All Forums | NFL Betting

Now Ive seen it all Det vs GB

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2916
Posts: 53
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by Mustang24:


Hey bud, not sure I follow. People who had gb at -7.5 and 9 both covered. 

I had lions +8. Ouch..

The lions +9 (where I got it)
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by TheDonkeyRancher:

Vegas did not want the people who took gb at -7.5 and people who took the closing line at 9 to win. That was one of the clearest fixes I've seen this year.
Cool story bro
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 1396
Posted: #28
I must have watched a different game as the game I watched gbay completely dominated as detroits vaunted defense allowed gb to control the clock at will
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:

Cool story bro

I've seen your posts before. And you're a douche.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by shiek:

I must have watched a different game as the game I watched gbay completely dominated as detroits vaunted defense allowed gb to control the clock at will

Not arguing they should have one. GB clearly dominated the game. That call was BS though. Most people who took the +9 were not expecting a lions win.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 370
Posted: #31
Yall kill me with this "vegas" and "fixes" shit, so fucking stupid some of yall always cry foul when u lose,how bout u just do your research before you bet? Do yall even watch football?? Lions cant do shit against elite teams and and on the road, and then at green bay??? Why would you even bother betting them?? really, why?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 267
Posted: #32
I had the lions big so he was definitely in. I honestly thought he's was in and didn't think they would overturn it.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by TheDonkeyRancher:


I've seen your posts before. And you're a douche.
Yeah, well I just saw your one post and you're an idiot.

The Ole' Vegas fix to stop the middling opportunity.  Happens all the time
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Farris2k1:

Yall kill me with this "vegas" and "fixes" garbage, so friggin stupid some of yall always cry foul when u lose,how bout u just do your research before you bet? Do yall even watch football?? Lions cant do garbage against elite teams and and on the road, and then at green bay??? Why would you even bother betting them?? really, why?

You're a fcking idiot and I shouldn't even respond. If you actually understood football or gambling you would understand the significance of these types of calls. Did I lose? Yes. Will I move on? Yes. Was it a bad call? Yes. That's all I'm saying.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 11527
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by obravo21:

 

Of Course the 2pt play...  you guessed right I had Lions +8... the Grounding call was also BS but i'll buy it.. but the conversion there was no way you could overturn that...

Of course the 2pt play? Gotta ask as one never knows with this forum. In any case Lion fans can be thankful the game was as close as it got. Had Rogers not left he am, believe me the debate at the end wouldn't have been an issue. Still the same ole Lions when they play they play the Pack at Lambeau.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 35
Posted: #36
The fix is in when I lose crowd out in full force again.

Totally delusional.

Bet against the fix then.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:

Yeah, well I just saw your one post and you're an idiot.

The Ole' Vegas fix to stop the middling opportunity.  Happens all the time

Just curious...is that your boyfriend in your pic?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by TheDonkeyRancher:


You're a fcking idiot and I shouldn't even respond. If you actually understood football or gambling you would understand the significance of these types of calls. Did I lose? Yes. Will I move on? Yes. Was it a bad call? Yes. That's all I'm saying.
I got news for you.  Vegas doesn't give a sh it about sports betting or a two point conversion.  They made more from the slot machines in one hour than they did from sports betting all month.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by TheDonkeyRancher:


Just curious...is that your boyfriend in your pic?
Ask yo moms, she too the pic. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by pinballwizard:

Of course the 2pt play? Gotta ask as one never knows with this forum. In any case Lion fans can be thankful the game was as close as it got. Had Rogers not left he am, believe me the debate at the end wouldn't have been an issue. Still the same ole Lions when they play they play the Pack at Lambeau.


As someone who isn't a lions fan I don't give a sht how they played. All I care about is the 2 point conversion that was called on the field and then overturned. Yes the lions are horrendous on the road. 9 points is a lot in a divisional game though. And regarding your rodgers argument...you could also argue if the other Stafford had shown up it would have been closer. All part of capping and betting. We all knew rodgers wasn't 100%. Except for bling. Sure he was busy sucking cock.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by TheDonkeyRancher:


As someone who isn't a lions fan I don't give a sht how they played. All I care about is the 2 point conversion that was called on the field and then overturned. Yes the lions are horrendous on the road. 9 points is a lot in a divisional game though. And regarding your rodgers argument...you could also argue if the other Stafford had shown up it would have been closer. All part of capping and betting. We all knew rodgers wasn't 100%. Except for bling. Sure he was busy sucking cock.
You stupid Donk, stop gambling, you obvious suck at it
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 1791
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by Tigermike1975:

I am not one for screaming fixes and am not here either but every questionable call this game went the way of the Packers. It is tough enough to win on the road at Lambeau but when you have to beat the Packers and the Flag Fairies that is asking too much. I will watch Detroit lose next week in Dallas and then I am done with the NFL. It had already moved down to 4th on my list of 5 sports I enjoy and I just don't enjoy watching flags really ensuring the outcome of the games. Green Bay most likely wins regardless of the extra help, but that extra help made it a no doubter.

I agree 100%. This game should have been much closer.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:

You stupid Donk, stop gambling, you obvious suck at it

Check my posted record pencil person. Heard you love the cock. You should stick with what your good at cocksucker.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 793
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by Farris2k1:

Yall kill me with this "vegas" and "fixes" garbage, so friggin stupid some of yall always cry foul when u lose,how bout u just do your research before you bet? Do yall even watch football?? Lions cant do garbage against elite teams and and on the road, and then at green bay??? Why would you even bother betting them?? really, why?

Don't be a complete moron your entire life. If you don't think games get fixed you are a sh1tbag....I bet you believe your girlfriend doesn't fake her orgasm when your little weaner is in her either
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by TheDonkeyRancher:


Check my posted record pencil person. Heard you love the cock. You should stick with what your good at cocksucker.
Please tell us more of the "prevent the middling fix" that "Vegas" just pulled off in that game
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2297
Posted: #46
If anything, why would they fix the game for a GB cover when GB was the public play? They got all the poor souls that saw AR aggravate his calf before the half and chased DET -1 2H.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #47
Gb -7.5 was the public play. Not 9. And unlike bling, Vegas doesn't like to get fcked in both holes.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #48
Gb -7.5 was the public play. Not 9. And unlike bling, Vegas doesn't like to get fcked in both holes.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #49
Gb -7.5 was the public play. Not 9. And unlike bling, Vegas doesn't like to get fcked in both holes.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1635
Posted: #50
Gb -7.5 was the public play. Not 9. And unlike bling, Vegas doesn't like to get fcked in both holes.
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.