I gotta say I am quite entertained reading all
the people taking the Skins…and laughing hysterically at people saying the
Skins are going to win straight up.
I’m not going to give this subject too much of
my time because I don’t feel it is worthy…but I would like to start a
discussion because I don’t want to see people lose money this weekend.
The Texans defense is better than the Redskins
and we saw Atlanta TORCH them for 48. The Texans mustered 3 GARBAGE time TD’s
and still lost by 27.
The Redskins secondary is deplorable going up
against arguably the BEST WR in football. To be honest I think the Barrow
Whalers from Football Town have a better secondary. (lol jk)
For all the people who look at metrics, trends,
statistics….let your eyes do the judging for you. Matt Ryan is going to have a
field day. I do think the Redskins defense will bottle up D Freeman a bit.
The Georgia Dome is gonna be bumping. I
personally don’t like any spreads over 6.5… unless I am betting in favor of the
Pats or Packers… that’s just me personally.
That being said… I am locked in at -7 on the
Falcons.
Falcons win BIG…
Matt Ryan 300+ yards 4 TDs
PS: They are not the most overrated 4-0 team. The Panthers success will evaporate as Cam and Olsen can't play 110% every week.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I gotta say I am quite entertained reading all
the people taking the Skins…and laughing hysterically at people saying the
Skins are going to win straight up.
I’m not going to give this subject too much of
my time because I don’t feel it is worthy…but I would like to start a
discussion because I don’t want to see people lose money this weekend.
The Texans defense is better than the Redskins
and we saw Atlanta TORCH them for 48. The Texans mustered 3 GARBAGE time TD’s
and still lost by 27.
The Redskins secondary is deplorable going up
against arguably the BEST WR in football. To be honest I think the Barrow
Whalers from Football Town have a better secondary. (lol jk)
For all the people who look at metrics, trends,
statistics….let your eyes do the judging for you. Matt Ryan is going to have a
field day. I do think the Redskins defense will bottle up D Freeman a bit.
The Georgia Dome is gonna be bumping. I
personally don’t like any spreads over 6.5… unless I am betting in favor of the
Pats or Packers… that’s just me personally.
That being said… I am locked in at -7 on the
Falcons.
Falcons win BIG…
Matt Ryan 300+ yards 4 TDs
PS: They are not the most overrated 4-0 team. The Panthers success will evaporate as Cam and Olsen can't play 110% every week.
I gotta say I am quite entertained reading all
the people taking the Skins…and laughing hysterically at people saying the
Skins are going to win straight up.
I’m not going to give this subject too much of
my time because I don’t feel it is worthy…but I would like to start a
discussion because I don’t want to see people lose money this weekend.
The Texans defense is better than the Redskins
and we saw Atlanta TORCH them for 48. The Texans mustered 3 GARBAGE time TD’s
and still lost by 27.
The Redskins secondary is deplorable going up
against arguably the BEST WR in football. To be honest I think the Barrow
Whalers from Football Town have a better secondary. (lol jk)
For all the people who look at metrics, trends,
statistics….let your eyes do the judging for you. Matt Ryan is going to have a
field day. I do think the Redskins defense will bottle up D Freeman a bit.
The Georgia Dome is gonna be bumping. I
personally don’t like any spreads over 6.5… unless I am betting in favor of the
Pats or Packers… that’s just me personally.
That being said… I am locked in at -7 on the
Falcons.
Falcons win BIG…
Matt Ryan 300+ yards 4 TDs
PS: They are not the most overrated 4-0 team. The Panthers success will evaporate as Cam and Olsen can't play 110% every week.
You have no idea what you are talking about. WAS defense is better in every category when compared to HOU and is actually top 10 in each defensive category. Here's the proof:
Wash D:
Points (10th)
Yards (4th)
Pass yards (9th)
Rush yards (2nd)
Houston D:
Points (27th)
Yards (11th)
Pass yards (11th)
Rush yards 22nd)
now go read/study before you make claims without even taking the time to look things up.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TitansFan2810:
I gotta say I am quite entertained reading all
the people taking the Skins…and laughing hysterically at people saying the
Skins are going to win straight up.
I’m not going to give this subject too much of
my time because I don’t feel it is worthy…but I would like to start a
discussion because I don’t want to see people lose money this weekend.
