You don't give the Green Bay Packers 9 points at Lambeau and not expect them to cover every time. I don't care if this Vikings team today is like the 1985 Bears playing against the 2017 Browns. Green Bay easily covers today and shows the folly of that line. The team and tradition, the history and that hallowed ground ... most revered stadium in the NFL ... makes picking the Packers +9 the best bet of week 16. Even my system supports it!!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
You don't give the Green Bay Packers 9 points at Lambeau and not expect them to cover every time. I don't care if this Vikings team today is like the 1985 Bears playing against the 2017 Browns. Green Bay easily covers today and shows the folly of that line. The team and tradition, the history and that hallowed ground ... most revered stadium in the NFL ... makes picking the Packers +9 the best bet of week 16. Even my system supports it!!
You are mistaken my friend. My high school has history, passion , and pride doesn't mean they would cover 9pts. You're a stooge. Vikings cover they need this packers without Rodgers - poop
We'll see who is the stooge :-))
0
Quote Originally Posted by denver8:
You are mistaken my friend. My high school has history, passion , and pride doesn't mean they would cover 9pts. You're a stooge. Vikings cover they need this packers without Rodgers - poop
You are mistaken my friend. My high school has history, passion , and pride doesn't mean they would cover 9pts. You're a stooge. Vikings cover they need this packers without Rodgers - poop
We'll see who is the stooge :-))
0
Quote Originally Posted by denver8:
You are mistaken my friend. My high school has history, passion , and pride doesn't mean they would cover 9pts. You're a stooge. Vikings cover they need this packers without Rodgers - poop
Is this you saying this or did your system tell you to say that?
Both my system and me concur this week on Packers. It's the systems 1st or 2nd best pick of the week. Good question by the way. My opinion is not as shrewd as the system. But 9 points for Pack at home? Jeeeeez.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EastsideBangers:
Is this you saying this or did your system tell you to say that?
Both my system and me concur this week on Packers. It's the systems 1st or 2nd best pick of the week. Good question by the way. My opinion is not as shrewd as the system. But 9 points for Pack at home? Jeeeeez.
Both my system and me concur this week on Packers. It's the systems 1st or 2nd best pick of the week. Good question by the way. My opinion is not as shrewd as the system. But 9 points for Pack at home? Jeeeeez.
Looks awfully easy, doesn't it?
Banging since 1983
0
Quote Originally Posted by footballsmart:
Both my system and me concur this week on Packers. It's the systems 1st or 2nd best pick of the week. Good question by the way. My opinion is not as shrewd as the system. But 9 points for Pack at home? Jeeeeez.
Well if it's free money and you have less than $10k on this game, you are a coward
Abe Lincoln (like the image by the way) ... I'm not into gambling. I'm into contests and establishing if this system works over a statistically large enough sample. Not betting 10k does not make a person a coward. It makes a brave and sensible person lik e Abe Lincoln save their hard earned money :-))
0
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
Well if it's free money and you have less than $10k on this game, you are a coward
Abe Lincoln (like the image by the way) ... I'm not into gambling. I'm into contests and establishing if this system works over a statistically large enough sample. Not betting 10k does not make a person a coward. It makes a brave and sensible person lik e Abe Lincoln save their hard earned money :-))
QUOTE Originally Posted by footballsmart: Both my system and me concur this week on Packers. It's the systems 1st or 2nd best pick of the week. Good question by the way. My opinion is not as shrewd as the system. But 9 points for Pack at home? Jeeeeez. Looks awfully easy, doesn't it?
Nothing is easy in picking teams against a spread. The default for any game is a 50% chance. When the system shows, as in this case, about a 63% chance of success, we jump on it. But that also means that 37% of the time ... almost half ... we are dead wrong. So to be a good capper I believe you have to fail a ton ... but over time come out a little on top. And that's still hard to do. It's never a 95% chance. In a perfect set up according to my system, chances of success are around 74 to 78 percent but that is very rare. And sports is so fickle. The packers could still lose this game by 30 or win it by 10 ... and I still say it's one of the best picks of the week given that line at Lambeau and about 9 other factors that make it attractive m.. but a great pick like this can still easily be wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EastsideBangers:
QUOTE Originally Posted by footballsmart: Both my system and me concur this week on Packers. It's the systems 1st or 2nd best pick of the week. Good question by the way. My opinion is not as shrewd as the system. But 9 points for Pack at home? Jeeeeez. Looks awfully easy, doesn't it?
Nothing is easy in picking teams against a spread. The default for any game is a 50% chance. When the system shows, as in this case, about a 63% chance of success, we jump on it. But that also means that 37% of the time ... almost half ... we are dead wrong. So to be a good capper I believe you have to fail a ton ... but over time come out a little on top. And that's still hard to do. It's never a 95% chance. In a perfect set up according to my system, chances of success are around 74 to 78 percent but that is very rare. And sports is so fickle. The packers could still lose this game by 30 or win it by 10 ... and I still say it's one of the best picks of the week given that line at Lambeau and about 9 other factors that make it attractive m.. but a great pick like this can still easily be wrong.
You don't give the Green Bay Packers 9 points at Lambeau and not expect them to cover every time. I don't care if this Vikings team today is like the 1985 Bears playing against the 2017 Browns. Green Bay easily covers today and shows the folly of that line. The team and tradition, the history and that hallowed ground ... most revered stadium in the NFL ... makes picking the Packers +9 the best bet of week 16. Even my system supports it!!
No way I would but a penny on GB with that scrub Qb. Minnesota Defense will shut him down.
