I gave a Pats fan buddy of mine a line of 11 wins for $100 bet. I got the under.
With that being said though, Brady has done more with less. As chaloots pointed out, Brady has been doing this his whole career. And this is probably the best defense he's had since those Super Bowl teams, which seem like ages ago. I think they'll be right there but ultimately, I think they are a 10-6 team.
I gave a Pats fan buddy of mine a line of 11 wins for $100 bet. I got the under.
With that being said though, Brady has done more with less. As chaloots pointed out, Brady has been doing this his whole career. And this is probably the best defense he's had since those Super Bowl teams, which seem like ages ago. I think they'll be right there but ultimately, I think they are a 10-6 team.
Like Bizkilla said,Brady has done more with less than any other QB in the history of the game bar none. You average fan couldn't tell you the name of 3 wr's and 2 running backs that Brady won superbowls with. He is top 3 of all time and in discussion for the best of all time. Let him play in a dome with Marvin Harrison,Reggie Wayne and Edge James and his numbers would be off the charts.
Like Bizkilla said,Brady has done more with less than any other QB in the history of the game bar none. You average fan couldn't tell you the name of 3 wr's and 2 running backs that Brady won superbowls with. He is top 3 of all time and in discussion for the best of all time. Let him play in a dome with Marvin Harrison,Reggie Wayne and Edge James and his numbers would be off the charts.
Pats defense held the greatest show on turf Rams to 17 pts.
No team in the 35 years of the 16 game schedule has won the Super Bowl game scoring 17 pts except the Gaints who did it beating Brady and the Pats.
The Pats defense scored as many TD's as Bradys offense did, that would be 1.
Yes it was the defense that won that SB.
Brady's offense produced just 14 and 17 pts in 2 other SB losses, including 2007 team with a historical offensive team. when facts are no team has won the SB scoring such few pts except the Gaints who did not need to score many pts because they were playing Brady and the Pats.
Last season Pats had a historical scoring offense, one of the top scoring offenses in history yet lost in the playoffs scoring just 13 pts.
In 2010 Brady had a rare scoring offense with over 500 pts in the reg season but scored just 21 pts in another playoff loss.
Brady has taken a number of historical offensive teams into the postseason and never won A SB with any of those, and scored a fraction of their reg season ave in their postseason losses.
Brady won SB's when his defense and kicker came to the rescue.
Pats defense held the greatest show on turf Rams to 17 pts.
No team in the 35 years of the 16 game schedule has won the Super Bowl game scoring 17 pts except the Gaints who did it beating Brady and the Pats.
The Pats defense scored as many TD's as Bradys offense did, that would be 1.
Yes it was the defense that won that SB.
Brady's offense produced just 14 and 17 pts in 2 other SB losses, including 2007 team with a historical offensive team. when facts are no team has won the SB scoring such few pts except the Gaints who did not need to score many pts because they were playing Brady and the Pats.
Last season Pats had a historical scoring offense, one of the top scoring offenses in history yet lost in the playoffs scoring just 13 pts.
In 2010 Brady had a rare scoring offense with over 500 pts in the reg season but scored just 21 pts in another playoff loss.
Brady has taken a number of historical offensive teams into the postseason and never won A SB with any of those, and scored a fraction of their reg season ave in their postseason losses.
Brady won SB's when his defense and kicker came to the rescue.
Pats defense held the greatest show on turf Rams to 17 pts.
No team in the 35 years of the 16 game schedule has won the Super Bowl game scoring 17 pts except the Gaints who did it beating Brady and the Pats.
The Pats defense scored as many TD's as Bradys offense did, that would be 1.
Yes it was the defense that won that SB.
Brady's offense produced just 14 and 17 pts in 2 other SB losses, including 2007 team with a historical offensive team. when facts are no team has won the SB scoring such few pts except the Gaints who did not need to score many pts because they were playing Brady and the Pats.
Last season Pats had a historical scoring offense, one of the top scoring offenses in history yet lost in the playoffs scoring just 13 pts.
In 2010 Brady had a rare scoring offense with over 500 pts in the reg season but scored just 21 pts in another playoff loss.
Brady has taken a number of historical offensive teams into the postseason and never won A SB with any of those, and scored a fraction of their reg season ave in their postseason losses.