The Texans defense is better than the Redskins
and we saw Atlanta TORCH them for 48. The Texans mustered 3 GARBAGE time TD’s
and still lost by 27.
The Redskins secondary is deplorable going up
against arguably the BEST WR in football. To be honest I think the Barrow
Whalers from Football Town have a better secondary. (lol jk)
For all the people who look at metrics, trends,
statistics….let your eyes do the judging for you. Matt Ryan is going to have a
field day. I do think the Redskins defense will bottle up D Freeman a bit.
The Georgia Dome is gonna be bumping. I
personally don’t like any spreads over 6.5… unless I am betting in favor of the
Pats or Packers… that’s just me personally.
That being said… I am locked in at -7 on the
Falcons.
Falcons win BIG…
Matt Ryan 300+ yards 4 TDs
PS: They are not the most overrated 4-0 team. The Panthers success will evaporate as Cam and Olsen can't play 110% every week.
You have no idea what you are talking about. WAS defense is better in every category when compared to HOU and is actually top 10 in each defensive category. Here's the proof:
Wash D:
Points (10th)
Yards (4th)
Pass yards (9th)
Rush yards (2nd)
Houston D:
Points (27th)
Yards (11th)
Pass yards (11th)
Rush yards 22nd)
now go read/study before you make claims without even taking the time to look things up.
was leaning skins but the fact that their #1 CB is questionable and #2 is out means I will most likely be on the Falcons. Probable teaser but with over as well
0
was leaning skins but the fact that their #1 CB is questionable and #2 is out means I will most likely be on the Falcons. Probable teaser but with over as well
I definitely agree with you on your points. This Skins team has been terrible the past couple of years..2012 (3-13), 2014 (4-12).. their road victories versus non-divisional opponents came against, Oakland....The simple fact this Skins team most significant victory versus non-divisional opponent was versus SD in OT shows me they have yet to prove they can, A) keep up with this current Falcons team and B) beat a good quality non divisional opponent on the road. On the Skins side I do think their run D is better than average. This is just from looking at their performances YTD.. holding all 4 teams they have faced to under 100 yards rushing. Do I think Freeman has another multi-td game...I would say no, but do I think Julio and Hankerson have big games...Yes, I do. I have been reading about how Thursday's game vs the Saints will affect the outcome and maybe a backdoor cover. Part of me agrees, but if anything I can see a cover by ATL...10 or more added with a Saints vs loss vs PHI on the road and then the letdown of ATL vs NO on Thursday. The only other angle I can see Skins covering is a couple of years ago these two teams played and Cousins was the QB, they only lost by a point, but both teams finished 3-13, and 4-12 respectively.
0
I definitely agree with you on your points. This Skins team has been terrible the past couple of years..2012 (3-13), 2014 (4-12).. their road victories versus non-divisional opponents came against, Oakland....The simple fact this Skins team most significant victory versus non-divisional opponent was versus SD in OT shows me they have yet to prove they can, A) keep up with this current Falcons team and B) beat a good quality non divisional opponent on the road. On the Skins side I do think their run D is better than average. This is just from looking at their performances YTD.. holding all 4 teams they have faced to under 100 yards rushing. Do I think Freeman has another multi-td game...I would say no, but do I think Julio and Hankerson have big games...Yes, I do. I have been reading about how Thursday's game vs the Saints will affect the outcome and maybe a backdoor cover. Part of me agrees, but if anything I can see a cover by ATL...10 or more added with a Saints vs loss vs PHI on the road and then the letdown of ATL vs NO on Thursday. The only other angle I can see Skins covering is a couple of years ago these two teams played and Cousins was the QB, they only lost by a point, but both teams finished 3-13, and 4-12 respectively.
I definitely agree with you on your points. This Skins team has been terrible the past couple of years..2012 (3-13), 2014 (4-12).. their road victories versus non-divisional opponents came against, Oakland....The simple fact this Skins team most significant victory versus non-divisional opponent was versus SD in OT shows me they have yet to prove they can, A) keep up with this current Falcons team and B) beat a good quality non divisional opponent on the road. On the Skins side I do think their run D is better than average. This is just from looking at their performances YTD.. holding all 4 teams they have faced to under 100 yards rushing. Do I think Freeman has another multi-td game...I would say no, but do I think Julio and Hankerson have big games...Yes, I do. I have been reading about how Thursday's game vs the Saints will affect the outcome and maybe a backdoor cover. Part of me agrees, but if anything I can see a cover by ATL...10 or more added with a Saints vs loss vs PHI on the road and then the letdown of ATL vs NO on Thursday. The only other angle I can see Skins covering is a couple of years ago these two teams played and Cousins was the QB, they only lost by a point, but both teams finished 3-13, and 4-12 respectively.
