24-20?
Haha, thats just exactly what Vegas is calling the score pretty much. If the lines turn out to be sharp, this should be the exact score... or maybe 24-21
24-20?
Haha, thats just exactly what Vegas is calling the score pretty much. If the lines turn out to be sharp, this should be the exact score... or maybe 24-21
24-20?
Haha, thats just exactly what Vegas is calling the score pretty much. If the lines turn out to be sharp, this should be the exact score... or maybe 24-21
24-20?
Haha, thats just exactly what Vegas is calling the score pretty much. If the lines turn out to be sharp, this should be the exact score... or maybe 24-21
You're highly delusional my friend. Seek some help.
The Packers are not the better team.
Pittsburgh has a better QB. They have better RB's. They have better WR's. They have better a better defense.
Good luck Sunday.
The Packers are not the better team. Seek some help.
You're highly delusional my friend. Seek some help.
The Packers are not the better team.
Pittsburgh has a better QB. They have better RB's. They have better WR's. They have better a better defense.
Good luck Sunday.
The Packers are not the better team. Seek some help.
The Pats/Steelers game was a while back as was the Saints/Steelers game. Look what the Pats did to the Jets earlier this year. Look what the Brownies did to the Saints earlier. Look what they did to the Pats.
See my point?
Who fucking cares? It doesn't fucking matter.
Bring up some relevant points please.
The Pats/Steelers game was a while back as was the Saints/Steelers game. Look what the Pats did to the Jets earlier this year. Look what the Brownies did to the Saints earlier. Look what they did to the Pats.
See my point?
Who fucking cares? It doesn't fucking matter.
Bring up some relevant points please.
You're highly delusional my friend. Seek some help.
The Packers are not the better team.
Pittsburgh has a better QB. They have better RB's. They have better WR's. They have better a better defense.
Good luck Sunday.
The Packers are not the better team. Seek some help.
You're highly delusional my friend. Seek some help.
The Packers are not the better team.
Pittsburgh has a better QB. They have better RB's. They have better WR's. They have better a better defense.
Good luck Sunday.
The Packers are not the better team. Seek some help.
Ok, this thread is turning into a bit of a pissing contest at this point...
Let's all agree that the Packers' secondary earns the nod over Pittsburghs'-- not exactly a secret. Woodsen and Williams are a formidable duo, they are athletic, and opportunistic, and have good hands ie they make INTs. But that facet of defense is merely a component of the Green Bay "team". Regarding their respective pass-rush, I believe it's a toss-up, tho GB is quicker off the edge while PITT is more powerful up the middle. Now, ARodg has looked impressive this postseason save for the 2ndH @ CHI after Pepper's came up under Rodgers' chin, after which he looked pedestrian. On the other side, Big Ben has not one, but TWO rings --- and he's chomping at the bit for a 3rd... like him or despise him, the guy just gets it done, and he's the FIRST person to admit that it is rarely "pretty" or whatever... the fact is, offensively Pittsburgh's rushing attack is far superior to that of the Pack, and conversely, nobody is BETTER at stopping the run than the Steel Curtain. When healthy, the best defender on the field for EITHER team is #43 wearing black n gold, ergo his well-earned Defensive Player of the Year honors... Crosby has the edge over Suisham in the kicking game, but in the kick-off return department, Pittsburgh ranked 12th in the NFL I believe...
Bottomline, two very evenly matched teams, but Green bay's one-dimensionality on offense gives me pause to agree that Green Bay is the better "team"... historically, the BEST teams both run the ball AND stop the run, and PITT is the only squad in this SB match-up that I can say excels in both departments...
Ok, this thread is turning into a bit of a pissing contest at this point...
Let's all agree that the Packers' secondary earns the nod over Pittsburghs'-- not exactly a secret. Woodsen and Williams are a formidable duo, they are athletic, and opportunistic, and have good hands ie they make INTs. But that facet of defense is merely a component of the Green Bay "team". Regarding their respective pass-rush, I believe it's a toss-up, tho GB is quicker off the edge while PITT is more powerful up the middle. Now, ARodg has looked impressive this postseason save for the 2ndH @ CHI after Pepper's came up under Rodgers' chin, after which he looked pedestrian. On the other side, Big Ben has not one, but TWO rings --- and he's chomping at the bit for a 3rd... like him or despise him, the guy just gets it done, and he's the FIRST person to admit that it is rarely "pretty" or whatever... the fact is, offensively Pittsburgh's rushing attack is far superior to that of the Pack, and conversely, nobody is BETTER at stopping the run than the Steel Curtain. When healthy, the best defender on the field for EITHER team is #43 wearing black n gold, ergo his well-earned Defensive Player of the Year honors... Crosby has the edge over Suisham in the kicking game, but in the kick-off return department, Pittsburgh ranked 12th in the NFL I believe...
Bottomline, two very evenly matched teams, but Green bay's one-dimensionality on offense gives me pause to agree that Green Bay is the better "team"... historically, the BEST teams both run the ball AND stop the run, and PITT is the only squad in this SB match-up that I can say excels in both departments...
You're highly delusional my friend. Seek some help.
The Packers are not the better team.
Pittsburgh has a better QB. They have better RB's. They have better WR's. They have better a better defense.
Good luck Sunday.
The Packers are not the better team. Seek some help.
You're highly delusional my friend. Seek some help.
The Packers are not the better team.
Pittsburgh has a better QB. They have better RB's. They have better WR's. They have better a better defense.
Good luck Sunday.
The Packers are not the better team. Seek some help.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.