Brady won SB's when his defense and kicker came to the rescue.
Pats defense held the greatest show on turf Rams to 17 pts.
No team in the 35 years of the 16 game schedule has won the Super Bowl game scoring 17 pts except the Gaints who did it beating Brady and the Pats.
The Pats defense scored as many TD's as Bradys offense did, that would be 1.
Yes it was the defense that won that SB.
Brady's offense produced just 14 and 17 pts in 2 other SB losses, including 2007 team with a historical offensive team. when facts are no team has won the SB scoring such few pts except the Gaints who did not need to score many pts because they were playing Brady and the Pats.
Last season Pats had a historical scoring offense, one of the top scoring offenses in history yet lost in the playoffs scoring just 13 pts.
In 2010 Brady had a rare scoring offense with over 500 pts in the reg season but scored just 21 pts in another playoff loss.
Brady has taken a number of historical offensive teams into the postseason and never won A SB with any of those, and scored a fraction of their reg season ave in their postseason losses.
Brady won SB's when his defense and kicker came to the rescue.
I hope you post that I'd love to read it.
Pats offense scored 3 TD's in the entire posteseason in 2002, their 1st SB win.
Brady led his offense to just 2 TD's in the entire postseason, that is in 3 games for those keeping score at home. And some-one believes he won that SB ???
Interesting that the most dominate Pats postseason team was......................the 2004 team.
That team is the only Pats SB team to run the ball more than 50% of plays in the regular season and postseason.
They also set some records for time of possesion or some kind of multiple play drive record in the divisional 20-3 win over Colts. Pats rushed 39 times for 210 yds.
Interesting that the Pats dominated the most in the postseason when they choose to pass less and run more with a great back in Corey Diilion.
When they choose to turn the offense over to Brady and they produced historical scoring offenses in the regular season they crashed and burned in the postseason time and again.......................................
I hope you post that I'd love to read it.
Pats offense scored 3 TD's in the entire posteseason in 2002, their 1st SB win.
Brady led his offense to just 2 TD's in the entire postseason, that is in 3 games for those keeping score at home. And some-one believes he won that SB ???
Interesting that the most dominate Pats postseason team was......................the 2004 team.
That team is the only Pats SB team to run the ball more than 50% of plays in the regular season and postseason.
They also set some records for time of possesion or some kind of multiple play drive record in the divisional 20-3 win over Colts. Pats rushed 39 times for 210 yds.
Interesting that the Pats dominated the most in the postseason when they choose to pass less and run more with a great back in Corey Diilion.
When they choose to turn the offense over to Brady and they produced historical scoring offenses in the regular season they crashed and burned in the postseason time and again.......................................
Pats defense held the greatest show on turf Rams to 17 pts.
No team in the 35 years of the 16 game schedule has won the Super Bowl game scoring 17 pts except the Gaints who did it beating Brady and the Pats.
The Pats defense scored as many TD's as Bradys offense did, that would be 1.
Yes it was the defense that won that SB.
Brady's offense produced just 14 and 17 pts in 2 other SB losses, including 2007 team with a historical offensive team. when facts are no team has won the SB scoring such few pts except the Gaints who did not need to score many pts because they were playing Brady and the Pats.
Last season Pats had a historical scoring offense, one of the top scoring offenses in history yet lost in the playoffs scoring just 13 pts.
In 2010 Brady had a rare scoring offense with over 500 pts in the reg season but scored just 21 pts in another playoff loss.
Brady has taken a number of historical offensive teams into the postseason and never won A SB with any of those, and scored a fraction of their reg season ave in their postseason losses.
Brady won SB's when his defense and kicker came to the rescue.
Pats defense held the greatest show on turf Rams to 17 pts.
No team in the 35 years of the 16 game schedule has won the Super Bowl game scoring 17 pts except the Gaints who did it beating Brady and the Pats.
The Pats defense scored as many TD's as Bradys offense did, that would be 1.
Yes it was the defense that won that SB.
Brady's offense produced just 14 and 17 pts in 2 other SB losses, including 2007 team with a historical offensive team. when facts are no team has won the SB scoring such few pts except the Gaints who did not need to score many pts because they were playing Brady and the Pats.