What do recent years have to do with this year when the team is completely revamped? They have added players to finish 6-10 to 8-8. Don't look at recent results without looking at a team's development.
To the OP: the Redskins defense has been playing very good, especially their front-seven and based on weeks 1-4 they are clearly one level ahead of the Texans.
I also don't believe the Redskins can beat the Falcons with those key injuries but the Falcons have the Saints on deck, a backdoor cover isn't impossible.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smelltheboo:
I definitely agree with you on your points. This Skins team has been terrible the past couple of years..2012 (3-13), 2014 (4-12).. their road victories versus non-divisional opponents came against, Oakland....The simple fact this Skins team most significant victory versus non-divisional opponent was versus SD in OT shows me they have yet to prove they can, A) keep up with this current Falcons team and B) beat a good quality non divisional opponent on the road. On the Skins side I do think their run D is better than average. This is just from looking at their performances YTD.. holding all 4 teams they have faced to under 100 yards rushing. Do I think Freeman has another multi-td game...I would say no, but do I think Julio and Hankerson have big games...Yes, I do. I have been reading about how Thursday's game vs the Saints will affect the outcome and maybe a backdoor cover. Part of me agrees, but if anything I can see a cover by ATL...10 or more added with a Saints vs loss vs PHI on the road and then the letdown of ATL vs NO on Thursday. The only other angle I can see Skins covering is a couple of years ago these two teams played and Cousins was the QB, they only lost by a point, but both teams finished 3-13, and 4-12 respectively.
What do recent years have to do with this year when the team is completely revamped? They have added players to finish 6-10 to 8-8. Don't look at recent results without looking at a team's development.
To the OP: the Redskins defense has been playing very good, especially their front-seven and based on weeks 1-4 they are clearly one level ahead of the Texans.
I also don't believe the Redskins can beat the Falcons with those key injuries but the Falcons have the Saints on deck, a backdoor cover isn't impossible.
Falcons have a cupcake schedule. Washington's another cupcake team but i wouldn't take them lightly. aside from pummeling Dallas, i see the score more in line with the Giants and Eagles meetings where Falcons won by 4 and 2 points.
everyone's all over the Falcons after back to back blowouts. i do not expect the Falcons to win by double digits. teams that win by +20 are in for a letdown next game. 75% of consensus on Falcons. Vegas will be making a killing here
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
Falcons have a cupcake schedule. Washington's another cupcake team but i wouldn't take them lightly. aside from pummeling Dallas, i see the score more in line with the Giants and Eagles meetings where Falcons won by 4 and 2 points.
everyone's all over the Falcons after back to back blowouts. i do not expect the Falcons to win by double digits. teams that win by +20 are in for a letdown next game. 75% of consensus on Falcons. Vegas will be making a killing here
ATL is 4-0 ATS. The most amount of points WAS has scored is 24, the least amount ATL has scored is 24. The better bet on WAS is on the 1H, where they are 3-1. ATS and straight up.
Probably the best bet is ATL in thr second half.
0
ATL is 4-0 ATS. The most amount of points WAS has scored is 24, the least amount ATL has scored is 24. The better bet on WAS is on the 1H, where they are 3-1. ATS and straight up.
This game is a no play for me until the CB are confirmed to go sunday. If not, skins going to have a hard time containing jones. im gunna play falcons if the CBs aren't playing
0
This game is a no play for me until the CB are confirmed to go sunday. If not, skins going to have a hard time containing jones. im gunna play falcons if the CBs aren't playing
I bet Washington just based on that. You had to expect them to falter at some point and having to lay a TD against a good defensive team was the spot IMO.
0
Atlanta went into the game 4-0ATS.
I bet Washington just based on that. You had to expect them to falter at some point and having to lay a TD against a good defensive team was the spot IMO.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.