The Packers just went down to the wire to beat the previous years super bowl team & it was an extremely exhausting game & to think they gotta fly to Chicago next week against their division rival will have the Packers looking ahead in the game so I am predicting a cover with Carolina & imo, the Panthers pull the upset & win outright!
It was an exhausting game for GB but it was also on thursday. I think they show up feeling good and ready to play. Also, look at the leaders on this team. Rodgers on O and Clay on D, these guys will NOT be looking ahead and they will have everyone ready to go.
GB was able to put up 42 points in week 1. Now they have a weaker opponent in the Panthers, I don't know much about the Panther D but I would say if they can score 42 vs NO they can also do it @CAR. If GB does break the 40 point mark, or even 30 then CAR needs 21+ points to cover. Sure they put up 21 vs zona but can they really do that against GB. I just don't see it happening.
Disclosure: Biased Packer fan lol
BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:
The Packers just went down to the wire to beat the previous years super bowl team & it was an extremely exhausting game & to think they gotta fly to Chicago next week against their division rival will have the Packers looking ahead in the game so I am predicting a cover with Carolina & imo, the Panthers pull the upset & win outright!
It was an exhausting game for GB but it was also on thursday. I think they show up feeling good and ready to play. Also, look at the leaders on this team. Rodgers on O and Clay on D, these guys will NOT be looking ahead and they will have everyone ready to go.
GB was able to put up 42 points in week 1. Now they have a weaker opponent in the Panthers, I don't know much about the Panther D but I would say if they can score 42 vs NO they can also do it @CAR. If GB does break the 40 point mark, or even 30 then CAR needs 21+ points to cover. Sure they put up 21 vs zona but can they really do that against GB. I just don't see it happening.
The Packers just went down to the wire to beat the previous years super bowl team & it was an extremely exhausting game & to think they gotta fly to Chicago next week against their division rival will have the Packers looking ahead in the game so I am predicting a cover with Carolina & imo, the Panthers pull the upset & win outright!
1.They won't be looking ahead in this one; it's to early in the season for a look ahead. Pack started slow last year, and starting fast was a point of emphasis this year all throughout training camp
2. Maybe a backdoor cover but that is all.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:
The Packers just went down to the wire to beat the previous years super bowl team & it was an extremely exhausting game & to think they gotta fly to Chicago next week against their division rival will have the Packers looking ahead in the game so I am predicting a cover with Carolina & imo, the Panthers pull the upset & win outright!
1.They won't be looking ahead in this one; it's to early in the season for a look ahead. Pack started slow last year, and starting fast was a point of emphasis this year all throughout training camp
It was an exhausting game for GB but it was also on thursday. I think they show up feeling good and ready to play. Also, look at the leaders on this team. Rodgers on O and Clay on D, these guys will NOT be looking ahead and they will have everyone ready to go.
GB was able to put up 42 points in week 1. Now they have a weaker opponent in the Panthers, I don't know much about the Panther D but I would say if they can score 42 vs NO they can also do it @CAR. If GB does break the 40 point mark, or even 30 then CAR needs 21+ points to cover. Sure they put up 21 vs zona but can they really do that against GB. I just don't see it happening.
Disclosure: Biased Packer fan lol
BOL
The defending super bowl champions are 4-20-1 ats as a double digit favorite if off an ats win of more than 3pts in their last game since 1980................
0
Quote Originally Posted by PackFan12:
It was an exhausting game for GB but it was also on thursday. I think they show up feeling good and ready to play. Also, look at the leaders on this team. Rodgers on O and Clay on D, these guys will NOT be looking ahead and they will have everyone ready to go.
GB was able to put up 42 points in week 1. Now they have a weaker opponent in the Panthers, I don't know much about the Panther D but I would say if they can score 42 vs NO they can also do it @CAR. If GB does break the 40 point mark, or even 30 then CAR needs 21+ points to cover. Sure they put up 21 vs zona but can they really do that against GB. I just don't see it happening.
Disclosure: Biased Packer fan lol
BOL
The defending super bowl champions are 4-20-1 ats as a double digit favorite if off an ats win of more than 3pts in their last game since 1980................
Cam Newton played awesome today & the only problem I saw was the damn head coach laying all the responsibility on his Qb.......he should have ran the ball more & Carolina would have won the game.
0
Cam Newton played awesome today & the only problem I saw was the damn head coach laying all the responsibility on his Qb.......he should have ran the ball more & Carolina would have won the game.