Last season Pats had a historical scoring offense, one of the top scoring offenses in history yet lost in the playoffs scoring just 13 pts.
In 2010 Brady had a rare scoring offense with over 500 pts in the reg season but scored just 21 pts in another playoff loss.
Brady has taken a number of historical offensive teams into the postseason and never won A SB with any of those, and scored a fraction of their reg season ave in their postseason losses.
Brady won SB's when his defense and kicker came to the rescue.
So you point out 1 game, the Carolina game where Brady played well while completely dismissing many, many games where Brady played poorly and counted on his defense and kicker to bail him out.
Your right and prove my point. A big part was Because of Brady producing historic offenses and because the team was built around Brady and the offense was handed to him it was Brady who crashed and burned in the postseason.
When the offense was not built around Brady when he was ask to do less is when the Pats had their best, most dominating postseason team.
The Pats offense was one of if not the very worst of any SB winner in the 16 game shcedule era, it's pretty clear they did not win SB'S because of their offense.
The 2003 Pats defense put-up a stat rarely ever seen in history, they held opponents to 35 field goals att to 21 TD'S.
You can look long and hard and you won't find many teams in history would produced a ratio of TD's give- up to holding opponets to FG atts, when the Pats defense played impressive is when the Pats won SB's.
When Brady and his offense played impressive with Moss they failed, just a fact, in fact they failed so miserably, they scored just 17 points in the SB, a point total so low that no team in the 35 years of the 16 game shcedule has won the SB with such a low point total except the Giants who held another historic Brady scoring offense to 14 pts.
Of coarse Brady is a great player, that's not the debate.
The debate is, it was the defense and kicker that won those 3 SB more than it was Brady, when your defense scores as many TD's in your teams SB win as your offense and your defense holds your opponent to a point total so low that no team has won a SB with such a low point total then you really must be confused if you think it was not the defense that won that SB, and the evidence shows it to be true................................
So you point out 1 game, the Carolina game where Brady played well while completely dismissing many, many games where Brady played poorly and counted on his defense and kicker to bail him out.
Your right and prove my point. A big part was Because of Brady producing historic offenses and because the team was built around Brady and the offense was handed to him it was Brady who crashed and burned in the postseason.
When the offense was not built around Brady when he was ask to do less is when the Pats had their best, most dominating postseason team.
The Pats offense was one of if not the very worst of any SB winner in the 16 game shcedule era, it's pretty clear they did not win SB'S because of their offense.
The 2003 Pats defense put-up a stat rarely ever seen in history, they held opponents to 35 field goals att to 21 TD'S.
You can look long and hard and you won't find many teams in history would produced a ratio of TD's give- up to holding opponets to FG atts, when the Pats defense played impressive is when the Pats won SB's.
When Brady and his offense played impressive with Moss they failed, just a fact, in fact they failed so miserably, they scored just 17 points in the SB, a point total so low that no team in the 35 years of the 16 game shcedule has won the SB with such a low point total except the Giants who held another historic Brady scoring offense to 14 pts.
Of coarse Brady is a great player, that's not the debate.
The debate is, it was the defense and kicker that won those 3 SB more than it was Brady, when your defense scores as many TD's in your teams SB win as your offense and your defense holds your opponent to a point total so low that no team has won a SB with such a low point total then you really must be confused if you think it was not the defense that won that SB, and the evidence shows it to be true................................
When you win championships it does not matter who was more responsible. The end result is a championship. Sure, we can point to the 85 Bears, the 2000 Ravens and the 2002 Bucs as teams who were carried by defense. But when it comes to debating championships, it is team effort. You win or lose as a team. Plain and simple.
Those Pats 3 out of 4 championship teams were fairly balanced with the defense being a better unit. But they won those titles on not only offense and defense, but also special teams. And a little luck called the "tuck rule"
When you win championships it does not matter who was more responsible. The end result is a championship. Sure, we can point to the 85 Bears, the 2000 Ravens and the 2002 Bucs as teams who were carried by defense. But when it comes to debating championships, it is team effort. You win or lose as a team. Plain and simple.
Those Pats 3 out of 4 championship teams were fairly balanced with the defense being a better unit. But they won those titles on not only offense and defense, but also special teams. And a little luck called the "tuck rule"
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.