140 as you did on the Atlanta game this week, you need to be successful at a much higher percentage, so it's VERY DECEPTIVE and BORDERLINE FRAUDULENT, to reply to a poster it doesn't matter because you only pay the juice when you lose as you have replied to many posters over the course of the season. That is a comment that is to bereft of nuance and intelligence. Also, it neglects the fact that many posters use bankroll management systems, where they risk more on a larger favorite (e.g, they would risk 524 to win 476 for a favorite at -110, but they would only risk 512 to win 488 for a favorite at -105); that is a very sound bankroll strategy and your response neglects the fact that for those using that strategy, they IMMEDIATELY LOSE MORE MONEY BY BUYING MORE JUICE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY WIN OR NOT. I also mentioned that even for the simple ATS picks with no juice that for some of them, I looked through the ENTIRE line history on sbrodds.com and they were NEVER available at the line you cited.
Why don't you just a) cite your units won and b) cite the source of your line? All reputable posters do (a) and many do (b). I will be happy to do (a) over the course of this week but I will also put BIG ASTERISKS on those lines that I think you MADE UP given the time you posted and the line history.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:
The only thing Huskerfan5b exposed is what a douchbag he really is. He cherry picks 41 selections out of 131 and then sets up a thread calling me out on my record. He asked me "please" twice to show units won for the season because the 60% could be misleading..then says thanks.. only to bad mouth me in a later posting. Talks about misleading..? He knows what my units won are and he knows what my record is and people like him including you porcelain fist( rehab) and the tards that bought the bill of goods are the frauds. Step up to the plate..post some plays and list a record..most likely cant hit 30% My units per play have been posted above. Put the work in and embarrass yourself as to what you may find. Im waiting for his post on that one. Since I was such an inspiration to him, maybe he can be an inspiration to me and finish what he started...but he wont, because hes the Fraud.
I didn't cherry pick anything. I specifically chose games where you did not buy any juice because I am not confident that you are truthful at what juice you are buying your inflated lines for. At one point last week shortly after you posted your picks, I wasn't able to get the line/juice you said you had on all three different sites that I use. Your interest here is clearly, for whatever reason, in inflating your record. It's VERY easy to attain 60-65% by mysteriously buying points. Also, it's worth noting that when you buy juice as high as -140 as you did on the Atlanta game this week, you need to be successful at a much higher percentage, so it's VERY DECEPTIVE and BORDERLINE FRAUDULENT, to reply to a poster it doesn't matter because you only pay the juice when you lose as you have replied to many posters over the course of the season. That is a comment that is to bereft of nuance and intelligence. Also, it neglects the fact that many posters use bankroll management systems, where they risk more on a larger favorite (e.g, they would risk 524 to win 476 for a favorite at -110, but they would only risk 512 to win 488 for a favorite at -105); that is a very sound bankroll strategy and your response neglects the fact that for those using that strategy, they IMMEDIATELY LOSE MORE MONEY BY BUYING MORE JUICE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY WIN OR NOT. I also mentioned that even for the simple ATS picks with no juice that for some of them, I looked through the ENTIRE line history on sbrodds.com and they were NEVER available at the line you cited.
Why don't you just a) cite your units won and b) cite the source of your line? All reputable posters do (a) and many do (b). I will be happy to do (a) over the course of this week but I will also put BIG ASTERISKS on those lines that I think you MADE UP given the time you posted and the line history.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.