0
Quote Originally Posted by footballsmart:
You don't give the Green Bay Packers 9 points at Lambeau and not expect them to cover every time. I don't care if this Vikings team today is like the 1985 Bears playing against the 2017 Browns. Green Bay easily covers today and shows the folly of that line. The team and tradition, the history and that hallowed ground ... most revered stadium in the NFL ... makes picking the Packers +9 the best bet of week 16. Even my system supports it!!
No way I would but a penny on GB with that scrub Qb. Minnesota Defense will shut him down.
Football Smart, you are experiencing firsthand why all the good posters - Suuma, Porcelain First, etc. - end up leaving this forum. The dopes, losers, morons, crybabies, fixed-game nuts, etc. end up driving almost anyone with an ounce of brains away from this site.
As for the game, Green Bay with the points is the smart way to play this one. Doesn't mean they're guaranteed to cover, but for anyone who understands the game, they are the smart pick. Even better might be a Green Bay/Oakland 2-team parlay.
0
Football Smart, you are experiencing firsthand why all the good posters - Suuma, Porcelain First, etc. - end up leaving this forum. The dopes, losers, morons, crybabies, fixed-game nuts, etc. end up driving almost anyone with an ounce of brains away from this site.
As for the game, Green Bay with the points is the smart way to play this one. Doesn't mean they're guaranteed to cover, but for anyone who understands the game, they are the smart pick. Even better might be a Green Bay/Oakland 2-team parlay.
Football Smart, you are experiencing firsthand why all the good posters - Suuma, Porcelain First, etc. - end up leaving this forum. The dopes, losers, morons, crybabies, fixed-game nuts, etc. end up driving almost anyone with an ounce of brains away from this site.
As for the game, Green Bay with the points is the smart way to play this one. Doesn't mean they're guaranteed to cover, but for anyone who understands the game, they are the smart pick. Even better might be a Green Bay/Oakland 2-team parlay.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoctorSuccess:
Football Smart, you are experiencing firsthand why all the good posters - Suuma, Porcelain First, etc. - end up leaving this forum. The dopes, losers, morons, crybabies, fixed-game nuts, etc. end up driving almost anyone with an ounce of brains away from this site.
As for the game, Green Bay with the points is the smart way to play this one. Doesn't mean they're guaranteed to cover, but for anyone who understands the game, they are the smart pick. Even better might be a Green Bay/Oakland 2-team parlay.
Football Smart, you are experiencing firsthand why all the good posters - Suuma, Porcelain First, etc. - end up leaving this forum. The dopes, losers, morons, crybabies, fixed-game nuts, etc. end up driving almost anyone with an ounce of brains away from this site. As for the game, Green Bay with the points is the smart way to play this one. Doesn't mean they're guaranteed to cover, but for anyone who understands the game, they are the smart pick. Even better might be a Green Bay/Oakland 2-team parlay.
U are totally right Doc. I tend not to worry about idiot posts. I'm a serious capping researcher with what I believe could be a very successful prediction machine ... So I need some forum to post and record picks. Along the way I expect to bump into the lowest and highest of humanity. The bottom line: I am doing this right and it will take time ... So I am not concerned with riff raff who either think there is a quick profit ... or those with no clue about proper statistics and probability. Now let's GO PACK!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoctorSuccess:
Football Smart, you are experiencing firsthand why all the good posters - Suuma, Porcelain First, etc. - end up leaving this forum. The dopes, losers, morons, crybabies, fixed-game nuts, etc. end up driving almost anyone with an ounce of brains away from this site. As for the game, Green Bay with the points is the smart way to play this one. Doesn't mean they're guaranteed to cover, but for anyone who understands the game, they are the smart pick. Even better might be a Green Bay/Oakland 2-team parlay.
U are totally right Doc. I tend not to worry about idiot posts. I'm a serious capping researcher with what I believe could be a very successful prediction machine ... So I need some forum to post and record picks. Along the way I expect to bump into the lowest and highest of humanity. The bottom line: I am doing this right and it will take time ... So I am not concerned with riff raff who either think there is a quick profit ... or those with no clue about proper statistics and probability. Now let's GO PACK!!
Wonder, what's the percentage of a home team dog like GB cover after losing on the road against the same team? Week 6 Min won GB by scores o 24 - 17. I think it's 67% for home dog to cover. But I'll let someone who has access to stats show me otherwwise.
Week 12 TB 20 @ ATL 34
Week 24 ATL 24 @ TB cover 7 pts spread... Any more example of this happening this season?
0
Wonder, what's the percentage of a home team dog like GB cover after losing on the road against the same team? Week 6 Min won GB by scores o 24 - 17. I think it's 67% for home dog to cover. But I'll let someone who has access to stats show me otherwwise.
Week 12 TB 20 @ ATL 34
Week 24 ATL 24 @ TB cover 7 pts spread... Any more example of this happening this season?
Theres nothing great about picking the packers. Last chance at the playoffs and rodgers blows it. Hundley was probably happy to get out of the spotlight after that disaster of a job he did. Now he has to retake the reigns. The entire team was crushed last week after being hopefull that rodgers would lead them to the playoffs. Vikings are the better with or without rodgers playing. The only way the packers cover is if the vikes are off tonight and a whole lot of luck.
0
Theres nothing great about picking the packers. Last chance at the playoffs and rodgers blows it. Hundley was probably happy to get out of the spotlight after that disaster of a job he did. Now he has to retake the reigns. The entire team was crushed last week after being hopefull that rodgers would lead them to the playoffs. Vikings are the better with or without rodgers playing. The only way the packers cover is if the vikes are off tonight and a whole lot of luck.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.