I took the liberty of doing some accounting for the 10,000 people that read this fraudulent thread this week:
3-1-1 on HUGE bets 2-7 on AVG bets (assuming Cinci +3.5 was AVG and your 600$ teasers are also AVG) 1-5 on SMALL bets 0-1 on PARLAYS
**Pending AVG bets on Over 49, Atlanta ML, Atlanta +12.5 (2x) (ATL +12.5 is in two different pending teasers)
I'm not sure exactly how much you lost this week so far since you don't mention what a small bet is, or what juice you're playing on these wagers but... I will assume that $250 is a unit and you "bet to win". I will also assume that SMALL wagers are 1 unit, AVERAGE wagers are 2 units and HUGE wagers are 4 units. If my assumptions are correct, you lost something in the order of $3000 dollars today. Even if my assumptions are incorrect, you lost quite a bit of monopoly money today as you were 6-14-1 on all posted plays. Hope this enlightens some of our covers forum readers.
0
I took the liberty of doing some accounting for the 10,000 people that read this fraudulent thread this week:
3-1-1 on HUGE bets 2-7 on AVG bets (assuming Cinci +3.5 was AVG and your 600$ teasers are also AVG) 1-5 on SMALL bets 0-1 on PARLAYS
**Pending AVG bets on Over 49, Atlanta ML, Atlanta +12.5 (2x) (ATL +12.5 is in two different pending teasers)
I'm not sure exactly how much you lost this week so far since you don't mention what a small bet is, or what juice you're playing on these wagers but... I will assume that $250 is a unit and you "bet to win". I will also assume that SMALL wagers are 1 unit, AVERAGE wagers are 2 units and HUGE wagers are 4 units. If my assumptions are correct, you lost something in the order of $3000 dollars today. Even if my assumptions are incorrect, you lost quite a bit of monopoly money today as you were 6-14-1 on all posted plays. Hope this enlightens some of our covers forum readers.
I took the liberty of doing some accounting for the 10,000 people that read this fraudulent thread this week:
3-1-1 on HUGE bets 2-7 on AVG bets (assuming Cinci +3.5 was AVG and your 600$ teasers are also AVG) 1-5 on SMALL bets 0-1 on PARLAYS
**Pending AVG bets on Over 49, Atlanta ML, Atlanta +12.5 (2x) (ATL +12.5 is in two different pending teasers)
I'm not sure exactly how much you lost this week so far since you don't mention what a small bet is, or what juice you're playing on these wagers but... I will assume that $250 is a unit and you "bet to win". I will also assume that SMALL wagers are 1 unit, AVERAGE wagers are 2 units and HUGE wagers are 4 units. If my assumptions are correct, you lost something in the order of $3000 dollars today. Even if my assumptions are incorrect, you lost quite a bit of monopoly money today as you were 6-14-1 on all posted plays. Hope this enlightens some of our covers forum readers.
You dont even know how much I bet on my games. I only posted what I was betting on 3 plays. A $100 parlay which I lost, a $600 teaser that I lost & a $1000 (Best Bet) teaser that I won.
My small wagers are for $100. My average bets are $350 & my HUGE bets are over $1,000, thats all im gonna say. Dont come in here talking trash, go pick your own games & go make your own money..................
0
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:
I took the liberty of doing some accounting for the 10,000 people that read this fraudulent thread this week:
3-1-1 on HUGE bets 2-7 on AVG bets (assuming Cinci +3.5 was AVG and your 600$ teasers are also AVG) 1-5 on SMALL bets 0-1 on PARLAYS
**Pending AVG bets on Over 49, Atlanta ML, Atlanta +12.5 (2x) (ATL +12.5 is in two different pending teasers)
I'm not sure exactly how much you lost this week so far since you don't mention what a small bet is, or what juice you're playing on these wagers but... I will assume that $250 is a unit and you "bet to win". I will also assume that SMALL wagers are 1 unit, AVERAGE wagers are 2 units and HUGE wagers are 4 units. If my assumptions are correct, you lost something in the order of $3000 dollars today. Even if my assumptions are incorrect, you lost quite a bit of monopoly money today as you were 6-14-1 on all posted plays. Hope this enlightens some of our covers forum readers.
You dont even know how much I bet on my games. I only posted what I was betting on 3 plays. A $100 parlay which I lost, a $600 teaser that I lost & a $1000 (Best Bet) teaser that I won.
My small wagers are for $100. My average bets are $350 & my HUGE bets are over $1,000, thats all im gonna say. Dont come in here talking trash, go pick your own games & go make your own money..................
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.