Vikings are an upcoming team but i dont think they will have enough to get to the Super Bowl. They have a good defense but offense doesnt have enough explosive playmakers to take advamtage of scoring opportunities. the O-line just hasnt been at full strength and cant run block or protect Bradford. A Super Bowl team always had a good running game and the Vikings dont have that. Also think Blair Walsh is still affected psychologically from that missed FG in last year's playoffs...
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
Vikings are an upcoming team but i dont think they will have enough to get to the Super Bowl. They have a good defense but offense doesnt have enough explosive playmakers to take advamtage of scoring opportunities. the O-line just hasnt been at full strength and cant run block or protect Bradford. A Super Bowl team always had a good running game and the Vikings dont have that. Also think Blair Walsh is still affected psychologically from that missed FG in last year's playoffs...
Dribble, what do you think about Pats making the superbowl then getting screwed or losing in a heartbreaking fashion like they did in sb 42. Losing another close one would probably hurt brady and belicheck more than not making it.
0
Dribble, what do you think about Pats making the superbowl then getting screwed or losing in a heartbreaking fashion like they did in sb 42. Losing another close one would probably hurt brady and belicheck more than not making it.
Developed this system many years ago, but it only will work if you follow it and be flexible and do not allow emotional biases to take over.
Example conference winners of AFC over last years:
AFC East : 2011 ---2014
Central: 2011----2012
South : 2006---2009
West : 2013----2015
Which division does 2016 most fit into, obvious choice to the initial look is AFC south 2006-2009 -2016 , but that would be wrong since fundamentally there is no team in that division that could win AFC,
West pattern: 2013-2015 -2016 can't do either, plus teams most likely do not repeat from same division, a rarity.
It comes down between North : 2010-2012- 2016
or East 2011-2014-2016,,,, Schmeto has North with Pitt, that is a possibility, it is not out of the question, but the pattern leans closer for me to the East 2011-2014-2016, then you have to test the Super Bowl dates for each division of the past, etc,.etc , anyway there are many facets to this but this is only a part of coming to the final conclusion. Fundamental point with Pitt is despite it's record, the model shows that a low seed will win the SB 51, first since 2011-2012. Schmeto has AfC WINNING sb, but I have NFC, those are based on year and date patterns as well.System always has to be backed up by evidence on the ground , that does not mean a team with a glossy record necessarily.
0
Developed this system many years ago, but it only will work if you follow it and be flexible and do not allow emotional biases to take over.
Example conference winners of AFC over last years:
AFC East : 2011 ---2014
Central: 2011----2012
South : 2006---2009
West : 2013----2015
Which division does 2016 most fit into, obvious choice to the initial look is AFC south 2006-2009 -2016 , but that would be wrong since fundamentally there is no team in that division that could win AFC,
West pattern: 2013-2015 -2016 can't do either, plus teams most likely do not repeat from same division, a rarity.
It comes down between North : 2010-2012- 2016
or East 2011-2014-2016,,,, Schmeto has North with Pitt, that is a possibility, it is not out of the question, but the pattern leans closer for me to the East 2011-2014-2016, then you have to test the Super Bowl dates for each division of the past, etc,.etc , anyway there are many facets to this but this is only a part of coming to the final conclusion. Fundamental point with Pitt is despite it's record, the model shows that a low seed will win the SB 51, first since 2011-2012. Schmeto has AfC WINNING sb, but I have NFC, those are based on year and date patterns as well.System always has to be backed up by evidence on the ground , that does not mean a team with a glossy record necessarily.
Schmeto picked Cubs, and Trump to with their titles. So did I .
I can see where he is coming from with picking Minnesota, yet that is not my conclusion from my system. The Vikings 3 losses do not necessarily doom them, but my issue from a fundamental analysis is the QB, too important in NFL. For me Bradford just isn't it, and can't despite the defense. I just don't see him being put in the same category as Cam Newton , the runner up last year, instead I see Bradford , at best that is, as an Alex Smith. If Bridgewater was healthy that might convince me. But he is not. Still, it's not over yet. I will keep an open mind. Closed minds thought to Cubs and Cavs could not come back from 1-3 deficits.
0
Schmeto picked Cubs, and Trump to with their titles. So did I .
I can see where he is coming from with picking Minnesota, yet that is not my conclusion from my system. The Vikings 3 losses do not necessarily doom them, but my issue from a fundamental analysis is the QB, too important in NFL. For me Bradford just isn't it, and can't despite the defense. I just don't see him being put in the same category as Cam Newton , the runner up last year, instead I see Bradford , at best that is, as an Alex Smith. If Bridgewater was healthy that might convince me. But he is not. Still, it's not over yet. I will keep an open mind. Closed minds thought to Cubs and Cavs could not come back from 1-3 deficits.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Finalist 
Hot Forum Topics
