All Forums | NFL Betting

Not sure why people continue to bet against...

Participants:

Search

Posts: 56

KobezKing

MVP

Joined: Dec, 2009

Posts: 16153

Posted: Jan. 12, 2014 - 3:44 AM ET #51

dude must be a jets fan lol. Since Brady took over in 2001. 3 sb wins, 5 appearances, 8 afc championship games. while in the same time span the 2nd closest team has 5 appearances. 2 fluke plays away from being 5-0 in superbowls. so basically every other yr they go to suberbowl and are a contender ever year. They are the best franchise in all of sports not just football and its not close. Look at other teams recently that won... Giants win miss playoffs, steelers win miss playoffs, ravens win miss playoffs. Every single year they are there. and to think they lost last yrs 3 best weapons. welker, gronk, hernandez yet they still go to afc champ game...... Dude stop being a hater u sound foolish. ya they havent won since 04-05 but u act like its easy to win superbowls. Some guys have 0 and they have 3 and have a chance every year to win another. Brady has the most wins in playoff history lollol. So name me another NFL franchise that has been close to pats since brady took over so i can laugh at u

0

KobezKing

MVP

Joined: Dec, 2009

Posts: 16153

Posted: Jan. 12, 2014 - 3:47 AM ET #52

biggest hater ever. ur right brady sux.winning est qb in playoff history with 3 sbs and he sux. Just a question if he sux then who is good???

0

SirJohnDrake

All-Star

Joined: Jan, 2006

Posts: 14746

Posted: Jan. 12, 2014 - 3:50 AM ET #53

Quote Originally Posted by ThomasStanley:

Brady and Belichick at home, thats a big no-no.

0

Sharkysden

Veteran

Joined: Sep, 2003

Posts: 3722

Posted: Jan. 12, 2014 - 9:42 AM ET #54

I'm a Bills fan and not a fan of the Patriots but I have to respect the fact that they are a great team every year. I shouldn't have to defend that, facts are facts.

0

bunny651

Captain

Joined: Apr, 2009

Posts: 6626

Posted: Jan. 12, 2014 - 10:18 AM ET #55

Quote Originally Posted by MYSTICRICH:

He wouldn't bother me so much if the media and the gerneral public would just stop with thr nonsense of saying he's great ,

When you throw the ball 0-10 yds 90 % of the time , and you play in two superbowls going 0-13 with 1 INT on balls thrown 20 yds in the air or longer , Don't tell me this is anything out but pathetic .

He plays on a very good team that is well coached ,he is a short passing dink and dunk system QB . and i like a QB that stands in the pocket and throws down field . Brady is Boring to me .

That doesn't make sense. Lets hate him just because the media hype him up as if it's his fault??

Except for Randy Moss(wasn't even in his prime when he played for them), I don't think he ever has a true #1 downfield threat and we do know what happened when they played together for the few seasons. As a matter of fact, he has to deal with the constant changing receiving corps his entire career. He even helped Branch become a SB MVP and we all know the rest. For instance, they got rid of one of his most reliable WR(Walker) this season. the two-TEs system the offense was built for, one is in jail and the other(the best in NFL) is hurt most of the season. Wait, did I mention the guy(Amendola) they signed to replace Walker was hurt a lot, too? Sure, just force the ball downfield or as you sais, sweep all those factors under the rug.

Which SB winning QB didn't have a great or at the very least an excellent team behind him? No disrespect to any QBS I am citing because they all were great. It is just to show anyone can find something to criticize if he wants to:

Dink and Dunk? I guess you can put Montana in that category as well since I forgot how many times Rice and Taylor took a short reception and turned into a long TD. A perfect "West Coast" system QB.

Jim Kelly, a HOF QB, didn't win one despite 4 straight tries.

Marino, one of the absolute best, never won one but just put everything on his teams and competition then.

The list goes on. My point is each QB isn't going to be perfect but that won't stop me from seeing how great they are/were.